Guest guest Posted October 7, 2009 Report Share Posted October 7, 2009 The same for me, my reaction is immediate. One factor to the severity of my reaction is, what other things are/is? my body fighting at that time. When the outdoor allergies are high or I haven't slept well I react more severally to EMS. Not all the time but in general when I can take myself out of the line of fire my EMS reactions will dissipate quickly. This is not true with my MCS. For me I feel like EMS are harder than MCS because I can't just walk away. But EMS effects leave quickly while the MCS effects last longer because the chemicals remain internal so I can have that reaction until my body starts to detox the chemicals. jw Jennie Wassenaar ________________________________ From: " paulpjc@... " <paulpjc@...> Sent: Wednesday, October 7, 2009 4:36:16 AM Subject: Re: Metal objects In a message dated 06/10/2009 18:59:13 GMT Daylight Time, charles@milieuziekt es.be writes: That is correct. No feeling but reacting. If you have read the issue of *hetbitje* September 2009, you could have seen, that the impact and registering in the body is immediately, but the biological reaction comes later on, and interestingly even when the exposure has long been gone. uk replies - There is no time delay when I stand by a powerful mobile or drive my car along the motorway and feel the waves from these devices without any visual or other clues. The thing in question is wether its the waves and thier many components that you feel and react to and then wether this causes any harm, and how you raect may be multifaceted in both physiological and phychological responses and so on..In essense the reaction time is probably dependant on a whole plethora of factors. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 8, 2009 Report Share Posted October 8, 2009 I think this is a great thread... maybe someone should try to summarize it for an FAQ? I think makes a great point... depending on who you talk to we have 5, 6, 20...50 senses. Sometimes I do feel EMFs directly in whatever hand or arm is closest to the source. Often the feeling is very ephemeral. makes a good point too, that expecting someone to respond in an arbitrary laboratory experiment is not a relevant test. What is the long term health effect (including mental focus, etc.) is what matters. But, even though the experiments have found something like 12 to 3, no effect, really it only takes 1 reproducible experiment to prove the effect is real. Even 1000 negative experiments don't negate that 1 if they were measuring something else, or were too sloppy, etc. Rea's experiment was positive and I don't think anyone chose to follow his protocol (why not?.... he's a doctor, and he's sensitive, so why not try his protocol first?). He used square wave pulses, took precautions to minimize chemical exposures, and only did blind tests on those who could pass a non-blind test. Then there was TNO, never really published, but fascinating. Most recently in the journal of Pathophysiology we have the very brilliant test of hand movements using a large movable reflector to cause standing waves in the signal from an FM tower at 0.05 V/m. Actually many of the subjects were not aware of any sensation, but their hands moved in accordance with the signal. Sharks, rays, lampreys, salamanders, platypus and echidnas clearly have electrosensor organs, extremely sensitive ones. Sharks can detect a few billionths of a volt per meter. The tri-field meter goes down to 10 volts per meter. I've seen one detector that goes to 0.1 volts per meter. No biologist doubts that the earliest vertebrates could sense electric field. Clearly a human is less sensitive than a shark, because we don't have as specialized a system. We probably are not as sensitive as a platypus. But I don't think anyone has really characterized the frequency response of any animal. These are hard experiments and usually the people who are good at studying animals are not good at electronics and vice versa. The same problem is there with studying humans. I think if you could keep people in a very electrically quiet environment for at least 2 days, and then expose them to very tiny signals, you'd get really nice results. With larger exposures, you're inhibiting or damaging the very cells that are suppose to be responding. I think ' view is very practical, but hopefully some day we will be able to recognize what and the others have said as the truth. Bill Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 8, 2009 Report Share Posted October 8, 2009 In a message dated 08/10/2009 16:45:23 GMT Daylight Time, wbruno@... writes: I think ' view is very practical, but hopefully some day we will be able to recognize what and the others have said as the truth. Bill uk replies - Many thanks for that Bill. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 9, 2009 Report Share Posted October 9, 2009 It's all good! Loni From: paulpjc@... <paulpjc@...> Subject: Re: Metal objects Date: Friday, October 9, 2009, 1:54 AM Â In a message dated 08/10/2009 16:45:23 GMT Daylight Time, wbrunogmail (DOT) com writes: I think ' view is very practical, but hopefully some day we will be able to recognize what and the others have said as the truth. Bill uk replies - Many thanks for that Bill. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 12, 2009 Report Share Posted October 12, 2009 Hi, Bill,  You recently wrote:  " Most recently in the journal of Pathophysiology we have the very brilliant test of hand movements using a large movable reflector to cause standing waves in the signal from an FM tower at 0.05 V/m. Actually many of the subjects were not aware of any sensation, but their hands moved in accordance with the signal. "  Do you know of anywhere online we can read about this? I am guessing you are talking about a subscription only journal?  Sounds very interesting. Since my hand accident (I severed the median nerve and a small nerve bundle, etc which required surgery in May) I have unusual sensations and intense pain in my hand when around cell and microwave towers, etc. I never had any hand symptoms before my accident. In fact, my major EMS problem right now is my hand. It is more highly reactive than the rest of me (but also it is probably perceived by my body as the weakest or most vulnerable body part right now, too, so that might be why???) I have no feeling yet (touch, I mean--lots of feeling there, just not good  )   With supplementation and use of the Quantum Pro, I have been able to remediate my other symptoms. (I still react some when out riding in the car, but I can take supplements when this happens and recover quickly. But my supplementation doesn't help my hand.)  Very interesting info. Thanks, Bill, Diane From: Bill Bruno <wbruno@...> Subject: Re: Metal objects Date: Thursday, October 8, 2009, 11:41 AM  I think this is a great thread... maybe someone should try to summarize it for an FAQ? I think makes a great point... depending on who you talk to we have 5, 6, 20...50 senses. Sometimes I do feel EMFs directly in whatever hand or arm is closest to the source. Often the feeling is very ephemeral. makes a good point too, that expecting someone to respond in an arbitrary laboratory experiment is not a relevant test. What is the long term health effect (including mental focus, etc.) is what matters. But, even though the experiments have found something like 12 to 3, no effect, really it only takes 1 reproducible experiment to prove the effect is real. Even 1000 negative experiments don't negate that 1 if they were measuring something else, or were too sloppy, etc. Rea's experiment was positive and I don't think anyone chose to follow his protocol (why not?.... he's a doctor, and he's sensitive, so why not try his protocol first?). He used square wave pulses, took precautions to minimize chemical exposures, and only did blind tests on those who could pass a non-blind test. Then there was TNO, never really published, but fascinating. Most recently in the journal of Pathophysiology we have the very brilliant test of hand movements using a large movable reflector to cause standing waves in the signal from an FM tower at 0.05 V/m. Actually many of the subjects were not aware of any sensation, but their hands moved in accordance with the signal. Sharks, rays, lampreys, salamanders, platypus and echidnas clearly have electrosensor organs, extremely sensitive ones. Sharks can detect a few billionths of a volt per meter. The tri-field meter goes down to 10 volts per meter. I've seen one detector that goes to 0.1 volts per meter. No biologist doubts that the earliest vertebrates could sense electric field. Clearly a human is less sensitive than a shark, because we don't have as specialized a system. We probably are not as sensitive as a platypus. But I don't think anyone has really characterized the frequency response of any animal. These are hard experiments and usually the people who are good at studying animals are not good at electronics and vice versa. The same problem is there with studying humans. I think if you could keep people in a very electrically quiet environment for at least 2 days, and then expose them to very tiny signals, you'd get really nice results. With larger exposures, you're inhibiting or damaging the very cells that are suppose to be responding. I think ' view is very practical, but hopefully some day we will be able to recognize what and the others have said as the truth. Bill Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 12, 2009 Report Share Posted October 12, 2009 In a message dated 12/10/2009 19:21:21 GMT Daylight Time, evie15422@... writes: Do you know of anywhere online we can read about this? I am guessing you are talking about a subscription only journal? Sounds very interesting. Since my hand accident (I severed the median nerve and a small nerve bundle, etc which required surgery in May) I have unusual sensations and intense pain in my hand when around cell and microwave towers, etc. I never had any hand symptoms Try Powerwatch Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 13, 2009 Report Share Posted October 13, 2009 This phenomenon is very well known. In germany, they found this *phantom pains* effect with people who had amputated hands, arms, or legs. When they were exposed to high frequency radiation, they felt pains, as if those amputated parts were still there. Special shielding over the remaining body parts could help this. So, on the body where nerves are cut, an extra sensitivity exists. Greetings, Claessens member Verband Baubiologie www.milieuziektes.nl www.milieuziektes.be www.hetbitje.nl checked by Norton Re: Metal objects > > In a message dated 12/10/2009 19:21:21 GMT Daylight Time, > evie15422@... writes: > > Do you know of anywhere online we can read about this? I am guessing you > are talking about a subscription only journal? Sounds very interesting. > Since my hand accident (I severed the median nerve and a small nerve > bundle, etc which required surgery in May) I have unusual sensations and > intense > pain in my hand when around cell and microwave towers, etc. I never had > any hand symptoms > > > Try Powerwatch > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 13, 2009 Report Share Posted October 13, 2009 Thanks !  Be well, Diane From: paulpjc@... <paulpjc@...> Subject: Re: Metal objects Date: Tuesday, October 13, 2009, 5:46 AM  In a message dated 12/10/2009 19:21:21 GMT Daylight Time, evie15422 (DOT) com writes: Do you know of anywhere online we can read about this? I am guessing you are talking about a subscription only journal? Sounds very interesting. Since my hand accident (I severed the median nerve and a small nerve bundle, etc which required surgery in May) I have unusual sensations and intense pain in my hand when around cell and microwave towers, etc. I never had any hand symptoms Try Powerwatch Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 13, 2009 Report Share Posted October 13, 2009 Thanks, ,  I appreciate the info. I had heard of phantom pain, but had no idea that was similar to what I was dealing with! Of course, I still have dead nerves there, so it makes sense.  Thanks again, Diane From: charles@... <charles@...> Subject: Re: Metal objects Date: Tuesday, October 13, 2009, 6:34 AM  This phenomenon is very well known. In germany, they found this *phantom pains* effect with people who had amputated hands, arms, or legs. When they were exposed to high frequency radiation, they felt pains, as if those amputated parts were still there. Special shielding over the remaining body parts could help this. So, on the body where nerves are cut, an extra sensitivity exists. Greetings, Claessens member Verband Baubiologie www.milieuziektes. nl www.milieuziektes. be www.hetbitje. nl checked by Norton Re: Metal objects > > In a message dated 12/10/2009 19:21:21 GMT Daylight Time, > evie15422 (DOT) com writes: > > Do you know of anywhere online we can read about this? I am guessing you > are talking about a subscription only journal? Sounds very interesting. > Since my hand accident (I severed the median nerve and a small nerve > bundle, etc which required surgery in May) I have unusual sensations and > intense > pain in my hand when around cell and microwave towers, etc. I never had > any hand symptoms > > > Try Powerwatch > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 14, 2009 Report Share Posted October 14, 2009 In a message dated 13/10/2009 20:36:46 GMT Daylight Time, evie15422@... writes: Date: Tuesday, October 13, 2009, 6:34 AM This phenomenon is very well known. In germany, they found this *phantom pains* effect with people who had amputated hands, arms, or legs. When they were exposed to high frequency radiation, they felt pains, as if those amputated parts were still there. Special shielding over the remaining body parts could help this. So, on the body where nerves are cut, an extra sensitivity exists. Greetings, uk replies - Coghill describes tghis in his book something in the air, he talks of a phenomenon which he terms Cerebral morphogenetic radiation which eminates from the DNA, being a double helix he sugessts that the DNA is both a perfect transmitter and a perfect reciver ? so the signals may still be sent and dealt with by a certain part of the brain or indeed localised DNA Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.