Guest guest Posted May 29, 2010 Report Share Posted May 29, 2010 Hi 1. I definitely agree with Diane's findings on GLUTEN… I've read more on this recently. In my opinion not only those " diagnosed " to be intolerant to gluten would benefit from eating gluten-free, but EVERYBODY would! Gluten are a man-made invention, and not a great one for our health. You can read a lot of scientific reports on this, and all these could be summarized in one sentence: Glutens in our diet only do bad stuff! It causes tj perm bbb, inflammation in the intestines, leaky gut,… and althus a lot of auto-immune diseases. 2. Same thing with salt NaCl (or kitchen salt but also very present in sea/Himalayan salt, high mineral waters and processed foods). It's toxic and we should avoid it as much as possible. It's the organic Sodium (Na) we need not the toxic inorganic NaCl. It is proven that NaCl also opens the tight junctions… 3. And yes also EMF opens the tight junctions… (and blood clogging) SOURCES ON THIS (also in addition to Diane's postings): 1. GLUTEN …the more gluten we eat, the greater is the risk of protein fragments entering our bloodstream… …Disruption of TJ allows harmful substances such as gluten fragments to slip through them… …The longer we eat gluten, the greater is our risk of developing other auto-immune disorders… www.dfwpsoriasis.org/glutensensitivity.doc ....Gluten is considered unhealthy for many people because it is a protein found in grains such as wheat and barley that can cause an inflammation in the intestines... http://www.ehow.com/video_4738853_gluten-unhealthy.html 2. NACL …There was a negative correlation between the concentration of NaCl and the fraction of intact tight junctions… http://erj.ersjournals.com/cgi/content/full/20/6/1444 ....Ingesting inorganic sodium chloride will result in an accumulation of sodium outside the cell and will pull water from the cells into the extracellular space by virtue of its concentration. In addition, water is withdrawn from the tissues in order to neutralize and suspend this toxic poison and then it is excreted via various routes (skin, kidneys, bowels, etc.). This inorganic mineral is totally unusable by our body and is excreted in the same form that it is ingested without being broken down or utilized. It creates an unnecessary hardship and wastage of energy on the body in general… ....The body needs sodium, but in small quantities. We get it from the fruits and vegetables we eat. Good tomatoes taste a little salty. Celery, spinach and dark greens are naturally rich in salt. The sodium that natural foods contain is enough to meet our needs. By adding sea salt to our diet, we are almost certain to take in too much sodium, and this will lead toseveral imbalances... ....Sea salt is touted as being healthier than table salt because the former has more trace minerals and the latter is heat processed. Nonetheless, sodium chloride in any form is toxic- it impairs all of our metabolic and cellular functions. Because it is toxic, the body retains water to dilute the toxicity so we don't die. This is edema, and it can result in headaches and heart irregularity. When we are retaining water, the fluid balance in the body is out of balance and cellular transport is Impaired. The body needs to maintain the fluid pressure inside the cells at a specific ratio to the fluid pressure outside of the cells. When we have extra high fluid pressure outside of the cells as a result of salt eating, the cells are not able to efficiently transport normal metabolic wastes out of the cells, thus we become more and more toxic, leading to chronic fatigue and illness. Furthermore, the body needs to maintain specific concentration ratios of sodium to potassium inside and outside of the cells for proper functioning. A high salt diet leads to excess sodium becoming " locked into " cells, creating cellular dysfunction. This has been linked to many modern diseases, including cancer, diabetes, hardening of arteries, hypertension, kidney disease, nervous disorders, and osteoporosis. As long as we have salt in our diet, we cannot effectively detoxify, lose excess weight and completely heal. Once we discontinue salt, it can take as many as a few years to offload all of the excess sodium... http://tribes.tribe.net/goodliving/thread/a5046a04-d910-4cf3-9503-75a867b0c242 3. EMF EMF causes tj perm. ( Goldsworthy): http://www.slideshare.net/staywired/andrew-goldsworthy-to-british-society-for-ec\ ological-medicine-at-the-royal-college-of-general-practitioners-presentation > > > > > > From: svetaswan <svetaswan@> > > Subject: Re: Wifi on Mac Mini desktop - WiFi woes > > > > Date: Monday, May 10, 2010, 9:39 PM > > > > > > Â > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi , > > > > Well, my parents' " normalcy " certainly isn't doing me any good. Sometimes " normal " is overrated - a lot of harm is being done by these so-called " normal " people sitting in board rooms making decisions about the technology that is supposedly " safe " for everyone (but what they're actually concerned about is what is more profitable to them). And there are other " normal " people in power making some evil, selfish decisions that harm the masses. > > > > I suppose I do have trouble verbalizing my symptoms in the most effective way - the frustrating thing about it is that e.s. has contributed to this difficulty. So e.s. itself makes it more difficult for some people to articulate their e.s.. It can be a real quagmire. > > > > But just today, I did receive a bit of hope - from my conversation with my Dad, he seems to be more open to the idea of getting rid of WiFi. He still seems to think that it's " all in my head " - but I didn't receive the strong resistance to the idea of dismantling WiFi that I did a couple of months ago. We'll see where this goes - I hope it wasn't just idle talk. (If this ever gets done, it won't be done right away - it will be at least June/July before it's done.) > > > > So your parents have come around - I guess they now see that you were " ahead of your time " . I guess it feels good to have the media finally validate what you've been feeling and knowing for years. I think Europe may be ahead of the U.S. when it comes to considering - and acting on - the dangers of this wireless technology. Then again, Europe is more progressive than the U.S. when it comes to many matters of public welfare (In Europe, " welfare " doesn't seem to be a bad word like it is over here.). I'm afraid that America is just too full of selfish, profit-mongering folks to fully investigate or admit to the harm that all of this " technological progress " is doing. > > > > As far as unplugging the WiFi at night - well, it's complicated. My sleep-wake cycle is really messed up and irregular (I'm on disability so I don't work)...often, I'm sleeping during the time when someone else in my household is awake (and using the computer). When I have been able to turn off WiFi, though - I've noticed a definite relief. Also, the company that provides our wireless internet got the *bright idea* to hook up the phone lines to the same device that sends out our wireless signal - so, powering off the WiFi router also means turning off our phone lines. So, to get relief from WiFi - it means risking someone not being able to reach us via phone in the case of an emergency. It's a really messed-up situation. > > > > As far as owning a DECT phone - well, I may be guilty as charged. Back in 2006, I bought my parents a cordless phone (with a base station, which is in their bedroom) for Christmas. I'm guessing that this phone uses DECT technology - it works too well for it not to be " dangerous " , lol. But I've never noticed any symptoms from the cordless phone - at least not before my computer-induced e.s. got out of hand and I became more aware of the issue of emf. And when I asked my mom a couple of months ago if she noticed any symptoms from the base station being right beside her bed, she laughed and said " no " . No apparent sleep difficulites. ..nothing. It still doesn't mean that we shouldn't get rid of it, though! > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 29, 2010 Report Share Posted May 29, 2010 , Yes, well I also have a suspicion that even gluten-free breads are no good for our health. When going gluten-free 10 days ago, I've gone grain-free too (which is not much of a difference in diet, because gluten are omni-present!), I also still eat rice. > > > > > > > > > From: svetaswan <svetaswan@> > > > Subject: Re: Wifi on Mac Mini desktop - WiFi woes > > > > > > Date: Monday, May 10, 2010, 9:39 PM > > > > > > > > > Â > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi , > > > > > > Well, my parents' " normalcy " certainly isn't doing me any good. > > > Sometimes " normal " is overrated - a lot of harm is being done by these > > > so-called " normal " people sitting in board rooms making decisions about > > > the technology that is supposedly " safe " for everyone (but what they're > > > actually concerned about is what is more profitable to them). And there > > > are other " normal " people in power making some evil, selfish decisions > > > that harm the masses. > > > > > > I suppose I do have trouble verbalizing my symptoms in the most > > > effective way - the frustrating thing about it is that e.s. has > > > contributed to this difficulty. So e.s. itself makes it more difficult > > > for some people to articulate their e.s.. It can be a real quagmire. > > > > > > But just today, I did receive a bit of hope - from my conversation with > > > my Dad, he seems to be more open to the idea of getting rid of WiFi. He > > > still seems to think that it's " all in my head " - but I didn't receive > > > the strong resistance to the idea of dismantling WiFi that I did a > > > couple of months ago. We'll see where this goes - I hope it wasn't just > > > idle talk. (If this ever gets done, it won't be done right away - it > > > will be at least June/July before it's done.) > > > > > > So your parents have come around - I guess they now see that you were > > > " ahead of your time " . I guess it feels good to have the media finally > > > validate what you've been feeling and knowing for years. I think Europe > > > may be ahead of the U.S. when it comes to considering - and acting on - > > > the dangers of this wireless technology. Then again, Europe is more > > > progressive than the U.S. when it comes to many matters of public > > > welfare (In Europe, " welfare " doesn't seem to be a bad word like it is > > > over here.). I'm afraid that America is just too full of selfish, > > > profit-mongering folks to fully investigate or admit to the harm that > > > all of this " technological progress " is doing. > > > > > > As far as unplugging the WiFi at night - well, it's complicated. My > > > sleep-wake cycle is really messed up and irregular (I'm on disability so > > > I don't work)...often, I'm sleeping during the time when someone else in > > > my household is awake (and using the computer). When I have been able to > > > turn off WiFi, though - I've noticed a definite relief. Also, the > > > company that provides our wireless internet got the *bright idea* to > > > hook up the phone lines to the same device that sends out our wireless > > > signal - so, powering off the WiFi router also means turning off our > > > phone lines. So, to get relief from WiFi - it means risking someone not > > > being able to reach us via phone in the case of an emergency. It's a > > > really messed-up situation. > > > > > > As far as owning a DECT phone - well, I may be guilty as charged. Back > > > in 2006, I bought my parents a cordless phone (with a base station, > > > which is in their bedroom) for Christmas. I'm guessing that this phone > > > uses DECT technology - it works too well for it not to be " dangerous " , > > > lol. But I've never noticed any symptoms from the cordless phone - at > > > least not before my computer-induced e.s. got out of hand and I became > > > more aware of the issue of emf. And when I asked my mom a couple of > > > months ago if she noticed any symptoms from the base station being right > > > beside her bed, she laughed and said " no " . No apparent sleep > > > difficulites. ..nothing. It still doesn't mean that we shouldn't get rid > > > of it, though! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 29, 2010 Report Share Posted May 29, 2010 I'm reading that " bread improver " is a combination of chemicals and enzymes... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bread_improver Well, if we skip on all processed foods, grains, gluten, sweeteners and pesticides that's healthier... And surprise-surprise quite close to the paleo-diet! . > > > > > > > > > From: svetaswan <svetaswan@> > > > Subject: Re: Wifi on Mac Mini desktop - WiFi woes > > > > > > Date: Monday, May 10, 2010, 9:39 PM > > > > > > > > > Â > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi , > > > > > > Well, my parents' " normalcy " certainly isn't doing me any good. > > > Sometimes " normal " is overrated - a lot of harm is being done by these > > > so-called " normal " people sitting in board rooms making decisions about > > > the technology that is supposedly " safe " for everyone (but what they're > > > actually concerned about is what is more profitable to them). And there > > > are other " normal " people in power making some evil, selfish decisions > > > that harm the masses. > > > > > > I suppose I do have trouble verbalizing my symptoms in the most > > > effective way - the frustrating thing about it is that e.s. has > > > contributed to this difficulty. So e.s. itself makes it more difficult > > > for some people to articulate their e.s.. It can be a real quagmire. > > > > > > But just today, I did receive a bit of hope - from my conversation with > > > my Dad, he seems to be more open to the idea of getting rid of WiFi. He > > > still seems to think that it's " all in my head " - but I didn't receive > > > the strong resistance to the idea of dismantling WiFi that I did a > > > couple of months ago. We'll see where this goes - I hope it wasn't just > > > idle talk. (If this ever gets done, it won't be done right away - it > > > will be at least June/July before it's done.) > > > > > > So your parents have come around - I guess they now see that you were > > > " ahead of your time " . I guess it feels good to have the media finally > > > validate what you've been feeling and knowing for years. I think Europe > > > may be ahead of the U.S. when it comes to considering - and acting on - > > > the dangers of this wireless technology. Then again, Europe is more > > > progressive than the U.S. when it comes to many matters of public > > > welfare (In Europe, " welfare " doesn't seem to be a bad word like it is > > > over here.). I'm afraid that America is just too full of selfish, > > > profit-mongering folks to fully investigate or admit to the harm that > > > all of this " technological progress " is doing. > > > > > > As far as unplugging the WiFi at night - well, it's complicated. My > > > sleep-wake cycle is really messed up and irregular (I'm on disability so > > > I don't work)...often, I'm sleeping during the time when someone else in > > > my household is awake (and using the computer). When I have been able to > > > turn off WiFi, though - I've noticed a definite relief. Also, the > > > company that provides our wireless internet got the *bright idea* to > > > hook up the phone lines to the same device that sends out our wireless > > > signal - so, powering off the WiFi router also means turning off our > > > phone lines. So, to get relief from WiFi - it means risking someone not > > > being able to reach us via phone in the case of an emergency. It's a > > > really messed-up situation. > > > > > > As far as owning a DECT phone - well, I may be guilty as charged. Back > > > in 2006, I bought my parents a cordless phone (with a base station, > > > which is in their bedroom) for Christmas. I'm guessing that this phone > > > uses DECT technology - it works too well for it not to be " dangerous " , > > > lol. But I've never noticed any symptoms from the cordless phone - at > > > least not before my computer-induced e.s. got out of hand and I became > > > more aware of the issue of emf. And when I asked my mom a couple of > > > months ago if she noticed any symptoms from the base station being right > > > beside her bed, she laughed and said " no " . No apparent sleep > > > difficulites. ..nothing. It still doesn't mean that we shouldn't get rid > > > of it, though! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 31, 2010 Report Share Posted May 31, 2010 Hi Bill, About the enzymes, I believe they are a problem too. In my post I didn't mean we only need to avoid gluten and NaCl. About the minerals, well we definitely need Sodium, Magnesium,... But inorganic Sodium as in NaCl (in kitchen/sea salt) really is toxic. Sea salt does have the 84 essential minerals we need so also some Magnesium, but because they are inorganic we don't absorb them very well. Our drinking water should have a minimum of minerals so the water doesn't deprive you from minerals when drinking, but our body needs the organic minerals such as in vegetables. There are a lot of sources on this for instance: http://tribes.tribe.net/goodliving/thread/a5046a04-d910-4cf3-9503-75a867b0c242 Probably there aren't enough organic minerals in our vegetables anymore due to the depleted land... That's why we should all go bio-farming with epsom salt (MgSO4) or sea salt as a fertilizer!? Interesting read here about an Australian who's using sea salt (withoug NaCl) to fertilize his land so the vegetables are higher in organic minerals... http://www.acresusa.com/toolbox/reprints/Mar06_Amena.pdf . > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > From: svetaswan <svetaswan@> > > > > > Subject: Re: Wifi on Mac Mini desktop - WiFi woes > > > > > <%40> > > > > > Date: Monday, May 10, 2010, 9:39 PM > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Â > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi , > > > > > > > > > > Well, my parents' " normalcy " certainly isn't doing me any good. > > > > > Sometimes " normal " is overrated - a lot of harm is being done by > > these > > > > > so-called " normal " people sitting in board rooms making decisions > > about > > > > > the technology that is supposedly " safe " for everyone (but what > > they're > > > > > actually concerned about is what is more profitable to them). And > > there > > > > > are other " normal " people in power making some evil, selfish > > decisions > > > > > that harm the masses. > > > > > > > > > > I suppose I do have trouble verbalizing my symptoms in the most > > > > > effective way - the frustrating thing about it is that e.s. has > > > > > contributed to this difficulty. So e.s. itself makes it more > > difficult > > > > > for some people to articulate their e.s.. It can be a real quagmire. > > > > > > > > > > But just today, I did receive a bit of hope - from my conversation > > with > > > > > my Dad, he seems to be more open to the idea of getting rid of WiFi. > > He > > > > > still seems to think that it's " all in my head " - but I didn't > > receive > > > > > the strong resistance to the idea of dismantling WiFi that I did a > > > > > couple of months ago. We'll see where this goes - I hope it wasn't > > just > > > > > idle talk. (If this ever gets done, it won't be done right away - it > > > > > will be at least June/July before it's done.) > > > > > > > > > > So your parents have come around - I guess they now see that you were > > > > > > > " ahead of your time " . I guess it feels good to have the media > > finally > > > > > validate what you've been feeling and knowing for years. I think > > Europe > > > > > may be ahead of the U.S. when it comes to considering - and acting on > > - > > > > > the dangers of this wireless technology. Then again, Europe is more > > > > > progressive than the U.S. when it comes to many matters of public > > > > > welfare (In Europe, " welfare " doesn't seem to be a bad word like it > > is > > > > > over here.). I'm afraid that America is just too full of selfish, > > > > > profit-mongering folks to fully investigate or admit to the harm that > > > > > > > all of this " technological progress " is doing. > > > > > > > > > > As far as unplugging the WiFi at night - well, it's complicated. My > > > > > sleep-wake cycle is really messed up and irregular (I'm on disability > > so > > > > > I don't work)...often, I'm sleeping during the time when someone else > > in > > > > > my household is awake (and using the computer). When I have been able > > to > > > > > turn off WiFi, though - I've noticed a definite relief. Also, the > > > > > company that provides our wireless internet got the *bright idea* to > > > > > hook up the phone lines to the same device that sends out our > > wireless > > > > > signal - so, powering off the WiFi router also means turning off our > > > > > phone lines. So, to get relief from WiFi - it means risking someone > > not > > > > > being able to reach us via phone in the case of an emergency. It's a > > > > > really messed-up situation. > > > > > > > > > > As far as owning a DECT phone - well, I may be guilty as charged. > > Back > > > > > in 2006, I bought my parents a cordless phone (with a base station, > > > > > which is in their bedroom) for Christmas. I'm guessing that this > > phone > > > > > uses DECT technology - it works too well for it not to be > > " dangerous " , > > > > > lol. But I've never noticed any symptoms from the cordless phone - at > > > > > > > least not before my computer-induced e.s. got out of hand and I > > became > > > > > more aware of the issue of emf. And when I asked my mom a couple of > > > > > months ago if she noticed any symptoms from the base station being > > right > > > > > beside her bed, she laughed and said " no " . No apparent sleep > > > > > difficulites. ..nothing. It still doesn't mean that we shouldn't get > > rid > > > > > of it, though! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 2, 2010 Report Share Posted June 2, 2010 Hi , Yes indeed, drinking pure H2O is not good in the long run because water always seeks to have a minimum amount of minerals. So if you drink very-low-mineral water (distilled water) it takes minerals from your body. Which is great for detoxing, but will also deplete you from minerals… Adding a bit Celtic sea salt to your water will stop the depletion of your body by your drinking water… If your water has got 30 ppm minimum it's okey. I've just checked it with my tds/ppm-meter and if I add 1 teaspoon of Himalaya-salt to one litre of water (1/4 gallon) it adds appr. 80 ppm to the water. But in the long run I wouldn't advise to drink water with sea/Himalaya- salt. I know some people advise it, well I don't! As you mention the amount of NaCl is too high in sea salt. And NaCl is toxic. On the Wiki-page you can see the amount of NaCl in the sea water (sea water has almost everywhere exactly the same composition): http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Seawater I think it is best to drink a mineral water with min. 30 ppm and max. 300 ppm and not too much Sodium (Na). I drink mostly waters with 3-6 mg/l of Sodium. There are other things that are important on water too, such as ph, Bicarbonates, Mg/Ca, energy/bovus value. But that may be more personal… Greets, . > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > From: svetaswan <svetaswan@> > > > > > > Subject: Re: Wifi on Mac Mini desktop - WiFi woes > > > > > > <%40> > > > > > > Date: Monday, May 10, 2010, 9:39 PM > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Â > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi , > > > > > > > > > > > > Well, my parents' " normalcy " certainly isn't doing me any good. > > > > > > Sometimes " normal " is overrated - a lot of harm is being done by > > > these > > > > > > so-called " normal " people sitting in board rooms making decisions > > > about > > > > > > the technology that is supposedly " safe " for everyone (but what > > > they're > > > > > > actually concerned about is what is more profitable to them). And > > > there > > > > > > are other " normal " people in power making some evil, selfish > > > decisions > > > > > > that harm the masses. > > > > > > > > > > > > I suppose I do have trouble verbalizing my symptoms in the most > > > > > > effective way - the frustrating thing about it is that e.s. has > > > > > > contributed to this difficulty. So e.s. itself makes it more > > > difficult > > > > > > for some people to articulate their e.s.. It can be a real quagmire. > > > > > > > > > > > > But just today, I did receive a bit of hope - from my conversation > > > with > > > > > > my Dad, he seems to be more open to the idea of getting rid of WiFi. > > > He > > > > > > still seems to think that it's " all in my head " - but I didn't > > > receive > > > > > > the strong resistance to the idea of dismantling WiFi that I did a > > > > > > couple of months ago. We'll see where this goes - I hope it wasn't > > > just > > > > > > idle talk. (If this ever gets done, it won't be done right away - it > > > > > > will be at least June/July before it's done.) > > > > > > > > > > > > So your parents have come around - I guess they now see that you were > > > > > > > > > " ahead of your time " . I guess it feels good to have the media > > > finally > > > > > > validate what you've been feeling and knowing for years. I think > > > Europe > > > > > > may be ahead of the U.S. when it comes to considering - and acting on > > > - > > > > > > the dangers of this wireless technology. Then again, Europe is more > > > > > > progressive than the U.S. when it comes to many matters of public > > > > > > welfare (In Europe, " welfare " doesn't seem to be a bad word like it > > > is > > > > > > over here.). I'm afraid that America is just too full of selfish, > > > > > > profit-mongering folks to fully investigate or admit to the harm that > > > > > > > > > all of this " technological progress " is doing. > > > > > > > > > > > > As far as unplugging the WiFi at night - well, it's complicated. My > > > > > > sleep-wake cycle is really messed up and irregular (I'm on disability > > > so > > > > > > I don't work)...often, I'm sleeping during the time when someone else > > > in > > > > > > my household is awake (and using the computer). When I have been able > > > to > > > > > > turn off WiFi, though - I've noticed a definite relief. Also, the > > > > > > company that provides our wireless internet got the *bright idea* to > > > > > > hook up the phone lines to the same device that sends out our > > > wireless > > > > > > signal - so, powering off the WiFi router also means turning off our > > > > > > phone lines. So, to get relief from WiFi - it means risking someone > > > not > > > > > > being able to reach us via phone in the case of an emergency. It's a > > > > > > really messed-up situation. > > > > > > > > > > > > As far as owning a DECT phone - well, I may be guilty as charged. > > > Back > > > > > > in 2006, I bought my parents a cordless phone (with a base station, > > > > > > which is in their bedroom) for Christmas. I'm guessing that this > > > phone > > > > > > uses DECT technology - it works too well for it not to be > > > " dangerous " , > > > > > > lol. But I've never noticed any symptoms from the cordless phone - at > > > > > > > > > least not before my computer-induced e.s. got out of hand and I > > > became > > > > > > more aware of the issue of emf. And when I asked my mom a couple of > > > > > > months ago if she noticed any symptoms from the base station being > > > right > > > > > > beside her bed, she laughed and said " no " . No apparent sleep > > > > > > difficulites. ..nothing. It still doesn't mean that we shouldn't get > > > rid > > > > > > of it, though! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.