Guest guest Posted May 3, 2006 Report Share Posted May 3, 2006 Yes is it happened to me to......I wore the Q link (during the day only) for about 3 months and then started to feel strangely unwell. I didn't connect it to the Q link at first but then had a kinesiology appointment with my therapist - my heart chakra tested weak and it suddenly dawned on me that that was where the Q link sits so I removed it and voila.....heart chakra was strong. I had never tested weak in that area before. After taking it off I felt a different person before the day was out. Another colleague was getting pains for a few weeks which she began to think was angina.....she was about to make an appointment with the cardiologist. When I told her of my experience she took the Q link off (sadly she'd bought it at my suggestion!"!) and again felt much better the next day and back to normal within 2-3 days. I too contacted the company and they said it couldn't possibly be the case. Having spoken to someone who is very well informed on energetic matters she told me that it stimulates the brow chakra so people feel quite buzzy and energetic in the beginning but it actually draws the energy from the 4th chakra (heart) to do this..........I can certainly relate to that in my case. Its a shame that we have had such a negative response from the company because I am sure their intentions in making the device are good and information/feedback is essential if they are to perfect their products and ensure a lasting and growing market. Charlizejadespring2003 <jadespring2003@...> wrote: Again I've heard that the new q link really works well for a time butthen the people start to feel toxic. I called the company today butthey refuse to acknowledge that this occurs. I know Yanick, someyears ago, discovered this. He's a biochemist who produces manywonderful products. My doctor told me that this happened to him andto one of his patients. This is the fifth case I've heard. Anyfeedback out there?And has anyone used the Ally, also sold by the same company (Clarus)?is Rotella, M.Ac., CNC Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 3, 2006 Report Share Posted May 3, 2006 Hi There – I don’t own one but I have a client who had a qlink and experienced the same thing.. perhaps it could be tested on the quantum to see if you are allergic to this metal the qlink is made of.. I have a couple necklace made of lapis stones that I like to wear, I feel its calming to me, bringing stress reduction.. And I have another necklace piece with a pouch that I put different little stones in – and you could charge these stones and jewelry on the quantum, too! And you could test to see what stones you need or are in affinity with you and wear them accordingly – But this can change daily, so good to change up and wear different jewelry sometimes… Depending on what you are going through – For example, I wore a gold necklace to my grandma’s funeral because gold is good For this type of protection – and it worked and helped me that day, I felt… The same way you wouldn’t want to take the same vitamins everyday the rest of your life, or eat the same foods the rest of your life (bec/ you’d get an allergy to them?) we need to swutch things up and come back to them – so it makes sense to me to alternate your jewelry, also.. and probably alternate the clothes we wear too, perhaps some different colors, etc? J .. So I don’t know, but maybe the Q-link is a good thing but should be worn in moderation, perhaps to be taken off and alternated with other Pieces sometimes? Just some thoughts… Maggie From: qxci-english [mailto:qxci-english ] On Behalf Of Charlize Grace Sent: Wednesday, May 03, 2006 8:26 AM qxci-english Subject: Re: q link Yes is it happened to me to......I wore the Q link (during the day only) for about 3 months and then started to feel strangely unwell. I didn't connect it to the Q link at first but then had a kinesiology appointment with my therapist - my heart chakra tested weak and it suddenly dawned on me that that was where the Q link sits so I removed it and voila.....heart chakra was strong. I had never tested weak in that area before. After taking it off I felt a different person before the day was out. Another colleague was getting pains for a few weeks which she began to think was angina.....she was about to make an appointment with the cardiologist. When I told her of my experience she took the Q link off (sadly she'd bought it at my suggestion! " !) and again felt much better the next day and back to normal within 2-3 days. I too contacted the company and they said it couldn't possibly be the case. Having spoken to someone who is very well informed on energetic matters she told me that it stimulates the brow chakra so people feel quite buzzy and energetic in the beginning but it actually draws the energy from the 4th chakra (heart) to do this..........I can certainly relate to that in my case. Its a shame that we have had such a negative response from the company because I am sure their intentions in making the device are good and information/feedback is essential if they are to perfect their products and ensure a lasting and growing market. Charlize jadespring2003 <jadespring2003@...> wrote: Again I've heard that the new q link really works well for a time but then the people start to feel toxic. I called the company today but they refuse to acknowledge that this occurs. I know Yanick, some years ago, discovered this. He's a biochemist who produces many wonderful products. My doctor told me that this happened to him and to one of his patients. This is the fifth case I've heard. Any feedback out there? And has anyone used the Ally, also sold by the same company (Clarus)? is Rotella, M.Ac., CNC SPONSORED LINKS Health and wellness Health wellness product Health and wellness program Stress management Health promotion and wellness Business health wellness New Messenger with Voice. Call regular phones from your PC and save big. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 3, 2006 Report Share Posted May 3, 2006 A friend of mine was doing a similar thing and enhancing clocks, watches, air purifiers for cars and homes to counteract the effect of emf through these objects. He told me that the problem with pendants (or objects that donot move vs. clock, watches) is that there is a chance that they accumulate negative frequencies, either from the environment, other people etc. etc. you know what I mean. So, it makes sense that the pendant works for a while and gets junked up. Unfortunately, that's just the way it goes. It's a new technology and people do not have a reference point as to the quality of the product. There are many products that work while they are new (for a while)...so beware!!! Hope this helps.. Mady Charlize Grace <charlizegrace@...> wrote: Yes is it happened to me to......I wore the Q link (during the day only) for about 3 months and then started to feel strangely unwell. I didn't connect it to the Q link at first but then had a kinesiology appointment with my therapist - my heart chakra tested weak and it suddenly dawned on me that that was where the Q link sits so I removed it and voila.....heart chakra was strong. I had never tested weak in that area before. After taking it off I felt a different person before the day was out. Another colleague was getting pains for a few weeks which she began to think was angina.....she was about to make an appointment with the cardiologist. When I told her of my experience she took the Q link off (sadly she'd bought it at my suggestion!"!) and again felt much better the next day and back to normal within 2-3 days. I too contacted the company and they said it couldn't possibly be the case. Having spoken to someone who is very well informed on energetic matters she told me that it stimulates the brow chakra so people feel quite buzzy and energetic in the beginning but it actually draws the energy from the 4th chakra (heart) to do this..........I can certainly relate to that in my case. Its a shame that we have had such a negative response from the company because I am sure their intentions in making the device are good and information/feedback is essential if they are to perfect their products and ensure a lasting and growing market. Charlizejadespring2003 <jadespring2003@...> wrote: Again I've heard that the new q link really works well for a time butthen the people start to feel toxic. I called the company today butthey refuse to acknowledge that this occurs. I know Yanick, someyears ago, discovered this. He's a biochemist who produces manywonderful products. My doctor told me that this happened to him andto one of his patients. This is the fifth case I've heard. Anyfeedback out there?And has anyone used the Ally, also sold by the same company (Clarus)?is Rotella, M.Ac., CNC Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 3, 2006 Report Share Posted May 3, 2006 > > Again I've heard that the new q link really works well for a time but > then the people start to feel toxic. I called the company today but > they refuse to acknowledge that this occurs. I know Yanick, some > years ago, discovered this. He's a biochemist who produces many > wonderful products. My doctor told me that this happened to him and > to one of his patients. This is the fifth case I've heard. Any > feedback out there? > > And has anyone used the Ally, also sold by the same company (Clarus)? > > is Rotella, M.Ac., CNC > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 3, 2006 Report Share Posted May 3, 2006 I bought the ally, too. It is highly endorsed by Dr. Dick A. Versendaal, founder of Contact Reflex Analysis. I think we all need to do some serious muscle testing and ask, " Is this good for me to wear all the time? " We need to ask the right questions because it may be different for each of us. After my long illness, I still have problems going into big stores and public places like restaurants. I am looking for some help in this area and thus broke down and bought a q link because I read that it has been improved. is Rotella, M.Ac., CNC > > Again I've heard that the new q link really works well for a time but > then the people start to feel toxic. I called the company today but > they refuse to acknowledge that this occurs. I know Yanick, some > years ago, discovered this. He's a biochemist who produces many > wonderful products. My doctor told me that this happened to him and > to one of his patients. This is the fifth case I've heard. Any > feedback out there? > > And has anyone used the Ally, also sold by the same company (Clarus)? > > is Rotella, M.Ac., CNC > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 3, 2006 Report Share Posted May 3, 2006 What a crazy world. Actually, when I went for a thermography last week, the guy was showing me his pendant and he had a suitcase filled with BioPro phone protectors. Rest assured, I'm going to be doing some careful asking of questions re these products and when I come up with some answers, I'll let you know. Yanick, biochemist, a long time ago realized the toxic effect of the Q link. There are people, like another female doctor that I know, who swears by it and wears it day and nite. Her house is like 20 feet from high tension wires. is Rotella, M.Ac., CNC > > Check out the other Q-Link on www.mybiopro.com/QWC Apparently the two > developers (?) split. This Q-Link appears to have a good reputation. This > is also the site for the cell phone chip. > > > > / > > Adv. CranioSacral Therapist > > Worcester, Massachusetts > > www.holisticnetwork.org/QWC > > > > _____ > > From: qxci-english [mailto:qxci-english ] On > Behalf Of jadespring2003 > Sent: Tuesday, May 02, 2006 7:33 PM > qxci-english > Subject: q link > > > > Again I've heard that the new q link really works well for a time but > then the people start to feel toxic. I called the company today but > they refuse to acknowledge that this occurs. I know Yanick, some > years ago, discovered this. He's a biochemist who produces many > wonderful products. My doctor told me that this happened to him and > to one of his patients. This is the fifth case I've heard. Any > feedback out there? > > And has anyone used the Ally, also sold by the same company (Clarus)? > > is Rotella, M.Ac., CNC > > > > > > > > ............................................ > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 3, 2006 Report Share Posted May 3, 2006 I, too, had several clients with bad experiences with Q-links. A friend of mine is a respected dowser from upstate NY. He also is clairvoyant and can see energy fields. He describes the effect as burning a deep hole into a person's aura somewhere between throat and heart chakra. Just recently he commented on the new BioPro Q-Links doing more damage than the old ones... Werner Institute of Feng Shui & Geopathology Morrin <mary.morrin@...> wrote: Check out the other Q-Link on www.mybiopro.com/QWC Apparently the two developers (?) split. This Q-Link appears to have a good reputation. This is also the site for the cell phone chip. / Adv. CranioSacral Therapist Worcester, Massachusetts www.holisticnetwork.org/QWC From: qxci-english [mailto:qxci-english ] On Behalf Of jadespring2003Sent: Tuesday, May 02, 2006 7:33 PMqxci-english Subject: q link Again I've heard that the new q link really works well for a time butthen the people start to feel toxic. I called the company today butthey refuse to acknowledge that this occurs. I know Yanick, someyears ago, discovered this. He's a biochemist who produces manywonderful products. My doctor told me that this happened to him andto one of his patients. This is the fifth case I've heard. Anyfeedback out there?And has anyone used the Ally, also sold by the same company (Clarus)?is Rotella, M.Ac., CNC Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 4, 2006 Report Share Posted May 4, 2006 I've had several people have problems with the plastic q-link, but people that sell them say the stainless steel one doesn't have this problem. Any clarifiation whether the people with problems it's only the black plastic one? Thanks Ann q link Again I've heard that the new q link really works well for a time but then the people start to feel toxic. I called the company today but they refuse to acknowledge that this occurs. I know Yanick, some years ago, discovered this. He's a biochemist who produces many wonderful products. My doctor told me that this happened to him and to one of his patients. This is the fifth case I've heard. Any feedback out there? And has anyone used the Ally, also sold by the same company (Clarus)? is Rotella, M.Ac., CNC ............................................. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 8, 2006 Report Share Posted May 8, 2006 well, I got the white plastic one. I have one of the old metal ones and don't feel a thing with that. I'll enquire further when I see my dr. in two weeks. In the meantime, any of you out there who've experienced the q link, please speak up! I just listened to a CD on it and the people at Clarus claim that when a q link is put near a blood sample, the cells unclump (darkfield). They don't do that with substitutes. My strategy is this: I'll clear my q link on my SE 5 radionics machine weekly. If I find it's not doing the job, I'll buy another one. If I have to buy four a year, then so be it. In the meantime, I'll continue to try to reach the company and hope they'll wake up and smell the coffee. is Rotella, M.Ac., CNC > > I've had several people have problems with the plastic q-link, but people > that sell them say the stainless steel one doesn't have this problem. > Any clarifiation whether the people with problems it's only the black > plastic one? > Thanks > Ann > > q link > > > Again I've heard that the new q link really works well for a time but > then the people start to feel toxic. I called the company today but > they refuse to acknowledge that this occurs. I know Yanick, some > years ago, discovered this. He's a biochemist who produces many > wonderful products. My doctor told me that this happened to him and > to one of his patients. This is the fifth case I've heard. Any > feedback out there? > > And has anyone used the Ally, also sold by the same company (Clarus)? > > is Rotella, M.Ac., CNC > > > > > > > > ............................................ > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 11, 2006 Report Share Posted May 11, 2006 I am not sure about the new Q Link, but the one I got a few years ago was fine in the beginning and then felt toxic to me as well. I tried the Tesla watch from ELF labs, but developed numbness and tingling in the middle finger tip (heart meridian) which they absolutely denied could be related, so who knows. I am now living in a large suburb of Los Angeles and still hoping to find a good product for this. Vida q link Again I've heard that the new q link really works well for a time but then the people start to feel toxic. I called the company today but they refuse to acknowledge that this occurs. I know Yanick, some years ago, discovered this. He's a biochemist who produces many wonderful products. My doctor told me that this happened to him and to one of his patients. This is the fifth case I've heard. Any feedback out there? And has anyone used the Ally, also sold by the same company (Clarus)? is Rotella, M.Ac., CNC ............................................. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 9, 2006 Report Share Posted June 9, 2006 I read an older post on this chat about some speculation on the part of some seers that the qlink might cause problems. I am interested in this, because of the metal used in the qlink. The following is a response from an upper level distributor to my question and those posed on the chat by others. I thought I would share it.Although I believe this product, and certainly others from the company, can be of value, it may be useful to stop using it after some time, as with magnets, and I am interested in your experiences. I want the very best for my clients.(BTWI think putting the chips on electrical devices makes a lot of sense, since it harmonizes the EMF's so they are not harmful and may be beneficial.) I feel a difference in my computer room since adding the harmonizer and chips. The room is full of electrical devices of various kinds. I'm putting chips on my sonic toothbrush and hairdryer too.Aurelie ce, PhD, CNHP, CMT, QBSCertified Quantum Biofeedback SpecialistTrinity, Florida727 232 0504http://www.mybiopro.com/vibrantenergyhttp://www.detoxwithwater.comRe: q link B. QLink2 This is a small pendant B�, which is worn around the neck. It is claimed not only to reduce the ill effects of computers, mobile phones, and other known sources of EM fields, but to enhance health generally. Because of this it is recommended to wear the pendant all the time. Like the TecnoAO, its operation depends on recent scientific understanding of subtle energy, but otherwise works on rather different principles. Rather than being preset to any specific frequencies, it adapts itself over a period of days to the natural frequencies of the wearer. (I don't know how it does this). According to speculations by the biophysicist Dr TM Srinavasan, it brings these into resonance with the same frequencies, selected out of the infinite spectrum of the zero-point field (ZPF). The effect of this is to improve the coherence (or signal/noise ratio) of the body's own vibrations. The evidence for effectiveness of the QLink is very impressive. Twenty-two volunteers (with no obvious health problems) were used in a study of the balance of acupuncture meridians, using electrical measurements with the Computronix Acupro II system. It was shown how exposure to an EM field, of the type people are so often exposed to, put these measurements out of balance, and how the balance was restored while wearing the QLink, even while EM field exposure continued. Indeed the balance while the individuals were both exposed to the field and wearing the QLink was better than the baseline condition when they had neither of these. Another study was done with the new technique of live-blood microscopy. This technique enables one to see that most people, especially those suffering from chronic illnesses, have distorted red and white cells, together with various kinds of debris in the serum. Four volunteers, none of whom suffered obvious ill health, nevertheless showed some of these pathological blood characteristics. These increased after eight hours exposure to an EM field. After a further three days, during which they both wore the QLink, and continued to have EM field exposure, the blood picture came back to normal - in fact rather better than it was before EM field exposure began. In a second study, the QLink was found to improve the blood picture in all of another eight volunteers, without any EM field exposure. In a recent study, Prof Tiller and Dr Norman Shealy 5�have recorded the EEG from a number of volunteers, who were either: (a) in their usual state, or ( wearing QLink, or © exposed to the EM field, or (d) exposed to EM field while wearing QLink. It was shown first how EM fields distorted the EEG, while the QLink alone had no such ill effects, and then how the QLink both restored the pattern of those exposed to the EM field, and even improved the pattern of those who were not so exposed. Recently I have tested my Kirlian image, either wearing or not wearing the QLink, by means of the CrownTV computerised Kirlian instrument. 6� The differences in various quantitative parameters were quite remarkable. Finally, in many testimonials, wearers have reported subjective improvements in well-being, mental clarity and general health. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 18, 2006 Report Share Posted June 18, 2006 The issue is not whether the Q link has merit. Indeed it does. However, after several months, does it still have that capability? is Rotella, M.Ac., CNC > > I read an older post on this chat about some speculation on the part of some seers that the qlink might cause problems. I am interested in this, because of the metal used in the qlink. The following is a response from an upper level distributor to my question and those posed on the chat by others. I thought I would share it. > > Although I believe this product, and certainly others from the company, can be of value, it may be useful to stop using it after some time, as with magnets, and I am interested in your experiences. I want the very best for my clients. > > (BTWI think putting the chips on electrical devices makes a lot of sense, since it harmonizes the EMF's so they are not harmful and may be beneficial.) I feel a difference in my computer room since adding the harmonizer and chips. The room is full of electrical devices of various kinds. I'm putting chips on my sonic toothbrush and hairdryer too. > > Aurelie ce, PhD, CNHP, CMT, QBS > Certified Quantum Biofeedback Specialist > Trinity, Florida > 727 232 0504 > > http://www.mybiopro.com/vibrantenergy > > http://www.detoxwithwater.com > > Re: q link B. QLink2 > > > This is a small pendant B�, which is worn around the neck. It is claimed not only to reduce the ill effects of computers, mobile phones, and other known sources of EM fields, but to enhance health generally. Because of this it is recommended to wear the pendant all the time. Like the TecnoAO, its operation depends on recent scientific understanding of subtle energy, but otherwise works on rather different principles. > > Rather than being preset to any specific frequencies, it adapts itself over a period of days to the natural frequencies of the wearer. (I don't know how it does this). According to speculations by the biophysicist Dr TM Srinavasan, it brings these into resonance with the same frequencies, selected out of the infinite spectrum of the zero-point field (ZPF). The effect of this is to improve the coherence (or signal/noise ratio) of the body's own vibrations. > > The evidence for effectiveness of the QLink is very impressive. Twenty-two volunteers (with no obvious health problems) were used in a study of the balance of acupuncture meridians, using electrical measurements with the Computronix Acupro II system. > > It was shown how exposure to an EM field, of the type people are so often exposed to, put these measurements out of balance, and how the balance was restored while wearing the QLink, even while EM field exposure continued. Indeed the balance while the individuals were both exposed to the field and wearing the QLink was better than the baseline condition when they had neither of these. > > Another study was done with the new technique of live-blood microscopy. This technique enables one to see that most people, especially those suffering from chronic illnesses, have distorted red and white cells, together with various kinds of debris in the serum. > > Four volunteers, none of whom suffered obvious ill health, nevertheless showed some of these pathological blood characteristics. These increased after eight hours exposure to an EM field. After a further three days, during which they both wore the QLink, and continued to have EM field exposure, the blood picture came back to normal - in fact rather better than it was before EM field exposure began. > > In a second study, the QLink was found to improve the blood picture in all of another eight volunteers, without any EM field exposure. > > > In a recent study, Prof Tiller and Dr Norman Shealy 5�have recorded the EEG from a number of volunteers, who were either: > (a) in their usual state, or > ( wearing QLink, or > © exposed to the EM field, or > (d) exposed to EM field while wearing QLink. > > It was shown first how EM fields distorted the EEG, while the QLink alone had no such ill effects, and then how the QLink both restored the pattern of those exposed to the EM field, and even improved the pattern of those who were not so exposed. > > > Recently I have tested my Kirlian image, either wearing or not wearing the QLink, by means of the CrownTV computerised Kirlian instrument. 6� The differences in various quantitative parameters were quite remarkable. > > Finally, in many testimonials, wearers have reported subjective improvements in well-being, mental clarity and general health. > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.