Guest guest Posted June 27, 2008 Report Share Posted June 27, 2008 Dear All, I wish to clarify one of my statements which I will reprint here: " Do I think all 16 or 17 yr olds are mature enough? NO!I do not! But I certainly know of MANY who are. Again this is why I think 18 yr old with PTCB or ExCPT only OR 17 yr old with HS Diploma/GED and education/training is acceptable and that the exam organizations should drop the age requirement. " I am referring to what I think the law should be in states that do not require education and training, but have an age limit to practice. I think you ALL know that i believe that all states should require education and training. So what I would and do support IF states were to require education and training is 17 yrs old PLUS HS/GED PLUS graduate from approved rx tech program. By the way Education and training must include mock labs then an externship after classroom didactics. Okay I'm done! Respectfully, Jeanetta Mastron CPhT BS Pharm Tech Educator Founder/Owner > > > > > > Just got an e-mail from the PTCB stating that Florida is now > > requiring > > > certification for pharmacy techs. The same has happened recently > > in > > > Illinois. FINALLY! This needs to be law in ALL 50 states. > > > > > > I, as a consumer, would feel much better if an overworked, stressed > > out > > > pharmacist doesn't have to rely on some 16 year high school kid > > filling > > > Rx's-who, of course, doesn't have a clue what they're doing. This, > > > hopefully, raises the standards for techs and that goes hand in > > hand > > > with better salaries. > > > > > > Kudos to you, Jeanetta, for this website to help new techs get > > > certified and find a meaningful, satisfying career! > > > > > > Nukes, CPhT > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.