And then what?

[Guest guest]

There was recently mention here of killing Lyme spyrochets with specific

freqieucies. The following, written by Ingrid Naiman, is relevant:

" Nature loves balance and there is, in fact, a context for proliferation

of anything from Candida albicans to Streptococcus aureus or the BX virus,

which, we noted was only capable of causing cancer if irradiated.  In short, it

did not cause cancer unless irradiated so what should we learn from this?

With the frequency generators, there is a specific rate that is fatal for

each form vibrating at its unique rate.  If exposed to that rate, the form

dies. 

Finding the rate for each pathogenic organism and substance is the basis of a

lot of list exchanges in the busy world of spin off technologies based on

Rife's work.  What is less clear is what happens when an organism dies.  I have

not had much occasion to observe this in the microscope, but if I were to

speculate on the basis of the very small number of observations I have made, the

organism is reduced to particulates so that the factors that hold the components

in place are rendered nonfunctional.  Let me try to say this in simpler

English.  If there is a blood parasite and it is killed by frequencies, the soft

tissue is destroyed but the parasite seems to retain its shape but there are

many tiny dots, too small to interpret, that remain.  Assuming these are

actually

inert or lifeless, it would appear that the frequencies can, in fact, destroy

parasites.  Moreover, it appears that there is no bacterial infection

following death in this manner.  It is important to state this because when a

parasite dies as a result of pharmaceutical or herbal remedies, the parasite has

to d

ecompose.  The dead parasite is then eaten by bacteria and after a few days,

if the immune system is working properly, white blood cells will eat the

bacteria.  This is the normal cycle and it could happen routinely without anyone

noticing if living in a tropical country where reinfection is practically

constant but the diet includes some antiparasitic foods that knock out the

infections.

With the frequency treatments, it is not clear what happens to the debris in

the blood.  In the very few chances I have had to observe, the white blood

cells were ignoring the debris and I suspect it is because of one of two

possibilities.  First, the white blood cells could have themselves been

traumatized by

the frequencies.  Second, the dead parasites may be so inert that they are

not identified as risk factors.  Given their appearance, it would seem easy to

eliminate them, but I honestly do not know if or how this happens . . . which

is one reason that these microscopes need to be used, not forced underground.

.....

To be ultrascientific, we teach people to limit their inquiries to one

variable.  There are reasons for this, but they are really absurd in real life

situations.  The ostensible reason is to attribute all responses to a single

factor

that is unique and therefore causal.  For instance, in medicine, we need to

have names for typhoid and hepatitis and Epstein-Barr and so on and so forth. 

If a condition doesn't have a name, there is no treatment for it because the

treatments are patented approaches to identified pathogens rather than systemic

approaches to immune enhancement or healing.

This is where I take issue with 20th century medicine, and, I am sorry to

say, even with people such as Rife who had the opportunity to observe context

but

fell into the trap set by the germ theorists. "

In other words, Rife aimed at killing the " bad guy " organisms, but did not

observe what happened around and after that. What then happens with the

debris in the blood?

Shivani Arjuna

www.LifeEnergies.com

**************

Need a new ride? Check out the largest site for U.S. used car

listings at AOL Autos.

(http://autos.aol.com/used?NCID=aolcmp00300000002851)