Jump to content
RemedySpot.com

Re: New Member Seeking Your Advice

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Guest guest

Hi

I have a couple of questions for you:

1. I have to ask: are you expecting a 100% diagnosis prior to surgery, when this monster can only accurately be determined by surgery?

2. What do you mean by the "unpleasant ramifications of the canal wall down procedure"?

3. When all is said and done, wouldn't you just want shot of the darned tumour? Why wait for more damage to occur?

Not to put too fine a point on this, it can't be stressed enough tha tcholesteatoma can do serious damage over a period of time. You yourself said it's quite possibly gobbled up your incus already; how much more are you willing to sacrifice to the cholesteatoma before thinking that perhapsn now may be the time to allow the surgeons to take a look. I'm not one to go lightly in to any surgery, but nor am I one to play with things like cholesteatoma. Two medicos have opined to you that it what you have is likely cholesteatoma; the next step logically would be surgery to get rid of it. Your surgeon would then decide whilst you are under anaesthetic which procedure (canal wall up, or canal wall down) would be most suitable.

I personally feel there are no "unpleasant ramifications of the canal wall down procedure" and certainly no small cosmetics would play any part in any decision to remove a growth as monstrous as cholesteatoma can be.

I'm not medico, but I have to say that my advice to you would be to go ahead - have the surgery and soon! You have little or nothing to lose, compared to what you could lose if it is cholesteatoma and you have no surgery, or you delay it for no real reason.

Kazzy

New Member Seeking Your Advice

Hello Everyone,I've been a member of the group for a couple of months now, and I've been reading the digest a couple of times a week. However, this is my first time to post.This is my situation- I would like any and all feedback or advice anyone has. I have put off making a decision about what to do about my c-toma long enough, and I need to make a decision relatively soon. My situation is probably very similar to what many people have experienced- I am 24 years old, and when I was a child I had two sets of tubes put into my ears (the second set put in after the first set fell out) to try and ameliorate the ear infections I was having. Then, when I was about 9 years old I had to get tympanoplasty surgery (the ear drum skin graft surgery) on both ears, since my ear drums had not closed properly from the tubes.That's the past. I had no problems with my ears for a long time, about 13 years or so. Fast forward to last summer, summer of 2005, basically one year ago this month. I swim at the gym as usual but water gets in my left ear as I'm practicing flipping in the water (learned not to do that again!). That night, it becomes clear my left ear is infected, because it is painful, feels full, and is giving off pretty unpleasant discharge. I go to the doctor, an ENT I hadn't been to before here in Dallas, Texas where I live. We take care of the ear infection, and all is well, but I come back 6 months later (last December or so) for a check-up just so he can take a look, and he orders a CAT scan since he thinks that there could be a c-toma forming in my left ear. (However, how long it's been there seems to be something that is impossible to know, since I wasn't having ENT check-ups basically between the ages of 10 and 23). I get the CAT scan done, and it comes back and my doctor says that it is highly "suspicious" for a cholesteatoma. Thus far I have had 2 opinions, and neither doctor has said firmly and conclusively, "Yes, you have a cholesteatoma," but they both said that the odds are over 90% and recommend surgery asap. They said that the Incus (one of the three ossicles) was partly blocked from view in the CAT scan, so that it's possible that the c-toma has already gobbled it up. Sure enough, my hearing in my left ear is distinctly less than in my right, which we confirmed with a hearing test. (Thinking out loud, though, does that necessarily mean that the c-toma has worn away one of my hearing ossicles, or could that also be a function of a perforated ear drum in that ear- I don't know. Apparently my ear drum in my left ear didn't fully close up, even after the tympanoplasty surgery).I apologize for being so verbose, but the devil certainly seems to be in the details when discussing these issues...So here I am now with a choice to make. Both doctors I have seen, one of whom is a nationally recognized otologist who I trust to be "on top of his game", have said that I need to get c-toma surgery and that I should definitely do it sooner rather than later. However, I'm just not quite ready to sign on the dotted line yet. Here's why:1. It still isn't a certainty that I have c-toma, though of course it is certainly the most likely possibility. 2. The surgery almost seems to bring more problems with it than it does solutions. My doctor told me that my hearing could actually be LESS after the surgery, since they may have to remove my ossicles and put in prostheses. Additionally, I'm not thrilled about the idea of having 5 or more surgeries to remove this thing- the rate of recurrence in "canal wall up" procedures, as my doctor recommended we do (and which I agree with because of the unpleasant cosmetic ramifications of the "canal wall down" procedure) is EXTREMELY high (20-40% is what I was told). Last, and I've partly gotten over this, but the possibility of facial nerve damage that would actually make me lose the ability to move half of my face is very alarming to me. The fact that my doctor said that this has never happened to any of his patients or to any patient at the ENT clinic at University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center where his practice is is certainly reassuring, but still, isn't there always a first? Given the choice, I would choose hearing loss in 1 ear over lifelong facial paralysis any day.3. Another concern I have is just the general way that surgery is approached by many in the medical community these days. I'm no expert in this at all, but I have heard it said that upwards of 70% of surgical procedures these days are unnecessary. Additionally, they don't seem to be that successful. I take my own personal experience as a case in point: Clearly the doctors who recommended tubes be put in my ears (and the ears of millions of kids in my generation) were not well advised. That seems to be one of the big reasons why we have lists like this one! Additionally, the tympanoplasty I had done when I was 9 didn't apparently work all that well. Surgery just doesn't seem to be the magic bullet that it's promised to be. Today the doctors are telling me I need to get surgery to correct a problem, but doctors also told my mother when I was a child that I needed tubes in my ears to prevent future ear infections. Clearly, the risks of tubes outweighed the rewards, which is why I'm in the present situation. I'm not saying that surgery is a bad thing, only that it seems we need more thorough and conservative criteria before going down that road.I asked my doctor if it was a CERTAINTY that my c-toma was going to grow and become increasingly problematic as time goes on, or if there was a possibility that I could live with this c-toma, perhaps having reduced hearing in my left ear, but never really having problems in the future. I found his answer very vague. (Again, he is an expert in his field and I am lucky to have him as a doctor, but I believe I have to approach all of this carefully). He said that Yes, it is a certainty that my c-toma will grow and create some or all of the resultant problems with it (hearing loss, infection, potentially even worse). However, he said, the thing that is a variable is the question of WHEN. He said it could be two weeks, or it could be 10 years, he really had no way to know. To me, something feels off about this. How can something be a CERTAIN problem, but we then have NO idea about the time frame? This doesn't seem quite right to me.One specific question I have for everyone: Has anyone ever known of someone who HAS indeed lost their hearing, had ear problems, or had meningitis or anything like that as a result of c-toma? The posts I have read have been very helpful in discussing people's experiences with c-toma surgery, recurrence, etc., but doesn't it seem a little strange that, while we all know many people through this list who have had experience with c-toma surgery, we don't seem to have a whole lot of living examples of people saying, "I lost all the hearing in my ear due to c-toma, and I sure wish I had gotten the surgery," or anything like that. Perhaps they are out there, I'm just not coming across them. Any information in this area would be much appreciated, as I'm just trying to assess whether the fact I have a c-toma means FOR SURE that it is going to grow and create problems, or if it could be relatively dormant. Heck, for all I know I've been living with this thing for the last 14 years or so and didn't even know it. Or, it could have grown after my ear infection last year, and be growing more right now as I type. I apologize again for this verbose posting, but I wanted to give everyone my full situation and describe my thinking on it thus far. What I would like to ask anyone who was nice enough to read this email is what their advice would be that I do at this point. Also, I would love to know if there is anyone else in the same boat as me, who is concerned about their c-toma and is looking into the possibility of surgery, but who is as of yet unconvinced that it is the best step. If there is anyone who has been diagnosed with c-toma but decided NOT to do the surgery it would be good to hear from them and understand their reasons for doing so. By the same token, if people find my logic very faulty, I would like to hear from them as well!Thank You everyone, and I look forward to being a more active member of the list. (Dallas, TX)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

,

i am sure you will get responses from those who have more experience

than I do. I had two surgeries - one to remove the c-toma, that had

destroyed the malleus and incus, and a second for reconstruction.

From all that I read, the likelihood of facial paralysis is slim. Of

course, that doesn't matter if it is you. Apparently, however, they

can put some sort of sensor on the nerve during surgery to alert them

of potential damage and also, even if one comes out of surgery with

some paralysis, the nerve damage frequently heals itself. I was much

more concerned about the potential damage the c-toma could do.

Hearing loss is one thing; having it continue to grow closer to the

brain is another.

Don't apologize for the lengthy message. As you said, the details are

important, and you articulated them perfectly. I wonder when they can

schedule surgery for you. I would think they couldn't schedule for a

month or so. Perhaps they could do another CAT scan to determine rate

of growth. I am just personally thrilled to be on this side of the

surgeries. All of the unknown is very scary and no one knows for

certain until they get in there. I would think, however, that surgery

would have less potential of more serious damage, if the c-toma is

smaller rather than larger.

Ok. That's my two cents worth. Let us know what you are thinking and

what you decide.

le (Cincinnati, OH)

On Jul 3, 2006, at 1:48 PM, wrote:

> Hello Everyone,

>

> I've been a member of the group for a couple of months now, and I've

> been reading the digest a couple of times a week. However, this is

> my first time to post.

>

> This is my situation- I would like any and all feedback or advice

> anyone has. I have put off making a decision about what to do about

> my c-toma long enough, and I need to make a decision relatively

> soon. My situation is probably very similar to what many people have

> experienced- I am 24 years old, and when I was a child I had two

> sets of tubes put into my ears (the second set put in after the

> first set fell out) to try and ameliorate the ear infections I was

> having. Then, when I was about 9 years old I had to get

> tympanoplasty surgery (the ear drum skin graft surgery) on both

> ears, since my ear drums had not closed properly from the tubes.

>

> That's the past. I had no problems with my ears for a long time,

> about 13 years or so. Fast forward to last summer, summer of 2005,

> basically one year ago this month. I swim at the gym as usual but

> water gets in my left ear as I'm practicing flipping in the water

> (learned not to do that again!). That night, it becomes clear my

> left ear is infected, because it is painful, feels full, and is

> giving off pretty unpleasant discharge. I go to the doctor, an ENT I

> hadn't been to before here in Dallas, Texas where I live. We take

> care of the ear infection, and all is well, but I come back 6 months

> later (last December or so) for a check-up just so he can take a

> look, and he orders a CAT scan since he thinks that there could be a

> c-toma forming in my left ear. (However, how long it's been there

> seems to be something that is impossible to know, since I wasn't

> having ENT check-ups basically between the ages of 10 and 23).

>

> I get the CAT scan done, and it comes back and my doctor says that

> it is highly " suspicious " for a cholesteatoma. Thus far I have had 2

> opinions, and neither doctor has said firmly and conclusively, " Yes,

> you have a cholesteatoma, " but they both said that the odds are over

> 90% and recommend surgery asap. They said that the Incus (one of the

> three ossicles) was partly blocked from view in the CAT scan, so

> that it's possible that the c-toma has already gobbled it up. Sure

> enough, my hearing in my left ear is distinctly less than in my

> right, which we confirmed with a hearing test. (Thinking out loud,

> though, does that necessarily mean that the c-toma has worn away one

> of my hearing ossicles, or could that also be a function of a

> perforated ear drum in that ear- I don't know. Apparently my ear

> drum in my left ear didn't fully close up, even after the

> tympanoplasty surgery).

>

> I apologize for being so verbose, but the devil certainly seems to

> be in the details when discussing these issues...

>

> So here I am now with a choice to make. Both doctors I have seen,

> one of whom is a nationally recognized otologist who I trust to

> be " on top of his game " , have said that I need to get c-toma surgery

> and that I should definitely do it sooner rather than later.

> However, I'm just not quite ready to sign on the dotted line yet.

> Here's why:

>

> 1. It still isn't a certainty that I have c-toma, though of course

> it is certainly the most likely possibility.

>

> 2. The surgery almost seems to bring more problems with it than it

> does solutions. My doctor told me that my hearing could actually be

> LESS after the surgery, since they may have to remove my ossicles

> and put in prostheses. Additionally, I'm not thrilled about the idea

> of having 5 or more surgeries to remove this thing- the rate of

> recurrence in " canal wall up " procedures, as my doctor recommended

> we do (and which I agree with because of the unpleasant cosmetic

> ramifications of the " canal wall down " procedure) is EXTREMELY high

> (20-40% is what I was told). Last, and I've partly gotten over this,

> but the possibility of facial nerve damage that would actually make

> me lose the ability to move half of my face is very alarming to me.

> The fact that my doctor said that this has never happened to any of

> his patients or to any patient at the ENT clinic at University of

> Texas Southwestern Medical Center where his practice is is certainly

> reassuring, but still, isn't there always a first? Given the choice,

> I would choose hearing loss in 1 ear over lifelong facial paralysis

> any day.

>

> 3. Another concern I have is just the general way that surgery is

> approached by many in the medical community these days. I'm no

> expert in this at all, but I have heard it said that upwards of 70%

> of surgical procedures these days are unnecessary. Additionally,

> they don't seem to be that successful. I take my own personal

> experience as a case in point: Clearly the doctors who recommended

> tubes be put in my ears (and the ears of millions of kids in my

> generation) were not well advised. That seems to be one of the big

> reasons why we have lists like this one! Additionally, the

> tympanoplasty I had done when I was 9 didn't apparently work all

> that well. Surgery just doesn't seem to be the magic bullet that

> it's promised to be. Today the doctors are telling me I need to get

> surgery to correct a problem, but doctors also told my mother when I

> was a child that I needed tubes in my ears to prevent future ear

> infections. Clearly, the risks of tubes outweighed the rewards,

> which is why I'm in the present situation. I'm not saying that

> surgery is a bad thing, only that it seems we need more thorough and

> conservative criteria before going down that road.

>

> I asked my doctor if it was a CERTAINTY that my c-toma was going to

> grow and become increasingly problematic as time goes on, or if

> there was a possibility that I could live with this c-toma, perhaps

> having reduced hearing in my left ear, but never really having

> problems in the future. I found his answer very vague. (Again, he is

> an expert in his field and I am lucky to have him as a doctor, but I

> believe I have to approach all of this carefully). He said that Yes,

> it is a certainty that my c-toma will grow and create some or all of

> the resultant problems with it (hearing loss, infection, potentially

> even worse). However, he said, the thing that is a variable is the

> question of WHEN. He said it could be two weeks, or it could be 10

> years, he really had no way to know.

>

> To me, something feels off about this. How can something be a

> CERTAIN problem, but we then have NO idea about the time frame? This

> doesn't seem quite right to me.

>

> One specific question I have for everyone: Has anyone ever known of

> someone who HAS indeed lost their hearing, had ear problems, or had

> meningitis or anything like that as a result of c-toma? The posts I

> have read have been very helpful in discussing people's experiences

> with c-toma surgery, recurrence, etc., but doesn't it seem a little

> strange that, while we all know many people through this list who

> have had experience with c-toma surgery, we don't seem to have a

> whole lot of living examples of people saying, " I lost all the

> hearing in my ear due to c-toma, and I sure wish I had gotten the

> surgery, " or anything like that. Perhaps they are out there, I'm

> just not coming across them. Any information in this area would be

> much appreciated, as I'm just trying to assess whether the fact I

> have a c-toma means FOR SURE that it is going to grow and create

> problems, or if it could be relatively dormant. Heck, for all I know

> I've been living with this thing for the last 14 years or so and

> didn't even know it. Or, it could have grown after my ear infection

> last year, and be growing more right now as I type.

>

> I apologize again for this verbose posting, but I wanted to give

> everyone my full situation and describe my thinking on it thus far.

> What I would like to ask anyone who was nice enough to read this

> email is what their advice would be that I do at this point. Also, I

> would love to know if there is anyone else in the same boat as me,

> who is concerned about their c-toma and is looking into the

> possibility of surgery, but who is as of yet unconvinced that it is

> the best step. If there is anyone who has been diagnosed with c-toma

> but decided NOT to do the surgery it would be good to hear from them

> and understand their reasons for doing so. By the same token, if

> people find my logic very faulty, I would like to hear from them as

> well!

>

> Thank You everyone, and I look forward to being a more active member

> of the list.

>

> (Dallas, TX)

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

,

All of the worries you have concerning the surgery will happen anyway if you DON'T have the surgery. The c-toma will continue to grow until it destroys everything inside your ear and then into your brain. You could end up with paralysis of your face, lost of any taste, and even eventually death.

I don't know who your doctor is, however, I would hope that he has encouraged you to research this subject so that you would know what to expect.

I also live in the Dallas area. My 16 year old son is scheduled for surgery on July 19th. We are using Dr. Trone at Medical City. He is very good and has quite a bit of experience with treating c-tomas.

From what I have been able to determine from research of this subject is that the c-toma will definitely continue to grow. As far as how quickly...that seems to be a definite variable. Sometimes they grow relatively quickly, and sometimes they grow extremely slow, from what I have been able to determine the rate of growth differs from one person to the next.

As far the problems caused from the c-tomas, I don't know which posts you have been reading, however, I have read case after case of the problems that had to be corrected because of damage caused by the c-toma.

From what I am reading, the surgeries themselves are very painful, however, it is not the surgery that has caused the loss of bones and tissue...it is the c-toma which destroyed those.

I am definitely NOT a advocate of diving into surgery if there are other viable alternatives, however, I also do not believe in putting off surgery when there are NOT viable alternatives.

Ultimately, you are the one who has to make the final decision. I hope you don't wait too long.

Best regards, Annette

New Member Seeking Your Advice

Hello Everyone,I've been a member of the group for a couple of months now, and I've been reading the digest a couple of times a week. However, this is my first time to post.This is my situation- I would like any and all feedback or advice anyone has. I have put off making a decision about what to do about my c-toma long enough, and I need to make a decision relatively soon. My situation is probably very similar to what many people have experienced- I am 24 years old, and when I was a child I had two sets of tubes put into my ears (the second set put in after the first set fell out) to try and ameliorate the ear infections I was having. Then, when I was about 9 years old I had to get tympanoplasty surgery (the ear drum skin graft surgery) on both ears, since my ear drums had not closed properly from the tubes.That's the past. I had no problems with my ears for a long time, about 13 years or so. Fast

forward to last summer, summer of 2005, basically one year ago this month. I swim at the gym as usual but water gets in my left ear as I'm practicing flipping in the water (learned not to do that again!). That night, it becomes clear my left ear is infected, because it is painful, feels full, and is giving off pretty unpleasant discharge. I go to the doctor, an ENT I hadn't been to before here in Dallas, Texas where I live. We take care of the ear infection, and all is well, but I come back 6 months later (last December or so) for a check-up just so he can take a look, and he orders a CAT scan since he thinks that there could be a c-toma forming in my left ear. (However, how long it's been there seems to be something that is impossible to know, since I wasn't having ENT check-ups basically between the ages of 10 and 23). I get the CAT scan done, and it comes back and my doctor says that it is highly "suspicious"

for a cholesteatoma. Thus far I have had 2 opinions, and neither doctor has said firmly and conclusively, "Yes, you have a cholesteatoma, " but they both said that the odds are over 90% and recommend surgery asap. They said that the Incus (one of the three ossicles) was partly blocked from view in the CAT scan, so that it's possible that the c-toma has already gobbled it up. Sure enough, my hearing in my left ear is distinctly less than in my right, which we confirmed with a hearing test. (Thinking out loud, though, does that necessarily mean that the c-toma has worn away one of my hearing ossicles, or could that also be a function of a perforated ear drum in that ear- I don't know. Apparently my ear drum in my left ear didn't fully close up, even after the tympanoplasty surgery).I apologize for being so verbose, but the devil certainly seems to be in the details when discussing these issues...So here I am

now with a choice to make. Both doctors I have seen, one of whom is a nationally recognized otologist who I trust to be "on top of his game", have said that I need to get c-toma surgery and that I should definitely do it sooner rather than later. However, I'm just not quite ready to sign on the dotted line yet. Here's why:1. It still isn't a certainty that I have c-toma, though of course it is certainly the most likely possibility. 2. The surgery almost seems to bring more problems with it than it does solutions. My doctor told me that my hearing could actually be LESS after the surgery, since they may have to remove my ossicles and put in prostheses. Additionally, I'm not thrilled about the idea of having 5 or more surgeries to remove this thing- the rate of recurrence in "canal wall up" procedures, as my doctor recommended we do (and which I agree with because of the unpleasant cosmetic ramifications of

the "canal wall down" procedure) is EXTREMELY high (20-40% is what I was told). Last, and I've partly gotten over this, but the possibility of facial nerve damage that would actually make me lose the ability to move half of my face is very alarming to me. The fact that my doctor said that this has never happened to any of his patients or to any patient at the ENT clinic at University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center where his practice is is certainly reassuring, but still, isn't there always a first? Given the choice, I would choose hearing loss in 1 ear over lifelong facial paralysis any day.3. Another concern I have is just the general way that surgery is approached by many in the medical community these days. I'm no expert in this at all, but I have heard it said that upwards of 70% of surgical procedures these days are unnecessary. Additionally, they don't seem to be that successful. I take my own personal

experience as a case in point: Clearly the doctors who recommended tubes be put in my ears (and the ears of millions of kids in my generation) were not well advised. That seems to be one of the big reasons why we have lists like this one! Additionally, the tympanoplasty I had done when I was 9 didn't apparently work all that well. Surgery just doesn't seem to be the magic bullet that it's promised to be. Today the doctors are telling me I need to get surgery to correct a problem, but doctors also told my mother when I was a child that I needed tubes in my ears to prevent future ear infections. Clearly, the risks of tubes outweighed the rewards, which is why I'm in the present situation. I'm not saying that surgery is a bad thing, only that it seems we need more thorough and conservative criteria before going down that road.I asked my doctor if it was a CERTAINTY that my c-toma was going to grow and become

increasingly problematic as time goes on, or if there was a possibility that I could live with this c-toma, perhaps having reduced hearing in my left ear, but never really having problems in the future. I found his answer very vague. (Again, he is an expert in his field and I am lucky to have him as a doctor, but I believe I have to approach all of this carefully). He said that Yes, it is a certainty that my c-toma will grow and create some or all of the resultant problems with it (hearing loss, infection, potentially even worse). However, he said, the thing that is a variable is the question of WHEN. He said it could be two weeks, or it could be 10 years, he really had no way to know. To me, something feels off about this. How can something be a CERTAIN problem, but we then have NO idea about the time frame? This doesn't seem quite right to me.One specific question I have for everyone: Has anyone ever known

of someone who HAS indeed lost their hearing, had ear problems, or had meningitis or anything like that as a result of c-toma? The posts I have read have been very helpful in discussing people's experiences with c-toma surgery, recurrence, etc., but doesn't it seem a little strange that, while we all know many people through this list who have had experience with c-toma surgery, we don't seem to have a whole lot of living examples of people saying, "I lost all the hearing in my ear due to c-toma, and I sure wish I had gotten the surgery," or anything like that. Perhaps they are out there, I'm just not coming across them. Any information in this area would be much appreciated, as I'm just trying to assess whether the fact I have a c-toma means FOR SURE that it is going to grow and create problems, or if it could be relatively dormant. Heck, for all I know I've been living with this thing for the last 14 years or so and

didn't even know it. Or, it could have grown after my ear infection last year, and be growing more right now as I type. I apologize again for this verbose posting, but I wanted to give everyone my full situation and describe my thinking on it thus far. What I would like to ask anyone who was nice enough to read this email is what their advice would be that I do at this point. Also, I would love to know if there is anyone else in the same boat as me, who is concerned about their c-toma and is looking into the possibility of surgery, but who is as of yet unconvinced that it is the best step. If there is anyone who has been diagnosed with c-toma but decided NOT to do the surgery it would be good to hear from them and understand their reasons for doing so. By the same token, if people find my logic very faulty, I would like to hear from them as well!Thank You everyone, and I look forward to being a more active

member of the list. (Dallas, TX)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Hello

Most of us here have already had surgeries and are well aware that gambling with ctoma is not worth the risk. The ENT doctors are the experts and if they think you should have surgery then it's probably good advice.

I ignored the problems I had with draining ears and chronic ear-ache for years. After all I'd always had lots of ear problems and hearing loss and my general doctor thought I'd be wasting my time going back to ENT. And then within the space of a couple of weeks a lot of ctoma symptoms appeared rapidly. I developed vertigo, face paralysis, fearsome headaches, double vision and a lot of pain throughout my head, neck and shoulder. At that point I'd become an emergency case and was at high risk from cranial complications. 5 years on and 4 surgeries things have improved greatly though I'm still having to deal with a few balance problems and some loss of facial function.

The trouble is that you never know when the ctoma will reach a critical stage, though when it does it's certainly an ordeal and irreversible damage may taken place by then. It's always better to go in for surgery sooner rather than later and in the long-run the surgery is far more preferable to the alternative.

Phil

No virus found in this outgoing message.

Checked by AVG Free Edition.

Version: 7.1.394 / Virus Database: 268.9.8/381 - Release Date: 03/07/06

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Glad you found this site. I'm one that has had a CWD

(modified radical version) and am very glad I had it.

Prior to my CWD I had 2 removal attempts and the

c-toma came back. The CWD provides about a 85% chance

that the c-toma will not come back, mine has not. In

the time since me CWD NO ONE has ever noticed that I

had one, I never heard of any who had it been noticed

other than explaining the weird hair cut. Hair grows

back quickly. By the way my CWD was in 1979, so it's

time tested....

tom hansen

--- <nathancrow@...> wrote:

> Hello Everyone,

>

> I've been a member of the group for a couple of

> months now, and I've

> been reading the digest a couple of times a week.

> However, this is

> my first time to post.

>

> This is my situation- I would like any and all

> feedback or advice

> anyone has. I have put off making a decision about

> what to do about

> my c-toma long enough, and I need to make a decision

> relatively

> soon. My situation is probably very similar to what

> many people have

> experienced- I am 24 years old, and when I was a

> child I had two

> sets of tubes put into my ears (the second set put

> in after the

> first set fell out) to try and ameliorate the ear

> infections I was

> having. Then, when I was about 9 years old I had to

> get

> tympanoplasty surgery (the ear drum skin graft

> surgery) on both

> ears, since my ear drums had not closed properly

> from the tubes.

>

> That's the past. I had no problems with my ears for

> a long time,

> about 13 years or so. Fast forward to last summer,

> summer of 2005,

> basically one year ago this month. I swim at the gym

> as usual but

> water gets in my left ear as I'm practicing flipping

> in the water

> (learned not to do that again!). That night, it

> becomes clear my

> left ear is infected, because it is painful, feels

> full, and is

> giving off pretty unpleasant discharge. I go to the

> doctor, an ENT I

> hadn't been to before here in Dallas, Texas where I

> live. We take

> care of the ear infection, and all is well, but I

> come back 6 months

> later (last December or so) for a check-up just so

> he can take a

> look, and he orders a CAT scan since he thinks that

> there could be a

> c-toma forming in my left ear. (However, how long

> it's been there

> seems to be something that is impossible to know,

> since I wasn't

> having ENT check-ups basically between the ages of

> 10 and 23).

>

> I get the CAT scan done, and it comes back and my

> doctor says that

> it is highly " suspicious " for a cholesteatoma. Thus

> far I have had 2

> opinions, and neither doctor has said firmly and

> conclusively, " Yes,

> you have a cholesteatoma, " but they both said that

> the odds are over

> 90% and recommend surgery asap. They said that the

> Incus (one of the

> three ossicles) was partly blocked from view in the

> CAT scan, so

> that it's possible that the c-toma has already

> gobbled it up. Sure

> enough, my hearing in my left ear is distinctly less

> than in my

> right, which we confirmed with a hearing test.

> (Thinking out loud,

> though, does that necessarily mean that the c-toma

> has worn away one

> of my hearing ossicles, or could that also be a

> function of a

> perforated ear drum in that ear- I don't know.

> Apparently my ear

> drum in my left ear didn't fully close up, even

> after the

> tympanoplasty surgery).

>

> I apologize for being so verbose, but the devil

> certainly seems to

> be in the details when discussing these issues...

>

> So here I am now with a choice to make. Both doctors

> I have seen,

> one of whom is a nationally recognized otologist who

> I trust to

> be " on top of his game " , have said that I need to

> get c-toma surgery

> and that I should definitely do it sooner rather

> than later.

> However, I'm just not quite ready to sign on the

> dotted line yet.

> Here's why:

>

> 1. It still isn't a certainty that I have c-toma,

> though of course

> it is certainly the most likely possibility.

>

> 2. The surgery almost seems to bring more problems

> with it than it

> does solutions. My doctor told me that my hearing

> could actually be

> LESS after the surgery, since they may have to

> remove my ossicles

> and put in prostheses. Additionally, I'm not

> thrilled about the idea

> of having 5 or more surgeries to remove this thing-

> the rate of

> recurrence in " canal wall up " procedures, as my

> doctor recommended

> we do (and which I agree with because of the

> unpleasant cosmetic

> ramifications of the " canal wall down " procedure) is

> EXTREMELY high

> (20-40% is what I was told). Last, and I've partly

> gotten over this,

> but the possibility of facial nerve damage that

> would actually make

> me lose the ability to move half of my face is very

> alarming to me.

> The fact that my doctor said that this has never

> happened to any of

> his patients or to any patient at the ENT clinic at

> University of

> Texas Southwestern Medical Center where his practice

> is is certainly

> reassuring, but still, isn't there always a first?

> Given the choice,

> I would choose hearing loss in 1 ear over lifelong

> facial paralysis

> any day.

>

> 3. Another concern I have is just the general way

> that surgery is

> approached by many in the medical community these

> days. I'm no

> expert in this at all, but I have heard it said that

> upwards of 70%

> of surgical procedures these days are unnecessary.

> Additionally,

> they don't seem to be that successful. I take my own

> personal

> experience as a case in point: Clearly the doctors

> who recommended

> tubes be put in my ears (and the ears of millions of

> kids in my

> generation) were not well advised. That seems to be

> one of the big

> reasons why we have lists like this one!

> Additionally, the

> tympanoplasty I had done when I was 9 didn't

> apparently work all

> that well. Surgery just doesn't seem to be the magic

> bullet that

> it's promised to be. Today the doctors are telling

> me I need to get

> surgery to correct a problem, but doctors also told

> my mother when I

> was a child that I needed tubes in my ears to

> prevent future ear

> infections. Clearly, the risks of tubes outweighed

> the rewards,

> which is why I'm in the present situation. I'm not

> saying that

> surgery is a bad thing, only that it seems we need

> more thorough and

> conservative criteria before going down that road.

>

> I asked my doctor if it was a CERTAINTY that my

> c-toma was going to

> grow and become increasingly problematic as time

> goes on, or if

> there was a possibility that I could live with this

> c-toma, perhaps

> having reduced hearing in my left ear, but never

> really having

> problems in the future. I found his answer very

> vague. (Again, he is

> an expert in his field and I am lucky to have him as

> a doctor, but I

> believe I have to approach all of this carefully).

> He said that Yes,

> it is a certainty that my c-toma will grow and

> create some or all of

> the resultant problems with it (hearing loss,

> infection, potentially

> even worse). However, he said, the thing that is a

> variable is the

> question of WHEN. He said it could be two weeks, or

> it could be 10

> years, he really had no way to know.

>

> To me, something feels off about this. How can

> something

=== message truncated ===

__________________________________________________

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

,

It seemed to me that in parts of your post that you feel like a

lot of surgeries are unnecessary but at the same time you are not

against surgery. I am a strong believer in c-toma and what they can

possibly do to you. Why? Growing up I had a ton of ear infections

with the eardrum bursting with blood and all that good stuff. I

never had tubes put in my ears however. As I was growing up I

started to lose my hearing slowly but surely and never really looked

into it too much but noticed that I said what? a lot and could not

hear people who spoke softly and also some things sounded far away

when they were right next to me (if that makes sense?). I have had

ringing in my right ear for most of my life. Also, everytime I would

get " stuffed up " or get a cold my ears would stay stuffed up for a

looonng time (fluid filled). This may sound weird but when I was

younger I would turn my head upside down and my ear would " open up. "

Must have been the fluid moving around in my ear. I am 28 years old

and had surgery May 30th to remove the c-toma from my right ear,

mastoidectomy and tympanoplasty. I was lucky because the c-toma

didn't destroy my ear bones, but I'm obviously in the early stages

of getting this all taken care of. Now I have to have the left ear

done. The reason the doctors finally suspected c-toma was because of

the fact that I had a severe ear infection that no antibiotic would

clear up. I was to the point of wanting to literally end my life.

The pain was awful. Finally, IV pain meds in the hospital took care

of the pain but the fluid wouldn't clear up.

All the reasons above were enough to convince me that I had

something going on and needed to be taken care of. I just wouldn't

want to see someone like you get to those points because you decided

not to have the surgery. My ENT showed me on the CT scan where the c-

toma had filled my mastoid bone. Your mastoid is suppose to be sort

of a spongy bone so air can flow through I suppose but my mastoid

was filled with c-toma material.

I pray that you come to a decision before you have issues like mine.

I'm sure other people have had worse happen than me but to be able

to get the c-toma before it causes anything worse than what you have

going on now would certainly be good.

Take care,

>

> Hello Everyone,

>

> I've been a member of the group for a couple of months now, and

I've

> been reading the digest a couple of times a week. However, this is

> my first time to post.

>

> This is my situation- I would like any and all feedback or advice

> anyone has. I have put off making a decision about what to do

about

> my c-toma long enough, and I need to make a decision relatively

> soon. My situation is probably very similar to what many people

have

> experienced- I am 24 years old, and when I was a child I had two

> sets of tubes put into my ears (the second set put in after the

> first set fell out) to try and ameliorate the ear infections I was

> having. Then, when I was about 9 years old I had to get

> tympanoplasty surgery (the ear drum skin graft surgery) on both

> ears, since my ear drums had not closed properly from the tubes.

>

> That's the past. I had no problems with my ears for a long time,

> about 13 years or so. Fast forward to last summer, summer of 2005,

> basically one year ago this month. I swim at the gym as usual but

> water gets in my left ear as I'm practicing flipping in the water

> (learned not to do that again!). That night, it becomes clear my

> left ear is infected, because it is painful, feels full, and is

> giving off pretty unpleasant discharge. I go to the doctor, an ENT

I

> hadn't been to before here in Dallas, Texas where I live. We take

> care of the ear infection, and all is well, but I come back 6

months

> later (last December or so) for a check-up just so he can take a

> look, and he orders a CAT scan since he thinks that there could be

a

> c-toma forming in my left ear. (However, how long it's been there

> seems to be something that is impossible to know, since I wasn't

> having ENT check-ups basically between the ages of 10 and 23).

>

> I get the CAT scan done, and it comes back and my doctor says that

> it is highly " suspicious " for a cholesteatoma. Thus far I have had

2

> opinions, and neither doctor has said firmly and

conclusively, " Yes,

> you have a cholesteatoma, " but they both said that the odds are

over

> 90% and recommend surgery asap. They said that the Incus (one of

the

> three ossicles) was partly blocked from view in the CAT scan, so

> that it's possible that the c-toma has already gobbled it up. Sure

> enough, my hearing in my left ear is distinctly less than in my

> right, which we confirmed with a hearing test. (Thinking out loud,

> though, does that necessarily mean that the c-toma has worn away

one

> of my hearing ossicles, or could that also be a function of a

> perforated ear drum in that ear- I don't know. Apparently my ear

> drum in my left ear didn't fully close up, even after the

> tympanoplasty surgery).

>

> I apologize for being so verbose, but the devil certainly seems to

> be in the details when discussing these issues...

>

> So here I am now with a choice to make. Both doctors I have seen,

> one of whom is a nationally recognized otologist who I trust to

> be " on top of his game " , have said that I need to get c-toma

surgery

> and that I should definitely do it sooner rather than later.

> However, I'm just not quite ready to sign on the dotted line yet.

> Here's why:

>

> 1. It still isn't a certainty that I have c-toma, though of course

> it is certainly the most likely possibility.

>

> 2. The surgery almost seems to bring more problems with it than it

> does solutions. My doctor told me that my hearing could actually

be

> LESS after the surgery, since they may have to remove my ossicles

> and put in prostheses. Additionally, I'm not thrilled about the

idea

> of having 5 or more surgeries to remove this thing- the rate of

> recurrence in " canal wall up " procedures, as my doctor recommended

> we do (and which I agree with because of the unpleasant cosmetic

> ramifications of the " canal wall down " procedure) is EXTREMELY

high

> (20-40% is what I was told). Last, and I've partly gotten over

this,

> but the possibility of facial nerve damage that would actually

make

> me lose the ability to move half of my face is very alarming to

me.

> The fact that my doctor said that this has never happened to any

of

> his patients or to any patient at the ENT clinic at University of

> Texas Southwestern Medical Center where his practice is is

certainly

> reassuring, but still, isn't there always a first? Given the

choice,

> I would choose hearing loss in 1 ear over lifelong facial

paralysis

> any day.

>

> 3. Another concern I have is just the general way that surgery is

> approached by many in the medical community these days. I'm no

> expert in this at all, but I have heard it said that upwards of

70%

> of surgical procedures these days are unnecessary. Additionally,

> they don't seem to be that successful. I take my own personal

> experience as a case in point: Clearly the doctors who recommended

> tubes be put in my ears (and the ears of millions of kids in my

> generation) were not well advised. That seems to be one of the big

> reasons why we have lists like this one! Additionally, the

> tympanoplasty I had done when I was 9 didn't apparently work all

> that well. Surgery just doesn't seem to be the magic bullet that

> it's promised to be. Today the doctors are telling me I need to

get

> surgery to correct a problem, but doctors also told my mother when

I

> was a child that I needed tubes in my ears to prevent future ear

> infections. Clearly, the risks of tubes outweighed the rewards,

> which is why I'm in the present situation. I'm not saying that

> surgery is a bad thing, only that it seems we need more thorough

and

> conservative criteria before going down that road.

>

> I asked my doctor if it was a CERTAINTY that my c-toma was going

to

> grow and become increasingly problematic as time goes on, or if

> there was a possibility that I could live with this c-toma,

perhaps

> having reduced hearing in my left ear, but never really having

> problems in the future. I found his answer very vague. (Again, he

is

> an expert in his field and I am lucky to have him as a doctor, but

I

> believe I have to approach all of this carefully). He said that

Yes,

> it is a certainty that my c-toma will grow and create some or all

of

> the resultant problems with it (hearing loss, infection,

potentially

> even worse). However, he said, the thing that is a variable is the

> question of WHEN. He said it could be two weeks, or it could be 10

> years, he really had no way to know.

>

> To me, something feels off about this. How can something be a

> CERTAIN problem, but we then have NO idea about the time frame?

This

> doesn't seem quite right to me.

>

> One specific question I have for everyone: Has anyone ever known

of

> someone who HAS indeed lost their hearing, had ear problems, or

had

> meningitis or anything like that as a result of c-toma? The posts

I

> have read have been very helpful in discussing people's

experiences

> with c-toma surgery, recurrence, etc., but doesn't it seem a

little

> strange that, while we all know many people through this list who

> have had experience with c-toma surgery, we don't seem to have a

> whole lot of living examples of people saying, " I lost all the

> hearing in my ear due to c-toma, and I sure wish I had gotten the

> surgery, " or anything like that. Perhaps they are out there, I'm

> just not coming across them. Any information in this area would be

> much appreciated, as I'm just trying to assess whether the fact I

> have a c-toma means FOR SURE that it is going to grow and create

> problems, or if it could be relatively dormant. Heck, for all I

know

> I've been living with this thing for the last 14 years or so and

> didn't even know it. Or, it could have grown after my ear

infection

> last year, and be growing more right now as I type.

>

> I apologize again for this verbose posting, but I wanted to give

> everyone my full situation and describe my thinking on it thus

far.

> What I would like to ask anyone who was nice enough to read this

> email is what their advice would be that I do at this point. Also,

I

> would love to know if there is anyone else in the same boat as me,

> who is concerned about their c-toma and is looking into the

> possibility of surgery, but who is as of yet unconvinced that it

is

> the best step. If there is anyone who has been diagnosed with c-

toma

> but decided NOT to do the surgery it would be good to hear from

them

> and understand their reasons for doing so. By the same token, if

> people find my logic very faulty, I would like to hear from them

as

> well!

>

> Thank You everyone, and I look forward to being a more active

member

> of the list.

>

> (Dallas, TX)

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Thank You everyone for all of your great replies. I am really

grateful. It is really wonderful to have this forum to be able to

talk about this stuff- Thank God for the internet.

Well, you've all given me a lot to think about. After reading your

replies, and also doing a little more research and reading more past

posts from people, I am now taking this cholesteatoma WAY more

seriously. Essentially, it seems to me like this:

There is a say 90% chance I have a cholesteatoma. For all practical

purposes, that means I have to act like I DO have one and take steps

as if I have one, because it is most likely. Not to would just be

denial. AND, it's essentially GUARANTEED that this thing is going to

grow- when is a little less clear, but again, why gamble with this

sort of thing. And, if and when it grows, it is going to (a) do more

damage to my hearing (which unfortunately has happened to many

people out there I now realize), (B) create infection, ©

potentially do the facial nerve damage that I am so afraid of

happening during the surgery, (d) potentially lead to hydrocephalus,

meningitis, or a brain abscess (whatever that is!). So, removing

this thing makes sense, and doing it sooner rather than later is

best so that it doesn't have more time to grow and eat away more of

my middle ear. (In February when I had my CT scan the tissue that

they think is the cholesteatoma was 7mm by 4mm. I figured it out

once, and I think that's about the size of a pea, or a little

bigger. I bet it's bigger now, because my hearing has gotten a

little worse in the last few months).

So, I think that the following is going to be my course of action.

What does everyone think about this?

1. Tomorrow (Wednesday) I am going to get another Audiogram (hearing

test). I'm very curious as to what the audiogram will show, and how

it will compare with the one I got done in July of 2005 after my ear

infection. If it shows my hearing in my left ear has gotten markedly

worse, that is going to be a big red flag saying " get surgery soon. "

2. Tomorrow, I am also having another appointment with my doctor to

continue talking with him about surgery. I think (but don't hold me

to this) I am going to get the surgery on the calendar, and if I see

something/hear something/come to understand something about my

condition that makes me postpone I can always do that.

3. I am going to ask my doctor about getting another CT scan before

the actual surgery date, just to get more information. If the scan

shows that the cholesteatoma has gotten bigger and eaten away more

of my ossicles, well then that confirms that surgery needs to happen

fast. If, however, the incus is visible in this scan and is whole

and intact, and the growth is still the same 7mm x 4mm, well then

that might give me reason for pause: NOT reason to not move forward

with the surgery, which probably needs to be done anyway, but just

reason that I might be able to move a little more slowly and do more

research into this thing.

Basically, I think that I'm going to end up getting surgery on this

thing sometime before the end of the year. But that gets me into all

of the questions of surgical choices: i.e. wall up or wall down,

facial nerve monitoring during the surgery or not, etc. Boy, this

sure seems like a whole nother can of worms, and one I don't know

much about.

I think that I'm confused about the CWU vs. CWD procedures. Kazzy,

you asked what I meant about the " unpleasant ramifications of the

canal wall down procedure. " Well, I was under the impression that

the canal wall down (CWD) procedure meant that the surgeon goes in

THROUGH the ear canal, and a larger hole than before is left in the

ear post-surgery that is unattractive. The rate of recurrence is

less on CWD procedures, but you are still left with an ear that

looks different from before. My doctor showed me pictures of one of

these ears, and I definitely wouldn't say that it was hard to look

at, or that it was terribly ugly, or that it would catch a LOT of

attention or anything, but nevertheless it just seemed like if a CWU

procedure can forego that cosmetic damage then it seemed like a

better idea. My doctor recommended CWU and said that he does that

with just about all of his patients now, and that it is by far the

more common. Now, do I have this correct, or am I confused?? I

wouldn't be surprised if I've somehow gotten it wrong, because all

of the reading I've done on all these different websites has gotten

to be sort of mindboggling! Could anyone clear this up for me?

(Also, I'm confused- somebody said that the surgeon decides DURING

the procedure whether to do a CWU or CWD. I don't get it- isn't this

choice made beforehand, so that the surgeon knows where they're

going to do the cutting?).

Along these same lines, if anybody knows of a good site or resource

that talks specifically about the SURGERY end of cholesteatoma, i.e.

different procedures, different risks, pictures of the ear

afterwards, etc., that would be great. I've found a lot of things

about cholesteatoma on the net, but not a lot of things that focus

on the surgical procedure itself very specifically.

Annette and Ilona- Thank you very much for the contact info. of

other good doctors here in Dallas. I may very well look into these

before this whole shooting match is over.

Thanks again everyone! Happy 4th!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Don't be fooled by the potentially positive/good results you may get from an audiogram at this stage; a cholesteatoma can conduct sound so can lead to false readings.

You seem to have the infformation you need to make an informed decision to go into exploratory surgery with a view to mastoidectomy. I know what I would do.

Good luck.

Kazzy

Re: New Member Seeking Your Advice

Thank You everyone for all of your great replies. I am really grateful. It is really wonderful to have this forum to be able to talk about this stuff- Thank God for the internet.Well, you've all given me a lot to think about. After reading your replies, and also doing a little more research and reading more past posts from people, I am now taking this cholesteatoma WAY more seriously. Essentially, it seems to me like this:There is a say 90% chance I have a cholesteatoma. For all practical purposes, that means I have to act like I DO have one and take steps as if I have one, because it is most likely. Not to would just be denial. AND, it's essentially GUARANTEED that this thing is going to grow- when is a little less clear, but again, why gamble with this sort of thing. And, if and when it grows, it is going to (a) do more damage to my hearing (which unfortunately has happened to many people out there I now realize), (B) create infection, © potentially do the facial nerve damage that I am so afraid of happening during the surgery, (d) potentially lead to hydrocephalus, meningitis, or a brain abscess (whatever that is!). So, removing this thing makes sense, and doing it sooner rather than later is best so that it doesn't have more time to grow and eat away more of my middle ear. (In February when I had my CT scan the tissue that they think is the cholesteatoma was 7mm by 4mm. I figured it out once, and I think that's about the size of a pea, or a little bigger. I bet it's bigger now, because my hearing has gotten a little worse in the last few months). So, I think that the following is going to be my course of action. What does everyone think about this? 1. Tomorrow (Wednesday) I am going to get another Audiogram (hearing test). I'm very curious as to what the audiogram will show, and how it will compare with the one I got done in July of 2005 after my ear infection. If it shows my hearing in my left ear has gotten markedly worse, that is going to be a big red flag saying "get surgery soon."2. Tomorrow, I am also having another appointment with my doctor to continue talking with him about surgery. I think (but don't hold me to this) I am going to get the surgery on the calendar, and if I see something/hear something/come to understand something about my condition that makes me postpone I can always do that.3. I am going to ask my doctor about getting another CT scan before the actual surgery date, just to get more information. If the scan shows that the cholesteatoma has gotten bigger and eaten away more of my ossicles, well then that confirms that surgery needs to happen fast. If, however, the incus is visible in this scan and is whole and intact, and the growth is still the same 7mm x 4mm, well then that might give me reason for pause: NOT reason to not move forward with the surgery, which probably needs to be done anyway, but just reason that I might be able to move a little more slowly and do more research into this thing.Basically, I think that I'm going to end up getting surgery on this thing sometime before the end of the year. But that gets me into all of the questions of surgical choices: i.e. wall up or wall down, facial nerve monitoring during the surgery or not, etc. Boy, this sure seems like a whole nother can of worms, and one I don't know much about.I think that I'm confused about the CWU vs. CWD procedures. Kazzy, you asked what I meant about the "unpleasant ramifications of the canal wall down procedure." Well, I was under the impression that the canal wall down (CWD) procedure meant that the surgeon goes in THROUGH the ear canal, and a larger hole than before is left in the ear post-surgery that is unattractive. The rate of recurrence is less on CWD procedures, but you are still left with an ear that looks different from before. My doctor showed me pictures of one of these ears, and I definitely wouldn't say that it was hard to look at, or that it was terribly ugly, or that it would catch a LOT of attention or anything, but nevertheless it just seemed like if a CWU procedure can forego that cosmetic damage then it seemed like a better idea. My doctor recommended CWU and said that he does that with just about all of his patients now, and that it is by far the more common. Now, do I have this correct, or am I confused?? I wouldn't be surprised if I've somehow gotten it wrong, because all of the reading I've done on all these different websites has gotten to be sort of mindboggling! Could anyone clear this up for me? (Also, I'm confused- somebody said that the surgeon decides DURING the procedure whether to do a CWU or CWD. I don't get it- isn't this choice made beforehand, so that the surgeon knows where they're going to do the cutting?). Along these same lines, if anybody knows of a good site or resource that talks specifically about the SURGERY end of cholesteatoma, i.e. different procedures, different risks, pictures of the ear afterwards, etc., that would be great. I've found a lot of things about cholesteatoma on the net, but not a lot of things that focus on the surgical procedure itself very specifically.Annette and Ilona- Thank you very much for the contact info. of other good doctors here in Dallas. I may very well look into these before this whole shooting match is over.Thanks again everyone! Happy 4th!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Hi

Hope you don't mind more input from me - I hope my comments are useful to you.

1. I think I would be right in saying that the patient has little or no input in to the type of surgery performed; it matters not what the patient wants, it's the surgeon's decision based on the results of the tests performed prior to surgery, and on his findings during the surgery.

2. You say your doctor recommends CWU; does he give any indication of repeat surgeries necessary in either respect (CWU vs CWD)? I think I would be right in saying that CWU leads almost always to more repeat surgeries than does CWD. CWU mostly leads to a 'look see' surgery 6 months or so down the line, with a view to reconstruction of the hearing mechanism. CWD is usually (to my knowledge) one surgery.

3. I still don't understand these 'unpleasant ramifications' of which you speak. I'm a CWD patient and I can say with hand on heart that I have suffered no 'unpleasant ramifications'. And besides.. there's nothing to see; the opening to the ear canal of the operated ear is slightly (and I mean 'slightly') larger than that of the other ear. I had six stitches above my ear, that's all - and you can barely see the scar and certainly not unless you're almost in my face. The aim of either surgery - CWU or CWD - is a clean, healthy, dry (ie cholesteatoma-free) ear. I have to express my surprise that a possibly distorted view about cosmetics appears somewhat higher on the list of priorities, than say, getting successfully rid of the cholesteatoma. Surely the latter is far more important? Or maybe I misunderstood.

4. Even if there is no apparent growth in the cholesteatoma (assuming it is a cholesteatoma), I don't understand why anyone would wish to delay surgery. That would just be delaying the inevitable. There is no other known treatment of cholesteatoma but surgery. Complete removal by surgery is the only known cure of this monster. Better out than in!

Kazzy

Re: New Member Seeking Your Advice

Thank You everyone for all of your great replies. I am really grateful. It is really wonderful to have this forum to be able to talk about this stuff- Thank God for the internet.Well, you've all given me a lot to think about. After reading your replies, and also doing a little more research and reading more past posts from people, I am now taking this cholesteatoma WAY more seriously. Essentially, it seems to me like this:There is a say 90% chance I have a cholesteatoma. For all practical purposes, that means I have to act like I DO have one and take steps as if I have one, because it is most likely. Not to would just be denial. AND, it's essentially GUARANTEED that this thing is going to grow- when is a little less clear, but again, why gamble with this sort of thing. And, if and when it grows, it is going to (a) do more damage to my hearing (which unfortunately has happened to many people out there I now realize), (B) create infection, © potentially do the facial nerve damage that I am so afraid of happening during the surgery, (d) potentially lead to hydrocephalus, meningitis, or a brain abscess (whatever that is!). So, removing this thing makes sense, and doing it sooner rather than later is best so that it doesn't have more time to grow and eat away more of my middle ear. (In February when I had my CT scan the tissue that they think is the cholesteatoma was 7mm by 4mm. I figured it out once, and I think that's about the size of a pea, or a little bigger. I bet it's bigger now, because my hearing has gotten a little worse in the last few months). So, I think that the following is going to be my course of action. What does everyone think about this? 1. Tomorrow (Wednesday) I am going to get another Audiogram (hearing test). I'm very curious as to what the audiogram will show, and how it will compare with the one I got done in July of 2005 after my ear infection. If it shows my hearing in my left ear has gotten markedly worse, that is going to be a big red flag saying "get surgery soon."2. Tomorrow, I am also having another appointment with my doctor to continue talking with him about surgery. I think (but don't hold me to this) I am going to get the surgery on the calendar, and if I see something/hear something/come to understand something about my condition that makes me postpone I can always do that.3. I am going to ask my doctor about getting another CT scan before the actual surgery date, just to get more information. If the scan shows that the cholesteatoma has gotten bigger and eaten away more of my ossicles, well then that confirms that surgery needs to happen fast. If, however, the incus is visible in this scan and is whole and intact, and the growth is still the same 7mm x 4mm, well then that might give me reason for pause: NOT reason to not move forward with the surgery, which probably needs to be done anyway, but just reason that I might be able to move a little more slowly and do more research into this thing.Basically, I think that I'm going to end up getting surgery on this thing sometime before the end of the year. But that gets me into all of the questions of surgical choices: i.e. wall up or wall down, facial nerve monitoring during the surgery or not, etc. Boy, this sure seems like a whole nother can of worms, and one I don't know much about.I think that I'm confused about the CWU vs. CWD procedures. Kazzy, you asked what I meant about the "unpleasant ramifications of the canal wall down procedure." Well, I was under the impression that the canal wall down (CWD) procedure meant that the surgeon goes in THROUGH the ear canal, and a larger hole than before is left in the ear post-surgery that is unattractive. The rate of recurrence is less on CWD procedures, but you are still left with an ear that looks different from before. My doctor showed me pictures of one of these ears, and I definitely wouldn't say that it was hard to look at, or that it was terribly ugly, or that it would catch a LOT of attention or anything, but nevertheless it just seemed like if a CWU procedure can forego that cosmetic damage then it seemed like a better idea. My doctor recommended CWU and said that he does that with just about all of his patients now, and that it is by far the more common. Now, do I have this correct, or am I confused?? I wouldn't be surprised if I've somehow gotten it wrong, because all of the reading I've done on all these different websites has gotten to be sort of mindboggling! Could anyone clear this up for me? (Also, I'm confused- somebody said that the surgeon decides DURING the procedure whether to do a CWU or CWD. I don't get it- isn't this choice made beforehand, so that the surgeon knows where they're going to do the cutting?). Along these same lines, if anybody knows of a good site or resource that talks specifically about the SURGERY end of cholesteatoma, i.e. different procedures, different risks, pictures of the ear afterwards, etc., that would be great. I've found a lot of things about cholesteatoma on the net, but not a lot of things that focus on the surgical procedure itself very specifically.Annette and Ilona- Thank you very much for the contact info. of other good doctors here in Dallas. I may very well look into these before this whole shooting match is over.Thanks again everyone! Happy 4th!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Could anyone clear this up for me?

(Also, I'm confused- somebody said that the surgeon decides DURING

the procedure whether to do a CWU or CWD. I don't get it- isn't this

choice made beforehand, so that the surgeon knows where they're

going to do the cutting?).

You're right to say that will usually aim for a more conservative CWU at the

outset, that's if there is no specific indication the the ctoma is

widespread or there are other complicating factors and the need for grafting

etc. It's really about whether the surgeon can access the ear successfully -

a CWD removes part of the back wall of the ear canal creating a continuous

space with the mastoid and it often includes a meatoplasty (a widening of

the ear canal).

The point is that the initial evaluation of ctoma is sometimes deceptive.

People here often report that the surgeons found the ctoma to be more

extensive than they thought. Little bits of ctoma sometimes spread around

hiding in bony pockets of the mastoid or nestling into the membrane of the

middle ear. The surgeon, painstakingly, has to find every last cell of the

disease, otherwise it may mean you'll be back in surgery after a while.

That's why the surgeon may not fully know beforehand which surgery will be

required - it can depend on what they find once they've seen inside. Both

CWD and CWU follow the same route - they go in through the mastoid and

difference is at the other end, once they've reached the middle ear space.

Phil

--

No virus found in this outgoing message.

Checked by AVG Free Edition.

Version: 7.1.394 / Virus Database: 268.9.9/382 - Release Date: 04/07/06

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Just wanted to comment on the facial nerve monitoring. I would think

they would do the monitoring during surgery no matter what, wouldn't

you? I remember having a bruise on my forehead and wondered why and

the doctor told me later without me even asking that it was from

have the nerve monitor on my head.

>

> Thank You everyone for all of your great replies. I am really

> grateful. It is really wonderful to have this forum to be able to

> talk about this stuff- Thank God for the internet.

>

> Well, you've all given me a lot to think about. After reading your

> replies, and also doing a little more research and reading more

past

> posts from people, I am now taking this cholesteatoma WAY more

> seriously. Essentially, it seems to me like this:

>

> There is a say 90% chance I have a cholesteatoma. For all

practical

> purposes, that means I have to act like I DO have one and take

steps

> as if I have one, because it is most likely. Not to would just be

> denial. AND, it's essentially GUARANTEED that this thing is going

to

> grow- when is a little less clear, but again, why gamble with this

> sort of thing. And, if and when it grows, it is going to (a) do

more

> damage to my hearing (which unfortunately has happened to many

> people out there I now realize), (B) create infection, ©

> potentially do the facial nerve damage that I am so afraid of

> happening during the surgery, (d) potentially lead to

hydrocephalus,

> meningitis, or a brain abscess (whatever that is!). So, removing

> this thing makes sense, and doing it sooner rather than later is

> best so that it doesn't have more time to grow and eat away more

of

> my middle ear. (In February when I had my CT scan the tissue that

> they think is the cholesteatoma was 7mm by 4mm. I figured it out

> once, and I think that's about the size of a pea, or a little

> bigger. I bet it's bigger now, because my hearing has gotten a

> little worse in the last few months).

>

> So, I think that the following is going to be my course of action.

> What does everyone think about this?

>

> 1. Tomorrow (Wednesday) I am going to get another Audiogram

(hearing

> test). I'm very curious as to what the audiogram will show, and

how

> it will compare with the one I got done in July of 2005 after my

ear

> infection. If it shows my hearing in my left ear has gotten

markedly

> worse, that is going to be a big red flag saying " get surgery

soon. "

> 2. Tomorrow, I am also having another appointment with my doctor

to

> continue talking with him about surgery. I think (but don't hold

me

> to this) I am going to get the surgery on the calendar, and if I

see

> something/hear something/come to understand something about my

> condition that makes me postpone I can always do that.

> 3. I am going to ask my doctor about getting another CT scan

before

> the actual surgery date, just to get more information. If the scan

> shows that the cholesteatoma has gotten bigger and eaten away more

> of my ossicles, well then that confirms that surgery needs to

happen

> fast. If, however, the incus is visible in this scan and is whole

> and intact, and the growth is still the same 7mm x 4mm, well then

> that might give me reason for pause: NOT reason to not move

forward

> with the surgery, which probably needs to be done anyway, but just

> reason that I might be able to move a little more slowly and do

more

> research into this thing.

>

> Basically, I think that I'm going to end up getting surgery on

this

> thing sometime before the end of the year. But that gets me into

all

> of the questions of surgical choices: i.e. wall up or wall down,

> facial nerve monitoring during the surgery or not, etc. Boy, this

> sure seems like a whole nother can of worms, and one I don't know

> much about.

>

> I think that I'm confused about the CWU vs. CWD procedures. Kazzy,

> you asked what I meant about the " unpleasant ramifications of the

> canal wall down procedure. " Well, I was under the impression that

> the canal wall down (CWD) procedure meant that the surgeon goes in

> THROUGH the ear canal, and a larger hole than before is left in

the

> ear post-surgery that is unattractive. The rate of recurrence is

> less on CWD procedures, but you are still left with an ear that

> looks different from before. My doctor showed me pictures of one

of

> these ears, and I definitely wouldn't say that it was hard to look

> at, or that it was terribly ugly, or that it would catch a LOT of

> attention or anything, but nevertheless it just seemed like if a

CWU

> procedure can forego that cosmetic damage then it seemed like a

> better idea. My doctor recommended CWU and said that he does that

> with just about all of his patients now, and that it is by far the

> more common. Now, do I have this correct, or am I confused?? I

> wouldn't be surprised if I've somehow gotten it wrong, because all

> of the reading I've done on all these different websites has

gotten

> to be sort of mindboggling! Could anyone clear this up for me?

> (Also, I'm confused- somebody said that the surgeon decides DURING

> the procedure whether to do a CWU or CWD. I don't get it- isn't

this

> choice made beforehand, so that the surgeon knows where they're

> going to do the cutting?).

>

> Along these same lines, if anybody knows of a good site or

resource

> that talks specifically about the SURGERY end of cholesteatoma,

i.e.

> different procedures, different risks, pictures of the ear

> afterwards, etc., that would be great. I've found a lot of things

> about cholesteatoma on the net, but not a lot of things that focus

> on the surgical procedure itself very specifically.

>

> Annette and Ilona- Thank you very much for the contact info. of

> other good doctors here in Dallas. I may very well look into these

> before this whole shooting match is over.

>

> Thanks again everyone! Happy 4th!

>

>

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

, I am 28 and was worried about all the same things your facing... facial paralysis, funky looking ear :) I am two weeks post op... and my ear is practically normal again....the incision behind the ear is practically in the crease of my ear.... so if i pull my ear forward my friends can see my battle wounds :) but most are like...."huh...is that it?" ahaha (then i explain what was done and they give me a little more sympathy" Just make sure you have a good Dr. and you will be fine... Mine is AMAZING! i love him.... but I am in Atlanta so that does not work much for you :) <nathancrow@...> wrote: Thank You everyone for all of your great replies. I am really grateful. It is really wonderful to have this forum to be able to talk about this stuff- Thank God for the internet.Well, you've all given me a lot to think about. After reading your replies, and also doing a little more research and reading more past posts from people, I am now taking this cholesteatoma WAY more seriously. Essentially, it seems to me like this:There is a say 90% chance I have a cholesteatoma. For all practical purposes, that means I have to act like I DO have one and take steps as if I have one, because it is most likely. Not to would just be denial. AND, it's essentially GUARANTEED that this thing is going to grow- when is a little less clear, but again, why gamble with this sort of thing. And, if and when it grows, it is going to (a)

do more damage to my hearing (which unfortunately has happened to many people out there I now realize), (B) create infection, © potentially do the facial nerve damage that I am so afraid of happening during the surgery, (d) potentially lead to hydrocephalus, meningitis, or a brain abscess (whatever that is!). So, removing this thing makes sense, and doing it sooner rather than later is best so that it doesn't have more time to grow and eat away more of my middle ear. (In February when I had my CT scan the tissue that they think is the cholesteatoma was 7mm by 4mm. I figured it out once, and I think that's about the size of a pea, or a little bigger. I bet it's bigger now, because my hearing has gotten a little worse in the last few months). So, I think that the following is going to be my course of action. What does everyone think about this? 1. Tomorrow (Wednesday) I am going to get another Audiogram

(hearing test). I'm very curious as to what the audiogram will show, and how it will compare with the one I got done in July of 2005 after my ear infection. If it shows my hearing in my left ear has gotten markedly worse, that is going to be a big red flag saying "get surgery soon."2. Tomorrow, I am also having another appointment with my doctor to continue talking with him about surgery. I think (but don't hold me to this) I am going to get the surgery on the calendar, and if I see something/hear something/come to understand something about my condition that makes me postpone I can always do that.3. I am going to ask my doctor about getting another CT scan before the actual surgery date, just to get more information. If the scan shows that the cholesteatoma has gotten bigger and eaten away more of my ossicles, well then that confirms that surgery needs to happen fast. If, however, the incus is visible in this scan

and is whole and intact, and the growth is still the same 7mm x 4mm, well then that might give me reason for pause: NOT reason to not move forward with the surgery, which probably needs to be done anyway, but just reason that I might be able to move a little more slowly and do more research into this thing.Basically, I think that I'm going to end up getting surgery on this thing sometime before the end of the year. But that gets me into all of the questions of surgical choices: i.e. wall up or wall down, facial nerve monitoring during the surgery or not, etc. Boy, this sure seems like a whole nother can of worms, and one I don't know much about.I think that I'm confused about the CWU vs. CWD procedures. Kazzy, you asked what I meant about the "unpleasant ramifications of the canal wall down procedure." Well, I was under the impression that the canal wall down (CWD) procedure meant that the surgeon goes in

THROUGH the ear canal, and a larger hole than before is left in the ear post-surgery that is unattractive. The rate of recurrence is less on CWD procedures, but you are still left with an ear that looks different from before. My doctor showed me pictures of one of these ears, and I definitely wouldn't say that it was hard to look at, or that it was terribly ugly, or that it would catch a LOT of attention or anything, but nevertheless it just seemed like if a CWU procedure can forego that cosmetic damage then it seemed like a better idea. My doctor recommended CWU and said that he does that with just about all of his patients now, and that it is by far the more common. Now, do I have this correct, or am I confused?? I wouldn't be surprised if I've somehow gotten it wrong, because all of the reading I've done on all these different websites has gotten to be sort of mindboggling! Could anyone clear this up for me?

(Also, I'm confused- somebody said that the surgeon decides DURING the procedure whether to do a CWU or CWD. I don't get it- isn't this choice made beforehand, so that the surgeon knows where they're going to do the cutting?). Along these same lines, if anybody knows of a good site or resource that talks specifically about the SURGERY end of cholesteatoma, i.e. different procedures, different risks, pictures of the ear afterwards, etc., that would be great. I've found a lot of things about cholesteatoma on the net, but not a lot of things that focus on the surgical procedure itself very specifically.Annette and Ilona- Thank you very much for the contact info. of other good doctors here in Dallas. I may very well look into these before this whole shooting match is over.Thanks again everyone! Happy 4th!

Want to be your own boss? Learn how on Small Business.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

,

Although most c'tomas grow slowly, some can be rapid, as was he case

with my son's 2nd. Six months post-op and it was back again and

significant. I've been told the worst outcome of c'toma is they

eventually grow into the brain, causing death. I've not reseached

exactly what happens at that stage, as I don't plan to ever let my

son's get to that point.

Most major medical facilities will have a facial nerve monitor, so

make sure your facility does have one before surgery. If not,

request another hospital. My son had approx. 70% hearing loss before

his 1st surgery and his loss is only about 20% now (possibly better

afer surgery last week, where 2 ossicles were removed and replaced

with prosthesis).

My ENT one told me that of all the conditions he treats, he has

the " most respect " for C'toma, because most people don't know they

have it until irreversible damage is done.

Good luck with your decision. My son has had 6 surgeries, 3 of which

had an incision behind the ear. He is 10 and had one last week. We

were out eating lunch the next day and he felt great. Keeping him

still is my biggest obstacle. With a competant otologist, you'll

feel good soon.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Hi Kazzy,

Your comments are definitely useful to me- Thank You. I have to

admit, this whole CWU vs. CWD thing is still a little confusing to

me.

I asked my doctor about it, and he showed me a picture of a CWD ear.

I would NOT say that it looked really " bad, " but I would say that it

looked " different. " The canal was significantly wider than that of

a " normal " ear, and it was definitely visible, even I think from

several feet away. Is it possible that your CWD is just far better,

or a more slight incision, than average? I'm confident to think that

if you saw the photo I saw (and a couple I saw around the internet)

you would have the same take on it as I do.

However, saying that, I would NOT be closed to the possibility of a

CWD surgery if I thought that it was a better option for me. If with

the canal wall " up " surgery I ended up having to get 5 or more

surgeries (heck, maybe even 3 or more) on my ear, and with a CWD I

could get rid of it once and for all, I think I'd definitely choose

it. You're absolutely right- the object is getting a clean and dry

cholesteatoma-free ear. That is definitely a higher priority than

aesthetics and looking good. I'm not exactly looking at an acting or

boy band career or anything in which the way my ears look is that

important :) .

But, my reason for being enthusiastic about the CWU procedure is

that if my doctor says I can get that c-toma free ear WITHOUT any

visible change to my ear by doing the CWU, why not do it? Does that

make sense, or do you think I'm failing to look at something? Please

tell me what you really think.

I haven't ruled out the CWD, I guess. Your points about the

possibility for recurrence with CWU definitely makes me pause. I

guess I might do some more research on it and just ask my doctor

again why he's confident with a CWU.

P.S. If anybody else on the list has a view on this CWU vs. CWD I

would love to hear from them.

>

> Hi

>

> Hope you don't mind more input from me - I hope my comments are

useful to you.

>

> 1. I think I would be right in saying that the patient has

little or no input in to the type of surgery performed; it matters

not what the patient wants, it's the surgeon's decision based on the

results of the tests performed prior to surgery, and on his findings

during the surgery.

>

> 2. You say your doctor recommends CWU; does he give any

indication of repeat surgeries necessary in either respect (CWU vs

CWD)? I think I would be right in saying that CWU leads almost

always to more repeat surgeries than does CWD. CWU mostly leads to

a 'look see' surgery 6 months or so down the line, with a view to

reconstruction of the hearing mechanism. CWD is usually (to my

knowledge) one surgery.

>

> 3. I still don't understand these 'unpleasant ramifications' of

which you speak. I'm a CWD patient and I can say with hand on heart

that I have suffered no 'unpleasant ramifications'. And besides..

there's nothing to see; the opening to the ear canal of the operated

ear is slightly (and I mean 'slightly') larger than that of the

other ear. I had six stitches above my ear, that's all - and you

can barely see the scar and certainly not unless you're almost in my

face. The aim of either surgery - CWU or CWD - is a clean, healthy,

dry (ie cholesteatoma-free) ear. I have to express my surprise that

a possibly distorted view about cosmetics appears somewhat higher on

the list of priorities, than say, getting successfully rid of the

cholesteatoma. Surely the latter is far more important? Or maybe I

misunderstood.

>

> 4. Even if there is no apparent growth in the cholesteatoma

(assuming it is a cholesteatoma), I don't understand why anyone

would wish to delay surgery. That would just be delaying the

inevitable. There is no other known treatment of cholesteatoma but

surgery. Complete removal by surgery is the only known cure of this

monster. Better out than in!

>

> Kazzy

>

>

> Re: New Member Seeking Your Advice

>

>

> Thank You everyone for all of your great replies. I am really

> grateful. It is really wonderful to have this forum to be able

to

> talk about this stuff- Thank God for the internet.

>

> Well, you've all given me a lot to think about. After reading

your

> replies, and also doing a little more research and reading more

past

> posts from people, I am now taking this cholesteatoma WAY more

> seriously. Essentially, it seems to me like this:

>

> There is a say 90% chance I have a cholesteatoma. For all

practical

> purposes, that means I have to act like I DO have one and take

steps

> as if I have one, because it is most likely. Not to would just

be

> denial. AND, it's essentially GUARANTEED that this thing is

going to

> grow- when is a little less clear, but again, why gamble with

this

> sort of thing. And, if and when it grows, it is going to (a) do

more

> damage to my hearing (which unfortunately has happened to many

> people out there I now realize), (B) create infection, ©

> potentially do the facial nerve damage that I am so afraid of

> happening during the surgery, (d) potentially lead to

hydrocephalus,

> meningitis, or a brain abscess (whatever that is!). So, removing

> this thing makes sense, and doing it sooner rather than later is

> best so that it doesn't have more time to grow and eat away more

of

> my middle ear. (In February when I had my CT scan the tissue

that

> they think is the cholesteatoma was 7mm by 4mm. I figured it out

> once, and I think that's about the size of a pea, or a little

> bigger. I bet it's bigger now, because my hearing has gotten a

> little worse in the last few months).

>

> So, I think that the following is going to be my course of

action.

> What does everyone think about this?

>

> 1. Tomorrow (Wednesday) I am going to get another Audiogram

(hearing

> test). I'm very curious as to what the audiogram will show, and

how

> it will compare with the one I got done in July of 2005 after my

ear

> infection. If it shows my hearing in my left ear has gotten

markedly

> worse, that is going to be a big red flag saying " get surgery

soon. "

> 2. Tomorrow, I am also having another appointment with my doctor

to

> continue talking with him about surgery. I think (but don't hold

me

> to this) I am going to get the surgery on the calendar, and if I

see

> something/hear something/come to understand something about my

> condition that makes me postpone I can always do that.

> 3. I am going to ask my doctor about getting another CT scan

before

> the actual surgery date, just to get more information. If the

scan

> shows that the cholesteatoma has gotten bigger and eaten away

more

> of my ossicles, well then that confirms that surgery needs to

happen

> fast. If, however, the incus is visible in this scan and is

whole

> and intact, and the growth is still the same 7mm x 4mm, well

then

> that might give me reason for pause: NOT reason to not move

forward

> with the surgery, which probably needs to be done anyway, but

just

> reason that I might be able to move a little more slowly and do

more

> research into this thing.

>

> Basically, I think that I'm going to end up getting surgery on

this

> thing sometime before the end of the year. But that gets me into

all

> of the questions of surgical choices: i.e. wall up or wall down,

> facial nerve monitoring during the surgery or not, etc. Boy,

this

> sure seems like a whole nother can of worms, and one I don't

know

> much about.

>

> I think that I'm confused about the CWU vs. CWD procedures.

Kazzy,

> you asked what I meant about the " unpleasant ramifications of

the

> canal wall down procedure. " Well, I was under the impression

that

> the canal wall down (CWD) procedure meant that the surgeon goes

in

> THROUGH the ear canal, and a larger hole than before is left in

the

> ear post-surgery that is unattractive. The rate of recurrence is

> less on CWD procedures, but you are still left with an ear that

> looks different from before. My doctor showed me pictures of one

of

> these ears, and I definitely wouldn't say that it was hard to

look

> at, or that it was terribly ugly, or that it would catch a LOT

of

> attention or anything, but nevertheless it just seemed like if a

CWU

> procedure can forego that cosmetic damage then it seemed like a

> better idea. My doctor recommended CWU and said that he does

that

> with just about all of his patients now, and that it is by far

the

> more common. Now, do I have this correct, or am I confused?? I

> wouldn't be surprised if I've somehow gotten it wrong, because

all

> of the reading I've done on all these different websites has

gotten

> to be sort of mindboggling! Could anyone clear this up for me?

> (Also, I'm confused- somebody said that the surgeon decides

DURING

> the procedure whether to do a CWU or CWD. I don't get it- isn't

this

> choice made beforehand, so that the surgeon knows where they're

> going to do the cutting?).

>

> Along these same lines, if anybody knows of a good site or

resource

> that talks specifically about the SURGERY end of cholesteatoma,

i.e.

> different procedures, different risks, pictures of the ear

> afterwards, etc., that would be great. I've found a lot of

things

> about cholesteatoma on the net, but not a lot of things that

focus

> on the surgical procedure itself very specifically.

>

> Annette and Ilona- Thank you very much for the contact info. of

> other good doctors here in Dallas. I may very well look into

these

> before this whole shooting match is over.

>

> Thanks again everyone! Happy 4th!

>

>

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

No one is going to notice anything about your ear. It

comes down to your choice on what you would like to do

but your making a mountain out of mole hill. 27 years

since my cwd you and no one has even said a word about

my ear....

tom hansen

--- <nathancrow@...> wrote:

> Hi Kazzy,

>

> Your comments are definitely useful to me- Thank

> You. I have to

> admit, this whole CWU vs. CWD thing is still a

> little confusing to

> me.

>

> I asked my doctor about it, and he showed me a

> picture of a CWD ear.

> I would NOT say that it looked really " bad, " but I

> would say that it

> looked " different. " The canal was significantly

> wider than that of

> a " normal " ear, and it was definitely visible, even

> I think from

> several feet away. Is it possible that your CWD is

> just far better,

> or a more slight incision, than average? I'm

> confident to think that

> if you saw the photo I saw (and a couple I saw

> around the internet)

> you would have the same take on it as I do.

>

> However, saying that, I would NOT be closed to the

> possibility of a

> CWD surgery if I thought that it was a better option

> for me. If with

> the canal wall " up " surgery I ended up having to get

> 5 or more

> surgeries (heck, maybe even 3 or more) on my ear,

> and with a CWD I

> could get rid of it once and for all, I think I'd

> definitely choose

> it. You're absolutely right- the object is getting a

> clean and dry

> cholesteatoma-free ear. That is definitely a higher

> priority than

> aesthetics and looking good. I'm not exactly looking

> at an acting or

> boy band career or anything in which the way my ears

> look is that

> important :) .

>

> But, my reason for being enthusiastic about the CWU

> procedure is

> that if my doctor says I can get that c-toma free

> ear WITHOUT any

> visible change to my ear by doing the CWU, why not

> do it? Does that

> make sense, or do you think I'm failing to look at

> something? Please

> tell me what you really think.

>

> I haven't ruled out the CWD, I guess. Your points

> about the

> possibility for recurrence with CWU definitely makes

> me pause. I

> guess I might do some more research on it and just

> ask my doctor

> again why he's confident with a CWU.

>

>

>

> P.S. If anybody else on the list has a view on this

> CWU vs. CWD I

> would love to hear from them.

>

>

> >

> > Hi

> >

> > Hope you don't mind more input from me - I hope my

> comments are

> useful to you.

> >

> > 1. I think I would be right in saying that the

> patient has

> little or no input in to the type of surgery

> performed; it matters

> not what the patient wants, it's the surgeon's

> decision based on the

> results of the tests performed prior to surgery, and

> on his findings

> during the surgery.

> >

> > 2. You say your doctor recommends CWU; does he

> give any

> indication of repeat surgeries necessary in either

> respect (CWU vs

> CWD)? I think I would be right in saying that CWU

> leads almost

> always to more repeat surgeries than does CWD. CWU

> mostly leads to

> a 'look see' surgery 6 months or so down the line,

> with a view to

> reconstruction of the hearing mechanism. CWD is

> usually (to my

> knowledge) one surgery.

> >

> > 3. I still don't understand these 'unpleasant

> ramifications' of

> which you speak. I'm a CWD patient and I can say

> with hand on heart

> that I have suffered no 'unpleasant ramifications'.

> And besides..

> there's nothing to see; the opening to the ear canal

> of the operated

> ear is slightly (and I mean 'slightly') larger than

> that of the

> other ear. I had six stitches above my ear, that's

> all - and you

> can barely see the scar and certainly not unless

> you're almost in my

> face. The aim of either surgery - CWU or CWD - is a

> clean, healthy,

> dry (ie cholesteatoma-free) ear. I have to express

> my surprise that

> a possibly distorted view about cosmetics appears

> somewhat higher on

> the list of priorities, than say, getting

> successfully rid of the

> cholesteatoma. Surely the latter is far more

> important? Or maybe I

> misunderstood.

> >

> > 4. Even if there is no apparent growth in the

> cholesteatoma

> (assuming it is a cholesteatoma), I don't understand

> why anyone

> would wish to delay surgery. That would just be

> delaying the

> inevitable. There is no other known treatment of

> cholesteatoma but

> surgery. Complete removal by surgery is the only

> known cure of this

> monster. Better out than in!

> >

> > Kazzy

> >

> >

> > Re: New Member Seeking

> Your Advice

> >

> >

> > Thank You everyone for all of your great

> replies. I am really

> > grateful. It is really wonderful to have this

> forum to be able

> to

> > talk about this stuff- Thank God for the

> internet.

> >

> > Well, you've all given me a lot to think about.

> After reading

> your

> > replies, and also doing a little more research

> and reading more

> past

> > posts from people, I am now taking this

> cholesteatoma WAY more

> > seriously. Essentially, it seems to me like

> this:

> >

> > There is a say 90% chance I have a

> cholesteatoma. For all

> practical

> > purposes, that means I have to act like I DO

> have one and take

> steps

> > as if I have one, because it is most likely. Not

> to would just

> be

> > denial. AND, it's essentially GUARANTEED that

> this thing is

> going to

> > grow- when is a little less clear, but again,

> why gamble with

> this

> > sort of thing. And, if and when it grows, it is

> going to (a) do

> more

> > damage to my hearing (which unfortunately has

> happened to many

> > people out there I now realize), (B) create

> infection, ©

> > potentially do the facial nerve damage that I am

> so afraid of

> > happening during the surgery, (d) potentially

> lead to

> hydrocephalus,

> > meningitis, or a brain abscess (whatever that

> is!). So, removing

> > this thing makes sense, and doing it sooner

> rather than later is

> > best so that it doesn't have more time to grow

> and

=== message truncated ===

__________________________________________________

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Tom Hansen said the following on 07/07/2006 06:08 PM:

>

>

>

>

> No one is going to notice anything about your ear. It

> comes down to your choice on what you would like to do

> but your making a mountain out of mole hill. 27 years

> since my cwd you and no one has even said a word about

> my ear....

>

> tom hansen

Likewise. Even my current ENT can't tell. He only knew why the canal

wall was wider than normal after I told him what sort of surgeries I'd

had in the past. From the outside it looks perfectly normal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Hi , I see you have had a lot of responses to your letter.

I'll let you know my experience. I am older than some here (52) and

just learned a while ago that I had c-toma's in both ears. I had

surgery the first of June in my right ear. I was like you,

questioning if I REALLY need to have it done, especially with my

age. If it had been growing all this time, what would another 30

years or so do, right? The doctor explained that anything to do with

the ears is not as exact as we may like. For instance they can't

tell you ahead of time how much hearing lose you will have, ect.

Also the CT scan shows shadows-some could be C-toma, some fluid. I

decided to have the surgery and the doctor found more damage than he

suspected from the CT scan. It had gone into part of my scull and

ate away the bone that protects the facial nerve and did a lot of

damage to my hearing bones. I have very little hearing in that ear

now, but if I would have left it alone it would have been worse.

Like a time bomb. Anyway, I just wanted to let you know that even

though I didn't want the surgery and really don't look forward to the

whole lifelong follow up - it was the right decision.

Good Luck

Hello Everyone,

>

> I've been a member of the group for a couple of months now, and

I've

> been reading the digest a couple of times a week. However, this is

> my first time to post.

>

> This is my situation- I would like any and all feedback or advice

> anyone has. I have put off making a decision about what to do about

> my c-toma long enough, and I need to make a decision relatively

> soon. My situation is probably very similar to what many people

have

> experienced- I am 24 years old, and when I was a child I had two

> sets of tubes put into my ears (the second set put in after the

> first set fell out) to try and ameliorate the ear infections I was

> having. Then, when I was about 9 years old I had to get

> tympanoplasty surgery (the ear drum skin graft surgery) on both

> ears, since my ear drums had not closed properly from the tubes.

>

> That's the past. I had no problems with my ears for a long time,

> about 13 years or so. Fast forward to last summer, summer of 2005,

> basically one year ago this month. I swim at the gym as usual but

> water gets in my left ear as I'm practicing flipping in the water

> (learned not to do that again!). That night, it becomes clear my

> left ear is infected, because it is painful, feels full, and is

> giving off pretty unpleasant discharge. I go to the doctor, an ENT

I

> hadn't been to before here in Dallas, Texas where I live. We take

> care of the ear infection, and all is well, but I come back 6

months

> later (last December or so) for a check-up just so he can take a

> look, and he orders a CAT scan since he thinks that there could be

a

> c-toma forming in my left ear. (However, how long it's been there

> seems to be something that is impossible to know, since I wasn't

> having ENT check-ups basically between the ages of 10 and 23).

>

> I get the CAT scan done, and it comes back and my doctor says that

> it is highly " suspicious " for a cholesteatoma. Thus far I have had

2

> opinions, and neither doctor has said firmly and

conclusively, " Yes,

> you have a cholesteatoma, " but they both said that the odds are

over

> 90% and recommend surgery asap. They said that the Incus (one of

the

> three ossicles) was partly blocked from view in the CAT scan, so

> that it's possible that the c-toma has already gobbled it up. Sure

> enough, my hearing in my left ear is distinctly less than in my

> right, which we confirmed with a hearing test. (Thinking out loud,

> though, does that necessarily mean that the c-toma has worn away

one

> of my hearing ossicles, or could that also be a function of a

> perforated ear drum in that ear- I don't know. Apparently my ear

> drum in my left ear didn't fully close up, even after the

> tympanoplasty surgery).

>

> I apologize for being so verbose, but the devil certainly seems to

> be in the details when discussing these issues...

>

> So here I am now with a choice to make. Both doctors I have seen,

> one of whom is a nationally recognized otologist who I trust to

> be " on top of his game " , have said that I need to get c-toma

surgery

> and that I should definitely do it sooner rather than later.

> However, I'm just not quite ready to sign on the dotted line yet.

> Here's why:

>

> 1. It still isn't a certainty that I have c-toma, though of course

> it is certainly the most likely possibility.

>

> 2. The surgery almost seems to bring more problems with it than it

> does solutions. My doctor told me that my hearing could actually be

> LESS after the surgery, since they may have to remove my ossicles

> and put in prostheses. Additionally, I'm not thrilled about the

idea

> of having 5 or more surgeries to remove this thing- the rate of

> recurrence in " canal wall up " procedures, as my doctor recommended

> we do (and which I agree with because of the unpleasant cosmetic

> ramifications of the " canal wall down " procedure) is EXTREMELY high

> (20-40% is what I was told). Last, and I've partly gotten over

this,

> but the possibility of facial nerve damage that would actually make

> me lose the ability to move half of my face is very alarming to me.

> The fact that my doctor said that this has never happened to any of

> his patients or to any patient at the ENT clinic at University of

> Texas Southwestern Medical Center where his practice is is

certainly

> reassuring, but still, isn't there always a first? Given the

choice,

> I would choose hearing loss in 1 ear over lifelong facial paralysis

> any day.

>

> 3. Another concern I have is just the general way that surgery is

> approached by many in the medical community these days. I'm no

> expert in this at all, but I have heard it said that upwards of 70%

> of surgical procedures these days are unnecessary. Additionally,

> they don't seem to be that successful. I take my own personal

> experience as a case in point: Clearly the doctors who recommended

> tubes be put in my ears (and the ears of millions of kids in my

> generation) were not well advised. That seems to be one of the big

> reasons why we have lists like this one! Additionally, the

> tympanoplasty I had done when I was 9 didn't apparently work all

> that well. Surgery just doesn't seem to be the magic bullet that

> it's promised to be. Today the doctors are telling me I need to get

> surgery to correct a problem, but doctors also told my mother when

I

> was a child that I needed tubes in my ears to prevent future ear

> infections. Clearly, the risks of tubes outweighed the rewards,

> which is why I'm in the present situation. I'm not saying that

> surgery is a bad thing, only that it seems we need more thorough

and

> conservative criteria before going down that road.

>

> I asked my doctor if it was a CERTAINTY that my c-toma was going to

> grow and become increasingly problematic as time goes on, or if

> there was a possibility that I could live with this c-toma, perhaps

> having reduced hearing in my left ear, but never really having

> problems in the future. I found his answer very vague. (Again, he

is

> an expert in his field and I am lucky to have him as a doctor, but

I

> believe I have to approach all of this carefully). He said that

Yes,

> it is a certainty that my c-toma will grow and create some or all

of

> the resultant problems with it (hearing loss, infection,

potentially

> even worse). However, he said, the thing that is a variable is the

> question of WHEN. He said it could be two weeks, or it could be 10

> years, he really had no way to know.

>

> To me, something feels off about this. How can something be a

> CERTAIN problem, but we then have NO idea about the time frame?

This

> doesn't seem quite right to me.

>

> One specific question I have for everyone: Has anyone ever known of

> someone who HAS indeed lost their hearing, had ear problems, or had

> meningitis or anything like that as a result of c-toma? The posts I

> have read have been very helpful in discussing people's experiences

> with c-toma surgery, recurrence, etc., but doesn't it seem a little

> strange that, while we all know many people through this list who

> have had experience with c-toma surgery, we don't seem to have a

> whole lot of living examples of people saying, " I lost all the

> hearing in my ear due to c-toma, and I sure wish I had gotten the

> surgery, " or anything like that. Perhaps they are out there, I'm

> just not coming across them. Any information in this area would be

> much appreciated, as I'm just trying to assess whether the fact I

> have a c-toma means FOR SURE that it is going to grow and create

> problems, or if it could be relatively dormant. Heck, for all I

know

> I've been living with this thing for the last 14 years or so and

> didn't even know it. Or, it could have grown after my ear infection

> last year, and be growing more right now as I type.

>

> I apologize again for this verbose posting, but I wanted to give

> everyone my full situation and describe my thinking on it thus far.

> What I would like to ask anyone who was nice enough to read this

> email is what their advice would be that I do at this point. Also,

I

> would love to know if there is anyone else in the same boat as me,

> who is concerned about their c-toma and is looking into the

> possibility of surgery, but who is as of yet unconvinced that it is

> the best step. If there is anyone who has been diagnosed with c-

toma

> but decided NOT to do the surgery it would be good to hear from

them

> and understand their reasons for doing so. By the same token, if

> people find my logic very faulty, I would like to hear from them as

> well!

>

> Thank You everyone, and I look forward to being a more active

member

> of the list.

>

> (Dallas, TX)

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Hi -

I also am new to the group; although, not new to c-toma diagnosis.

My experience is this: I had never had problems with my ears as a

child (I do recall one ear infection). Actually, my sister is the

one who had recurring ear infections & had a tube placed in her

ear. Lucky her - she has no ear problems! Anyway, when I was 29

(in 1999), I had trouble with my left ear - I was feeling fullness &

pressure. I thought it was an ear infection. I saw an ENT who

basically did nothing - he told me to take Sudafed. Well, I was

pregnant and could not take any medication (I checked with my ob).

About 6 months later, my hearing was worse so I went back to the

ENT. Still nothing. Finally, in 2002, I saw another ENT who

suggested that I see an otologist at University of Miami. I did

that, and was diagnosed with a c-toma. Well, when he went in and

did the surgery, he discovered that the c-toma had completely

destroyed some bones (sorry - I don't know the technical jargon! -

but they were the stirrup, anvil, etc.) and had worked its way to

the bone that covers your facial nerve. That is what freaked me out

the most - the possibility of paralysis from not treating this

monster! Or the possibility that it could work its way to your

brain. When I had my second surgery, he installed a prosthetic

device. I would have to say that my hearing improved, but it was

pretty bad before the surgery. Now, the story continues - I have

been having some trouble with my right ear that I had been

attributing to sinus problems (this is not manifesting itself in the

same manner that it did with my left ear! - if I recall correctly, I

had an ear infection in my left ear and I thought I had a hole in my

eardrum and that's why I couldn't hear). So I went to an ENT

yesterday and he thinks I have a c-toma in my right ear and I have

already made an appointment with the otologist and I will make my

surgical appointment ASAP if in fact I have a c-toma! I hope this

helps. To me, it's the thought that this thing is eating away at

bones, etc. that scares me. I would just as soon get rid of it,

even if it requires surgery. And I am the type of person that does

not take medication unless absolutely necessary, nor do I often go

to the doctor.

>

> Hello Everyone,

>

> I've been a member of the group for a couple of months now, and

I've

> been reading the digest a couple of times a week. However, this is

> my first time to post.

>

> This is my situation- I would like any and all feedback or advice

> anyone has. I have put off making a decision about what to do

about

> my c-toma long enough, and I need to make a decision relatively

> soon. My situation is probably very similar to what many people

have

> experienced- I am 24 years old, and when I was a child I had two

> sets of tubes put into my ears (the second set put in after the

> first set fell out) to try and ameliorate the ear infections I was

> having. Then, when I was about 9 years old I had to get

> tympanoplasty surgery (the ear drum skin graft surgery) on both

> ears, since my ear drums had not closed properly from the tubes.

>

> That's the past. I had no problems with my ears for a long time,

> about 13 years or so. Fast forward to last summer, summer of 2005,

> basically one year ago this month. I swim at the gym as usual but

> water gets in my left ear as I'm practicing flipping in the water

> (learned not to do that again!). That night, it becomes clear my

> left ear is infected, because it is painful, feels full, and is

> giving off pretty unpleasant discharge. I go to the doctor, an ENT

I

> hadn't been to before here in Dallas, Texas where I live. We take

> care of the ear infection, and all is well, but I come back 6

months

> later (last December or so) for a check-up just so he can take a

> look, and he orders a CAT scan since he thinks that there could be

a

> c-toma forming in my left ear. (However, how long it's been there

> seems to be something that is impossible to know, since I wasn't

> having ENT check-ups basically between the ages of 10 and 23).

>

> I get the CAT scan done, and it comes back and my doctor says that

> it is highly " suspicious " for a cholesteatoma. Thus far I have had

2

> opinions, and neither doctor has said firmly and

conclusively, " Yes,

> you have a cholesteatoma, " but they both said that the odds are

over

> 90% and recommend surgery asap. They said that the Incus (one of

the

> three ossicles) was partly blocked from view in the CAT scan, so

> that it's possible that the c-toma has already gobbled it up. Sure

> enough, my hearing in my left ear is distinctly less than in my

> right, which we confirmed with a hearing test. (Thinking out loud,

> though, does that necessarily mean that the c-toma has worn away

one

> of my hearing ossicles, or could that also be a function of a

> perforated ear drum in that ear- I don't know. Apparently my ear

> drum in my left ear didn't fully close up, even after the

> tympanoplasty surgery).

>

> I apologize for being so verbose, but the devil certainly seems to

> be in the details when discussing these issues...

>

> So here I am now with a choice to make. Both doctors I have seen,

> one of whom is a nationally recognized otologist who I trust to

> be " on top of his game " , have said that I need to get c-toma

surgery

> and that I should definitely do it sooner rather than later.

> However, I'm just not quite ready to sign on the dotted line yet.

> Here's why:

>

> 1. It still isn't a certainty that I have c-toma, though of course

> it is certainly the most likely possibility.

>

> 2. The surgery almost seems to bring more problems with it than it

> does solutions. My doctor told me that my hearing could actually

be

> LESS after the surgery, since they may have to remove my ossicles

> and put in prostheses. Additionally, I'm not thrilled about the

idea

> of having 5 or more surgeries to remove this thing- the rate of

> recurrence in " canal wall up " procedures, as my doctor recommended

> we do (and which I agree with because of the unpleasant cosmetic

> ramifications of the " canal wall down " procedure) is EXTREMELY

high

> (20-40% is what I was told). Last, and I've partly gotten over

this,

> but the possibility of facial nerve damage that would actually

make

> me lose the ability to move half of my face is very alarming to

me.

> The fact that my doctor said that this has never happened to any

of

> his patients or to any patient at the ENT clinic at University of

> Texas Southwestern Medical Center where his practice is is

certainly

> reassuring, but still, isn't there always a first? Given the

choice,

> I would choose hearing loss in 1 ear over lifelong facial

paralysis

> any day.

>

> 3. Another concern I have is just the general way that surgery is

> approached by many in the medical community these days. I'm no

> expert in this at all, but I have heard it said that upwards of

70%

> of surgical procedures these days are unnecessary. Additionally,

> they don't seem to be that successful. I take my own personal

> experience as a case in point: Clearly the doctors who recommended

> tubes be put in my ears (and the ears of millions of kids in my

> generation) were not well advised. That seems to be one of the big

> reasons why we have lists like this one! Additionally, the

> tympanoplasty I had done when I was 9 didn't apparently work all

> that well. Surgery just doesn't seem to be the magic bullet that

> it's promised to be. Today the doctors are telling me I need to

get

> surgery to correct a problem, but doctors also told my mother when

I

> was a child that I needed tubes in my ears to prevent future ear

> infections. Clearly, the risks of tubes outweighed the rewards,

> which is why I'm in the present situation. I'm not saying that

> surgery is a bad thing, only that it seems we need more thorough

and

> conservative criteria before going down that road.

>

> I asked my doctor if it was a CERTAINTY that my c-toma was going

to

> grow and become increasingly problematic as time goes on, or if

> there was a possibility that I could live with this c-toma,

perhaps

> having reduced hearing in my left ear, but never really having

> problems in the future. I found his answer very vague. (Again, he

is

> an expert in his field and I am lucky to have him as a doctor, but

I

> believe I have to approach all of this carefully). He said that

Yes,

> it is a certainty that my c-toma will grow and create some or all

of

> the resultant problems with it (hearing loss, infection,

potentially

> even worse). However, he said, the thing that is a variable is the

> question of WHEN. He said it could be two weeks, or it could be 10

> years, he really had no way to know.

>

> To me, something feels off about this. How can something be a

> CERTAIN problem, but we then have NO idea about the time frame?

This

> doesn't seem quite right to me.

>

> One specific question I have for everyone: Has anyone ever known

of

> someone who HAS indeed lost their hearing, had ear problems, or

had

> meningitis or anything like that as a result of c-toma? The posts

I

> have read have been very helpful in discussing people's

experiences

> with c-toma surgery, recurrence, etc., but doesn't it seem a

little

> strange that, while we all know many people through this list who

> have had experience with c-toma surgery, we don't seem to have a

> whole lot of living examples of people saying, " I lost all the

> hearing in my ear due to c-toma, and I sure wish I had gotten the

> surgery, " or anything like that. Perhaps they are out there, I'm

> just not coming across them. Any information in this area would be

> much appreciated, as I'm just trying to assess whether the fact I

> have a c-toma means FOR SURE that it is going to grow and create

> problems, or if it could be relatively dormant. Heck, for all I

know

> I've been living with this thing for the last 14 years or so and

> didn't even know it. Or, it could have grown after my ear

infection

> last year, and be growing more right now as I type.

>

> I apologize again for this verbose posting, but I wanted to give

> everyone my full situation and describe my thinking on it thus

far.

> What I would like to ask anyone who was nice enough to read this

> email is what their advice would be that I do at this point. Also,

I

> would love to know if there is anyone else in the same boat as me,

> who is concerned about their c-toma and is looking into the

> possibility of surgery, but who is as of yet unconvinced that it

is

> the best step. If there is anyone who has been diagnosed with c-

toma

> but decided NOT to do the surgery it would be good to hear from

them

> and understand their reasons for doing so. By the same token, if

> people find my logic very faulty, I would like to hear from them

as

> well!

>

> Thank You everyone, and I look forward to being a more active

member

> of the list.

>

> (Dallas, TX)

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

,

I probably started growing a C-toma about your age (24) and only

recently got surgery to correct it (I am 36). I REALLY wish that it

had been diagnosed and corrected far sooner, as the complications of

a C-toma over time are quite scary. I lost a good bit of hearing as

a result of this progressing. My advice to you is DO NOT IGNORE

THIS. If your otologist wants to move ahead, and it sounds like you

are in very good hands, then please do so.

I was not diagnosed early enough, but then again I also ignored some

obvious signs that something was very wrong, like the otorrhea that

you described having. I put it off and it almost cost me having

permanent vertigo/dizziness, and permanent loud tinnitus in my left

ear. I thank God I took action when I did, even though it was far

too late. As a result I could have had far better hearing than what

I wound up with, even though it is pretty good now.

Forget the hearing for a minute though, the complications that I

could have had is what scares me the most and I barely escaped that

fate. I ignored the otorrhea, the chronic ear infections, the stuffy

feeling in my ear. I just took decongestants and put it off. After

more years of that, it progressed so that just pushing on my ear

canal caused me to have dizziness and vertigo since the C-toma ate

through all of my hearing bones and was laying on my inner ear

structures. The slightest pressure from a finger or from a loud

sound such as concert speaker caused me to lose my balance. If that

inner ear membrane had popped open, I would have had permanent

vertigo/dizziness, and permanent loud tinnitus for the rest of my

life. How's that for putting it off? I also had a labyrinthine

fistula.

Here's the deal, it seems there is just no good way to assess the

severity of this problem until you let the surgeon go in and take a

look. If he says it's a 90% chance, DO IT. In the best case, it's

not that bad and he takes it out, or you don't even have one, then

you move on. In the worst case, you'll be thankful you got it done

when you did. Here's the good news...

In my experience, the surgery is not that bad. Being a young guy, I

bet you'd be back up within a few days and feeling your old self

inside of a week. Two surgeries? I have been there. It's still not

that bad. You bounce back, you get through it.

The cosmetic ramifications??! Let's face it, this is not an issue.

My ear canal was enlarged about 10-20% or so, but you'd be hard

pressed to even see the slightest difference looking at the two. I

can even send you pictures if you'd like.

I have a prosthesis and guess what, it's hard to tell the difference

with it, it is that good. Hopefully you are young enough and your

bones are still intact.

Quite frankly, it makes me cringe to think there's even a chance you

might decide against taking action, even with the risk of

complications for this surgery. I know it is scary, but DO NOT PUT

THIS OFF. Deal with it now and stick with your otologist, it sounds

like you have a good one and they are telling you what you need to

hear.

Email me if you want and read my post titled 'My Summary of

Experiences with Cholesteatoma' which should appear shortly, after

it is reviewed by the moderator.

Take care,

Denver, CO

>

> Hello Everyone,

>

> I've been a member of the group for a couple of months now, and

I've

> been reading the digest a couple of times a week. However, this is

> my first time to post.

>

> This is my situation- I would like any and all feedback or advice

> anyone has. I have put off making a decision about what to do

about

> my c-toma long enough, and I need to make a decision relatively

> soon. My situation is probably very similar to what many people

have

> experienced- I am 24 years old, and when I was a child I had two

> sets of tubes put into my ears (the second set put in after the

> first set fell out) to try and ameliorate the ear infections I was

> having. Then, when I was about 9 years old I had to get

> tympanoplasty surgery (the ear drum skin graft surgery) on both

> ears, since my ear drums had not closed properly from the tubes.

>

> That's the past. I had no problems with my ears for a long time,

> about 13 years or so. Fast forward to last summer, summer of 2005,

> basically one year ago this month. I swim at the gym as usual but

> water gets in my left ear as I'm practicing flipping in the water

> (learned not to do that again!). That night, it becomes clear my

> left ear is infected, because it is painful, feels full, and is

> giving off pretty unpleasant discharge. I go to the doctor, an ENT

I

> hadn't been to before here in Dallas, Texas where I live. We take

> care of the ear infection, and all is well, but I come back 6

months

> later (last December or so) for a check-up just so he can take a

> look, and he orders a CAT scan since he thinks that there could be

a

> c-toma forming in my left ear. (However, how long it's been there

> seems to be something that is impossible to know, since I wasn't

> having ENT check-ups basically between the ages of 10 and 23).

>

> I get the CAT scan done, and it comes back and my doctor says that

> it is highly " suspicious " for a cholesteatoma. Thus far I have had

2

> opinions, and neither doctor has said firmly and

conclusively, " Yes,

> you have a cholesteatoma, " but they both said that the odds are

over

> 90% and recommend surgery asap. They said that the Incus (one of

the

> three ossicles) was partly blocked from view in the CAT scan, so

> that it's possible that the c-toma has already gobbled it up. Sure

> enough, my hearing in my left ear is distinctly less than in my

> right, which we confirmed with a hearing test. (Thinking out loud,

> though, does that necessarily mean that the c-toma has worn away

one

> of my hearing ossicles, or could that also be a function of a

> perforated ear drum in that ear- I don't know. Apparently my ear

> drum in my left ear didn't fully close up, even after the

> tympanoplasty surgery).

>

> I apologize for being so verbose, but the devil certainly seems to

> be in the details when discussing these issues...

>

> So here I am now with a choice to make. Both doctors I have seen,

> one of whom is a nationally recognized otologist who I trust to

> be " on top of his game " , have said that I need to get c-toma

surgery

> and that I should definitely do it sooner rather than later.

> However, I'm just not quite ready to sign on the dotted line yet.

> Here's why:

>

> 1. It still isn't a certainty that I have c-toma, though of course

> it is certainly the most likely possibility.

>

> 2. The surgery almost seems to bring more problems with it than it

> does solutions. My doctor told me that my hearing could actually

be

> LESS after the surgery, since they may have to remove my ossicles

> and put in prostheses. Additionally, I'm not thrilled about the

idea

> of having 5 or more surgeries to remove this thing- the rate of

> recurrence in " canal wall up " procedures, as my doctor recommended

> we do (and which I agree with because of the unpleasant cosmetic

> ramifications of the " canal wall down " procedure) is EXTREMELY

high

> (20-40% is what I was told). Last, and I've partly gotten over

this,

> but the possibility of facial nerve damage that would actually

make

> me lose the ability to move half of my face is very alarming to

me.

> The fact that my doctor said that this has never happened to any

of

> his patients or to any patient at the ENT clinic at University of

> Texas Southwestern Medical Center where his practice is is

certainly

> reassuring, but still, isn't there always a first? Given the

choice,

> I would choose hearing loss in 1 ear over lifelong facial

paralysis

> any day.

>

> 3. Another concern I have is just the general way that surgery is

> approached by many in the medical community these days. I'm no

> expert in this at all, but I have heard it said that upwards of

70%

> of surgical procedures these days are unnecessary. Additionally,

> they don't seem to be that successful. I take my own personal

> experience as a case in point: Clearly the doctors who recommended

> tubes be put in my ears (and the ears of millions of kids in my

> generation) were not well advised. That seems to be one of the big

> reasons why we have lists like this one! Additionally, the

> tympanoplasty I had done when I was 9 didn't apparently work all

> that well. Surgery just doesn't seem to be the magic bullet that

> it's promised to be. Today the doctors are telling me I need to

get

> surgery to correct a problem, but doctors also told my mother when

I

> was a child that I needed tubes in my ears to prevent future ear

> infections. Clearly, the risks of tubes outweighed the rewards,

> which is why I'm in the present situation. I'm not saying that

> surgery is a bad thing, only that it seems we need more thorough

and

> conservative criteria before going down that road.

>

> I asked my doctor if it was a CERTAINTY that my c-toma was going

to

> grow and become increasingly problematic as time goes on, or if

> there was a possibility that I could live with this c-toma,

perhaps

> having reduced hearing in my left ear, but never really having

> problems in the future. I found his answer very vague. (Again, he

is

> an expert in his field and I am lucky to have him as a doctor, but

I

> believe I have to approach all of this carefully). He said that

Yes,

> it is a certainty that my c-toma will grow and create some or all

of

> the resultant problems with it (hearing loss, infection,

potentially

> even worse). However, he said, the thing that is a variable is the

> question of WHEN. He said it could be two weeks, or it could be 10

> years, he really had no way to know.

>

> To me, something feels off about this. How can something be a

> CERTAIN problem, but we then have NO idea about the time frame?

This

> doesn't seem quite right to me.

>

> One specific question I have for everyone: Has anyone ever known

of

> someone who HAS indeed lost their hearing, had ear problems, or

had

> meningitis or anything like that as a result of c-toma? The posts

I

> have read have been very helpful in discussing people's

experiences

> with c-toma surgery, recurrence, etc., but doesn't it seem a

little

> strange that, while we all know many people through this list who

> have had experience with c-toma surgery, we don't seem to have a

> whole lot of living examples of people saying, " I lost all the

> hearing in my ear due to c-toma, and I sure wish I had gotten the

> surgery, " or anything like that. Perhaps they are out there, I'm

> just not coming across them. Any information in this area would be

> much appreciated, as I'm just trying to assess whether the fact I

> have a c-toma means FOR SURE that it is going to grow and create

> problems, or if it could be relatively dormant. Heck, for all I

know

> I've been living with this thing for the last 14 years or so and

> didn't even know it. Or, it could have grown after my ear

infection

> last year, and be growing more right now as I type.

>

> I apologize again for this verbose posting, but I wanted to give

> everyone my full situation and describe my thinking on it thus

far.

> What I would like to ask anyone who was nice enough to read this

> email is what their advice would be that I do at this point. Also,

I

> would love to know if there is anyone else in the same boat as me,

> who is concerned about their c-toma and is looking into the

> possibility of surgery, but who is as of yet unconvinced that it

is

> the best step. If there is anyone who has been diagnosed with c-

toma

> but decided NOT to do the surgery it would be good to hear from

them

> and understand their reasons for doing so. By the same token, if

> people find my logic very faulty, I would like to hear from them

as

> well!

>

> Thank You everyone, and I look forward to being a more active

member

> of the list.

>

> (Dallas, TX)

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Thanks for that, . I am a surgery convert now as well- mine

is scheduled for November (my doctor said he thought that I could

wait till then). It just makes sense- the risks of surgery are less

than the risks of c-toma, is what I decided.

Thanks also for your comments (I think they were yours, I read them

on the " digest " email I get) re: precautions to take at teaching

hospitals. I'm getting my surgery done at UT Southwestern Med.

Center here in Dallas, and I am DEFINITELY going to remember to talk

to my doctor about that and specify it on the release form. I'm so

glad I read your post.

> >

> > Hello Everyone,

> >

> > I've been a member of the group for a couple of months now, and

> I've

> > been reading the digest a couple of times a week. However, this

is

> > my first time to post.

> >

> > This is my situation- I would like any and all feedback or

advice

> > anyone has. I have put off making a decision about what to do

> about

> > my c-toma long enough, and I need to make a decision relatively

> > soon. My situation is probably very similar to what many people

> have

> > experienced- I am 24 years old, and when I was a child I had two

> > sets of tubes put into my ears (the second set put in after the

> > first set fell out) to try and ameliorate the ear infections I

was

> > having. Then, when I was about 9 years old I had to get

> > tympanoplasty surgery (the ear drum skin graft surgery) on both

> > ears, since my ear drums had not closed properly from the tubes.

> >

> > That's the past. I had no problems with my ears for a long time,

> > about 13 years or so. Fast forward to last summer, summer of

2005,

> > basically one year ago this month. I swim at the gym as usual

but

> > water gets in my left ear as I'm practicing flipping in the

water

> > (learned not to do that again!). That night, it becomes clear my

> > left ear is infected, because it is painful, feels full, and is

> > giving off pretty unpleasant discharge. I go to the doctor, an

ENT

> I

> > hadn't been to before here in Dallas, Texas where I live. We

take

> > care of the ear infection, and all is well, but I come back 6

> months

> > later (last December or so) for a check-up just so he can take a

> > look, and he orders a CAT scan since he thinks that there could

be

> a

> > c-toma forming in my left ear. (However, how long it's been

there

> > seems to be something that is impossible to know, since I wasn't

> > having ENT check-ups basically between the ages of 10 and 23).

> >

> > I get the CAT scan done, and it comes back and my doctor says

that

> > it is highly " suspicious " for a cholesteatoma. Thus far I have

had

> 2

> > opinions, and neither doctor has said firmly and

> conclusively, " Yes,

> > you have a cholesteatoma, " but they both said that the odds are

> over

> > 90% and recommend surgery asap. They said that the Incus (one of

> the

> > three ossicles) was partly blocked from view in the CAT scan, so

> > that it's possible that the c-toma has already gobbled it up.

Sure

> > enough, my hearing in my left ear is distinctly less than in my

> > right, which we confirmed with a hearing test. (Thinking out

loud,

> > though, does that necessarily mean that the c-toma has worn away

> one

> > of my hearing ossicles, or could that also be a function of a

> > perforated ear drum in that ear- I don't know. Apparently my ear

> > drum in my left ear didn't fully close up, even after the

> > tympanoplasty surgery).

> >

> > I apologize for being so verbose, but the devil certainly seems

to

> > be in the details when discussing these issues...

> >

> > So here I am now with a choice to make. Both doctors I have

seen,

> > one of whom is a nationally recognized otologist who I trust to

> > be " on top of his game " , have said that I need to get c-toma

> surgery

> > and that I should definitely do it sooner rather than later.

> > However, I'm just not quite ready to sign on the dotted line

yet.

> > Here's why:

> >

> > 1. It still isn't a certainty that I have c-toma, though of

course

> > it is certainly the most likely possibility.

> >

> > 2. The surgery almost seems to bring more problems with it than

it

> > does solutions. My doctor told me that my hearing could actually

> be

> > LESS after the surgery, since they may have to remove my

ossicles

> > and put in prostheses. Additionally, I'm not thrilled about the

> idea

> > of having 5 or more surgeries to remove this thing- the rate of

> > recurrence in " canal wall up " procedures, as my doctor

recommended

> > we do (and which I agree with because of the unpleasant cosmetic

> > ramifications of the " canal wall down " procedure) is EXTREMELY

> high

> > (20-40% is what I was told). Last, and I've partly gotten over

> this,

> > but the possibility of facial nerve damage that would actually

> make

> > me lose the ability to move half of my face is very alarming to

> me.

> > The fact that my doctor said that this has never happened to any

> of

> > his patients or to any patient at the ENT clinic at University

of

> > Texas Southwestern Medical Center where his practice is is

> certainly

> > reassuring, but still, isn't there always a first? Given the

> choice,

> > I would choose hearing loss in 1 ear over lifelong facial

> paralysis

> > any day.

> >

> > 3. Another concern I have is just the general way that surgery

is

> > approached by many in the medical community these days. I'm no

> > expert in this at all, but I have heard it said that upwards of

> 70%

> > of surgical procedures these days are unnecessary. Additionally,

> > they don't seem to be that successful. I take my own personal

> > experience as a case in point: Clearly the doctors who

recommended

> > tubes be put in my ears (and the ears of millions of kids in my

> > generation) were not well advised. That seems to be one of the

big

> > reasons why we have lists like this one! Additionally, the

> > tympanoplasty I had done when I was 9 didn't apparently work all

> > that well. Surgery just doesn't seem to be the magic bullet that

> > it's promised to be. Today the doctors are telling me I need to

> get

> > surgery to correct a problem, but doctors also told my mother

when

> I

> > was a child that I needed tubes in my ears to prevent future ear

> > infections. Clearly, the risks of tubes outweighed the rewards,

> > which is why I'm in the present situation. I'm not saying that

> > surgery is a bad thing, only that it seems we need more thorough

> and

> > conservative criteria before going down that road.

> >

> > I asked my doctor if it was a CERTAINTY that my c-toma was going

> to

> > grow and become increasingly problematic as time goes on, or if

> > there was a possibility that I could live with this c-toma,

> perhaps

> > having reduced hearing in my left ear, but never really having

> > problems in the future. I found his answer very vague. (Again,

he

> is

> > an expert in his field and I am lucky to have him as a doctor,

but

> I

> > believe I have to approach all of this carefully). He said that

> Yes,

> > it is a certainty that my c-toma will grow and create some or

all

> of

> > the resultant problems with it (hearing loss, infection,

> potentially

> > even worse). However, he said, the thing that is a variable is

the

> > question of WHEN. He said it could be two weeks, or it could be

10

> > years, he really had no way to know.

> >

> > To me, something feels off about this. How can something be a

> > CERTAIN problem, but we then have NO idea about the time frame?

> This

> > doesn't seem quite right to me.

> >

> > One specific question I have for everyone: Has anyone ever known

> of

> > someone who HAS indeed lost their hearing, had ear problems, or

> had

> > meningitis or anything like that as a result of c-toma? The

posts

> I

> > have read have been very helpful in discussing people's

> experiences

> > with c-toma surgery, recurrence, etc., but doesn't it seem a

> little

> > strange that, while we all know many people through this list

who

> > have had experience with c-toma surgery, we don't seem to have a

> > whole lot of living examples of people saying, " I lost all the

> > hearing in my ear due to c-toma, and I sure wish I had gotten

the

> > surgery, " or anything like that. Perhaps they are out there, I'm

> > just not coming across them. Any information in this area would

be

> > much appreciated, as I'm just trying to assess whether the fact

I

> > have a c-toma means FOR SURE that it is going to grow and create

> > problems, or if it could be relatively dormant. Heck, for all I

> know

> > I've been living with this thing for the last 14 years or so and

> > didn't even know it. Or, it could have grown after my ear

> infection

> > last year, and be growing more right now as I type.

> >

> > I apologize again for this verbose posting, but I wanted to give

> > everyone my full situation and describe my thinking on it thus

> far.

> > What I would like to ask anyone who was nice enough to read this

> > email is what their advice would be that I do at this point.

Also,

> I

> > would love to know if there is anyone else in the same boat as

me,

> > who is concerned about their c-toma and is looking into the

> > possibility of surgery, but who is as of yet unconvinced that it

> is

> > the best step. If there is anyone who has been diagnosed with c-

> toma

> > but decided NOT to do the surgery it would be good to hear from

> them

> > and understand their reasons for doing so. By the same token, if

> > people find my logic very faulty, I would like to hear from them

> as

> > well!

> >

> > Thank You everyone, and I look forward to being a more active

> member

> > of the list.

> >

> > (Dallas, TX)

> >

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...