Guest guest Posted August 20, 2001 Report Share Posted August 20, 2001 High fives to Ginny and on their posts I actually laughed outloud Ginny, when you told me how the doctor's face completely changed when he was introduced to you...hehe And ...you said that 74% of doctors support abortion if the baby is going to be a dwarf to prevent the " pain and suffering " of raising that child...I find that number to be so hard to believe but I do not find it hard to believe that some doctors are not more postive thinking when it comes to a fetus that is developing with a physical/mental condition. Adam, my boyfriend for those who know me, has a niece who is 5 and she is achon. When his sister had an ultrasound on one appointment they noticed then that was not matching the normal " images " for a developing fetus at that time. So they did an amnio and got the results. Adam's sister and brother-in-law thought long and hard about what to do...they already had a son, ph 3, and at the same time, they had just met me at the beginning of me and Adam's relationship. I rememeber Adam's sister telling me that the doctor gave her a lot of options, told her the complications/problems achons have as they grow older, etc and it worried her to death. So I sat down with her one day and talked to her and gave her information about achondroplasia that I printed out from the lpa site...I told her about the physical problems I have with day to day life eventhough I'm Diastrophic and how me and my family deal with them and overcome them. I told her how when I was born in 1979, before the dawn of technology, that my mom and dad did not know I was a dwarf until I laid in that incubator blue as Elvis's suede shoes and not breathing...BUT they did not leave me...it helped Adam's sister and her husband make their decision and is now running around like a normal 5 yr old and hasn't had as many of the problems as a lot of achon children have around her age...and her big brother is never too far from her either I'm not trying to say I'm the hero for 's birth, her parents are, but it proves the idea of what would have happened if they never met me? What would have happened if the doctor did not tell that woman her baby was a dwarf? And how did women before our time deal with the surprising fact that their newborns have a physical difference? I know some of those facts are kind of grim but otherwise, there ARE some good outcomes and possibilities. I guess what I'm trying to say is only the strongest can deal with the " pain and suffering " of raising a child with a disability and apparently, all of our parents have and have done good jobs with us. If this woman was mentally disabled then the doctor could have at least let her carry full term and put the baby up for adoption, IF she was so far mental to where she couldn't take care of the child whether it was a dwarf or not. There was a story in the paper a while back of a Downs Syndrome woman who was about 25 and got pregnant...her baby was healthy but her family signed papers to raise her baby for her, since she was so mentally incapacitated. There are so many " yeah well.. " 's and " what if " 's with this situation...but unfortunately what's done is done...no one can bring back that child but I think this tragedy, like many others, is also a lesson for those who are pregnant now with a child with a disability and dont want to keep the baby but also dont want to kill it, and for those that just question the reason for their existance. And unfortunately, I know for a fact that this kind of thing has happened before for the very same reasons...that only the weakest give in to some of the most challenging, yet rewarding, things. Gretchen www.geocities.com/elfsnot20 ===== " I never worry about diets. The only carrots that interest me are the number you get in a diamond. " Mae West __________________________________________________ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 11, 2005 Report Share Posted December 11, 2005 Dear Buzz: Of all the information I have received from the SLL-CLL web page, the statement on living everyday as it might be your last, should be emulated by everyone who has this dreaded disease. It's easy to speculate and second guess your actions, but to live like today maybe your last is very appropriate for all of us to practice in our daily lives. " Thank You For Reminding Us On How We Should Live Our Lives! " When in doubt, GO FOR IT!! When it's time to let go and place our trust in our God, go with dignity. Hope everyone has a " Happy Holiday Season! " Pete Fritsch Diagnosis: CLL January 15, 2002 Rituxan Six (6) Treatments Rituxan and Fludarabine Ten (10) Treatments Campath Thirty-six (36) Treatments Flavopiridol Twenty-four (24) Treatments* Flavopridiol Twenty-four (24) Treatments* * Clinical Trial - The Ohio State University BUZZ SHINN <shinnbuzz@...> wrote: Re: the wonderings of some folks and speculations thereof concerning why the cancers. The fact is that few of us can really say how or why our cancers are caused. The simple answer is " all of the above " Yeah things have changed since the 50's 0r 60's or.... " but its really irrelevant and mere speculation. The fact is that in the past (and even now) we have willingly partaken of chemicals that later proved carcinogenic or mutagenic. What caused the cancers? Who can say but I know for certain I have had numerous exposures to bad stuff.What to do? do my best to eliminate those things which are questionable in my life and live each day like it may be my last (it will be someday). I choose to honor the gift of life by enjoying it to the fullest no matter what the circumstances. I also hope to have the wisdom to know when its time to go and to let go gracefully to the last great adventure of this life. I guess I share my thoughts with y'all in the hopes that they might add to our lives. So much for the soapbox, I just wanted to share. With peace love and joy to all. buzz Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 11, 2005 Report Share Posted December 11, 2005 Buzz Shinn writes: " The fact is that in the past (and even now) we have willingly partaken of chemicals that later proved carcinogenic or mutagenic. " No argument there but what about all the toxic materials that have been showered on us without our knowledge or approval? The list is long, very long and anyone who pays attention should have a good idea of what's been going on since the days of WWII. I don't mean to start a debate but I can offer a synopsis of a recent study that addresses the issue of involuntary exposure. I offered to send this to members of the ACOR list and will do the same for members of this list. Just send me your e-mail address and I'll forward you a copy. A final word to Buzz. It certainly is true that it's too late for us to worry about what caused our cancers. But if we simply close the book on the issue, are we not doing a disservice to our succeeding generations? Fred Hummel, 79, Arcata, CA; CLL/SLL dx 1.98; Fludara 2000; Fludara, Rituxan, Novantrone, Decadron, 2002; Rituxan, 2004; Rituxan, Chlorambucil, Prednisone, 2005. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 11, 2005 Report Share Posted December 11, 2005 Fred, Thank you. Your point about remembering our obligation to future generations is correct. Please send me the summary you mention. Carolynswift@... --- Fred Hummel <fch@...> wrote: > > Buzz Shinn writes: " The fact is that in the past > (and even now) we have > willingly partaken of chemicals that later proved > carcinogenic or > mutagenic. " > > No argument there but what about all the toxic > materials that have been > showered on us without our knowledge or approval? > The list is long, very > long and anyone who pays attention should have a > good idea of what's been > going on since the days of WWII. > > I don't mean to start a debate but I can offer a > synopsis of a recent study > that addresses the issue of involuntary exposure. I > offered to send this to > members of the ACOR list and will do the same for > members of this list. Just > send me your e-mail address and I'll forward you a > copy. > > A final word to Buzz. It certainly is true that it's > too late for us to > worry about what caused our cancers. But if we > simply close the book on the > issue, are we not doing a disservice to our > succeeding generations? > > Fred Hummel, 79, Arcata, CA; > CLL/SLL dx 1.98; > Fludara 2000; > Fludara, Rituxan, Novantrone, Decadron, 2002; > Rituxan, 2004; > Rituxan, Chlorambucil, Prednisone, 2005. > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 11, 2005 Report Share Posted December 11, 2005 From my point of view, to ignore what has been done to our environment, and is still being done, is indeed to harm our grandchildren. We may not want to look at what has been done to us, but it is our obigation to do so. Carolyn, age 77, dx 9/04/ w & w --- Fred Hummel <fch@...> wrote: > > Buzz Shinn writes: " The fact is that in the past > (and even now) we have > willingly partaken of chemicals that later proved > carcinogenic or > mutagenic. " > > No argument there but what about all the toxic > materials that have been > showered on us without our knowledge or approval? > The list is long, very > long and anyone who pays attention should have a > good idea of what's been > going on since the days of WWII. > > I don't mean to start a debate but I can offer a > synopsis of a recent study > that addresses the issue of involuntary exposure. I > offered to send this to > members of the ACOR list and will do the same for > members of this list. Just > send me your e-mail address and I'll forward you a > copy. > > A final word to Buzz. It certainly is true that it's > too late for us to > worry about what caused our cancers. But if we > simply close the book on the > issue, are we not doing a disservice to our > succeeding generations? > > Fred Hummel, 79, Arcata, CA; > CLL/SLL dx 1.98; > Fludara 2000; > Fludara, Rituxan, Novantrone, Decadron, 2002; > Rituxan, 2004; > Rituxan, Chlorambucil, Prednisone, 2005. > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 12, 2005 Report Share Posted December 12, 2005 To the group - I really wonder if there really is that much more cancer now or do we have much better diagnostics and therefore are able to label our sicknesses with the proper names?!! Any thought on this? Bonnie >From: BUZZ SHINN <shinnbuzz@...> >Date: Sun Dec 11 16:15:14 CST 2005 >SLL-CLL-edu >Subject: What's done is done >Re: the wonderings of some folks and speculations thereof concerning why the cancers. The fact is that few of us can really say how or why our cancers are caused. The simple answer is " all of the above " Yeah things have changed since the 50's 0r 60's or.... " but its really irrelevant and mere speculation. The fact is that in the past (and even now) we have willingly partaken of chemicals that later proved carcinogenic or mutagenic. What caused the cancers? Who can say but I know for certain I have had numerous exposures to bad stuff.What to do? do my best to eliminate those things which are questionable in my life and live each day like it may be my last (it will be someday). I choose to honor the gift of life by enjoying it to the fullest no matter what the circumstances. I also hope to have the wisdom to know when its time to go and to let go gracefully to the last great adventure of this life. I guess I share my thoughts with y'all in the hopes that they might add to our lives. So much for the soapbox, I just wanted to share. > With peace love and joy to all. buzz > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.