Guest guest Posted February 26, 2003 Report Share Posted February 26, 2003 My son had a cholesteatoma removed in May 2001 and a tympanoplasty performed at the same time. He had a TORP (hydroxypatite) inserted in Feb 2002 during his second look op. Although the prosthesis dislodged within a couple of weeks, it caused no problem until it extruded at the end of August 2002. Since then, the ear has been constantly discharging through the site of the extrusion. A polyp also formed at the site and was removed by the consultant at the outpatient clinic ( he said it was only possible without a general because was so cooperative). Weekly suctioning, antibiotics inserted into middle ear, oral antibiotics have not resolved it. Due for an op on 7th March but until then, the nurse is now using a dressing with antibiotic cream in the ear canal to limit contact of discharge with skin of ear canal. It was causing it to be inflamed and granulation tissue was forming. Since the regular use of the dressing the skin is now healthy looking. As the problem has not cleared up, the present intention is to create as healthy an environment as possible for surgery. has normal hearing in the right ear and is managing fine in all respects. However he did say he could hear much better when the prosthesis was in place. I have decided against another prosthesis and the surgeon is happy with that, he says he can do it later if wants one when he is older. (12 years) would have to miss sporting activities for ages and be extra careful about any bumps to the head I also am now concerned that if he rejected this one, he might do the same again and we would have a repeat of the present problem. I am really interested in hearing of experiences with prostheses. Would you recommend it? Any problems, particularly extrusion. Thank you. Maureen Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 26, 2003 Report Share Posted February 26, 2003 At 10:40 PM 2/26/2003 +0000, you wrote: >I am really interested in hearing of experiences with prostheses. >Would you recommend it? Any problems, particularly extrusion. Thank >you. > >Maureen Mine is extruding, too. It's taking a long time to come through and I swear I can feel it when it's trying to get out. I've pretty much decided against a third prosthesis as there is no guarantee that it won't extrude either. I don't want to go for any more surgeries if at all avoidable, so I'm probably going to replace my TORP with a hearing aid if and when it does finally decide to completely extrude. My second prosthesis, BTW, was completely entrapped with a recurrence of cholesteatoma a year-and-a-half after my second look surgery and had to be removed with the regrowth. Diane http://www.sassysuds.com Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 26, 2003 Report Share Posted February 26, 2003 Hi Maureen, I have a similar concern and it's on my list of questions for my son's doctor. (I hope he has some time since the list is getting pretty long.) My son had CWU procedure, 3 1/2 yrs ago and then reconstruction a year later. The c-toma grew back and he had his third surgery last week. I'm inclined, and so is my husband, to consider not having reconstruction for at least 2 years to make sure it doesn't grow back. He had a CWD last week. My son seems to think he gets along fine with hearing in only one ear (Are there any issues in his learning and socialization that we should be concerned about?<-another question for the doctor) and he doesn't want the reconstruction. So, we need to discuss with the doctor, who indicated that he wanted to do the reconstruction in about 8 mos.. Luckily, we have the time to really weigh our options. Right now, we're all pretty sick of surgery!!! Best of luck to your son on March 7. Gus Experiences with Prostheses- Would you recommend it? My son had a cholesteatoma removed in May 2001 and a tympanoplasty performed at the same time. He had a TORP (hydroxypatite) inserted in Feb 2002 during his second look op. Although the prosthesis dislodged within a couple of weeks, it caused no problem until it extruded at the end of August 2002. Since then, the ear has been constantly discharging through the site of the extrusion. A polyp also formed at the site and was removed by the consultant at the outpatient clinic ( he said it was only possible without a general because was so cooperative). Weekly suctioning, antibiotics inserted into middle ear, oral antibiotics have not resolved it. Due for an op on 7th March but until then, the nurse is now using a dressing with antibiotic cream in the ear canal to limit contact of discharge with skin of ear canal. It was causing it to be inflamed and granulation tissue was forming. Since the regular use of the dressing the skin is now healthy looking. As the problem has not cleared up, the present intention is to create as healthy an environment as possible for surgery. has normal hearing in the right ear and is managing fine in all respects. However he did say he could hear much better when the prosthesis was in place. I have decided against another prosthesis and the surgeon is happy with that, he says he can do it later if wants one when he is older. (12 years) would have to miss sporting activities for ages and be extra careful about any bumps to the head I also am now concerned that if he rejected this one, he might do the same again and we would have a repeat of the present problem.I am really interested in hearing of experiences with prostheses. Would you recommend it? Any problems, particularly extrusion. Thank you.Maureen Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 27, 2003 Report Share Posted February 27, 2003 Hi Maureen, I have a prostheses for 2+ years now. I haven't had any problems. I never did ask the doc what it was made of. Jane >From: " Maureen <m.carbery@...> " <m.carbery@...> >Reply-cholesteatoma >cholesteatoma >Subject: Experiences with Prostheses- Would you recommend >it? >Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2003 22:40:43 -0000 > > My son had a cholesteatoma removed in May 2001 and a tympanoplasty >performed at the same time. He had a TORP (hydroxypatite) inserted in >Feb 2002 during his second look op. >Although the prosthesis dislodged within a couple of weeks, it caused >no problem until it extruded at the end of August 2002. Since then, >the ear has been constantly discharging through the site of the >extrusion. A polyp also formed at the site and was removed by the >consultant at the outpatient clinic ( he said it was only possible >without a general because was so cooperative). Weekly >suctioning, antibiotics inserted into middle ear, oral antibiotics >have not resolved it. Due for an op on 7th March but until then, the >nurse is now using a dressing with antibiotic cream in the ear canal >to limit contact of discharge with skin of ear canal. It was causing >it to be inflamed and granulation tissue was forming. Since the >regular use of the dressing the skin is now healthy looking. As the >problem has not cleared up, the present intention is to create as >healthy an environment as possible for surgery. > > has normal hearing in the right ear and is managing fine in >all respects. However he did say he could hear much better when the >prosthesis was in place. I have decided against another prosthesis >and the surgeon is happy with that, he says he can do it later if > wants one when he is older. (12 years) would have >to miss sporting activities for ages and be extra careful about any >bumps to the head I also am now concerned that if he rejected this >one, he might do the same again and we would have a repeat of the >present problem. > >I am really interested in hearing of experiences with prostheses. >Would you recommend it? Any problems, particularly extrusion. Thank >you. > >Maureen > > > _________________________________________________________________ MSN 8 with e-mail virus protection service: 2 months FREE* http://join.msn.com/?page=features/virus Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 27, 2003 Report Share Posted February 27, 2003 Thank you everyone for replying. I have lost so many messages I will keep this one short. Next time I will write in Word and then copy and paste. We have decided the cons far outweigh the pros in 's case. The surgeon said he would be quite happy to perform a reconstruction if wants to go ahead when he is old enough to decide for himself. As has only the footplate left the odds are pretty high it would get dislodged. The technology can only get better, the consultant is a top man, we can afford to wait. As J has normal functioning in the right ear a reconstruction is not so critical at this time. Regards maureen Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 2, 2003 Report Share Posted March 2, 2003 ---Hi Maureen, sorry to hear that your son had so much trouble with the torp. I have had the same thing happen to me. It didn't work, my body got all messed up because of it, extreme dizziness ect. so the prothesis was removed. I will not have another one put in, it just wasn't meant for me. What is the surgery on the 7th for? Are they going to remove it completely? Best of luck to you and your son, I will keep you inmy prayers. Charla In cholesteatoma , " Maureen <m.carbery@n...> " <m.carbery@n...> wrote: > My son had a cholesteatoma removed in May 2001 and a tympanoplasty > performed at the same time. He had a TORP (hydroxypatite) inserted in > Feb 2002 during his second look op. > Although the prosthesis dislodged within a couple of weeks, it caused > no problem until it extruded at the end of August 2002. Since then, > the ear has been constantly discharging through the site of the > extrusion. A polyp also formed at the site and was removed by the > consultant at the outpatient clinic ( he said it was only possible > without a general because was so cooperative). Weekly > suctioning, antibiotics inserted into middle ear, oral antibiotics > have not resolved it. Due for an op on 7th March but until then, the > nurse is now using a dressing with antibiotic cream in the ear canal > to limit contact of discharge with skin of ear canal. It was causing > it to be inflamed and granulation tissue was forming. Since the > regular use of the dressing the skin is now healthy looking. As the > problem has not cleared up, the present intention is to create as > healthy an environment as possible for surgery. > > has normal hearing in the right ear and is managing fine in > all respects. However he did say he could hear much better when the > prosthesis was in place. I have decided against another prosthesis > and the surgeon is happy with that, he says he can do it later if > wants one when he is older. (12 years) would have > to miss sporting activities for ages and be extra careful about any > bumps to the head I also am now concerned that if he rejected this > one, he might do the same again and we would have a repeat of the > present problem. > > I am really interested in hearing of experiences with prostheses. > Would you recommend it? Any problems, particularly extrusion. Thank > you. > > Maureen Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 3, 2003 Report Share Posted March 3, 2003 Hi Charla, How long is the surgery for the Torp? Do they need to make an incision? I am seeing my surgeon this month about this procedure, if they can do it. Thanks Lynn -- Re: Experiences with Prostheses- Would you recommend it? ---Hi Maureen, sorry to hear that your son had so much trouble with the torp. I have had the same thing happen to me. It didn't work, my body got all messed up because of it, extreme dizziness ect. so the prothesis was removed. I will not have another one put in, it just wasn't meant for me. What is the surgery on the 7th for? Are they going to remove it completely? Best of luck to you and your son, I will keep you inmy prayers. CharlaIn cholesteatoma , "Maureen <m.carbery@n...>" <m.carbery@n...> wrote:> My son had a cholesteatoma removed in May 2001 and a tympanoplasty > performed at the same time. He had a TORP (hydroxypatite) inserted in > Feb 2002 during his second look op. > Although the prosthesis dislodged within a couple of weeks, it caused > no problem until it extruded at the end of August 2002. Since then, > the ear has been constantly discharging through the site of the > extrusion. A polyp also formed at the site and was removed by the > consultant at the outpatient clinic ( he said it was only possible > without a general because was so cooperative). Weekly > suctioning, antibiotics inserted into middle ear, oral antibiotics > have not resolved it. Due for an op on 7th March but until then, the > nurse is now using a dressing with antibiotic cream in the ear canal > to limit contact of discharge with skin of ear canal. It was causing > it to be inflamed and granulation tissue was forming. Since the > regular use of the dressing the skin is now healthy looking. As the > problem has not cleared up, the present intention is to create as > healthy an environment as possible for surgery.> > has normal hearing in the right ear and is managing fine in > all respects. However he did say he could hear much better when the > prosthesis was in place. I have decided against another prosthesis > and the surgeon is happy with that, he says he can do it later if > wants one when he is older. (12 years) would have > to miss sporting activities for ages and be extra careful about any > bumps to the head I also am now concerned that if he rejected this > one, he might do the same again and we would have a repeat of the > present problem.> > I am really interested in hearing of experiences with prostheses. > Would you recommend it? Any problems, particularly extrusion. Thank > you.> > Maureen Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 6, 2003 Report Share Posted March 6, 2003 > ---Hi Maureen, sorry to hear that your son had so much trouble with > the torp. I have had the same thing happen to me. It didn't work, my > body got all messed up because of it, extreme dizziness ect. so the > prothesis was removed. I will not have another one put in, it just > wasn't meant for me. What is the surgery on the 7th for? Are they > going to remove it completely? Best of luck to you and your son, I > will keep you inmy prayers. Charla > > > Hi Charla, Sorry I haven't responded earlier, I haven't accessed this site for a few days. The prosthesis was removed by the consultant when the nurse found it poking through during her suctioning, and the consultant said it was intact, he also didn't use any cement so it is not an allergic reaction to that either. The operation is an exploratory to discern(and hopefully resolve ) what is causing the discharge despite all the possible non-surgical treatments he could have had. The surgeon says until he goes in, he cannot say what is happening. The discharge is through the perforation caused by the extruded prosthesis. The discharge was quite corrosive and was causing the outer ear to get inflamed causing a polyp to form on the ear canal. Fortunately we have a wonderful nurse, not only is she kind but also very competent. She has now been putting in a dressing every week (after suction) which dams up the discharge and prevents contact with the skin of the ear canal for a few days. The outer ear is now okay. During an outpatient appointment the surgeon was able to remove another polyp which grew on the site of the perforation. In addition to the oral antibiotics he has had antibiotic syringed into the middle ear but still no resolution. So we go into tonight for the op tomorrow morning (depending on the surgeon's schedule, and hopefully home in the evening if is corpus mentis and eating/drinking before the surgeon comes round. Otherwise all being well we should go home on Saturday. Best regards maureen Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.