Re: Trusting Wikipedia (Need help in what formulation of the Vitamin B's to use

[Guest guest]

quote: > " --The loudest voices and most obsessive contributors become the

arbiters of truth. "

Hmmmmm. Kind of sounds like what goes on here Alobar - which is why I trust NO

opinions here expressed (including yours) and do my own research. I do value

personal experience, however, while realizing we are all different and what

works for one may not work for all. That said, personal experience is the most

valuable contribution anyone can make to this group - while unsubstantiated

opinion spouting is just a lot of noise.

Best,

Dee

>

> Below are a few reasons I do not trust Wikipedia.

>

> Alobar

>

>

> http://www.naturalnews.com/029939_Wikipedia_bias.html

>

> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

>

> Orthomolecular Medicine News Service, May 3, 2010

> Widespread Condemnation of Wikipedia Bias

> Readers Report Suppression of Nutritional Medicine

>

> http://orthomolecular.org/resources/omns/v06n16.shtml

>

> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

>

> Wikipedia Doesn't Like Me ...

> Opinion by Consumer Advocate Tim Bolen

> Saturday, January 2nd, 2010

>

>

> Critics like Oliver Kamm of the London Times said in his November 25, 2009

> article:

>

>snipped

>

> The default position of Wikipedia is to leave editors to sort it out among

themselves. The loudest voices and most obsessive contributors become the

arbiters of truth.

[Guest guest]

The facts and low opinions of WIKIpedia's bias have been properly substantiated

in my view.

all good,

Duncan

>... unsubstantiated opinion spouting is just a lot of noise.

>

> Best,

> Dee

>

> ---

[Guest guest]

At first Wikipedia, for me was very usefull, unlimited info. BUT, when Natural

products/natural healing was down graded, I don't trust it, so, U are right.

Gerardo Barriga

From: Duncan Crow <duncancrow@...>

>Coconut Oil

>Sent: Saturday, October 15, 2011 8:47 AM

>Subject: Re: Trusting Wikipedia (Need help in what

formulation of the Vitamin B's to use

>

>

> 

>The facts and low opinions of WIKIpedia's bias have been properly substantiated

in my view.

>

>all good,

>

>Duncan

>

>

>

>>... unsubstantiated opinion spouting is just a lot of noise.

>>

>> Best,

>> Dee

>>

>> ---

>

>

>

>

>

[Guest guest]

On the other hand - in the case of brazil nuts they happened to be right.

Dee

> >

> >>... unsubstantiated opinion spouting is just a lot of noise.

> >>

> >> Best,

> >> Dee

> >>

> >> ---

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

>

>

[Guest guest]

On 2011-10-15 11:02 AM, Dolores <dgk@...> wrote:

> while unsubstantiated opinion spouting is just a lot of noise.

Which is precisely what the vast majority of wikipedia content actually is.