RE: Re:OT FW: check for viruses

[Guest guest]

In a message dated 9/7/04 11:24:07 PM Eastern Daylight Time, crjohnr@... writes:

I believe Francesca has already asked that these be labeled as OT and perhaps better yet dropped.

sorry if I have burdoned the list. I am thankful to take advantage of the great brain power here, and only wanted to give something back - such as I could in my own area of knowledge. I did think that a Subject: on viruses would be automatically considered per se as OT. If some people (out of 1500) read this and do not want to have to go off-list to be protected, c'est la vie. You do have a purists' point, well taken, which I respect.

Well, let's arm-wrestle for it... Just kidding (by half)

--

Ken

[Guest guest]

-----Original Message-----

clipped ------

I believe Francesca has already asked that these be labeled as OT and perhaps better yet dropped. This is inadequate information to help the clueless and spam to those who are familiar with web security issues.

I don't mean this as a criticism, I often comment beyond my level of certainty and often off topic, so do what I say not what I do :-)

live well for as long as you can

JR

PS maybe we can revisit the old chat room idea so folks with too much time on their hands can use it productively with each other.