Re: Re: RADIOWAVES FROM LCD SCREEN / detecting RF

[Guest guest]

The Trifield, and certainly the Electrosmog Detector are not sensitive

enough for measuring LCD screens,

For that a VLF Spion or a Profi Spion with ball antenna is suited.

I am awaiting a brandnew optical antenna for my Profi Spion, who wil do all

this very nicely.

I am also awaiting a new lowfrequency meter, which also displays the found

frequncies.

At the moment I am busy translating the newest issue of *het bitje* November

2007 into english.

The dutch and german editions are already on the HP.

It is about the fourth generation of HF meters.

Greetings,

Claessens

member Verband Baubiologie

www.milieuziektes.nl

www.milieuziektes.be

www.hetbitje.nl

checked by Bitdefender

Re: RADIOWAVES FROM LCD SCREEN / detecting RF

> wrote that if he sees the needle move a hair on his Trifield

> 100X

> he knows to stay away because there's RF.

>

> The ONLY place I've seen the needle move even a hair on this meter is

> in

> an area where there are 6+ tv and radio towers. I would not recommend

> relying on this meter if RF is a problem for you!

>

> You can get an RF alert inexpensively from lessemf.com/. Or, an

> Electrosmog Detector from my site. MUCH more sensitive than the

> Trifield 100X.

>

> Shivani

> www.LifeEnergies.com

>

[Guest guest]

Great ,

I am eagerly awaiting your translation!

Does it also discuss the instruments you are waiting for?

They sound worth knowing more about too.

Will you post to this list when the translation is ready?

Bill

On 11/2/07, charles <charles@...> wrote:

>

> The Trifield, and certainly the Electrosmog Detector are not sensitive

> enough for measuring LCD screens,

>

> For that a VLF Spion or a Profi Spion with ball antenna is suited.

>

> I am awaiting a brandnew optical antenna for my Profi Spion, who wil do

> all

> this very nicely.

>

> I am also awaiting a new lowfrequency meter, which also displays the found

>

> frequncies.

>

> At the moment I am busy translating the newest issue of *het bitje*

> November

> 2007 into english.

> The dutch and german editions are already on the HP.

> It is about the fourth generation of HF meters.

>

> Greetings,

> Claessens

> member Verband Baubiologie

> www.milieuziektes.nl

> www.milieuziektes.be

> www.hetbitje.nl

> checked by Bitdefender

>

> Re: RADIOWAVES FROM LCD SCREEN / detecting RF

>

> > wrote that if he sees the needle move a hair on his Trifield

> > 100X

> > he knows to stay away because there's RF.

> >

> > The ONLY place I've seen the needle move even a hair on this meter is

> > in

> > an area where there are 6+ tv and radio towers. I would not recommend

> > relying on this meter if RF is a problem for you!

> >

> > You can get an RF alert inexpensively from lessemf.com/. Or, an

> > Electrosmog Detector from my site. MUCH more sensitive than the

> > Trifield 100X.

> >

> > Shivani

> > www.LifeEnergies.com

> >

>

>

>

[Guest guest]

>It would be great to have a meter that would be sensitive enough to detect

these wireless routers.

For low cost RF meters sensitive enough to detect even background levels

(fractions of a nW/cm²), take a look at Electrosmog Meter

http://www.lessemf.com/rf.html#492 and Better RF Meter (only $89!) at

http://www.lessemf.com/rf.html#437

Of course, there are better (and more expensive) meters as well.

Emil

[Guest guest]

I have found the electrosmog meter to be very useful.

It's compact enough to carry in a large pocket.

The readings are a bit temperature dependent, especially

for low values. It's not directional in any useful sense,

and you can't add a directional antenna. And it doesn't go

above 3.5 GHz (although I think it can respond to 5.8GHz,

but underreports by a lot).

Still I think I need something to detect between the triField and this

meter.

It would also be better if it had a sound demodulator or other

way to identify the source (some meters have selectable

frequency bands). The old HF-detektor had demodulation.

On 11/3/07, Less EMF Inc <lessemf@...> wrote:

>

> >It would be great to have a meter that would be sensitive enough to

> detect these wireless routers.

> For low cost RF meters sensitive enough to detect even background levels

> (fractions of a nW/cm²), take a look at Electrosmog Meter

> http://www.lessemf.com/rf.html#492 and Better RF Meter (only $89!) at

> http://www.lessemf.com/rf.html#437

> Of course, there are better (and more expensive) meters as well.

> Emil

>

>

[Guest guest]

In a message dated 11/3/2007 6:02:51 PM GMT Standard Time,

jaime_schunkewitz@... writes:

My reply was to somebody who detected RF from

an LCD monitor using a Trifield meter. That comment

still stands, if one sees that meter move a

hairs width on " Radio/Microwave " band then

you know it's bad stuff.

We all know the Trifield is not sensitive, but it

does detect a wireless router within a few feet, a

microwave oven, and I've seen it pick up ONE cell

phone tower while driving down the highway.

With that said, it would be wise for an

Thanks Eli, I only really use the trifeild for emf/efeilds, I have a

Electrosmog detector for cell phones etc. The only reason I used the triefeild

in

RF mode was to check the rf and yes the needle moved to over .1mw/cm2 which I

found unusual my noisy laptop does not evan show a twitch on the needle. I

am sticking to the esmog detector and early next year a new model is due for

release which measure up to 7gig with aread power level display.