Guest guest Posted August 21, 2005 Report Share Posted August 21, 2005 > I am considering to buy a Springlife Polarizer OM Pendant ( www.bioharmonics.com ). > Some people say they don't notice any difference whether or not they wear the pendant. > Others, among which Marc, say that it sure does help. Yes, the percentage of folks that the Springlife Polarizers has helped here seems to be pretty low. I can say from my own usage that it is certainly not a complete solution for me either, but rather part of a solution which includes other things, notably Quantum power strips, supplements, and diet. The polarizers are one of the best portable solutions I've found however, in terms of effectiveness and my being able to tolerate them for an extended period of time. Also, if you are considering buying one, you might want to hold off for a week or two -- their website says that they are implementing a newer, better method of energy enhancement on the Polarizers, although I'm not sure if/how this will affect its usefulness for ES. It sounds like they will be offering " upgrades " to current owners, so I will be sending in some polarizers to have them upgraded, and then see if I can tell the difference. > [1] http://forums.bioharmonics.com/index.php?showtopic=22 & st=15 > " I have been working with several people with elecromagnetic sensitivity (EMS) > lately and there are some similarities within all of them. > All have a very strong anti-bioenergy signature which is often seated > in the head/brain area, and most in the back of the head/brain area I have noticed myself that the effect of the Springlife Polarizers are especially strong if I place it on the back of my neck (using the provided clip, I can just clip it to the collar of my shirt). > * Has anyone tried the Harmonizer, as sold by Bioharmonics [1] ? I have not -- its too elxpensive to be an impulse purchase, and seems like it'd be rather complex / inconvenient to use. Of course, if it does all it caims, it would be worth it. But I don't even see very many testimonials about it (although I think this is because they don't want to make health claims that will get them arrested) > * Could it be that mercury and other heavy metals are the core > cause of That has been my opinion for 5 years, and I've seen no reason to change that opinion. I first read this theory in a Swedish publication on mercury toxicity. I seem to be very heavy metal toxic, based on my extreme reactions to supplements which are supposed to detox heavy metals. Lately I've been using " Etherium Black " from Harmonic Innerprises, which at least is tolerable at one spray per day. However, that product does not have a lot of testimonials or claims concerning its impact on heavy metals, but from my own personal experience it seems to work (I know full well the symptoms of detox, having tried dozens of such products over the past 5 years). The one product that they advertise as being good for heavy metal detox (Aulterra spray) is too strong for me to use. > I've also tried some drops of NDF plus ( www.bioray2000.com ) and > this seems to help also, but I am a bit cautious, because I'm not > sure if it's a true chelator and I've read some " backfire " I think NDF is a true chelator, and one that focuses on the nervous system and one where the toxins come out in your next 1-2 urinations -- so that makes it rather unique. But a bit too strong for me, unless I follow it up with some Megahydrin (which is either neutralizing the NDF or neutralizing the heavy metals mobilized but not excreted). Also, the following article on NDF from the makers of PCA-Rx is rather troubling to me: http://ssl.maxamlabs.com/MAXAM_ASP_CMS_Templates_STD_HTML.asp?PageINDX=18 Personally, I've used both PCA-Rx and NDF, and they both seem to chelate metals to me, but again, they are both too strong for me to use even at a minimal dose for very long. Marc Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 22, 2005 Report Share Posted August 22, 2005 Hi Marc, Thanks for the feedback. I mailed the company and this was their reply: >Although we have not yet raised the price on the polarizers, the ones >going out now do have the new enhancement! > So I will go ahead and order one. I'll let you know the results. On September 1st the prices will rise. I'm doubting whether to buy the clip-type or the collar-type. Any suggestions? >> * Has anyone tried the Harmonizer, as sold by Bioharmonics [1] ? > >I have not -- its too elxpensive to be an impulse purchase, and >seems like it'd be rather complex / inconvenient to use. Of >course, if it does all it caims, it would be worth it. But >I don't even see very many testimonials about it (although I >think this is because they don't want to make health claims >that will get them arrested) I've asked a question about the effectiveness of the Harmonizer w.r.t. : http://forums.bioharmonics.com/index.php?showtopic=88 So far, no response. I am able to use 3 drops, 2 times a day of the NDF plus and I can tolerate it. I often feel better (more vital, less brainfog, less itchy) quite soon after taking the drops under the tongue. When I drink it, mixed with water, it has a very strong effect on my intestines (due to the probiotics), often resulting in diarrhea. Under the tongue, it's much better tolerable for me. I will stay on this dosage for a while and will also continue using the alpha lipoic acid (every 3 hours). It seems that the two combine quite well. Because lipoic acid excretes the mercury through the bile/intestines, it's very important to maintain frequent bowel movements. If not, I start to feel bad until the next bowel movement. In that sense, the NDF is much better tolerable for me. But when the ALA-protocol is followed with all the vitamin/mineral supplements, then it works quite well. >Also, the following article on NDF from the makers of PCA-Rx is >rather troubling to me: > > http://ssl.maxamlabs.com/MAXAM_ASP_CMS_Templates_STD_HTML.asp?PageINDX=18 > >Personally, I've used both PCA-Rx and NDF, and they both seem >to chelate metals to me, but again, they are both too strong for >me to use even at a minimal dose for very long. Yes, this is troubling. Thanks for the info. I'm thinking of doing another mercury urine test, but this time using NDF as provocation/chelation agent instead of the DMPS. That will prove whether or not the NDF is truly chelating mercury. Based on how I feel I sure think it works, because it relieves the mercury-toxicity symptoms for me. Ed Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 23, 2005 Report Share Posted August 23, 2005 > That will prove whether or not the NDF is truly chelating mercury. Based > on how I feel I sure think it works, because it relieves the > mercury-toxicity symptoms for me. Yes, my opinion on NDF was also based on the way it made me feel, not on the basis of any tests. However, I went through thirty bottles of NDF (1/2 ounce bottles), and still appear to be heavy metal toxic, so either I had a *lot* of metals in me to start with, or it's not that effective, or the Microhydrin/Megahydrin I was following it up with was counteracting its effect. I will note that my health improved a great deal during those 30 bottles (and my ES reduced a great deal), but that does not necessarily imply a cause-and-effect, as I was doing other things as well. Marc Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.