Re: External sources of EMF

[Guest guest]

> Look around and see if there are mobile phone masts around.

> Do you own your private phone mast in your living room?

> Many people do. They have those wireless phones according to the

> DECT/GAP standard. Those base stations transmit continiously 24

> hours a day pulsed signals, whether you phone or not.

> They can reach 300 meters and go through 20 cm concrete.

> Check your neighbours. If they have one, talk to them.

Although it's easy for me not to have a wireless phone in my

house, I think it's pretty impossible to control your outside

environment without moving. For example, I *know* there are

mobile phone antennas near my house. There are also power

lines. There are also TV and radio station antenna towers

within line-of-sight. And I'm sure my neighbors on both

sides of me have wireless phones, computers, etc. And don't

forget satellites sending signals down to Earth.

To me, avoidance & shielding is impractical (and impossible)

in such an environment. EMF protection devices on the

other hand can wipe out all these external sources. For

example, I know that there's something coming into to my

den -- it bothers me even if everything is turned off.

However, put an EMF protection device in there and everything

is fine. A simple solution. Much cheaper than moving.

The only problem is finding the right device that works

for you, but even if you bought 20 different devices and

tried them all, it'd still be cheaper than selling your

house and moving to a new one.

Marc

[Guest guest]

For example, I *know* there are

> mobile phone antennas near my house. There are also power

> lines. There are also TV and radio station antenna towers

> within line-of-sight. And I'm sure my neighbors on both

> sides of me have wireless phones, computers, etc. And don't

> forget satellites sending signals down to Earth.

>

> To me, avoidance & shielding is impractical (and impossible)

> in such an environment. EMF protection devices on the

> other hand can wipe out all these external sources. For

> example, I know that there's something coming into to my

> den -- it bothers me even if everything is turned off.

> However, put an EMF protection device in there and everything

> is fine. A simple solution. Much cheaper than moving.

> The only problem is finding the right device that works

> for you, but even if you bought 20 different devices and

> tried them all, it'd still be cheaper than selling your

> house and moving to a new one.

>

> Marc

Hello Marc,

it is near impossible to shield against power lines.

But you cabn shield against high frequency radiation from outside

phone masts.

I do not agree with your reasoning.

Your EMF protection devices do work, but only against the

longitudinal waves, and by a certain level of electrosensibility.

By not shielding (f.i. the bedroom) against the transversal waves,

your electrosensibility will grow to a level, where your body acts

as a greater resonator than your devices can handle, and than they

are not working any more for you.

You have a false illusion of safety.

Those devices work as resonators and absorb the longitudinal waves,

but do not heal you.

By shielding your bedroom, your body can rest at night and

recuperate, slowly, but steady.

When the body thinks it is dark, it produces the hormon Melatonine,

which regulates a number of processes in the body. It makes stuff

against tumors. Women with breast cancer have a very low Melatonine

level, and someone found that suicides had a Melatonine level of

zero.

Now, hich frequency waves are seen by the body as light, and

therefore, not enough Melatonine will be made.

So, also therefore, it is important to shield the bedroom and have

it radiation free. We say 0,1 - 1 uW/m2 max.

Those towers can give you 2.000 to 20.000 uW/m2 and more, in your

rooms.

A DECT house-phone can give 2.000 to 20.000 uW/m2 also.

That is why I call it *your private phone mast*.

Claessens

[Guest guest]

>Your EMF protection devices do work, but only against the

>longitudinal waves, and by a certain level of electrosensibility.

>By not shielding (f.i. the bedroom) against the transversal waves,

>your electrosensibility will grow to a level, where your body acts

>as a greater resonator than your devices can handle, and than they

>are not working any more for you.

>You have a false illusion of safety.

I find it amusing when people say these things, because my own

experience proves them incorrect. My ES symptoms were extreme

a few years ago -- I could not do anything. However, through

the use of these devices and nutrition my symptoms have been

steadily going away. And my tolerance is such that I can

now use a 21 " CRT monitor all day. So I do not have a false

illusion of safety. It is you who have a false illusion

of danger. :-)

Marc

[Guest guest]

Oh wait, I have more to say on this message...

>Those devices work as resonators and absorb the longitudinal waves,

>but do not heal you.

I have tried over 20 EMF protection devices over the past 3 years, and one

thing I know for sure is that they operate under many different assumptions

about why EMF is bad, and they clearly do different things. Your statement

above may be applicable to some of the devices, but it is certainly not

true for all of them. For example, the Springlife Polarizers have been

said to heal a variety of conditions, and are good for more than just EMF.

Also, based on my own reaction, I'd say that the devices based on the work

of Lakhovsky also are healing:

* Earthcalm Pendant (http://earthcalm.com/)

* Electromagnetic Pollution Rectifiers (http://bewisepolarize.com)

* Ray-X Button (http://www.bodymagnetics.com/prod10068-A.htm)

I have experience with all these devices. Do you?

Marc

[Guest guest]

> >Those devices work as resonators and absorb the longitudinal

waves, but do not heal you.

>

> I have tried over 20 EMF protection devices over the past 3 years,

and one

> thing I know for sure is that they operate under many different

assumptions

> about why EMF is bad, and they clearly do different things. Your

statement

> above may be applicable to some of the devices, but it is

certainly not

> true for all of them. For example, the Springlife Polarizers have

been

> said to heal a variety of conditions, and are good for more than

just EMF.

> Also, based on my own reaction, I'd say that the devices based on

the work

> of Lakhovsky also are healing:

>

> * Earthcalm Pendant (http://earthcalm.com/)

> * Electromagnetic Pollution Rectifiers

(http://bewisepolarize.com)

> * Ray-X Button (http://www.bodymagnetics.com/prod10068-A.htm)

>

> I have experience with all these devices. Do you?

> Marc

Hello Marc,

no, not those, but similar.

They use symbols, like the BioProtect uses symbols.

The bewisepolarize uses the Lakhovsky/Bergstresser symbols.

I have them as antennas for my Lakhovsky Multiple Wave Oscillator.

They work fine, till your electrosensibility outgrows them.

Let us hope, that that will not come.

I have also many years of experience with electrosmog.

Claessens