Guest guest Posted January 19, 2004 Report Share Posted January 19, 2004 Hi Rose, Could I ask if you ask patient to remove their Q LInk during QXCI treatments? Sorry if this sound like a silly questions! Kind Regards Q-link Research?? As many of you know, I am a distributor for Q-links and recommend them to many of my clients. I personally have not seen any negative affects while wearing my Q-link. Infact my radiation levels are the lowest they have been and Iike I said in previous e-mails to the group—I do not pick up negative energies from my clients anymore. I have seen some of the negative e-mails regarding Q-links as of late. I would really like to see the research that shows long term usage of the Q-link adversely affects the autonomic nervous system. Show me the science!! I am open minded enough to look at this. I support biological dentistry and Dr Klinghardt’s philosophy, however I hope he has good science to back his statements about long term use of EMF protecting devices-- actually harming the body. sincerely Rose s R.T............................................ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 19, 2004 Report Share Posted January 19, 2004 I just got back from my naturopath who uses a bioresonance machine (now outlawed in US). The Bio Shield needs to be recharged weekly by putting it in the sun and she says she finds it three times more effective than a Q link. There's only way one to find out -- do the testing yourself and see. I can only say that I notice a difference with the Shield and noticed nothing with the Q link. I've tried everything including those jade donut rings and gadgets that are now sitting in a box in the attic. I don't sell the Q link nor the Bio Shield -- I bought them both so have no vested interested in anything. is Rotella > > > As many of you know, I am a distributor for Q-links and recommend them > to many of my clients. I personally have not seen any negative affects > while wearing my Q-link. Infact my radiation levels are the lowest they > have been and Iike I said in previous e-mails to the group-I do not pick > up negative energies from my clients anymore. > I have seen some of the negative e-mails regarding Q-links as of late. I > would really like to see the research that shows long term usage of the > Q-link adversely affects the autonomic nervous system. Show me the > science!! I am open minded enough to look at this. I support > biological dentistry and Dr Klinghardt's philosophy, however I hope he > has good science to back his statements about long term use of EMF > protecting devices-- actually harming the body. > sincerely > Rose s R.T Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 23, 2004 Report Share Posted January 23, 2004 The research I've seen on the Q link is generally presented by people who sell the Q link. The best way to get research results is to do it yourself. I don't sell any devices and I've bought them all. I will tell you this and it's observation on my part (a kind of research)... my husband wore a Bio Shield for the first time yesterday and it's the first time since the holidays that he has walked in the house not half dead. He usually falls asleep around 8:30 p.m. and he was awake until around l0:30. Reminding again that the Bio Shield needs to be charged in the sunlight once a week. Blessings to you, is Rotella, M.Ac. > > > As many of you know, I am a distributor for Q-links and recommend them > to many of my clients. I personally have not seen any negative affects > while wearing my Q-link. Infact my radiation levels are the lowest they > have been and Iike I said in previous e-mails to the group-I do not pick > up negative energies from my clients anymore. > I have seen some of the negative e-mails regarding Q-links as of late. I > would really like to see the research that shows long term usage of the > Q-link adversely affects the autonomic nervous system. Show me the > science!! I am open minded enough to look at this. I support > biological dentistry and Dr Klinghardt's philosophy, however I hope he > has good science to back his statements about long term use of EMF > protecting devices-- actually harming the body. > sincerely > Rose s R.T Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 25, 2004 Report Share Posted January 25, 2004 Hi I am wearing a Qlink for the first time - one week so far and I am writing a diary about my experiences. I have not tried any of the other devices. I am a QX practitioner and homeopath and find myself very drained ( as a ME sufferer) after undertaking any sessions with severely depleted clients. Since wearing the Qlink, I had a strange 24 hours during which my heart pulsated rapidly and I didn't sleep but since then my energy has soared. I attended a full day workshop yesterday and my attention didn't dip all day - something impossible previously. I have no current vested interest in making these comments but I shall track the next month with interest. Clare Kelway Re: Q-link Research?? The research I've seen on the Q link is generally presented by people who sell the Q link. The best way to get research results is to do it yourself. I don't sell any devices and I've bought them all. I will tell you this and it's observation on my part (a kind of research)... my husband wore a Bio Shield for the first time yesterday and it's the first time since the holidays that he has walked in the house not half dead. He usually falls asleep around 8:30 p.m. and he was awake until around l0:30. Reminding again that the Bio Shield needs to be charged in the sunlight once a week. Blessings to you, is Rotella, M.Ac. > > > As many of you know, I am a distributor for Q-links and recommend them > to many of my clients. I personally have not seen any negative affects > while wearing my Q-link. Infact my radiation levels are the lowest they > have been and Iike I said in previous e-mails to the group-I do not pick > up negative energies from my clients anymore. > I have seen some of the negative e-mails regarding Q-links as of late. I > would really like to see the research that shows long term usage of the > Q-link adversely affects the autonomic nervous system. Show me the > science!! I am open minded enough to look at this. I support > biological dentistry and Dr Klinghardt's philosophy, however I hope he > has good science to back his statements about long term use of EMF > protecting devices-- actually harming the body. > sincerely > Rose s R.T ............................................. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 29, 2004 Report Share Posted January 29, 2004 Hi CLare, sorry for the silly question but could you clarify ME sufferer for me. Also, was the rapid pulse and sleep deprivation you encountered on the first day of your wearing the Q Link? and then straight back to feeling increased amounts or energy or was it graudual over thsi first week? Kind Regards Re: Q-link Research?? > > > The research I've seen on the Q link is generally presented by people who > sell the Q link. The best way to get research results is to > do it yourself. I don't sell any devices and I've bought them all. I will > tell you this and it's observation on my part (a kind of research)... > my husband wore a Bio Shield for the first time yesterday and it's the first > time since the holidays that he has walked in the house not > half dead. He usually falls asleep around 8:30 p.m. and he was awake until > around l0:30. Reminding again that the Bio Shield needs > to be charged in the sunlight once a week. Blessings to you, is > Rotella, M.Ac. > > > > > > > > > > > As many of you know, I am a distributor for Q-links and recommend them > > to many of my clients. I personally have not seen any negative affects > > while wearing my Q-link. Infact my radiation levels are the lowest they > > have been and Iike I said in previous e-mails to the group-I do not pick > > up negative energies from my clients anymore. > > I have seen some of the negative e-mails regarding Q-links as of late. I > > would really like to see the research that shows long term usage of the > > Q-link adversely affects the autonomic nervous system. Show me the > > science!! I am open minded enough to look at this. I support > > biological dentistry and Dr Klinghardt's philosophy, however I hope he > > has good science to back his statements about long term use of EMF > > protecting devices-- actually harming the body. > > sincerely > > Rose s R.T > > > > ............................................ > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 31, 2004 Report Share Posted January 31, 2004 ME stands for Myalgic Encephalomyelitis or Chronic Fatigue Syndrome in simple English. The rapid pulse and sleep deprivation was only during the first 24 hour period of wearing the Qlink. My energy levels since have been consistently good. I continue to feel much more energised and somehow calmer and with mental clarity. It has been refreshing to make positive decisions that have taken months to make over the past two weeks. Once made, you wonder why they could have proven so frustrating to make? I haven't suffered detox issues as I understand others may do - but I do a lot of on-going detox work as part of my ME management program anyway. Best regards Clare Re: Re: Q-link Research?? Hi CLare, sorry for the silly question but could you clarify ME sufferer for me. Also, was the rapid pulse and sleep deprivation you encountered on the first day of your wearing the Q Link? and then straight back to feeling increased amounts or energy or was it graudual over thsi first week? Kind Regards Re: Q-link Research?? > > > The research I've seen on the Q link is generally presented by people who > sell the Q link. The best way to get research results is to > do it yourself. I don't sell any devices and I've bought them all. I will > tell you this and it's observation on my part (a kind of research)... > my husband wore a Bio Shield for the first time yesterday and it's the first > time since the holidays that he has walked in the house not > half dead. He usually falls asleep around 8:30 p.m. and he was awake until > around l0:30. Reminding again that the Bio Shield needs > to be charged in the sunlight once a week. Blessings to you, is > Rotella, M.Ac. > > > > > > > > > > > As many of you know, I am a distributor for Q-links and recommend them > > to many of my clients. I personally have not seen any negative affects > > while wearing my Q-link. Infact my radiation levels are the lowest they > > have been and Iike I said in previous e-mails to the group-I do not pick > > up negative energies from my clients anymore. > > I have seen some of the negative e-mails regarding Q-links as of late. I > > would really like to see the research that shows long term usage of the > > Q-link adversely affects the autonomic nervous system. Show me the > > science!! I am open minded enough to look at this. I support > > biological dentistry and Dr Klinghardt's philosophy, however I hope he > > has good science to back his statements about long term use of EMF > > protecting devices-- actually harming the body. > > sincerely > > Rose s R.T > > > > ............................................ > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 31, 2004 Report Share Posted January 31, 2004 Thank you Clare. It's amazing how affecting one of the two most electromagnetically active areas of the body in such a subtle way, can have such an affect on the whole. On another note, do you have your bed facing in a South \North direction? I know myself when my bed is arranged in line with the earth nagnetic flux that I feel more in tune with things. I know that some people say this is nonsense, but I honestly feel that it has an effect on the quality of sleep that I get as compared to when my bed is arranged at right angles to the usual flow. Thanks again for you honesty and openness. Best Regards Re: Q-link Research?? > > > > > > The research I've seen on the Q link is generally presented by people who > > sell the Q link. The best way to get research results is to > > do it yourself. I don't sell any devices and I've bought them all. I > will > > tell you this and it's observation on my part (a kind of research)... > > my husband wore a Bio Shield for the first time yesterday and it's the > first > > time since the holidays that he has walked in the house not > > half dead. He usually falls asleep around 8:30 p.m. and he was awake > until > > around l0:30. Reminding again that the Bio Shield needs > > to be charged in the sunlight once a week. Blessings to you, is > > Rotella, M.Ac. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > As many of you know, I am a distributor for Q-links and recommend them > > > to many of my clients. I personally have not seen any negative affects > > > while wearing my Q-link. Infact my radiation levels are the lowest they > > > have been and Iike I said in previous e-mails to the group-I do not pick > > > up negative energies from my clients anymore. > > > I have seen some of the negative e-mails regarding Q-links as of late. I > > > would really like to see the research that shows long term usage of the > > > Q-link adversely affects the autonomic nervous system. Show me the > > > science!! I am open minded enough to look at this. I support > > > biological dentistry and Dr Klinghardt's philosophy, however I hope he > > > has good science to back his statements about long term use of EMF > > > protecting devices-- actually harming the body. > > > sincerely > > > Rose s R.T > > > > > > > > ............................................ > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.