Guest guest Posted January 6, 2006 Report Share Posted January 6, 2006 Hi, , Welcome to the group. I tend to be more of a hover member, but solely because I belong to a number of various groups and have little time to respond as much as I like (or I would be on this computer 24/7 and no good to anyone!). I agree with the other member who posted about pragmatics (use of language). So many educational personnel (and I apologize if I offend anyone in the educational system that reads this that believes otherwise, but have found it to be true in my own personal experiences)...they, for the most part, feel if a child " talks " , and has no stuttering, fluency or articulation issues that they do not " need/services " in the area of Speech/Language. The consensus appears to me that there are many children (and I have been told this by school staff on numerous occasions) in far greater need for speech services than my child. The key you need to focus on with the SLP and your district is the 'language' portion of that degree/profeesional opinion. It is so much more than articulation, fluency, or basic talking. It is the issues that become difficulties if not accommodated. For example, conversational aspects (turn-taking and engaging another person in communication, or reciprocity in conversation), understanding the non-verbal language (head nodding, pointing, hands in hips, shrugging of shoulders), flexible thinking and behaviors (imagination and problem solving), learning emotions, empathy. I obtained an excellent resource that most SLPs/school professionals are shocked that I own and I use the info in it all the time to gain services. I got this from some autism conference workshop (cannot remember even which one) several years ago, but it is a small little publication that is chocked full of excellent verbage, easy to understand and quite useful to anyone who has a child on the autism spectrum. It is typically only read by speech therapists. It is called, " MEETING THE NEEDS OF CHILDREN WITH AUTISTIC SPECTRUM DISORDERS " , by Rita Jordan and Glenys , ISBN #1-85346-582-8...$20 approx. These kids of ours need to learn a few things in order to communicate effecively (and add to this that they need these skills in order to live independently and hold a job, etc. upon graduating, showing educational need): *a communicative intent, *something to communicate about, *a means for communicating, and *a reason for communicating. Our kids have issues with literal understanding of communication, their approach to others (social skills), developing friendships, how to handle teasing and bullying, problem solving, making choices and decisions, recalling events. THESE ARE ALL ISSUES FOR A SPEECH-LANGAUGE PATHOLOGIST TO APPROACH, and that interfere with education and learning. Ex.: If your child's teacher talks to your child about an assignment or probem, and your child walks away, they will be perceived as being rude or uninterested by the common layperson and their peers. But if your child's disability affects his reasoning for why the teacher or peer is talking to them, or a need for the child to respond, then his disability impacts his education with that teacher and conversational skills and freindship are lost with that peer. That's not effective communication, and your child needs to learn. EX.: If another child says to your child, " You're stupid " ,or, " I don;t like your shirt " , and your child punches him in the face, then he needs to learn coping strategies through communication channels, and social skills. One doesn't go around punching people that say things to you that you may not understand, or, like a social skill that in this population, is not learned through observation, like a typical child, but through effective teaching. I think you understand what I am trying to say. Don't let one school personnel staff member make you, the expert on your child, think your child does not need services based in what another person's perception or misinterpretation may be. ALways keep your child's needs at the forefront of whatever decsiosn are amde, and always ask the staff... " What does a national typical peer in this grade do in this same situation? And, " Can you please show me the national statistics that support your response? " YOu will more than likely find they cannot be interpreted as " typical " with your child and therefore, warrant service or need. Please feel free to email me anytime with questions, I hate when the school plays this particular game. I care what other children are getting, of course, but at MY child's IEP meetings, I only care what MY CHILD'S rights are and what HE/SHE needs. Those results, in return, eventually help other kids in similar situations. Akron, OH > > Hi Everyone, > I hope everyone had a nice holiday season. I know I am sad to see it end. > I have a question for anyone who can help. I have a 5 year son diagnosed PDD-NOS. He is very high functioning. He talks and has a large vocabulary, but sometimes has a hard time with his communication skills. He does receive speech therapy through school but I have a feeling that will stop next year. We are already hearing from the school " If the principal walked in here he would wonder why he was getting speech " . I was wondering if anyone else has had a similar situation where there child is considered high functioning that the school does not want to give services. Does anyone know who sets the standards that the services are required. He had a Auditory Processing Test this past fall and scored a 75 when the average per the speech therapist is 100-110. I thought speech therapy helps with auditory processing, Am I wrong? If anyone can help I would appreciate any input anyone has. > Thanks, > > > > --------------------------------- > Photos > Ring in the New Year with Photo Calendars. Add photos, events, holidays, whatever. > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.