Guest guest Posted August 14, 2010 Report Share Posted August 14, 2010 Taking nanoparticles of bioavailable silica actually makes me uneasy given that we don't need much silica. Even though I like MegaHydrate. I would rather it was ordinary insoluble silica. I thought absorbability was about particle size and charge all good, Duncan > > Megahydrate, previously called Microhydrin in its MLM days, is a nonoparticle. As someone previously posted here in discussing this, absorbability is all about particle size and not chemistry. > > > If you listen to Dr. Flanagan's tape on his products, you can't help but be amazed. In fact, Dr. Flanagan was the first person that I ever heard mention the term nanoparticle. This was about ten years ago... well before it was commonly used by anyone else in science. Now everyone is in the nano game and some of its applications are worthy of concern. Particle size is likely why one feels the results of taking this stuff almost as you swallow. > > > > I can't imagine how anyone actually needs very much silica, but if you are deficient in it, this would be a very good way to get it and, all the while, improve your health in these other important ways. I probably don't take over 50 mg a day, but I miss it when I don't. > > > >After taking a look at Megahydrate web info, I can't see where this is a good source of silca. Conditions successfully treated >seem to be of an anti-oxidant and/or hydration nature. Not being a chemist, I don't know if I'm missing something in the >biological process. Could you explain more how Megahydrate is a better source of silca than DE. Thank you. > > >Love and Laughter, > >Anne > >Hot Springs, AR > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.