Guest guest Posted April 23, 2004 Report Share Posted April 23, 2004 Hi folks: Does anyone have an answer to this one? (I have previously noted an apparent error in the USDA's database. When I pointed it out to them by email they did not reply. Is this another? If so, is the database littered with errors? And if so, is there much point in relying on these data to tell us what we want to know? Lots of 'if's here. Perhaps there is a simple explanation and the following is not an error.) I took the nutrient data for 1700 calories-worth of broccoli from Fitday.com, which presumably uses the data from the USDA. This is what it showed for grams of macronutrients, along with the standard multipliers and associated calories. (I have tried to 'force' this table to format better). ----------------- grams multiplier kcals ----------------- ------ --------- ------ Fat -------------- 21.25 ----9---- 191.25 Protein --------- 180.93 ----4---- 723.72 Carbohydrate ---- 307.22 ----4--- 1228.88 Carb, minus fiber 131.15 ----4---- 524.60 Fiber, if ignored 176.07 ----0?----- 0.00 Fiber, if counted 176.07 ----4---- 704.28 Now as I said above, this data is for 1700 calories-worth of broccoli, as was indicated near the top of the Fitday data table. If you add up the calories for fat, protein and total carbohydrate you get 2143.85 - 26.1% higher than the 1700 number for total calories. But if, instead, you assume the total carbohydrate grams number includes the fiber, and that the fiber is not included in the calorie total, and then add up the fat, protein and the 'carbohydrate minus fiber' calorie numbers, you get 1429.57 calories, or 15.3% less than the 1700 total. Can someone please enlighten me as to what it is I am missing here? These are not small discrepancies and appear much too big to be accounted for by minor variations in the 'energy per gram' conversion factors. Nor are these discrepancies confined to broccoli. All the half dozen or so vegetables I checked have similar types of discrepancies, but not, it seems, all the same percentage. Rodney. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.