Guest guest Posted July 18, 2004 Report Share Posted July 18, 2004 The soy pendulum is swinging to the safe side...if you are a female cynomolgus monkey??? +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ " This is convincing evidence that at dietary levels, the estrogens found in soy do not stimulate cell growth and other markers for cancer risk. " Wood (lead researcher) To investigate how a diet high in soy phytoestrogens called isoflavones affects markers for breast and uterine cancer, Wood and colleagues performed studies on postmenopausal monkeys. The monkeys were given one of three diets for three years: • Soy that didn't contain isoflavones. • Soy with the isoflavones intact. • Soy without isoflavones, but with Premarin or estrogen therapy added. The researchers measured breast density, numbers of dividing breast and uterine cells and levels of the estrogen produced by the body— all markers for cancer risk. Monkeys on the soy plus estrogen diet had increased levels of all markers, while monkeys that ate soy with isoflavones had lower levels of the estrogen produced by the body. " These findings suggest that high dietary levels of soy isoflavones do not increase markers for breast and uterine cancer risk in postmenopausal monkeys and may contribute to an estrogen profile associated with reduced breast cancer risk, " say the researchers. http://jcem.endojournals.org/cgi/content/abstract/89/5/2319 Adrenocortical Effects of Oral Estrogens and Soy Isoflavones in Female Monkeys E. Wood, J. Mark Cline, S. , C. Register and Jay R. Kaplan Comparative Medicine Clinical Research Center, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina 27157- 1040 Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: E. Wood, D.V.M., Comparative Medicine Clinical Research Center, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Medical Center Boulevard, Winston-Salem, North Carolina 27157-1040. E-mail: chwood@.... The goal of this study was to evaluate the long-term adrenocortical effects of premenopausal oral contraceptives (OC) and postmenopausal conjugated equine estrogens (CEE) and soy isoflavones in a female cynomolgus monkey model. Half of the animals received a triphasic OC for a period of 26 months, after which all monkeys were ovariectomized and randomized to one of three diet groups for 36 months: 1) isoflavone-depleted soy protein (control) (n = 54); 2) soy protein with isoflavones (129 mg/d equivalent) (SPI+) (n = 56); or 3) isoflavone-depleted soy protein with CEE (0.625 mg/d equivalent) (n = 59). In the premenopausal phase, OC treatment resulted in significantly higher cortisol (F) and lower dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate, androstenedione, and testosterone relative to intact controls. In the postmenopausal phase, CEE treatment resulted in significantly higher basal F and lower dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate, androstenedione, and testosterone when compared with control and SPI+ diets. Serum F and androgens in the SPI+ group did not differ significantly from the control group. The SPI+ group had significantly lower adrenal weight than either control or CEE groups, and this effect was localized primarily to the zona fasciculata region of the adrenal cortex. These findings suggest that long-term estrogen treatment may contribute to an androgen-deficient and hypercortisolemic state. This work was supported, in part, by Program Project Grant HL-45666 from the NIH/National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, Bethesda, land (to J.R.K.), by the NIH/National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine R01-AT00639 (to J.M.C.), and by the NIH/National Center for Research Resources T32 RR 07009 (to C.E.W.). Abbreviations: A4, Androstenedione; BMI, body mass index; BW, body weight; CEE, conjugated equine estrogen(s); DHEA-S, dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate; E2, 17ß-estradiol; ER, estrogen receptor(s); F, cortisol; H & E, hematoxylin and eosin; OC, oral contraceptive(s); SPI–, soy protein depleted of isoflavones; SPI+, soy protein with isoflavones; T, testosterone. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 21, 2010 Report Share Posted June 21, 2010 Looks like we're back to 'balance' again and thoughtfulness rather than hysteria or a desire to jump on the Internet bandwagon every time we read something. I think back now about how people are so afraid of a CT-Scan when its usefulness in determining where we are at a given point, can be life-saving by putting us on notice. This doesn't mean, however, indiscriminating and regularly routine Scans. Fifty Eight (58) boy am I ancient, a VA Radiologist said, " you have had your life's share of X-rays " and 50 years after he said that, I learn I have Bladder cancer. Let's assume it caused the cancer, which nobody knows, it took fifty years after my having a " lifetime exposure " . Hmmm. Here we 'indoctrinated against medicine' kind of people have learned that Tagamet (Cimetidine) can be useful against cancer and on and on. We all know about SOY and GMO, but then there's Genestein in soy. I don't think anyone is suggesting we eat Make-believe Soy Burgers and other fake-meat GMO soy food, but where indicated, perhaps it can be useful. I don't always know when that is, therefore my following statement. What all of this tells me is that we need to continue to search, have an open mind and, should any of us be in 'advanced' stages of cancer development, we need to work with someone that knows what works and what doesn't. Joe C. From: VGammill Sent: Monday, June 21, 2010 4:02 PM Subject: [ ] soy and breast cancer List, In reviewing current medical literature (mostly human studies) on the feared relationship between soy/genistein and breast cancer, I fail to find anything alarming. I am not a fan of GMO soy, but I do find many components of soy that are characterized by fear mongers as horrible, are in fact quite useful for fighting cancer. One site suggested on this list vilified the phytic acid component in soy. In the general lack of balance or fairness in the article they neglected to mention that the Satanic mineral-depleting phytic acid is the selfsame compound as IP6 that has been beatified on other sites for its miraculous cancer-fighting properties. Others have suggested that only fermented soy should be used, but this contains genistein which is in high concentration in Haelan, the patented fermented soy drink that is used by many cancer patients who can afford it. About ten years ago I had a talk with Italian gynecologist-oncologist Claudio D'Arrigo. We were both interested in the anti-cancer properties found in pittosporum. He said that he found both cancer-treating/preventing and cancer-causing/promoting compounds in every plant he examined and he believed this to be a universal. At the time I thought " those crazy Italians " but now I entertain some of these same thoughts. (abstracts below) ------------------ Nutr Cancer. 2009 Nov;61(6):792-8. Early intake appears to be the key to the proposed protective effects of soy intake against breast cancer. <http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=%22Messina%20M%22%5BAuthor%5D>Messina M, <http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=%22Hilakivi-e%20L%22%5BAuthor%5D>H\ ilakivi-e L. Loma University, Loma , California, USA. markm@... Abstract There is a large variation in breast cancer incidence and mortality rates worldwide. Migration studies have indicated that this variation is primarily the result of lifestyle influences. Although there has been much research conducted, definitively identifying dietary factors that impact breast cancer risk has proven difficult. In part this may be because most clinical and epidemiologic studies have focused on adult dietary exposure. However, evidence suggests that childhood and/or adolescence is the period of life when the breast is most sensitive to dietary influences. Further, the available epidemiologic and animal data suggest that early soy intake reduces breast cancer risk. Soy foods are unique dietary sources of isoflavones, diphenolic compounds that exert estrogen-like effects under certain experimental conditions. The protection effects of soy may result from the soybean isoflavones stimulating differentiation of the breast in much the same way that the elevated estrogen levels do during pregnancy. More specifically, in rats, the primary isoflavone genistein reduces mammary tumorigenesis and increases mammary tissue differentiation by leading to a reduction in the number of terminal end buds (TEB) and an increase in the number of differentiated lobules. There is need and justification for continued investigation of the early soy intake hypothesis, particularly to determine the cellular targets of soy action and to identify the signaling pathways mediating the effects on mammary gland morphology and susceptibility to breast cancer. PMID: 20155618 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE] ------------------------------------ Am J Clin Nutr. 2009 May;89(5):1673S-1679S. Epub 2009 Apr 1. Perspectives on the soy-breast cancer relation. <http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=%22Messina%20M%22%5BAuthor%5D>Messina M, <http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=%22Wu%20AH%22%5BAuthor%5D>Wu AH. Department of Nutrition, School of Public, Health, Loma University, Loma , CA, USA. markm@... Abstract There has been considerable investigation of the potential for soy foods to reduce risk of breast cancer. Initial enthusiasm for this research was partially based on the historically low incidence rates of breast cancer and high soy food intake in Japan. There are several putative soybean chemopreventive agents, but most cancer research has focused on isoflavones. Isoflavones possess both hormonal and nonhormonal properties relevant to carcinogenesis. Recent epidemiologic analyses indicate that among Asians high soy intake is associated with an approximate one-third reduction in the risk of both pre- and postmenopausal breast cancer. However, several lines of evidence suggest that to derive maximum protection against breast cancer, soy must be consumed early in life. This evidence is consistent with the lack of significant effects noted in clinical studies that have evaluated the effects of isoflavone-containing products on breast cancer risk markers. Isoflavones may exert their putative protective effects by stimulating breast cell differentiation in a manner similar to that which is thought to occur during early pregnancy. Finally, the ability of the isoflavone genistein to stimulate the growth of mammary tumors in ovariectomized athymic nude mice implanted with estrogen-sensitive breast cancer cells has raised concern that soy foods, and especially isoflavone supplements, are contraindicated for patients with breast cancer and women at high risk of breast cancer. However, findings from clinical studies, in which breast biopsies have been taken or breast tissue density measured after isoflavone exposure, are reassuring and contrast with the proliferative effects of conventional combined hormone therapy, although understanding of the effect of soy and isoflavones on breast tissues remains imprecise. PMID: 19339397 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE] ---------------------------------------- J Epidemiol. 2010 Mar 5;20(2):83-9. Epub 2010 Feb 20. Factors to consider in the association between soy isoflavone intake and breast cancer risk. <http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=%22Nagata%20C%22%5BAuthor%5D>Nagata C. Department of Epidemiology & Preventive Medicine, Gifu University Graduate School of Medicine, Yanagido, Gifu, Japan. chisato@... Abstract It has been suggested that soy isoflavones have protective effects against breast cancer. However, data from epidemiological studies are not conclusive. A recent meta-analysis showed that soy intake was inversely associated with breast cancer risk in Asian but not Western populations, which indicates that protection against breast cancer may require that women consume levels of soy typical in Asian diets. In addition to the amount of soy isoflavones consumed, the form and food source of isoflavones, timing of isoflavone exposure, estrogen receptor status of tumors, and equol-producer status and hormonal profile of individuals may modify the association between soy isoflavone intake and the risk of breast cancer. These factors might explain the heterogeneity of results from studies. This present report contrasts background data from Japanese and Western women to identify the potential modifying of these factors. PMID: 20173308 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE] --------------------------- J Clin Oncol. 2008 Apr 1;26(10):1677-83. Epub 2008 Mar 3. Plasma isoflavone level and subsequent risk of breast cancer among Japanese women: a nested case-control study from the Japan Public Health Center-based prospective study group. <http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=%22Iwasaki%20M%22%5BAuthor%5D>Iwasaki M, <http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=%22Inoue%20M%22%5BAuthor%5D>Inoue M, <http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=%22Otani%20T%22%5BAuthor%5D>Otani T, <http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=%22Sasazuki%20S%22%5BAuthor%5D>Sasazuki S, <http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=%22Kurahashi%20N%22%5BAuthor%5D>Kurahas\ hi N, <http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=%22Miura%20T%22%5BAuthor%5D>Miura T, <http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=%22Yamamoto%20S%22%5BAuthor%5D>Yamamoto S, <http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=%22Tsugane%20S%22%5BAuthor%5D>Tsugane S; <http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=%22Japan%20Public%20Health%20Center-bas\ ed%20prospective%20study%20group%22%5BCorporate%20Author%5D>Japan Public Health Center-based prospective study group. Epidemiology and Prevention Division, Research Center for Cancer Prevention and Screening, National Cancer Center, 5-1-1 Tsukiji, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, 104-0045, Japan. moiwasak@... Abstract PURPOSE: Because they have large variations in consumption, Asian countries are suitable settings for studies of the effect of relatively high-dose isoflavone intake on breast cancer risk. Nevertheless, no prospective study from Asia has assessed blood or urine levels as biomarkers of isoflavone intake. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 24,226 women ages 40 to 69 years in the Japan Public Health Center-based prospective study who responded to the baseline questionnaire and provided blood in 1990 to 1995 were observed to December 2002. During a mean 10.6 years of follow-up, 144 patients newly diagnosed with breast cancer were identified. Two matched controls for each patient were selected from the cohort. Isoflavone levels were assessed by plasma level and food frequency questionnaire, and the odds ratio of breast cancer according to isoflavone level was estimated using a conditional logistic regression model. RESULTS: We found a statistically significant inverse association between plasma genistein and risk of breast cancer, but no association for plasma daidzein. Adjusted odds ratios for the highest versus lowest quartile of plasma level were 0.34 for genistein (95% CI, 0.16 to 0.74; P for trend, .02) and 0.71 for daidzein (95% CI, 0.35 to 1.44; P for trend, .54). Median plasma genistein values in the control group were 31.9 ng/mL for the lowest and 353.9 ng/mL for the highest quartile groups. Regarding dietary intake of isoflavones, nonsignificant inverse associations were observed for both genistein and daidzein. CONCLUSION: This nested case-control study found an inverse association between plasma genistein and the risk of breast cancer in Japan. PMID: 18316793 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE] --------------------------- Br J Cancer. 2008 Jan 15;98(1):9-14. Epub 2008 Jan 8. Epidemiology of soy exposures and breast cancer risk. <http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=%22Wu%20AH%22%5BAuthor%5D>Wu AH, <http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=%22Yu%20MC%22%5BAuthor%5D>Yu MC, <http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=%22Tseng%20CC%22%5BAuthor%5D>Tseng CC, <http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=%22Pike%20MC%22%5BAuthor%5D>Pike MC. Department of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089-9175, USA. annawu@... Abstract Most of the early studies published on soy and breast cancer were not designed to test the effect of soy; the assessment of soy intake was usually crude and few potential confounders were considered in the analysis. In this review, we focused on studies with relatively complete assessment of dietary soy exposure in the targeted populations and appropriate consideration for potential confounders in the statistical analysis of study data. Meta-analysis of the 8 (1 cohort, 7 case-control) studies conducted in high-soy-consuming Asians show a significant trend of decreasing risk with increasing soy food intake. Compared to the lowest level of soy food intake (<or=5 mg isoflavones per day), risk was intermediate (OR=0.88, 95% confidence interval (CI)=0.78-0.98) among those with modest ( approximately 10 mg isoflavones per day) intake and lowest (OR=0.71, 95% CI=0.60-0.85) among those with high intake (>or=20 mg isoflavones per day). In contrast, soy intake was unrelated to breast cancer risk in studies conducted in the 11 low-soy-consuming Western populations whose average highest and lowest soy isoflavone intake levels were around 0.8 and 0.15 mg per day, respectively. Thus, the evidence to date, based largely on case-control studies, suggest that soy food intake in the amount consumed in Asian populations may have protective effects against breast cancer. PMID: 18182974 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE] Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 27, 2010 Report Share Posted June 27, 2010 Processed soy is just as toxic as the " standard American diet " that is what is so scary about it. Through deceptive advertising Americans have come to believe that SOY is a miracle health food. Nothing could be further from the truth. Asian's consume soy mostly fermented as a condiment not as a substitute for protein as we do in the U.S.. I just want to educate people. Sure eating anything on rare occasions won't kill anyone. I will admit... I go crazy every once in a while and have a custard filled donut... pure poison , but boy doesn't taste good. Fortunately those once in a whiles are fewer and fewer in between. Before I was educated, before I was diagnosed with CANCER I was a big carnivore, oh I loved my veggies but meat mostly RED was a must at every meal. Oppppppps I got cancer and began to research alternative treatments and a whole new world has opened up and I have learned so much about our diet and it saddens me to know how ignorant most of us are about what we feed ourselves and our children!!!!! I could go on and on ... obesity, diabetes, cancer... we all know...... time to get educate or die as I see it. NO joke... the average american diet is killing us slowly but surely. Sugar , processed foods, hydrogenated anything, white anything, and yes most soy products !!!!!! it is not a good thing.... Please do some research. I yi yi people..... Be Well, Vicki > > > >Soy that has not been fermented is a poison ! > > Vicki, I think that you are overstating the case. How is unfermented > soy more toxic than the standard American diet that is saturated with > high fructose corn syrup, trans fats, preservatives, colorants, > bromide " conditioners, " BPA, fluoride, genetically-modified > mysteries, antibiotics and endocrine disrupters? Unfermented soy is > less toxic than virtually all the millions of lbs of medicines that > Americans lap up each year. > > Sure there are thousands of healthier things to eat than unfermented > soy and almost all of them taste better too. Having a few chunks of > tofu in your miso is such an absolute non-issue compared to the > smarmy financial relationship of the B. Komen Foundation and > Kentucky Fried Chicken. > http://blogs.laweekly.com/squidink/fast-food/kfc-susan-komen-deceptive-ad-c/ > > What's next, the American Cancer Society slipping into bed with > Marlboro cigarettes? > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.