Re: Re: Tachyon products

[Guest guest]

>>>Did you ever test an ATTI tachyonized pendant to be worn on the

>>>chest over the thymus gland?

>>

>>No, I never had any results from any of the tachyon products I

>>tried, and I tried plenty of them. Eventually just gave up

>>on them, as it obviously was not what I needed.

>

> Which ones did you try and for how long?

Well, it's been 3 years, so I may have forgotten a few things,

but I did try a tachyonized pendant over my thymus gland (despite

my previously saying that I had not -- I meant that I had not

tried a cubic zirconium pendant). I also tried the silica

discs on my fuse box, on my computer, on my computer monitor,

on my supplements, on me, and on the headboad of my bed

(both 4 and 6 " ). I also tried the tachyonized water.

I also tried the vitalizer belt and the sweat bands.

So after spending several hundred dollars and after trying

these products for many months (and some for a year or two),

I would say that it was all a huge waste of money. None of these

items *ever* improved my tolerance for computer use or

florescent lights at all, which was my main reason for buying

them in the first place. The sweat bands

did improve my energy, but the difference was so small that

it was not worth the effort of trying to hide the fact that

I was wearing sweat bands! I get a much larger boost

in energy from using a small Springlife Polarizer pendant,

and with this I *do* get an improved tolerance for the

computer, plus a reduction in allergies and chemical

sensitivities, plus improved digestion.

Adding a Quantum power strip around my computer at both

home and work pretty much seems to supply the best overall

solution I've found after spending thousands of dollars

on dozens of EMF protection devices. It still requires

an daily intake of certain foods and supplements (antioxidants,

minerals, proteins, polysaccarides) to work full-time in an

environment surrounded by computer monitors and

florescent lights, but at least it works!

Marc

[Guest guest]

> Why did you continue using them for such a long time if they didnt

> work?

Well, this was bacitk in 2001, and I wasn't really aware that there

was this huge industry of EMF protection devices out there.

Basically, I thought there was the Q-Link, Bioelectric Shield,

and Tachyon products -- the ones with the biggest marketing

budgets, I guess... :-) So I experimented with them much

longer than I should have. These days, I would have

gotten rid of all of these products in less than a week,

but back then I used them for months and months, waiting

for them to do something (and out of work on medical

disability the whole time). These companies all had this

great marketing gimick -- " it may take up to 3 months before

you notice beneficial effects " . So I waited. And waited.

The beneficial effects never came. So again, I was just

wasting my time, when I should have been moving onto something

else.

> Did you use combinations of other tools at the same time?

I certainly did. I probably tried every combination

imaginable. They just didn't help. Whatever they did,

it was not addressing the cause of my EMF sensitivity.

> have had just the OPPOSITE effect from ATTI tachyonized tools.

Yes, but don't assume that just because you had that effect,

that everyone else does. I've seen this over and over with

my own recommendations to others -- sometimes they work,

but sometimes they don't. Everyone is different. You can't

know if they'll help you unless you try them. Just don't

make the same mistake that I did -- there's no need to

wait months to tell if something works. You should know

in a few minutes, or at most a few days.

Also, note that I've talked with 2 different health practioners

who seen some clients who used Tachyon products. One said

that Tachyon products don't seem to work for any of her

clients, and the other said that she's had to undo some

of the damage done by Tachyon products. So they had even

a more negative impression of them than I do.

> Also, there are some pretty impressive studies on EMF/ELF

> tolerance and tachyonized tools.

I'm not denying that some people are helped by them. Just

not me.

Also, besides " EMF tolerance " , there is another issue --

what are the longterm health effects of using a certain

EMF protection device. Some of these devices have healing

characteristics, where your health will improve with time.

Others are just the opposite -- your health will gradually

get worse, even though you may be happy that you can tolerate

EMF better. It's probably similar to a situation where

one treats a bacterial infection with antibiotics or

probiotics. Both may help with the infection, although

one will make your health worse and one better.

Marc

[Guest guest]

>>Why did you continue using them for such a long time if they didnt

>>work?

Adding to this, the Tachyon sweatbands did seem to provide a slight

boost in energy, so I continued using these for much longer than most

of the other Tachyon products. But the big problem was hiding them.

After all, people are going to give you strange looks if you're

wearing sweatbands at work! I eventually found that placing

them under my socks was the best way to hide them, but even

then that was problematic, and I eventually decided that the

benefits from them wasn't worth the hassle, especially when

there were plenty of other things which provided an energy boost.

Marc

[Guest guest]

> Undo damage done by Tachyon products? I have never ever experienced

> or heard of anyone else that experienced that Tachyon energy can be

> harmful, so I would be interested to know what this practitioner was

> referring to.

She was referring to a mother who started using some sort of " orange

Tachyon disc " on her baby (I don't even know if it was ATTI tachyon or

some other company), and the baby started having seizures. I know

from my own experience, the first night I tried using a tachyon

silica disc above my bed, I woke up in the middle of the night with

nasty head pains. So again, I don't deny that the products do

*something*, but I was looking for computer EMF protection, not

head pains... :-)

> The studies were also done on animals, which rules out placebo.

I just get skeptical about all " studies " , as the company paying

for the study usually makes sure that the results come out in favor

of their product. Even testimonials are problematic, as one can

report an improvement after the first day of using a product

and write a testimonial, only to later realize that the improvement

was temporary. I've had this happen to me -- in fact, I know

of at least 2 companies that use my testimonial to sell their

products, even though the improvements I reported were only

temporary and I no longer recommend the products!

Marc

[Guest guest]

> Although I dont have any experience whatsoever

> with Bioharmonics products and what kind of energy they emit, it

> would be interesting to test these for comparison

Well, like I said, I've already done that... :-)

The Tachyon products (from the company you prefer) did not

help my EMF sensitivity, although I could barely notice

them producing some sort of energy.

The Springlife Polarizers from Bioharmonics did help my

EMF sensitivity, and some of the models are extremely

strong (for me, at least).

If we could suppose that both products are producing

similar energy, I'd make a wild guess that the Springlife

Polarizers are 100-1000 times stronger.

I agree that a lot of these companies marketing methods leave

much to be desired -- they certainly don't help their own

credibility with the things they write!

Marc

[Guest guest]

> If we could suppose that both products are producing

> similar energy, I'd make a wild guess that the Springlife

> Polarizers are 100-1000 times stronger.

One other key difference between the Tachyon and the

Springlife products appears to be their area of

effectiveness. As I understand it (correct me if

I'm wrong), the Silica discs put out a long

cylindrical pattern, which is 15 feet long and

perhaps only a few inches wide. It also sounds

like this field is projected out of one side of

the silica disc.

The Springlife Polarizers on the other hand appear

to work within a spherical area from the device,

and as you get further away from them the power

diminishes. I've noticed its effect from as

far as 7 feet away, but of course its strongest

when making contact.

As far as I can tell, the Tachyon sweatbands

also have a spherical pattern, so in this respect

they are quite different than the Tachyon silica

discs. Also, this may be why I notice benefits

from the sweatbands and not the discs.

Marc

[Guest guest]

> In other words, these stronger products have an adverse effect on

> your wellbeing?

Well, there is an appropriate " dosage " for everything.

Would you take 10 antibiotic pills if your doctor told

you to take 1? Same thing with EMF protection devices. I get

an adverse effect with too much Quantum Products as well, however

with the right amount they are quite helpful. Better I think

to find a product line that at least has the potential of

being too strong, rather than one which is consistently too

weak.

> Still, if the energy doesnt " feel " the same, it

> probably isnt.

Well, the energy around a Springlife Polarizer is supposed

to " chi " , and I do recall when I first got them that they

reminded me of a Reiki treatment, which is also supposed

to be " chi " . I would say that Reiki is stronger than

a Springlife Polarizer, but then again, nobody gets Reiki

treatments 24 hours a day...

Marc

[Guest guest]

> The sweatbands emit much less tachyon energy in an

> omnidirectional field. If you still have these and dont use other

> energy tools while sleeping, I can recommend to put them under your

> pillow and see what happens.

Now that I think of it, I *did* used to put the Tachyon sweatbands

underneath my pillow! That was before I got the Springlife polarizers.

These days, I just use an OM pendant next to my bedstand at night,

as the field extending from this is large enough and strong enough

that I don't need to put it under the pillow.

Marc