Jump to content
RemedySpot.com

Re: Genital Herpes: Zapping

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Please see below comments that may halp..doing one set of zaps is not

resolution except sometimes for acute issues.

You also need to consider ALL aspects involved..e.g. for Herpes Lysine is

often needed/deficient. You also need to support the organs involved.

Zapping

Introduction

The origin of the term zapping is from Hulda e, based upon the findings

that certain frequencies would resonate with and thus disrupt the cell

membranes of various organisms. This resonant frequency behaviour is

believed the same as soldiers breaking step over a bridge not to set it into

resonance and a soprano hitting the frequency of a glass prompting it to

shatter. This earlier definition has now come into somewhat more common

usage and is used more generally to reflect treatments designed at

disturbing pathogenic activity. It may be interesting to note in this

context that viruses do not have a cell wall and nor do certain other

elements or morphed species of pathogens (such as form part of a pleomorphic

view of shape-shifter pathogens).

In terms of addressing pathogenic activity there is likely validity in both:

1.. The resonant frequency (original zapping term) approach.

2.. The homeopathic approach.

The latter is generally viewed as more catalytic in either creating an

absent organism response to a pathogen (immune system non-recognition etc.)

or in enhancing immune system activity.

When Dr was asked by the writer what the patterns were in terms of

pathogens he clearly stated that these were based on frequencies: indeed

e's material is extensively marked in his library. Personally this is

surprising as my concept would be the combination of both approaches would

be beneficial, following the basic premise of:

1. Identify and reduce stressor activity.

2. Support the organs and systems affected.

Application of Zapping

There are as many approaches to this as there are practitioners. However

some approach classifications broadly are:

1. The shotgun approach: zap everything that shows a significant

reactivity is beaten into submission.

2. The acute corroboration approach: identify reactive pathogens,

corroborate their significance by an individual reaction test and/or client

symptoms.

3. Chronic issues: a healthy system will attempt to deal with

pathogens. This typically represents the reactive (reaction to active)

alarm and reaction phase. This phase is only sustained by the organism for

some 24-48 hours after which it adopts a less resource demanding strategy

based on the stressor being likely to maintain a presence over the

foreseeable future. In doing this the central control downgrades the alert

status and implements instead adaptation measures to co-exist with minimal

disruption with the stressor. This progressively enters the chronic phase

of an issue and is the stage that many, many clients present in. Under

these circumstances identifying, corroborating and addressing acute (purple

and red) pathogenic issues may be relevant but may also be significantly

missing the primary stressors. Addressing chronic issues requires a

combination of skills as the issues become masked and thus of lower

reactivity. Practitioner skill in both understanding the possible causal

factors from both general findings and the clients specific health history

are relevant. Additionally at the deeper (exhaustive?) levels of chronic

conditions the ability of pathogens to morph can create complications.

The following may help to illustrate this:

The client presented with vomiting following a group camping weekend. The

scan indicated a high possibility of E Coli originated disturbance,

displayed as a high reactivity response. Since this reactivity test is the

order of 1/100th of a second it represents possibility only. A resonance

test, whereby the same signal was input to the client non-intrusively for 1

second and a response measured converted this from possibility to

probability. Since the probability analysis corroborated with clients

presentation the digitised homeopathic pattern was applied for a period of

minutes with subsequent resonance test indicating a substantial diminishment

in value. The significance of co-existing functional disturbances was

examined both using the system and client real world information. Following

several minutes of subsequent supportive treatment to peripheral aspects the

process, occupying a total of 15 minutes, was concluded. Within an hour the

client had sufficiently recovered to return to normal activities with a

good, but not completely restored, functionality. Within a day all

digestive processes were functionally normal. If the client had suffered

with the body would have adapted and the issue become less reactive,

probably requiring resonance tests on several possibilities.

In terms of chronic issues CFS/ME and MS often have a viral association:

chicken and egg is interesting but in terms of health restoration possibly

somewhat irrelevant. In tracking one MS client whose onset was proceeded by

right hip shingles (her dysfunction is on the right side) and which event

only came to light (despite an extensive questionnaire) 3 sessions in,

herpes was investigated and 2 independent sessions a week apart showed a

high resonance in the individual reaction test. Subsequent treatment

involved not only zapping but also the use of real homeopathic and immune

system restorative activity. Similar processes have applied to certain but

not all CFS clients.

EPFX-SCIO Treatment Options

It is recommended before any item is zapped that it's relevance to the

client is assessed and corroborated. It is also recommended, from

experience, that the resonance value is employed rather than the rectified.

The latter has been found to be the best measure of the fact that pathogenic

activity is reducing. Essentially if a resonance of 96 applied on testing,

then a shift to nominally 90 or below indicates that the issue is moving.

Whether you continue to zap to very low resonance is at the discretion of

the practitioner. Certain practitioners perspective is that to get

something moving will awaken and re-implement the organism's intrinsic

health restoration system. This is of course is our nature care

practitioner perspective rather than blasting items into oblivion which

would be the equivalent of a magic bullet. Re-education both on the

lifestyle awareness and in terms of the internal mechanisms is more

beneficial to the client long term.

It is possible that for obstinate issues the resonance may show as still

significantly high on the next visit. This will set the scene for maybe

trying to reduce the resonance to a lower level of possibly 80 on the second

visit.

In zapping it is also crucial to bear in mind the client's vitality and

ability to deal with the debris created by such activity. An extremely

competent English naturopath was pushed by a client to zap her exhaustively

in one visit: the results were an almost intolerably uncomfortable

detoxification reaction with the client threatening to sue for the

discomfort caused. Balance in all things is appropriate and not only the

Varhope values but also your own sensing of the client lifestyle and

vitality should be incorporated in this evaluation.

Zapping Power

In terms of zapping power the QXCI may be considered as somewhat lightweight

(this is not meant to be derogatory but reflects the subtlety and

homeopathic catalytic nature of its approach), whilst the SCIO with a more

exact waveform will be more penetrating with increased effectiveness.

Users of first and second generation bioresonance equipment have noticed a

difference in zapping between these systems and the QXCI, and also operate

similarly to my own personal approach on dense physical (pathogenic) items

in:

1. Using double power.

2. Removing the head harness.

3. Placing either the head harness or a pad accessory on the body area

to be treated.

It is appreciated that this is not possible with systemic type issues but is

quite applicable where there is for example a digestive pathogen.

The head harness is restored to an individual reaction after treatment,

returning power to normal. It should be noted in SCIO releases currently

undergoing audit that there is facility to adjust the power on a sliding

scale.

Multiple Item Zapping

It is possible via the mechanism below to treat multiple items concurrently.

I have no firm views on this but do not use it myself, my personal view

falling between two camps:

1. That clearing active issues reduces the stressor load on the body

and clears them out of the way.

2. That it is lazy of me and the internal body wisdom may resent this

shotgun approach.

The Autozap Lists

These effectively take the top 5 items from a category and treat them for 1

minute each. Some automatically zap the top pathogen. My personal comments

on this are as above. In some cases e.g. viruses the same lists can be

generated using the search facility. However some other lists such as CFS

employ a variety of patterns appropriate to that condition.

Summary

The nature of the QX-SCIO is that the user has choices. There is no one way

to use it except that it should be used with integrity, intent and awareness

of the considerations laid out above.

Dr Kelsey, PhD

QXCI Manual Author and Advanced Trainer

Kelsey PhD

QXCI User Manual Author, Advanced Trainer

Visit www.qxcisynergy.co.uk for tech infos

Genital Herpes

Hi, can anyone help with Genital Herpes. I have zapped herpes three

times, zapped chronic fatigue at least twice, done virtual doctor

protocal, recommended therapies. The client is cleaning up her diet

and flora in the colon. There has been little to no change in this

outbreak that has lasted now for 9 months. Can anyone help?

Thanks, Elaine

.............................................

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Kelsey PhD

QXCI User Manual Author, Advanced Trainer

Visit www.qxcisynergy.co.uk for tech infos

Genital Herpes

>

>

>

>

>

> Hi, can anyone help with Genital Herpes. I have zapped herpes three

> times, zapped chronic fatigue at least twice, done virtual doctor

> protocal, recommended therapies. The client is cleaning up her diet

> and flora in the colon. There has been little to no change in this

> outbreak that has lasted now for 9 months. Can anyone help?

>

> Thanks, Elaine

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

> ............................................

>

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...