Re: Suing neighbor over wi-fi

[Guest guest]

,

 

Your neighbor deserves to be sued that's for sure, and some extra attention

to ES-ers would be a good thing...

 

But for your problem to be solved fast, could you somehow talk to your

neighbor? If you'd give him an LCD-screen in exchange of his plasma-screen the

problem would be solved emf-wise?

 

.

 

From: paulpjc@... <paulpjc@...>

Subject: Re: Re: Suing neighbor over wi-fi

Date: Friday, April 2, 2010, 11:13 AM

 

PUK replies - I swear to God I would happily blow a few thousand pounds on

suing the couple who are making my life a misery with their Plasma TV.

Even if I knew I would loose I would love to see their vindictive control

freakish smug faces in a court of law. The lady being sued by Fistenburg said

she simply gave up complying with his wishes and live as she would like, -

Kinda selfish and childish mindset going on here it seems ? I feel for

Arthur in his plight, it really should be incumbent on a " user " of these

polluting technologies to ensure that where expressed their " habits " do not

cause

hardship of health impacts to others, particularly where is concerns

someones home(santuary) so basically the lady should be told to thoroughly

screen

her house to stop the waves from entering his property it is her muck that

she is spreading, she should clean up her act, so many people should check

into a rehap to break this addiction and to explore the real reason why

they defend so vigorously their (in-human) right to use it versus the well

being of another human-being.

The thing that really gets me is when I tell some people about my problem

with the Plasma TV a common reply is - well he is entitled to watch his TV

! Yes is my reply of course, but he is not entitled to pollute my home

(some 50m away)with radiation that is so relentless and that he controls at

the flick of a switch knowing that it causes me great discomfort and damages

my health and well being, my rights here should be paramount when the

solution could be as simple as replacing the TV. Its human rights vs in-human

rights

The House of SIM CARDS, a fragile refuge of a generation that will have

forgoten they are flesh and blood when finally their batteries run dry and

down it falls without warning and once again they will gaze into human eyes.

In a message dated 02/04/2010 01:19:52 GMT Daylight Time,

snoshoe_2 (DOT) com writes:

I think it would depend on the situation if I'd sue.

I'd like surrounding neighbors to not use their wireless items, but as it

is now if I was to take action it would be against the providers.

Now if the neighbors were deliberately harrassing with it, or being

obnoxious as some neighbors are, that might be another story.

[Guest guest]

> But for your problem to be solved fast, could you somehow talk to your

> neighbor? If you'd give him an LCD-screen in exchange of his

> plasma-screen the problem would be solved emf-wise?

" Give " your neighbor a several thousand dollar television? He

could buy an awful lot of EMF protection for that!

Also, some people think plasma TVs look better than LCDs, so

that might be a hard sell...

Marc

[Guest guest]

Do you have the link for the youtube demo?

 

A

From: paulpjc@... <paulpjc@...>

Subject: Re: Suing neighbor over wi-fi

Date: Friday, 2 April, 2010, 22:31

 

PUK replies - Suing you neighbour rarely comes out of a whim, and is likely

a last resort if nothing else due to the expense, but the TV issue is a

problem, imagine you sit in a flat or a semi-detatched house and your sofa is

positioned on the dividing wall and along comes your neighbour and puts up

like a picture on the otherside of the wall, ussually no thicker than

260mm (could equally be a baby sleeping in a cot) a Large television wether its

LCD or Plasma coming from our point of veiw you are in big trouble, I

would go so far as saying that these highly radiative devices should have a

warning sticker on them in this regard. But in my case with the Plasma TV as

you know and as I have demonstrated on youtube (Plasma TV RFI) this swamps

my house daily, and I put the person on notice 18 months ago re the problem

and he as good as spat at me ! He has a smug look on his face as if to say

you cant touch me ! Well like I say this situation would make good grounds

for suing on the basis of personal injury, phychological torture... this

case would have legs, it can be readily demonstrated that the problem exists

which in anyones mind would generate curiosity how this can occur from

such a distance from a comercial TV set - Just need the funds and I would be

on this case like a rat up a drain pipe !!!! I am not ashamed to be ES !!!

PUK

In a message dated 01/04/2010 23:06:13 GMT Daylight Time, stephen_vandev

ijvere (DOT) com writes:

Yes, but with the sensitivities we observe on this group, one could

> end up trying to sue their neighbors for watching their plasma TVs,

> having a fridge, using compact fluorescent lights, etc. Seems a

> bit silly.

>

> Marc

[Guest guest]

Well I think is struggling with the emf from the plasma of his neighbor

already a copple of years?. if it could be easily solved with some

emf-protection I suppose he would've found it by now.

Actually these days big screens aren't that expensive. If he can sell the

plasma-tv of the neighbor on eBay he won't loose that much money on it.

But yes, I think the difficult part will be persuading the neighbor as he

seems to love harming his neighbors emf-wise. Hope you get a solution for

this .

.

P.S. Actually I think plasma screens look better than lcd's myself! If I had

known it's so bad emf-wise I would've bought another tv a year ago, I do

" feel " the plasma when I'm detoxing and more sensitive for some emf.

Van: [mailto: ] Namens Marc

Verzonden: vendredi 2 avril 2010 16:48

Aan:

Onderwerp: Re: Re: Suing neighbor over wi-fi

> But for your problem to be solved fast, could you somehow talk to your

> neighbor? If you'd give him an LCD-screen in exchange of his

> plasma-screen the problem would be solved emf-wise?

" Give " your neighbor a several thousand dollar television? He

could buy an awful lot of EMF protection for that!

Also, some people think plasma TVs look better than LCDs, so

that might be a hard sell...

Marc

[Guest guest]

Yes I agree PUK. Wow, I didn't realize that a tv emf would travel next door.

Loni

From: paulpjc@... <paulpjc@...>

Subject: Re: Re: Suing neighbor over wi-fi

Date: Friday, April 2, 2010, 4:13 AM

 

PUK replies - I swear to God I would happily blow a few thousand pounds on

suing the couple who are making my life a misery with their Plasma TV.

Even if I knew I would loose I would love to see their vindictive control

freakish smug faces in a court of law. The lady being sued by Fistenburg said

she simply gave up complying with his wishes and live as she would like, -

Kinda selfish and childish mindset going on here it seems ? I feel for

Arthur in his plight, it really should be incumbent on a " user " of these

polluting technologies to ensure that where expressed their " habits " do not

cause

hardship of health impacts to others, particularly where is concerns

someones home(santuary) so basically the lady should be told to thoroughly

screen

her house to stop the waves from entering his property it is her muck that

she is spreading, she should clean up her act, so many people should check

into a rehap to break this addiction and to explore the real reason why

they defend so vigorously their (in-human) right to use it versus the well

being of another human-being.

The thing that really gets me is when I tell some people about my problem

with the Plasma TV a common reply is - well he is entitled to watch his TV

! Yes is my reply of course, but he is not entitled to pollute my home

(some 50m away)with radiation that is so relentless and that he controls at

the flick of a switch knowing that it causes me great discomfort and damages

my health and well being, my rights here should be paramount when the

solution could be as simple as replacing the TV. Its human rights vs in-human

rights

The House of SIM CARDS, a fragile refuge of a generation that will have

forgoten they are flesh and blood when finally their batteries run dry and

down it falls without warning and once again they will gaze into human eyes.

In a message dated 02/04/2010 01:19:52 GMT Daylight Time,

snoshoe_2 (DOT) com writes:

I think it would depend on the situation if I'd sue.

I'd like surrounding neighbors to not use their wireless items, but as it

is now if I was to take action it would be against the providers.

Now if the neighbors were deliberately harrassing with it, or being

obnoxious as some neighbors are, that might be another story.

[Guest guest]

No you should not be ashamed but society makes us feel that way. When I had

company here & snuck out to sleep at the park I just said " screw it " I am what I

am and I'm going to do what I need to feel better. Loni

From: paulpjc@... <paulpjc@...>

Subject: Re: Suing neighbor over wi-fi

Date: Friday, April 2, 2010, 4:31 AM

 

PUK replies - Suing you neighbour rarely comes out of a whim, and is likely

a last resort if nothing else due to the expense, but the TV issue is a

problem, imagine you sit in a flat or a semi-detatched house and your sofa is

positioned on the dividing wall and along comes your neighbour and puts up

like a picture on the otherside of the wall, ussually no thicker than

260mm (could equally be a baby sleeping in a cot) a Large television wether its

LCD or Plasma coming from our point of veiw you are in big trouble, I

would go so far as saying that these highly radiative devices should have a

warning sticker on them in this regard. But in my case with the Plasma TV as

you know and as I have demonstrated on youtube (Plasma TV RFI) this swamps

my house daily, and I put the person on notice 18 months ago re the problem

and he as good as spat at me ! He has a smug look on his face as if to say

you cant touch me ! Well like I say this situation would make good grounds

for suing on the basis of personal injury, phychological torture... this

case would have legs, it can be readily demonstrated that the problem exists

which in anyones mind would generate curiosity how this can occur from

such a distance from a comercial TV set - Just need the funds and I would be

on this case like a rat up a drain pipe !!!! I am not ashamed to be ES !!!

PUK

In a message dated 01/04/2010 23:06:13 GMT Daylight Time, stephen_vandev

ijvere (DOT) com writes:

Yes, but with the sensitivities we observe on this group, one could

> end up trying to sue their neighbors for watching their plasma TVs,

> having a fridge, using compact fluorescent lights, etc. Seems a

> bit silly.

>

> Marc

[Guest guest]

> Well I think is struggling with the emf from the plasma of his

> neighbor already a copple of years?. if it could be easily solved with some

> emf-protection I suppose he would've found it by now.

Not necessarily. Over the years, I've noticed that

some people are only willing to try certain things,

so there could be an easy, obvious solution to their

problem yet they refuse to try it.

For example, that guy who is suing his neighbor and

who lived in isolation for 20 years. I *believe* this

person has received plenty of advice over the years

about how he could improve his health so he would

be less sensitive (I think I even postal mailed

him a letter many years ago on this subject), but

I'm under the impression that he is unwilling to

do so -- he thinks the cellphone towers and the

wi-fi transmitters should go away, and that he

shouldn't have to do anything special to live

his life comfortably.

Marc

[Guest guest]

Yes I agree he should be willing to try different things to make his home more

liveable but sometimes the exposure is just too strong & an individual is way

too sentisitive.

I keep trying things but nothing is a pancea. Some things help llike the QLink

but not enough.

 

Loni

 

From: Marc <marc@...>

Subject: RE: Re: Suing neighbor over wi-fi

Date: Friday, April 2, 2010, 8:55 AM

 

> Well I think is struggling with the emf from the plasma of his

> neighbor already a copple of years?. if it could be easily solved with some

> emf-protection I suppose he would've found it by now.

Not necessarily. Over the years, I've noticed that

some people are only willing to try certain things,

so there could be an easy, obvious solution to their

problem yet they refuse to try it.

For example, that guy who is suing his neighbor and

who lived in isolation for 20 years. I *believe* this

person has received plenty of advice over the years

about how he could improve his health so he would

be less sensitive (I think I even postal mailed

him a letter many years ago on this subject), but

I'm under the impression that he is unwilling to

do so -- he thinks the cellphone towers and the

wi-fi transmitters should go away, and that he

shouldn't have to do anything special to live

his life comfortably.

Marc

[Guest guest]

> Yes I agree he should be willing to try different things to make his home

> more liveable but sometimes the exposure is just too strong & an

> individual is way too sensitive.

Yes, but as and others have pointed out, that sensitivity can

be reduced. What some people don't seem to realize is that they are

suffering from a health problem -- a health problem that is exacerbated

by EMF exposure. So one cannot blame 100% of their symptoms on the

wi-fi transmitters and cellphone towers. They have to take some of

responsibility themselves, as a healthy person would likely not notice

anything from those same wi-fi transmitters and cellphone towers.

And the most likely culprits that we've seen here are heavy metal

poisoning, parasites, nutritional deficiencies, or failed metabolic

processes (typically in the liver). Fix these problems, and you

no longer care about what your neighbors are doing.

Marc

[Guest guest]

So are you totally cured then of ES Marc? This is such a catch 22. I have the

metabolic problem but it is genetic. Toxins add to the problem.

 

If you are bombarded by a toxin that you can not deal with it will definitely

hinder/prevent your healing. What we can control is what we put in our mouths

but it is not enough for some depending on their damage/illness.

 

One can't stereotype this & say fix your bodies inabilities, you are no longer

ES. Some may overcome but some damage could be permanent & one needs to learn to

live & survive with their handycap.

 

You can always eat right, take the right suppliments for you, & make your

environment as safe as possible for yourself.  These things should help one to

function better.

 

Ya take this arsenic but heal your gut,liver, & detox parasite, heavy metals.

Don't let that arsenic bother you as you are trying to get better! 

 

Loni

 

 

From: Marc <marc@...>

Subject: RE: Re: Suing neighbor over wi-fi

Date: Friday, April 2, 2010, 9:27 AM

 

> Yes I agree he should be willing to try different things to make his home

> more liveable but sometimes the exposure is just too strong & an

> individual is way too sensitive.

Yes, but as and others have pointed out, that sensitivity can

be reduced. What some people don't seem to realize is that they are

suffering from a health problem -- a health problem that is exacerbated

by EMF exposure. So one cannot blame 100% of their symptoms on the

wi-fi transmitters and cellphone towers. They have to take some of

responsibility themselves, as a healthy person would likely not notice

anything from those same wi-fi transmitters and cellphone towers.

And the most likely culprits that we've seen here are heavy metal

poisoning, parasites, nutritional deficiencies, or failed metabolic

processes (typically in the liver). Fix these problems, and you

no longer care about what your neighbors are doing.

Marc

[Guest guest]

Marc,

I think most ES-ers here try to get healthier somehow, me included. But it

doesn't happen overnight that you're suddenly relieved from ES and are

totally detoxed. It seems like it takes years.

That Arthur is probably too impatient to get healthier in the long run, well

if he gets fried all the time I can understand that! Maybe he only cares

about his situation or he wants to fight for all ES-ers, anyway, I think it

is very courageous of him to sue his neighbor in the public arena. When

everybody thinks you're crazy.

You may think it is ridiculous to start suing people for having wifi, well

it is considered ridiculous by the general opinion, but imo it's not:

-I think Wifi is bad for everybody, not just for ES-ers. It attacks

everybody's immunity, so it's good for everybody if we get rid of as much

wifi as possible.

-The discussion on harmful EMF has to start somewhere and the ball will only

start rolling when you get the media's attention.

.

Van: [mailto: ] Namens Marc

Verzonden: vendredi 2 avril 2010 18:27

Aan:

Onderwerp: RE: Re: Suing neighbor over wi-fi

> Yes I agree he should be willing to try different things to make his home

> more liveable but sometimes the exposure is just too strong & an

> individual is way too sensitive.

Yes, but as and others have pointed out, that sensitivity can

be reduced. What some people don't seem to realize is that they are

suffering from a health problem -- a health problem that is exacerbated

by EMF exposure. So one cannot blame 100% of their symptoms on the

wi-fi transmitters and cellphone towers. They have to take some of

responsibility themselves, as a healthy person would likely not notice

anything from those same wi-fi transmitters and cellphone towers.

And the most likely culprits that we've seen here are heavy metal

poisoning, parasites, nutritional deficiencies, or failed metabolic

processes (typically in the liver). Fix these problems, and you

no longer care about what your neighbors are doing.

Marc

[Guest guest]

Yes I agree with you. Whether one can feel it or not; this bombardment

of electrosmog is bad for everyone. Big concern for our next generation. The

reluctance to realize this is going to mean more illness & more early deaths.

 

We do need to raise awareness. It's just hard because then you are exposed to

psycho Stigma.

 

Loni

 

From: Vandevijvere <@...>

Subject: RE: Re: Suing neighbor over wi-fi

Date: Friday, April 2, 2010, 9:59 AM

 

Marc,

I think most ES-ers here try to get healthier somehow, me included. But it

doesn't happen overnight that you're suddenly relieved from ES and are

totally detoxed. It seems like it takes years.

That Arthur is probably too impatient to get healthier in the long run, well

if he gets fried all the time I can understand that! Maybe he only cares

about his situation or he wants to fight for all ES-ers, anyway, I think it

is very courageous of him to sue his neighbor in the public arena. When

everybody thinks you're crazy.

You may think it is ridiculous to start suing people for having wifi, well

it is considered ridiculous by the general opinion, but imo it's not:

-I think Wifi is bad for everybody, not just for ES-ers. It attacks

everybody's immunity, so it's good for everybody if we get rid of as much

wifi as possible.

-The discussion on harmful EMF has to start somewhere and the ball will only

start rolling when you get the media's attention.

.

Van: groups (DOT) com [mailto:groups (DOT) com] Namens Marc

Verzonden: vendredi 2 avril 2010 18:27

Aan: groups (DOT) com

Onderwerp: RE: Re: Suing neighbor over wi-fi

> Yes I agree he should be willing to try different things to make his home

> more liveable but sometimes the exposure is just too strong & an

> individual is way too sensitive.

Yes, but as and others have pointed out, that sensitivity can

be reduced. What some people don't seem to realize is that they are

suffering from a health problem -- a health problem that is exacerbated

by EMF exposure. So one cannot blame 100% of their symptoms on the

wi-fi transmitters and cellphone towers. They have to take some of

responsibility themselves, as a healthy person would likely not notice

anything from those same wi-fi transmitters and cellphone towers.

And the most likely culprits that we've seen here are heavy metal

poisoning, parasites, nutritional deficiencies, or failed metabolic

processes (typically in the liver). Fix these problems, and you

no longer care about what your neighbors are doing.

Marc

[Guest guest]

> So are you totally cured then of ES Marc? This is such a catch 22. I have

> the metabolic problem but it is genetic. Toxins add to the problem.

I'm cured enough that I don't worry about my neighbor's wi-fi or plasma

TV (and living in the city, my neighbors are CLOSE. Three tall/skinny

houses where one house use to be. And one of my neighbors has at least

2 large plasma TVs that I can see through their window -- you can tell

that they are plasmas by how the doesn't change with viewing angle).

The only thing I'm not totally cured from is my work EMF exposure,

which is far worse than anything that anyone's neighbors would do.

And yes, of course it can take years to figure things out and show some

improvement, but unless someone can correct me on this, this person

has spent 20 years doing *nothing* (someone please jump in and please

tell me that I'm wrong about this!).

Marc

[Guest guest]

Well I am very happy for you Marc & we should follow your lead for sure. But as

you say you are still sensitive to work emf. Perhaps it is too strong there. I

think it is all relative to what you are exposed to also. Well for that matter

relative to our bodies damage or malfunctioning.

 

Do you know for a fact that this person suing has done nothing in 20 years to

help himself?

 

Loni

From: Marc <marc@...>

Subject: RE: Re: Suing neighbor over wi-fi

Date: Friday, April 2, 2010, 10:12 AM

 

> So are you totally cured then of ES Marc? This is such a catch 22. I have

> the metabolic problem but it is genetic. Toxins add to the problem.

I'm cured enough that I don't worry about my neighbor's wi-fi or plasma

TV (and living in the city, my neighbors are CLOSE. Three tall/skinny

houses where one house use to be. And one of my neighbors has at least

2 large plasma TVs that I can see through their window -- you can tell

that they are plasmas by how the doesn't change with viewing angle).

The only thing I'm not totally cured from is my work EMF exposure,

which is far worse than anything that anyone's neighbors would do.

And yes, of course it can take years to figure things out and show some

improvement, but unless someone can correct me on this, this person

has spent 20 years doing *nothing* (someone please jump in and please

tell me that I'm wrong about this!).

Marc

[Guest guest]

> Do you know for a fact that this person suing has done nothing in 20

> years to help himself?

No, I don't know this for a tfact -- I heard this from someone else

many years ago, who told me that I was wasting my time writing him a letter

telling him how to reduce his sensitivity. Perhaps someone here knows

better?

Marc

[Guest guest]

Marc, we all appreciate what you've done for this group, every day for the

past 5 years or so. You helped really a lot of people on ES, and I think

very highly of you.

I don't think we should judge Arthur because he hasn't done anything to get

better. I know some people wouldn't try anything because it's not backed up

by most scientists/doctors. Actually doing something can get you worse as

well (for instance getting rid of your amalgam fillings if your dentist

isn't well equipped or very handy). Anyway for a not-experienced person

especially it's a very complicated matter.

All I know is that it takes a lot of guts to sue somebody for having wifi.

And in his way Arthur may have also contributed to the process where people

are starting to get more aware of the dangers of EMF.

.

Van: [mailto: ] Namens Marc

Verzonden: vendredi 2 avril 2010 19:37

Aan:

Onderwerp: RE: Re: Suing neighbor over wi-fi

> Do you know for a fact that this person suing has done nothing in 20

> years to help himself?

No, I don't know this for a tfact -- I heard this from someone else

many years ago, who told me that I was wasting my time writing him a letter

telling him how to reduce his sensitivity. Perhaps someone here knows

better?

Marc

[Guest guest]

> I don't think we should judge Arthur because he hasn't done anything to

> get better.

You're right, I shouldn't judge, but I do find it a bit frustrating,

as if he had done some things right he may not be having the

problems with his neighbor that he is having now.

But of course, you're right -- although heavy metal toxicity seems

to be a major contributor to ES, there are many ways that doctors

deal with this that could end up making you much worse. So in

some cases, it may actually be better to do nothing!

Marc

[Guest guest]

PUK replies - Regarding Plasma Tvs, lets be sure on this one, they are not

all equal, if anyone can find such a scenario that I am subject to with the

Pioneer Plasma TV then let me know. There are several here in my

neighbourhood, none of which can so discernibly be detected in my home as the

latter. It is a plasma TV on steroids !!!! see my youtube vids Plasma TV RFI

affecting electrosensitiive.

In a message dated 02/04/2010 18:12:24 GMT Daylight Time,

marc@... writes:

I'm cured enough that I don't worry about my neighbor's wi-fi or plasma

TV (and living in the city, my neighbors are CLOSE. Three tall/skinny

houses where one house use to be. And one of my neighbors has at least

2 large plasma TVs that I can see through their window -- you can tell

that they are plasmas by how the doesn't change with viewing angle).

[Guest guest]

Puk replies - What if the problem is genetic ?

In a message dated 02/04/2010 18:09:23 GMT Daylight Time, loni326@...

writes:

Yes, but as and others have pointed out, that sensitivity can

be reduced. What some people don't seem to realize is that they are

suffering from a health problem -- a health problem that is exacerbated

by EMF exposure. So one cannot blame 100% of their symptoms on the

wi-fi transmitters and cellphone towers. They have to take some of

responsibility themselves, as a healthy person would likely not notice

anything from those same wi-fi transmitters and cellphone towers.

[Guest guest]

Puk replies - its not next door its over the road in a house 40m away !

The radiation travels through the mains cables in the street and the phone

cables and then in the air its a viscious circle. Have you seen my You tube

vid - Plasma TV RFI affecting electrosensitive ? parts 1 and 2

In a message dated 02/04/2010 16:49:58 GMT Daylight Time, loni326@...

writes:

Yes I agree PUK. Wow, I didn't realize that a tv emf would travel next

door. Loni

[Guest guest]

Hi You can see my youtube vids by acessing PAULBOOKHAM1, if you listen to

my poetry please dont hang yourself.

In a message dated 02/04/2010 16:04:50 GMT Daylight Time,

betty_starbuckle@... writes:

Do you have the link for the youtube demo?

A

[Guest guest]

Puk replies - His only concern was wether the TV is legal, nothing else.

there is a cold heartedness about this man that borders on disfunctional, I

have done all I can and now just bide my time and bear my cross !

In a message dated 02/04/2010 15:48:29 GMT Daylight Time,

marc@... writes:

But for your problem to be solved fast, could you somehow talk to your

> neighbor? If you'd give him an LCD-screen in exchange of his

> plasma-screen the problem would be solved emf-wise?

" Give " your neighbor a several thousand dollar television? He

could buy an awful lot of EMF protection for that!

Also, some people think plasma TVs look better than LCDs, so

that might be a hard sell...

Marc

[Guest guest]

Puk replies - thanks for your empathy, although he is not my neighbour he

lives over the road, that how powerful his TV is that it can enter our homes

from such a distance and swamp everything with the signal. Please see

youtube vid. access under PAULBOOKHAM1

In a message dated 02/04/2010 15:27:25 GMT Daylight Time,

@... writes:

,

Your neighbor deserves to be sued that's for sure, and some extra

attention to ES-ers would be a good thing...

But for your problem to be solved fast, could you somehow talk to your

neighbor? If you'd give him an LCD-screen in exchange of his plasma-screen the

problem would be solved emf-wise?

.

[Guest guest]

> Puk replies - What if the problem is genetic ?

I've heard from at least one doctor that genetics can be overcome

to an extent via diet and supplements... and certainly with ES,

you can shielding, avoidance, EMF devices...

Marc

[Guest guest]

No I haven't seen it but I will look it up. Loni

From: paulpjc@... <paulpjc@...>

Subject: Re: Re: Suing neighbor over wi-fi

Date: Sunday, April 4, 2010, 3:49 PM

 

Puk replies - its not next door its over the road in a house 40m away !

The radiation travels through the mains cables in the street and the phone

cables and then in the air its a viscious circle. Have you seen my You tube

vid - Plasma TV RFI affecting electrosensitive ? parts 1 and 2

In a message dated 02/04/2010 16:49:58 GMT Daylight Time, loni326 (DOT) com

writes:

Yes I agree PUK. Wow, I didn't realize that a tv emf would travel next

door. Loni