Guest guest Posted August 23, 2005 Report Share Posted August 23, 2005 > I'm finding > that I'm even starting to get sensitive to the Q-Link clocks now and > turn them off. Did you ever have a good reaction to the Clarus Clocks? If so, you'd be the first person I've heard from that has... Marc Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 23, 2005 Report Share Posted August 23, 2005 In a message dated 8/23/2005 12:41:36 PM Pacific Daylight Time, marc@... writes: Did you ever have a good reaction to the Clarus Clocks? If so, you'd be the first person I've heard from that has... I have one (ironically, I had it before developing e.s. and it does absolutely nothing that I can notice). In fairness, one I have was purchased 10 years ago. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 23, 2005 Report Share Posted August 23, 2005 I'm answering two posts at once. The first point you made was that the quantum pro did not clean up the lines the same way that the stete filters do. I understand this from reading the post you wrote earlier that it leaves the high frequencies in and does something quite different to the electricity. The point was that it does not, as far as I understand, put any new currents into the air but works on the electricity in the lines. If the stetzer filters do nothing to the low frequency noise and the quantum products do then I need them as well. I will have to play with it a bit to see what is best. But I'm gessing I will be plugging stetzer filters in to remove high frequencies still. I know from experimenting with a frequency generator that the higher frequencies can be the most damaging if exposed to them too much. Although I also know if not overexposed to them they can be very good for removing brain fog. And so I will experiment with both the quantum pro and the stetzer filters to try to create an energy within my home that works best, maybe using only a few of the stetzers or using many of them. Now to your second question, did I find anything good in the clarus clocks. I am able to get some quick energy by sitting under my pyramid that has a clarus clock attached to it. I know some people in the group may understand this. But I found a way to stop " Psychic attacks " by sitting under this pyramid. But I have since found a better way using a material called velostat. But I know I am also becoming sensitive to the frequency that it puts out. I'm not throwing them away. Once the sensitivity subsides I may find a temporary use for them again some time in the future. Again, thanks for the info about the quantum products. I couldn't find anything on google searches like what you were talking about. > > I'm finding > > that I'm even starting to get sensitive to the Q-Link clocks now and > > turn them off. > > Did you ever have a good reaction to the Clarus Clocks? If so, > you'd be the first person I've heard from that has... > > Marc Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 23, 2005 Report Share Posted August 23, 2005 > Again, thanks for the info about the quantum products. I couldn't > find anything on google searches like what you were talking about. Yeah, the company that makes the Quantum Products has not been very good at marketing. I think the other company that took their technology and targetted the audio/video industry is doing a better job at marketing. Also, I see that there yet another company that makes somewhat similar products, although much more expensive and probably only for the rich audio/videophiles: http://www.bybeeconnection.com/ourtech.asp Marc Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 24, 2005 Report Share Posted August 24, 2005 I was searching and coming up with the audio video products and the prices were very different than the one you were quoting. I notice that the symphony pro, etc. by that company do put a frequency in the air to modify or cancel or harmonize products in a 50 or so foot radius. I would not be interested in their products for the reason that I'm only wanting to modify, harmonize, etc. the wiring in the walls. I do still have a clarus negative ion generator that I have for several years and I think it does a good job and creates a good effect. And I have found that the pocket version of their clocks when placed between thick layers of velostat has a good effect as well. But then again, I have to be careful not to get too much of it. > > Again, thanks for the info about the quantum products. I couldn't > > find anything on google searches like what you were talking about. > > Yeah, the company that makes the Quantum Products has not been > very good at marketing. I think the other company that took > their technology and targetted the audio/video industry is > doing a better job at marketing. > > Also, I see that there yet another company that makes somewhat > similar products, although much more expensive and probably > only for the rich audio/videophiles: > > http://www.bybeeconnection.com/ourtech.asp > > Marc Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 24, 2005 Report Share Posted August 24, 2005 > I was searching and coming up with the audio video products and the > prices were very different than the one you were quoting. I notice > that the symphony pro, etc. by that company do put a frequency in the > air to modify or cancel or harmonize products in a 50 or so foot > radius. I would not be interested in their products for the reason > that I'm only wanting to modify, harmonize, etc. the wiring in the > walls. You may want to check with the folks who make the Quantum Pro, because I believe that the Quantum Pro works in the same way as the Symphony, Clarus Clocks, etc. That is, I believe it transmits a coherent field which alters EMF in the air and in the wires. Marc Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 24, 2005 Report Share Posted August 24, 2005 I'm reading about the product and I don't see any mention whatsoever of it emitting any kind of frequencies into the environment. All I read is that it goes to work on the wiring within the walls and they speak of their power strips as filters. If what you say is true then I can see why you would prefer the power strips or the home unit and not the quantum pro device. Just in case you are right I will be sure to not damage the box and not throw it away. I will return it if it puts more electricity into the air like a clarus clock. Thanks. > > I was searching and coming up with the audio video products and the > > prices were very different than the one you were quoting. I notice > > that the symphony pro, etc. by that company do put a frequency in the > > air to modify or cancel or harmonize products in a 50 or so foot > > radius. I would not be interested in their products for the reason > > that I'm only wanting to modify, harmonize, etc. the wiring in the > > walls. > > You may want to check with the folks who make the Quantum Pro, > because I believe that the Quantum Pro works in the same way > as the Symphony, Clarus Clocks, etc. That is, I believe > it transmits a coherent field which alters EMF in the air > and in the wires. > > Marc Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 24, 2005 Report Share Posted August 24, 2005 > I'm reading about the product and I don't see any mention whatsoever > of it emitting any kind of frequencies into the environment. It's my understanding that the audio/video products on QuantumQRT.com are derived from the same technology as the Quantum Pro. So if the description on QuantumQRT.com says it broadcasts coherent waves, then I would think that the Quantum Pro does as well. I certainly could be wrong about this, though -- for example, on AdvancedLiving.com, they talk about an extra antenna that could be added to the Quantum Pro, so perhaps the standard Quantum Pro has no antenna. By the way, I've owned a Quantum Pro for 4 years, and have used it at work. I'd say its overkill for a house, though. Marc Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 25, 2005 Report Share Posted August 25, 2005 > If what you say is true then > I can see why you would prefer the power strips or the home unit and > not the quantum pro device. Just in case you are right I will be sure > to not damage the box and not throw it away. I will return it if it > puts more electricity into the air like a clarus clock. Well, I for one will be very interested to hear the results of your experimentation -- it sounds like you have hundreds of dollars worth of stuff from Clarus, Stetzer, and Quantum, and it will be interesting to hear what works best. Marc Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 26, 2005 Report Share Posted August 26, 2005 My quantum pro arrived yesterday morning. I got to use it for the first time last night when I got home. I know that my Q-Link clocks would max out my trifield meter on the electromagnetic scales. I barely get a reading (around 1) with the quantum pro. And that could be from just the unit itself and not something that it is emitting into the air. And I have to put the trifield up pretty close to it before getting a reading. I put it on its highest setting to see how it would make me feel. Unless i develop some side effects in the future it seems like a keeper. At that price I hope it lasts for a long time and doesn't break in a year or two. Yes, I'm sure, like many people in this group I've tried all kinds of stuff. I think those stetzer filters are fantastic and will surely be buying more. And I really like what I'm feeling with those polarizers. Two devices I've got from this group. I still use the Q-Link ally. I have a hat that has a zipper in it near the top. It has thick layers of velostat in the top and also in a layer that touches the head. Placing the ally in between the layers produces a good effect. But I can't leave it on for all that long. Velostat also has a good effect. It shields from microwaves. I wear hats with them in it and also have a pair of boxer underwear that is lined with it. It covers my tailbone. My head and my tailbone seem to be very sensitive to electrosmog. > > If what you say is true then > > I can see why you would prefer the power strips or the home unit and > > not the quantum pro device. Just in case you are right I will be sure > > to not damage the box and not throw it away. I will return it if it > > puts more electricity into the air like a clarus clock. > > Well, I for one will be very interested to hear the results of your > experimentation -- it sounds like you have hundreds of dollars > worth of stuff from Clarus, Stetzer, and Quantum, and it will > be interesting to hear what works best. > > Marc Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 26, 2005 Report Share Posted August 26, 2005 > My quantum pro arrived yesterday morning. I put it on its highest > setting to see how it would make me feel. The highest setting? Yikes! I find that I really have to be careful to not overdo it with these devices -- having too much is just as bad as having too little. Fortunately with the Quantum Products, there is quite a range in variability in strength among all the various products (although I think the Companion is too weak to be of much use) Marc Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 26, 2005 Report Share Posted August 26, 2005 Yep, its on the highest setting. And I feel good too. Less noise in the walls = less noise in the head. The stetzer filters don't do anything to the lower frequencies. I had a hunch the quantum pro would work IF it did what it claimed to do in the way that it claimed it does. Cleaning up the lower frequencies appears to be necessary as well. My breaker box is located in the bedroom of the house, being a trailer, and not on the far wall of the garage. The highest setting appears to be necessary. A 400 dollar quantum pro is a lot cheaper than moving. By the way, I don't see any kind of hook up on it for an antennae. Maybe the newer devices are different than the ones sold 4 years ago. Take care. > > My quantum pro arrived yesterday morning. I put it on its highest > > setting to see how it would make me feel. > > The highest setting? Yikes! I find that I really have to be careful > to not overdo it with these devices -- having too much is just as > bad as having too little. Fortunately with the Quantum Products, > there is quite a range in variability in strength among all the > various products (although I think the Companion is too weak > to be of much use) > > Marc Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 26, 2005 Report Share Posted August 26, 2005 > By the way, I don't see any kind of hook up on it for > an antennae. Maybe the newer devices are different than the ones sold > 4 years ago. Mine doesn't have a hookup for an antenna either -- it seems that there is a variation of the Quantum Pro that has an antenna jack. I see a couple variations of the Quantum Pro being offered for sale at AdvancedLiving.com And since the folks at Quantum Products are claiming that they are constantly improving their devices, it wouldn't surprise me if yours is different than my 4-year-old model. Marc Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.