Jump to content
RemedySpot.com

Re: Fwd> Cell Phones?

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

I am not an expert on cell technology, but have developed other wireless

technology. I believe in simplistic terms there is less EMF when phone is

idle.

A cell phone sits and listens for broadcast messages and responds if it

hears a message destine for its address. It therefore is receiving data all

the time from doing the listening, but the amount of data would be less

since it is not transmitting like during a conversation. During

transmission it would be a much larger stream of data around the antenna =

greater EMF.

In the case of somebody holding phone by their head, a cell phone in

transmission is like placing your head beside a cell tower, which would have

obvious negative effects. If they placed an idle phone by their head, they

would still get EMF, but at a lower concentration. The question then

becomes how much EMF is bad for the brain? Or how much EMF triggers ES?

That is my two cents from general assumptions.

Glenn

----Original Message Follows----

From: Marc <marc@...>

Reply-

Subject: Fwd> Cell Phones?

Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2004 21:37:52 -0700

Hi all,

Here is a question that somebody asked on another list I'm

subscribed to -- does anyone have a good answer for this?

" is it true that if a cell phone is turned on but not

engaged in conversation that the electromagnetic field

that it generates is a lot lower than if the phone is

engaged in conversation? "

If someone has an answer to this, I'll pass it on to

the person who asked the question.

Thanks!

Marc

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My understanding is that when the phone engages the signal from the

nearest tower the power levels of the headset go up. This is because

the phone, as an antenna, is transmitting. The power also goes up when

there are obstructions between the phone and the tower....the phone

draws more signal from the tower.

Fwd> Cell Phones?

Hi all,

Here is a question that somebody asked on another list I'm subscribed to

-- does anyone have a good answer for this?

" is it true that if a cell phone is turned on but not

engaged in conversation that the electromagnetic field

that it generates is a lot lower than if the phone is

engaged in conversation? "

If someone has an answer to this, I'll pass it on to

the person who asked the question.

Thanks!

Marc

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The phone will emit intermittently, in order to " tell " the system where it is.

The power of this signal will be the same as the power during conversation.

Low power if signal is good, higher power if signal is weak.

Emil DeToffol

www.lessemf.com

At 09:37 PM 9/13/2004, you wrote:

>Hi all,

>

>Here is a question that somebody asked on another list I'm

>subscribed to -- does anyone have a good answer for this?

>

> " is it true that if a cell phone is turned on but not

> engaged in conversation that the electromagnetic field

> that it generates is a lot lower than if the phone is

> engaged in conversation? "

>

>If someone has an answer to this, I'll pass it on to

>the person who asked the question.

>

>Thanks!

>

>Marc

>

>

>

>

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In einer eMail vom 14.09.2004 08:35:54 (MEZ) - Mitteleurop. Sommerze schreibt

glennhcoleman@...:

Hallo,

someone asked,

> " is it true that if a cell phone is turned on but not

> engaged in conversation that the electromagnetic field

> that it generates is a lot lower than if the phone is

> engaged in conversation? "

Yes, it is true. Through electroacupuncture I could measure the biological

negative effect, the EMF of a cell phone has while conversation and while just

beeing turned on and waiting for a call. The effect of the phone only being

turned on is weaker than the effect of a normal electric bulb near your body and

it disappears again, if you put the phone aside at a distance. The effect of

the cell phone during conversation is about 5 times stronger at the start of

teh conversation, it accumulates with the duration of the conversation and with

the number of calls and stays with you after the conversation for a longer

time - may be hours. EEG research has shown that the effect of one call of 1

minute duration it takes several days to recover. Research on the brain of rats

has shown that the radiation of a cell phone damages the brain cells so that

they die some time after the exposure.

Aware of this I tried to find things, that could prevent this negative

effect. Most of the " devices " mentioned in this list do this, also some crystals

and

certain geometrical structures mostly spiral like. But why and how they do

this, is an interesting but difficult question. The key point is here the

longitudinal or Tesla waves with their peculiar qualities, that are changed by

these

tools.

Dietrich Gruen

>

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...