Guest guest Posted November 19, 2002 Report Share Posted November 19, 2002 Actually, braces CAN be for a medical necessity. Such as myself.. I can't chew properly because of the way my teeth are. Which then will later cause TMJ and so on. (jaw problems).. I would rather go WITHOUT braces, but I NEED them to prevent further problems with my mouth. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 19, 2002 Report Share Posted November 19, 2002 Okay, here we go again. Despite many claims that it is, limb lengthening for dwarfism is not cosmetic. For starters insurance would not pay for it if it were strictly cosmetic and they do (at the same time they refuse to pay for people over five feet who just want to be taller). More importantly, aside from ELL adding around ten to twelve inches to ones height, enabling them to reach the top shelf in a store, drive a car without extension pedals and a plethora of other things, it fixes or helps to alleviate many of the deformities that LPs have. It can fix the varus or valgus of the tibia, with a gradual approach, allowing for a more precise correction which in turn greatly reduces the chance of nerve problems and when they lengthen the femurs they attend to the fixed flexion deformity of the hips reducing lordosis, which in turn decreases the chance of stenosis. Also, by realigning the bones the chance of getting arthritis is reduced. The analogy to Roe v. Wade is an interesting one, and unfortunately I think in many ways a correct one. I say unfortunately because in the end it is only LPs who suffer. I know I am pretty much alone in this opinion, but I think the time has more than come for LPA to look into all doctors performing this procedure and separate the wheat from the chaff, the skilled surgeons who are offering safe treatment to those LPs who want it, from the hacks who have no business performing this surgery on LPs. Without this guidance people are left to search for surgeons on their own and their lives can be changed forever because they found someone who sounded good to them, but did not know about LPs, did not know that the only real candidates for complete EEL are achons, hypochons, and people with CHH. I hope LPA one day will come to understand this, but I have my doubts, not so much about the understanding for I think many do see my point, but about an actual willingness to do what needs to be done. It would take courage given how many people react to the basic idea of ELL, but as the late Senator Everett Dirksen said when he was convincing his Republican colleagues to join with Northern Democrats against the Dixiecrats and vote for the Civil Rights Act of 1964, " There is no force so powerful as an idea whose time has come. " Gillian. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 19, 2002 Report Share Posted November 19, 2002 Gillian does bring up a good point for LPA to consider if it hasn't already and that is, " I think the time has more than come for LPA to look into all doctors performing this procedure and separate the wheat from the chaff, the skilled surgeons who are offering safe treatment to those LPs who want it, from the hacks who have no business performing this surgery on LPs. Without this guidance people are left to search for surgeons on their own and their lives can be changed forever because they found someone who sounded good to them, but did not know about LPs, did not know that the only real candidates for complete EEL are achons, hypochons, and people with CHH. I hope LPA one day will come to understand this.... " Now, whether all of us, some of us or just a few of us see ELL as being cosmetic or medically beneficial to us that I don't think we will ever change as that is just an opinion as to how one feels on the issue. However, like Gillian, I also believe that the more informed we are on this option and on the doctors who peform it, the better we will be to decide whether or not it would benefit us medically if a few of us so choose it. Personally, I would not choose it, but I wouldn't be against another lp who did and if they did I would want them to have the most up to date information that is available for them out there so that everything goes right for them. Something to chew on, especially for those who deem ELL as being cosmetic only, is to ask yourself this, " Did you elect to have braces growing up? " Nooooo, I don't mean A.F.O.'s or foot braces which are a medical necessity for a few of us, but those for your teeth. Technically speaking, braces are not a medical necessity either. Afterall if one chooses NOT to have braces their lifespan will still be as long, their teeth will still be as white as braces only " align " teeth they don't whiten them and yes, they will still be able to chew and swallow their food as hundreds of millions do daily elsewhere in the world without them. So, before any of us condemns those lp's who have chosen on their own to have ELL done, you might better rip those braces out because you had also something " done " to you for the same reason you allege they had ELL. Lastly, maybe it's time we change our membership requirement in LPA from 4'10 " and under due to a medical condition to that PLUS this: 4'10 " and over due to ELL because we may be shutting out a group of people who I've already seen on this list profess and admit that ELL did NOT cure them of their dwarfism and that they still very much want to be a part of us, but some of them feel shut out by a few of us over something they chose on their own. And yes, maybe a few in their group had ELL done because they hated themselves and/or their dwarfism (only saying this as part of my defense of still including them, not saying that any TRULY felt this way, but even if a few of them did), shouldn't we accept and love them anyway, regardless of whatever reason they chose on their own to have it done? And even IF what they chose was an error on their part? Because haven't we all made errors in our lives? Some of them even being major ones? Just asking and thinking as usual. luv, grady Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 19, 2002 Report Share Posted November 19, 2002 Good point Ames. One that I didn't think of, that being TMJ and/or other future jaw problems arising from one NOT having braces. However, was it the braces only that corrected that problem and/or additional orthodontic work besides the braces alone? In any case, braces or ELL, that same argument could also be used saying that ELL can be of medical help or of necessity for future orthopedic problems in some of us such as arthritus and other things Gillian stated before in her post. That ELL helps and is not of a cosmetic nature as braces can also be of a medical help for some. I still agree with Gillian, although not with her decision which was her own becuase I wouldn't chosen it myself, but with the idea that it's better to be informed of the ELL procedures out there, the doctors performing such and yes, even the medical risks involved if one of us so chooses to have it done rather than having nothing available for us to review just because a few of us are adamantly against it and we wouldn't have chosen it for ourselves. I just think, regardless of the personal " feelings " towards ELL out there by ANY of us, pro or con, I know the more educated the LP is on this subject the better they will be to make a decision concerning it. Because information on it enlightens me, not people feelings at a given moment which tends to change as much as the sunrise does to sunset. My opinion only. luv, grady Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 19, 2002 Report Share Posted November 19, 2002 FYI-- The below statement was presented to the LPA Medical Board (MAB) in Salt Lake last July. We are making small tweaks to the wording before presenting for a final vote-- After this official position is approved, LPA plans to be more forthcoming and accurate (Although Not selling, or any perception of Selling) in presenting information about ELL to it's membership. i.e. the best medical approaches, Doctors etc. PROPOSED -- LPA Official Statement of Position on Extended Limb Lengthening (ELL) LPA, Inc., is dedicated to the support and advocacy of short-statured individuals. One aspect of that support is to provide a balanced and accurate resource of medical data and information, so that individuals can make informed decisions about medical procedures and treatments. To that end, LPA takes the following position on ELL. 1.. ELL is a surgical procedure with potential risks and benefits. 2.. LPA will provide accurate and balanced information on ELL, both pro and con, so that patients and their families can make informed decisions. This includes allowing both proponents and opponents of ELL to disburse information through LPA. 3.. LPA will provide warm and open membership access for those members who choose to undergo the ELL procedure. 4.. LPA will resist the marketing of ELL purely for cosmetic purposes and focus on its medical advantages and teaching social acceptance of short stature for what it is. **** END OF ELL PROPOSED STATEMENT *** > > > > === > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 19, 2002 Report Share Posted November 19, 2002 .. I know I am pretty much alone in this opinion, but I think the time has more than come for LPA to look into all doctors performing this procedure and separate the wheat from the chaff, the skilled surgeons who are offering safe treatment to those LPs who want it, from the hacks who have no business performing this surgery on LPs. Without this guidance people are left to search for surgeons on their own and their lives can be changed forever because they found someone who sounded good to them, but did not know about LPs, did not know that the only real candidates for complete EEL are achons, hypochons, and people with CHH. I hope LPA one day will come to understand this, but I have my doubts, not so much about the understanding for I think many do see my point, but about an actual willingness to do what needs to be done Gillian and all For Many, Many years , LPA through it's Medical Advisory Board has supported the research of ELL. One of our own , Dr. Rimoin , has been doing ELL with a controlled number of patients and monitoring the long term effects of the procedure. Dr. Rimoin reported out to the MAB and officers for several years on his work. . .complete with status reports and pictures etc. I don't know what t he status of his work is , because it's been since I was president when I attended the meetings, but to say that LPA as an organization does not support the process , I believe is incorrect. There have been. . .and many there still are. . ..many long term questions about ELL AS THERE ARE WITH ANY NEW MEDICAL PROCEDURE. I'm glad for you that ELL has been a positive part of your life and admire your efforts to educate people on the process. Marge Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 19, 2002 Report Share Posted November 19, 2002 > FYI-- > > The below statement was presented to the LPA Medical Board (MAB) in Salt > Lake last July. > > We are making small tweaks to the wording before presenting for a final > vote-- After this official position is approved, LPA plans to be more > forthcoming and accurate (Although Not selling, or any perception of > Selling) in presenting information about ELL to it's membership. i.e. the > best medical approaches, Doctors etc. > > > > PROPOSED -- LPA Official Statement of Position on Extended Limb Lengthening > (ELL) > > LPA, Inc., is dedicated to the support and advocacy of short- statured > individuals. One aspect of that support is to provide a balanced and > accurate resource of medical data and information, so that individuals can > make informed decisions about medical procedures and treatments. To that > end, LPA takes the following position on ELL. > > 1.. ELL is a surgical procedure with potential risks and benefits. > 2.. LPA will provide accurate and balanced information on ELL, both pro > and con, so that patients and their families can make informed decisions. > This includes allowing both proponents and opponents of ELL to disburse > information through LPA. > 3.. LPA will provide warm and open membership access for those members who > choose to undergo the ELL procedure. > 4.. LPA will resist the marketing of ELL purely for cosmetic purposes and > focus on its medical advantages and teaching social acceptance of short > stature for what it is. > **** END OF ELL PROPOSED STATEMENT *** > I guess my other post did not make it up here, so I guess Ill have to write the entire thing over again. This is in regards to ELL. I was " " who was on for a very short time on CBS Sunday Morning. I just have a comment to make towards what Dr. Ain had to say about the procedure. First of all I think that it was inappropriate to say that you can die from this procedure or lose a limb. You cannot die from actually getting your limbs lengthened. What you can die from is the anesthesia. But this is not the only surgery that requires anesthesia, obviously. Almost any orthopedic surgery would require this. You can die from the gas you get when you get your teeth pulled. About losing the limb.......if anything Dr. Paley and his team save people from having to get their limbs amputated. The fact that everyone says that it is very painful. Ok I will admit there is pain involved, I know from personal experience. But people today act as if there is nothing that there can be done about it. Pain meds are perscribed and I only had to use mine for the first 2 months. The pain is nowhere near as bad as people say it is. In regards to this statement.....2.)LPA will provide accurate and balanced information on ELL, both pro and con, so that patients and their families can make informed decisions. This includes allowing both proponents and opponents of ELL to disburse information through LPA. I was not too succesful with that a few years ago. My mother struggled to find information on ELL and the LPA was one of the first places she turned too. They simply said that it is not recommended and she was turned away. I have talked to various people from LPA and they have told me that I have made the wrong decision and that I will eventually regret it. Sounds to me like they are not providing accurate or balanced info. I don't feel welcomed into the LPA either. I was actually thinking about going to an LPA convention in Boston but I felt like I would not be welcomed. People say that this procedure is cosmetic, and yet I still don't understand why this is so. LP's think that we go through this procedure just for the height. No Way! I have gotten so much out of this I cannot even find words to explain it. They say that it changes who you are. I am a little person and I always will be. I am still petite and I have all of the features that an LP would have. If you saw CBS you would know what I am talking about. My hands are tiny, my feet are tiny, I have the facial features too. But that is not even the point. What matters the most is that I am an LP at heart and I would never want to change who I am. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 19, 2002 Report Share Posted November 19, 2002 You're a brave girl and it's a shame that the group who should be the most accepting of your decision is not. If this had been made available to me at your age I would have done the same, no second thoughts. The heck with what any group thought, other's narrowmindedness has never been the deciding factor in my life. It would have made so many things easier to deal with. No matter how hard we try, we are still a minority and the world is not going to make major adjustments to make our lives easier. Not for a very long time anyway, so why not do what we can do for ourselves. It's not about body image, it's about overcoming some of the restrictions. If you make it to Boston I'd love to meet you, the coke/pepsi is on me and we can share " hospital stories " . -- In dwarfism@y..., " DeAndrade " <lilkrissysl04@h...> wrote: > > > FYI-- > > > > The below statement was presented to the LPA Medical Board (MAB) > in Salt > > Lake last July. > > > > We are making small tweaks to the wording before presenting for a > final > > vote-- After this official position is approved, LPA plans to be > more > > forthcoming and accurate (Although Not selling, or any perception of > > Selling) in presenting information about ELL to it's membership. > i.e. the > > best medical approaches, Doctors etc. > > > > > > > > PROPOSED -- LPA Official Statement of Position on Extended Limb > Lengthening > > (ELL) > > > > LPA, Inc., is dedicated to the support and advocacy of short- > statured > > individuals. One aspect of that support is to provide a balanced and > > accurate resource of medical data and information, so that > individuals can > > make informed decisions about medical procedures and treatments. To > that > > end, LPA takes the following position on ELL. > > > > 1.. ELL is a surgical procedure with potential risks and benefits. > > 2.. LPA will provide accurate and balanced information on ELL, > both pro > > and con, so that patients and their families can make informed > decisions. > > This includes allowing both proponents and opponents of ELL to > disburse > > information through LPA. > > 3.. LPA will provide warm and open membership access for those > members who > > choose to undergo the ELL procedure. > > 4.. LPA will resist the marketing of ELL purely for cosmetic > purposes and > > focus on its medical advantages and teaching social acceptance of > short > > stature for what it is. > > **** END OF ELL PROPOSED STATEMENT *** > > > > > I guess my other post did not make it up here, so I guess Ill have to > write the entire thing over again. This is in regards to ELL. I > was " " who was on for a very short time on CBS Sunday Morning. > > I just have a comment to make towards what Dr. Ain had to say about > the procedure. First of all I think that it was inappropriate to say > that you can die from this procedure or lose a limb. You cannot die > from actually getting your limbs lengthened. What you can die from is > the anesthesia. But this is not the only surgery that requires > anesthesia, obviously. Almost any orthopedic surgery would require > this. You can die from the gas you get when you get your teeth > pulled. About losing the limb.......if anything Dr. Paley and his > team save people from having to get their limbs amputated. The fact > that everyone says that it is very painful. Ok I will admit there is > pain involved, I know from personal experience. But people today act > as if there is nothing that there can be done about it. Pain meds are > perscribed and I only had to use mine for the first 2 months. The > pain is nowhere near as bad as people say it is. > > In regards to this statement.....2.)LPA will provide accurate and > balanced information on ELL, both pro and con, so that patients and > their families can make informed decisions. This includes allowing > both proponents and opponents of ELL to disburse information through > LPA. I was not too succesful with that a few years ago. My mother > struggled to find information on ELL and the LPA was one of the first > places she turned too. They simply said that it is not recommended > and she was turned away. I have talked to various people from LPA and > they have told me that I have made the wrong decision and that I will > eventually regret it. Sounds to me like they are not providing > accurate or balanced info. I don't feel welcomed into the LPA either. > I was actually thinking about going to an LPA convention in Boston > but I felt like I would not be welcomed. > > People say that this procedure is cosmetic, and yet I still don't > understand why this is so. LP's think that we go through this > procedure just for the height. No Way! I have gotten so much out of > this I cannot even find words to explain it. They say that it changes > who you are. I am a little person and I always will be. I am still > petite and I have all of the features that an LP would have. If you > saw CBS you would know what I am talking about. My hands are tiny, my > feet are tiny, I have the facial features too. But that is not even > the point. What matters the most is that I am an LP at heart and I > would never want to change who I am. > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 20, 2002 Report Share Posted November 20, 2002 At 12:27 AM +0000 11/20/02, DeAndrade wrote: >I just have a comment to make towards what Dr. Ain had to say about >the procedure. First of all I think that it was inappropriate to say >that you can die from this procedure or lose a limb. You cannot die >from actually getting your limbs lengthened. What you can die from is >the anesthesia. But this is not the only surgery that requires >anesthesia, obviously. Just one quibble. With ELL, you can die from a fat embolism breaking loose during the stretching process. This would be an exceedingly rare complication, but it is specific to ELL. Dan Kennedy Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 20, 2002 Report Share Posted November 20, 2002 > > >I just have a comment to make towards what Dr. Ain had to say about > >the procedure. First of all I think that it was inappropriate to say > >that you can die from this procedure or lose a limb. You cannot die > >from actually getting your limbs lengthened. What you can die from is > >the anesthesia. But this is not the only surgery that requires > >anesthesia, obviously. > > Just one quibble. With ELL, you can die from a fat embolism breaking > loose during the stretching process. This would be an exceedingly > rare complication, but it is specific to ELL. > > Dan Kennedy Maybe this is so but as far as I know Dr. Paley has never had anyone lose a leg or die from the procedure. It was inappropriate for Dr. Ain to say this because he doesn't specialize in ELL. If he doesn't agree with it thats fine. Another thin I dont get is that in a previous documentary he said that he would allow his daughter a, I think that is her name, to get the surgery if that was her decision. Why now is he all of the sudden going totally against this? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 20, 2002 Report Share Posted November 20, 2002 My understanding of what Dr. Ain said in both documentaries is that he doesn't believe in it and wouldn't want to change the way he is. In regards to his daughter, if the time came and SHE wanted the procedure done, it would be HER choice. One thing Dr. Ain emphasized on the recent documentary is that many of the individuals having ELL done were young and born to average size parents. There leaves question as to whether or not the decision to have the procedure was really the child's or the parents. Personally, I don't understand how young teen is knowledgeable to make a such life changing decision. Just my two cents Barbara > >> >>> I just have a comment to make towards what Dr. Ain had to say about >>> the procedure. First of all I think that it was inappropriate to > say >>> that you can die from this procedure or lose a limb. You cannot die >>> from actually getting your limbs lengthened. What you can die from > is >>> the anesthesia. But this is not the only surgery that requires >>> anesthesia, obviously. >> >> Just one quibble. With ELL, you can die from a fat embolism > breaking >> loose during the stretching process. This would be an exceedingly >> rare complication, but it is specific to ELL. >> >> Dan Kennedy > > > Maybe this is so but as far as I know Dr. Paley has never had anyone > lose a leg or die from the procedure. It was inappropriate for Dr. > Ain to say this because he doesn't specialize in ELL. If he doesn't > agree with it thats fine. Another thin I dont get is that in a > previous documentary he said that he would allow his daughter a, > I think that is her name, to get the surgery if that was her > decision. Why now is he all of the sudden going totally against this? > > > > > === > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 20, 2002 Report Share Posted November 20, 2002 I want to respond to a couple of things that have been raised in various posts over the past two days. First, is absolutely correct, Dr. Paley and Dr. Herzenberg have never had a patient die from a fat embolism. Yes, this is risk, but it is a risk in any procedure that requires one to break the bone (i.e. the same risk applies in any procedure one has done to straighten their legs). For Dr. Ain to list death as one of the key complications is very unfair, not even the worst of the ELL surgeons have ever killed someone, to my knowledge. More appropriate complications to raise are nerve damage, pin and bone infections, and muscle contractures. These complications are real and if you do not have a surgeon who knows what he is doing they could become lasting side effects. Second, I am fully aware of the work Dr. Rimoin and Dr. Isaacson have been doing out in California and I also know they are both members of the MAB. This is a good thing, but the technique they use, the Villiarubius (sp?) method is very different from the Ilizarov method which is practiced by the majority of ELL surgeons in this country, not to mention ISKD. If you are open to what Dr. Rimoin and Dr. Isaacson do, why be so closed minded about Dr. Paley, Dr. Herzenberg, Dr. Rozbruch, Dr. Dahl and the rest. It makes no sense to me. Dr. Paley has offered to present his results to members of the MAB and the Executive Board, where he would have patients at all levels of treatment plus others who are at various years post-op, including myself and my results and over ten years old, my tibias almost fourteen. Also, since I am the first person in North America to complete all three stages of this procedure, I would venture to guess not many of Dr. Rimoin's results are much older than mine. Don't get me wrong, I think it is good that LPA is working with Dr. Rimoin and Dr. Isaacson, but why exclude Dr. Paley, Dr. Herzenberg, Dr. Dahl and Dr. Rozbruch? Why not invite other surgeons to share their data? Unless there is some special arrangement between LPA and Dr. Rimoin that I am missing, I cannot figure it out. Finally, I welcome the statement the Executive Board is debating right now, but I have to ask if they have asked for input from anyone who actually has real life experiences with ELL or do they plan to as they move forward if and when this is ever approved? Just curious. Gillian. ===================== Few men are willing to brave the disapproval of their fellows, the censure of their colleagues, the wrath of their society. Moral courage is a rarer commodity than bravery in battle or great intelligence. Yet it is the one essential, vital quality of those who seek to change a world which yields most painfully to change. F. Kennedy Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 21, 2002 Report Share Posted November 21, 2002 Jianna is only 12 and is beggign for the surgery. In her case there is a valid point for it...Her arms are very bowed and causing her a lot of pain due to the madelung deformity. She woudl have it done to alleviate that which is going to get worse and not for the lengthening...the straightening IF it is possible which we do not know at this time. However, I am more concerned that she accept herself for who she is where she is than I am for the cosmetics changes it woudl bring. We have had some pretty emotional discourses about this...Puberty is hell in an average kid's life but for one like this its worse because society puts such a prize on supernormalcy. Sometimes the emotional need for these things outweighs the biological need.... Apryl Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 21, 2002 Report Share Posted November 21, 2002 Yes it is true that most of the LPs who have chosen to do this have been born to two average height parents, but that does not mean we are incapable of making this decision. As I have said before, for me it was strictly an issue of function. When you're thirteen it's true, you do not need to worry about the necessities of daily living. If you're in a store you just say " Mom can you get that for me " and your parents are always the ones to drive you somewhere. But when I heard about this I started thinking ahead to the time in my life that Mom and Dad would not be around all the time and would have to do all this on my own. Would I manage, of course, but it would make life a lot easier if I did this. Also, I knew this would not change who I am. Four feet or five feet, I would still be the same internally so I figured if I could take advantage to what science and technology and medicine had to offer to make my life functionally easier. I know some like to search for a negative reason that forced us to do this, our parents, kids at school, we could not accept what we are, we wanted to blend in with average society, whatever, but it is not there. Ask why she did this, ask anyone who is actually brave enough to share their thoughts and experiences with this group knowing the response they will likely get. It's gotten better since I started posting four or so years ago, but I fully understand why many LPs who choose ELL have little to nothing to do with the LP community after. Acceptance is the most important thing, provided you have not undergone ELL. Gillian. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 21, 2002 Report Share Posted November 21, 2002 Hi, Apryl -- One thing you *might* want to look into is orthopedic surgery to lengthen and straighten Jianna's arms. ELL involves lengthening the lower legs, and upper legs, and the upper arms, and the arms are by far the easiest part of the surgery to do. I know of one orthopedist who's been treating patients with dwarfism for years, and who believes that there may well be considerable merit in doing ELL for the arms only. Dan Kennedy At 9:00 AM -0500 11/21/02, AngelsRTru@... wrote: >Jianna is only 12 and is beggign for the surgery. In her case there is a >valid point for it...Her arms are very bowed and causing her a lot of pain >due to the madelung deformity. She woudl have it done to alleviate that >which is going to get worse and not for the lengthening...the straightening >IF it is possible which we do not know at this time. However, I am more >concerned that she accept herself for who she is where she is than I am for >the cosmetics changes it woudl bring. We have had some pretty emotional >discourses about this...Puberty is hell in an average kid's life but for one >like this its worse because society puts such a prize on supernormalcy. >Sometimes the emotional need for these things outweighs the biological >need.... > >Apryl Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 21, 2002 Report Share Posted November 21, 2002 --- Gillian Mueller wrote: > I want to respond to a couple of things that have been raised in various posts over the past two days. For Dr. Ain to list death as one of the key complications is very unfair, Gillian -- Most surgeons list death as a possible outcome in ALL major surgeries. I was told it was a possibility during both of my decompressions. I wouldn't take this as a slight towards this particular procedure. Rose Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 21, 2002 Report Share Posted November 21, 2002 Rose: I understand that death is always an outcome in any procedure, it was just the way Dr. Ain said it (and I'm not sure if you saw the show) that seemed to imply this has happened at least a couple of times and that fact should stop you from doing this that bothered me. Death is always a risk, life in general is a risk, but I think it is long past time for the top LP surgeons and the top ELL surgeons to come together and discuss the potential risks of all this and start to communicate to help LPs instead of just going on talk shows and saying you should not do this because you could die or lose your leg. Those kind of comments help no one. Gillian. > Gillian -- > Most surgeons list death as a possible outcome in ALL major > surgeries. I was told it was a possibility during both of my > decompressions. I wouldn't take this as a slight towards this > particular procedure. > > Rose Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 21, 2002 Report Share Posted November 21, 2002 I've talked with Dr. Ain about this, and I think it's fair to say that he considers the risk of death far more unacceptable in a procedure that truly might be thought of as cosmetic, as opposed to the risk of death in, for example, a spinal-decompression operation designed to reverse paralysis. Dan At 5:17 PM +0000 11/21/02, Gillian Mueller wrote: >Rose: I understand that death is always an outcome in any procedure, >it was just the way Dr. Ain said it (and I'm not sure if you saw the >show) that seemed to imply this has happened at least a couple of >times and that fact should stop you from doing this that bothered >me. Death is always a risk, life in general is a risk, but I think >it is long past time for the top LP surgeons and the top ELL surgeons >to come together and discuss the potential risks of all this and >start to communicate to help LPs instead of just going on talk shows >and saying you should not do this because you could die or lose your >leg. Those kind of comments help no one. Gillian. > > >> Gillian -- >> Most surgeons list death as a possible outcome in ALL major >> surgeries. I was told it was a possibility during both of my >> decompressions. I wouldn't take this as a slight towards this >> particular procedure. >> > > Rose Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 21, 2002 Report Share Posted November 21, 2002 How do you know limb lengthening was specifically designed to make people taller?? How do you know it wasn't started to help people like myself who had ONE LIMB shorter than the other???? I don't think ANYONE is trying to " cure " dwarfism.. nor do any of the doctors say they're trying to, either.. so I think it's unfair for you to say such a thing. You people need to just agree to disagree and realize that the ELL HAS improved MANY people's lives. I recently got a newsletter from my hospital in Dallas showing pics and talking about how they performed it YET AGAIN on someone else with a limb shorter than the other. So some of you may not agree with it.. get over it. Don't try and tell someone that they were wrong for doing it, or try and make em feel bad for doing it. It's their own personal choice.. NOT yours. Amy Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 21, 2002 Report Share Posted November 21, 2002 I was 12 years old when I made the decision to get this done. But I had been talking about it ever since I was 9. I even made a video in my third grade class about my condition and what I thought about the lengthening. If kids were forced into the ELL then I dont think they would follow through with the entire thing. I was ecstatic to know that I was able to get this done and from everyone else I have talked to they were the same way. My parents are average sized and whenever something came up they always asked my input. They would have supported me either way. This was 100% my decision. > >> > >>> I just have a comment to make towards what Dr. Ain had to say about > >>> the procedure. First of all I think that it was inappropriate to > > say > >>> that you can die from this procedure or lose a limb. You cannot die > >>> from actually getting your limbs lengthened. What you can die from > > is > >>> the anesthesia. But this is not the only surgery that requires > >>> anesthesia, obviously. > >> > >> Just one quibble. With ELL, you can die from a fat embolism > > breaking > >> loose during the stretching process. This would be an exceedingly > >> rare complication, but it is specific to ELL. > >> > >> Dan Kennedy > > > > > > Maybe this is so but as far as I know Dr. Paley has never had anyone > > lose a leg or die from the procedure. It was inappropriate for Dr. > > Ain to say this because he doesn't specialize in ELL. If he doesn't > > agree with it thats fine. Another thin I dont get is that in a > > previous documentary he said that he would allow his daughter a, > > I think that is her name, to get the surgery if that was her > > decision. Why now is he all of the sudden going totally against this? > > > > > > > > > > === > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 21, 2002 Report Share Posted November 21, 2002 I think it would be better if doctors and surgeons would spend more time educating themselves about psycho/social aspects of dwarfism, and then try to make their patients feel better about their condition instead of spending thousands of dollars trying to " cure " it. But it's all about the money. -Bill Bradford Re: Limb Lengthening -- it's not cosmetic Rose: I understand that death is always an outcome in any procedure, it was just the way Dr. Ain said it (and I'm not sure if you saw the show) that seemed to imply this has happened at least a couple of times and that fact should stop you from doing this that bothered me. Death is always a risk, life in general is a risk, but I think it is long past time for the top LP surgeons and the top ELL surgeons to come together and discuss the potential risks of all this and start to communicate to help LPs instead of just going on talk shows and saying you should not do this because you could die or lose your leg. Those kind of comments help no one. Gillian. > Gillian -- > Most surgeons list death as a possible outcome in ALL major > surgeries. I was told it was a possibility during both of my > decompressions. I wouldn't take this as a slight towards this > particular procedure. > > Rose === Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 22, 2002 Report Share Posted November 22, 2002 ELL, or at least the Ilizarov method was invented almost fifty years ago in Russia to treat LLD and correct deformities. Using this method to lengthen LPs came later. Dr. Ilizarov certainly did not develop this to " cure dwarfism " or to make money. He did it to help his patients. Gillian. At 07:34 PM 11/21/2002 -0500, you wrote: >How do you know limb lengthening was specifically designed to make people >taller?? How do you know it wasn't started to help people like myself who had >ONE LIMB shorter than the other???? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 24, 2002 Report Share Posted November 24, 2002 Agreed, Barbara. An adolescent's decision making ability and skills are the emotional equivalent of a summer storm -- sudden and fierce -- often over as quickly as they start. It's been my experience that compliance is a cooperative effort nearly 100% of the time. Aucott From: Barbara B <<A HREF= " dwarfism/post?protectID=18923325018209320216\ 9218141024124241134222149046039109074 " >tobubba@c...</A>> Date: Wed Nov 20, 2002 2:45 pm Subject: Re: Re: Limb Lengthening -- it's not cosmetic Personally, I don't understand how young teen is knowledgeable to make a such life changing decision. Just my two cents Barbara Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.