Mr. Matt & the controversy

[Guest guest]

I think Matt should wait until the show has aired or at least its

outcome can be seen or felt as previously stated. However, lest anyone

think I don't believe in Matt's ability to publicly, professionally

and positively represent us in the best fashion possibly, I do:).

I do know, even if Matt does his best and he will, TV will often edit

it down from a positive statement about us coming a positive one such

as Matt is, into looking like a silly statement coming from a silly

dwarf. Editing can do that to anyone's appearance by snipping a word

here or there and then joining some facial expression one may have had

later in the interview to a question or comment before. And knowing

that TV does that to THEIR advantage to gain a few more viewers and/or

just for a laugh, for what do they care about truth and us anyway when

it's about the almighty dollar, they may do that to you, tho you still

did your best:(.

This is something to think about, again not doubting your capability,

just their honesty in protraying you protraying us honestly. If you do

it, I would request full editorial control over what is finally shown

or released of your statement. To see if it matches what you had

intended to express or convey, especially to those who dont know

anything about us or LPA.

Again, to me, Matt is a great compassionate man, one who is on our

side. But I still think you should wait for the above reasons AND for

the reasons others have stated as well, such as possibly seeking the

membership's approval(?) or agreement(?) in wanting you to do it for

us in the first place. However, that's an issue I'm not familiar with,

so I am gently bowing out and keeping quiet on that one.

luv, grady

[Guest guest]

-----I do know, even if Matt does his best and he will, TV will often

edit it down from a positive statement about us coming a positive one

such as Matt is, into looking like a silly statement coming from a

silly dwarf. Editing can do that to anyone's appearance by snipping a

word here or there and then joining some facial expression one may

have had later in the interview to a question or comment before. And

knowing that TV does that to THEIR advantage to gain a few more

viewers and/or just for a laugh, for what do they care about truth

and us anyway when it's about the almighty dollar, they may do that

to you, tho you still did your best . -----

So that you turn that frown into a smile, if Matt participates in the

FOX news show it is live program. No editing involved unless y'all

tape it, take it into your personal Apple computers, do your digital

i-Movie magic and produce another product.

And if you have that kind of talent, I can tell you there are jobs

out there for you. And if it's funny, send me a copy, we may need to

have a " Roast Rohloff " one day.

(who now has to go see how many times she's posted today before

Bradford wet noodles her)

[Guest guest]

Grady-- In response to your concern:

It's live -- No editing takes place, only 2 second beeping.

Matt

Mr. Matt & the controversy

I think Matt should wait until the show has aired or at least its

outcome can be seen or felt as previously stated. However, lest anyone

think I don't believe in Matt's ability to publicly, professionally and

positively represent us in the best fashion possibly, I do:).

I do know, even if Matt does his best and he will, TV will often edit it

down from a positive statement about us coming a positive one such as

Matt is, into looking like a silly statement coming from a silly dwarf.

Editing can do that to anyone's appearance by snipping a word here or

there and then joining some facial expression one may have had later in

the interview to a question or comment before. And knowing that TV does

that to THEIR advantage to gain a few more viewers and/or just for a

laugh, for what do they care about truth and us anyway when it's about

the almighty dollar, they may do that to you, tho you still did your

best:(.

This is something to think about, again not doubting your capability,

just their honesty in protraying you protraying us honestly. If you do

it, I would request full editorial control over what is finally shown or

released of your statement. To see if it matches what you had intended

to express or convey, especially to those who dont know anything about

us or LPA.

Again, to me, Matt is a great compassionate man, one who is on our side.

But I still think you should wait for the above reasons AND for the

reasons others have stated as well, such as possibly seeking the

membership's approval(?) or agreement(?) in wanting you to do it for us

in the first place. However, that's an issue I'm not familiar with, so I

am gently bowing out and keeping quiet on that one.

luv, grady

===