Re: grand experiment of anti-aging

[Guest guest]

Hi Jim; I'm not 40 though, I'm actually 56 and today I can speak from the

experience of seeing the outcome of taking an anti-aging approach for several

years. I'm still in my prime by most youth markers :0)

Because I'm in the biological shape of a 40-year old or perhaps lower, I'll

remain ahead of my peer group, who are already feeling their age. In fact I'd

have to depreciate about 5 times as fast as they do to experience their level of

fitness in the next 4 years.

Probably won't happen; I think I'll be able to maintain or even increase my lead

in the next four years. I intend to still be around 40 biologically, maybe

lower, which is about a 20-year improvement in vitality over what my peer group

has at 60. In my area by the way we have way less obesity per capita and much

better health than average for the USA generally so I'm hardly comparing myself

to a peer group of very unhealthy people. Nope, average builds who work, and

play softball in the beer leagues. West coast hosers.

No telling how long I'll actually live in good health of course but barring

accident or injury, there's no indication that the gain will evaporate

overnight. Meanwhile, I still fail to get sick, the first rule of anti-aging.

Yup, it's been great fun and it has produced a wonderful result for my wife,

myself, and many others, some of whom are reading this I have no problem with

using us as an example of maintaining most youth markers despite middle age, and

that's why many people follow much of the science I've been using to get there.

all good,

Duncan

>

> Hi Duncan:

>

> My opinion is that you will not know " how young " you are till you are at

> least 60. This is all a grand experiment.. I love it and I appears

> that you do also. However, the proof cannot really reveal itself fully

> at age 40. The main thing at any age is that we are paying attention,

> which is really all that counts, and good health is a big part of the

> result. May we all prosper and gain spiritually as we wade through

> this. If we do this and happen to be successful in our goal of living to

> a very old age with clarity and good health, we will become quite

> powerful influences on those that understand what we have done. If we

> fail, we will have lost nothing, really.

>

> Cheers,

> Jim

>

[Guest guest]

Being free of sickness is no indicator of health.  Sickness as we refer to it

in

the West is acutally a cleansing process.  The deeper the healing we go

through,

we will experience a healing crisis or 'sickness' in order to clean out what no

longer serves our highest self.   If someone is sick because of living a sick

life they are still in a healing/detoxification process. I actually pray for

'sickness'.  I finally had a bacterial 'cold' and was set back 5 days.  After

that felt like running (not jogging)!  Running as hard as I could until I could

no longer run.  I haven't run in years.  This so called cold actually cleaned

something out and freed up more energy.  I've been running almost everyday

since-my body craves to run. 

On a healthy living program that is intended for deep tissue healing, organ and

glandular rejuvination then sickness is inevitable.

Dan

________________________________

From: Duncan Crow <duncancrow@...>

Coconut Oil

Sent: Thu, December 2, 2010 1:07:45 PM

Subject: Re: grand experiment of anti-aging

 

Hi Jim; I'm not 40 though, I'm actually 56 and today I can speak from the

experience of seeing the outcome of taking an anti-aging approach for several

years. I'm still in my prime by most youth markers :0)

Because I'm in the biological shape of a 40-year old or perhaps lower, I'll

remain ahead of my peer group, who are already feeling their age. In fact I'd

have to depreciate about 5 times as fast as they do to experience their level of

fitness in the next 4 years.

Probably won't happen; I think I'll be able to maintain or even increase my lead

in the next four years. I intend to still be around 40 biologically, maybe

lower, which is about a 20-year improvement in vitality over what my peer group

has at 60. In my area by the way we have way less obesity per capita and much

better health than average for the USA generally so I'm hardly comparing myself

to a peer group of very unhealthy people. Nope, average builds who work, and

play softball in the beer leagues. West coast hosers.

No telling how long I'll actually live in good health of course but barring

accident or injury, there's no indication that the gain will evaporate

overnight. Meanwhile, I still fail to get sick, the first rule of anti-aging.

Yup, it's been great fun and it has produced a wonderful result for my wife,

myself, and many others, some of whom are reading this I have no problem with

using us as an example of maintaining most youth markers despite middle age, and

that's why many people follow much of the science I've been using to get there.

all good,

Duncan

>

> Hi Duncan:

>

> My opinion is that you will not know " how young " you are till you are at

> least 60. This is all a grand experiment.. I love it and I appears

> that you do also. However, the proof cannot really reveal itself fully

> at age 40. The main thing at any age is that we are paying attention,

> which is really all that counts, and good health is a big part of the

> result. May we all prosper and gain spiritually as we wade through

> this. If we do this and happen to be successful in our goal of living to

> a very old age with clarity and good health, we will become quite

> powerful influences on those that understand what we have done. If we

> fail, we will have lost nothing, really.

>

> Cheers,

> Jim

>

[Guest guest]

Duncan,

Can you please share with us the markers you are speaking about?...

Thanks, d

From: Duncan Crow <duncancrow@...>

Subject: Re: grand experiment of anti-aging

Coconut Oil

Date: Thursday, December 2, 2010, 1:07 PM

 

Hi Jim; I'm not 40 though, I'm actually 56 and today I can speak from the

experience of seeing the outcome of taking an anti-aging approach for several

years. I'm still in my prime by most youth markers :0)

Because I'm in the biological shape of a 40-year old or perhaps lower, I'll

remain ahead of my peer group, who are already feeling their age. In fact I'd

have to depreciate about 5 times as fast as they do to experience their level of

fitness in the next 4 years.

Probably won't happen; I think I'll be able to maintain or even increase my lead

in the next four years. I intend to still be around 40 biologically, maybe

lower, which is about a 20-year improvement in vitality over what my peer group

has at 60. In my area by the way we have way less obesity per capita and much

better health than average for the USA generally so I'm hardly comparing myself

to a peer group of very unhealthy people. Nope, average builds who work, and

play softball in the beer leagues. West coast hosers.

No telling how long I'll actually live in good health of course but barring

accident or injury, there's no indication that the gain will evaporate

overnight. Meanwhile, I still fail to get sick, the first rule of anti-aging.

Yup, it's been great fun and it has produced a wonderful result for my wife,

myself, and many others, some of whom are reading this I have no problem with

using us as an example of maintaining most youth markers despite middle age, and

that's why many people follow much of the science I've been using to get there.

all good,

Duncan

>

> Hi Duncan:

>

> My opinion is that you will not know " how young " you are till you are at

> least 60. This is all a grand experiment.. I love it and I appears

> that you do also. However, the proof cannot really reveal itself fully

> at age 40. The main thing at any age is that we are paying attention,

> which is really all that counts, and good health is a big part of the

> result. May we all prosper and gain spiritually as we wade through

> this. If we do this and happen to be successful in our goal of living to

> a very old age with clarity and good health, we will become quite

> powerful influences on those that understand what we have done. If we

> fail, we will have lost nothing, really.

>

> Cheers,

> Jim

>

[Guest guest]

Beg to disagree with this Dan, maybe I understand it backwards In my view

deep healing and rejuvenation are ongoing and to be appreciated. Glutathione is

the molecule for cleansing and most of that rejuvenation, energy, and immune

system boost, so I keep mine up and have ozone therapy too ...I don't buy the

concept of " inevitable sickness " unless it's going to befall me right before I

die, which I agree is inevitable. Not being sick for a single day before that is

my goal. It's hard to get back what months you lose to depreciation while being

sick and there are other ways to detoxify and heal without being sick.

(

On a healthy living program that is intended for deep tissue healing, organ and

glandular rejuvination then sickness is inevitable.

)

all good,

Duncan

> >

> > Hi Duncan:

> >

> > My opinion is that you will not know " how young " you are till you are at

> > least 60. This is all a grand experiment.. I love it and I appears

> > that you do also. However, the proof cannot really reveal itself fully

> > at age 40. The main thing at any age is that we are paying attention,

> > which is really all that counts, and good health is a big part of the

> > result. May we all prosper and gain spiritually as we wade through

> > this. If we do this and happen to be successful in our goal of living to

> > a very old age with clarity and good health, we will become quite

> > powerful influences on those that understand what we have done. If we

> > fail, we will have lost nothing, really.

> >

> > Cheers,

> > Jim

> >

>

>

>

>

>

[Guest guest]

Hi Don; sure, the youth markers include:

Younger skin

Wrinkle removal

Improved vision

Enhanced memory and mood elevation

Higher energy level

Greater capacity for exercise

Heightened sexuality

Improved sleep

Lowered blood pressure

Improved cholesterol profiles

Improved cardiac capacity

Restoration of vital organs that have shrunk with age

Stronger bones with increased bone mass

Elimination of cellulite

Faster tissue repair and healing of injuries

Restoration of immune system

The actual peer-reviewed HGH therapy references I posted at

<http://members.shaw.ca/SomaLife-gHP/> reveal details of:

diabetes, obesity, aging, heart, cholesterol and HGH deficiency.

heart disease and its variants, renal dysfunction and HGH deficiency.

arthritis and renal dysfunction and their reversal with HGH and IGF-1 therapy.

myelin sheath regrowth in neurodegeneratives such as Alzheimer's, ALS, and MS.

osteoporosis and increased bone mineral density with HGH therapy.

fibromyalgia and HGH deficiency.

Here are youth markers that improved and the percentage that experienced it,

from Dr. Chein's clinical trials in conjunction with his associate Dr. L. Cass

Terry, chairman of neurology at the Medical College of Wisconsin in Milwaukee.

To be perfectly accurate, Dr. Chein also monitored and adjusted sex hormone

levels; you can do that with pregnenolone and DHEA if your system keeps fairly

normal balance with it.

Effects of HGH Therapy -- Percent of patients reporting improvement

Enhanced muscle strength 88%

Higher energy levels 84%

Lengthened exercise endurance 83%

Expanded exercise tolerance 81%

Increased muscle mass 81%

Improved overall sense of well being 78%

Improved libido/potency 75%

Improved immune functions 73%

Decreased body fat without diet 72%

Firmer skin tone and texture

(Natural face lift as early as 3 months) 71%

Expanded healing capacity 71%

Renewed skin thickness 68%

Revived emotional stability 67%

Strengthened memory 62%

Longer duration of penile erection 62%

Faster healing of injuries 61%

Reduced hot flashes 58%

Decreased frequency of nighttime urination 57%

Renewed healing of old injuries 55%

Increased back flexibility 53%

Diminished wrinkles 51%

Menstrual cycle regulation 39%

Improved men's hair growth 38%

One can readily see the benefit of doing compared to not doing. The science sold

me by 1982 before some of this work was done.

all good,

Duncan

>

> Duncan,

> Can you please share with us the markers you are speaking about?...

> Thanks, d

>

[Guest guest]

Iam not Duncan but would like to make a statement. If one would take the time to

go back in the archives and pick up the beginning of Alobar

and Duncans conversations,one could increase their knowledge tenfold.

From one(Alobar) you can get the benefit of all the research he has done simply

because he is trying to survive, the other(Duncan, a vender) shares his

knowledge to Alobar . The result? We can all receive from those conversations.

mike

[Guest guest]

Hi Liz;

I've been keeping up on nutritional and longevity research for about 20 years

since my introduction to Durk and Sandy's book Life Extension in 1982 and

subsequent LEF magazine subscription until around 1995 when I got Internet and

better access to research via Pubmed, Medscape, online industry journals and

such. I had to revisit all that during my five year health column in the local

paper, which got yanked after dentists pulled their advertising following my

mercury fillings articles

As a wholistic consultant about half of my output is about edifying clients on

what the research says, something like health coaching but backing it up like I

usually do on the list. Besides the nutritional and anti-aging data I use detox

methods, ozone therapy, Beck blood electrification, Beck magnetic pulser,

cranial electrostimulation, binaural beat/hemi-sync, colloidal silver (I make

high-volume colloidal silver makers for people too and I take electromagnetic

radiation readings in homes and businesses. About half my clients are referrals

from other health professionals including regulated ones, for things like

drug-resistent ulcers, osteomyelitis, bowel issues, multiple chemical

sensitivity, but some come just for the ozone saunas.

Sounds pretty sober but I do have a fun side

I have a website or two and product sales from them help keep me interested in

maintaining the information. I can tell by the traffic that most people by far

read the information and then buy their products elsewhere.

I think you'd use around 3 Tbsp of VCO daily but that depends on your other fats

intake. I used coconut oil for awhile early on; today I prefer cream and butter

and I never get around to putting coconut oil into my shopping cart.

DHEA is tricky because it only increases estrogen and testosterone, while most

middle-agers are also progesterone-low. Pregnenolone also increases progesterone

and does it in better balance with the other hormones IMO. I started with DHEA

for a few months but today I use 25 mg pregnenolone.

Undenatured whey powder dose varies according to your goal. For healthy

glutahtione levels a scoop of about 30-35 grams twice daily is OK; body builders

and HIV and cancer patients would dose around 180 grams total daily. Oral

glutathione does not increase serum glutathione unless it is liposomal it does.

Regardless, serum glutathione only enters a couple of cell types but all cells

make their own so you're better off with undenatured powder whey and selenium

precursors for that, and if you're taking that you don't need to take

glutathione oral. I don't value glutathione's use as a supplement so I have to

defer dosage information to people who do.

> Also if you could be specific in regards to

> VCO

> DHEA

> Whey powder

> glutathione

> Pregnonolone

> What would be doses to take of these listed-for a 50 year old woman

> Just chillin here in IN, (Liz)

all good,

Duncan