Guest guest Posted September 22, 2001 Report Share Posted September 22, 2001 From: " Pam Young (by way of ilena rose) " <sic42001@...> Sent: Saturday, September 22, 2001 1:37 PM Subject: Pan Plastic Terrorists? > Dear Sisters: > > I would like to tell you what the ASPRS (American Society of Plastic & > reconstructive Surgeons) has done for us. > > Documents from the Breast Implant Depository show that in Nov. 1990 a memo > from > Ann Woodbury, who was connected to the ASPRS, made breast cancer patients a > marketing target for the ASPRS. > > This memo states: " With 88,000 new cases of breast cancer occurring in white > women per year in the United States and with mastectomy being the most > common first therapy, the reconstructive field would appear to be a major > potential market. " > > Along with this memo are about 20 pages of documents showing every State in > the U.S. and analysis of plastic surgeons compared to the potential market > of breast cancer victims. > > In a letter from Dr. Norman Cole (former Pres. of ASPRS) to his colleagues, > he writes: " There is no question that your personal efforts to protect a > woman's right to choose breast implants...have had a tremendous impact. " > (see document ASP005183) > > A Jan. 20, 1992 letter from Dr. Bell (ASPRS) to Dr. Norman Cole > (Pres. of ASPRS) states: " I am appalled by the national panic that now > exists over a series of anecdotal and scientfically unsubstantiated > observations about silicone breast implants...The American Civil Liberties > Union would seem to be an ideal medium via which we might raise our > constitutional objections. " > > A Feb. 3, 1992 letter from Dr. C. to Dr. Norman Cole, states: > " If it is proven that there is a chronic low-grade immune stimulus caused by > gel bleed from silicone gel implants, and if this results in autoimmune > complications in a small percentage of patients, it is also possible that > there might be positive results that could result from this chronic immune > stimulation. " > > An April 4, 1992 letter from Dr. Lu Feng to Dr. Norman Cole (ASPRS) > states: " During the tumultuous confrontation between the one hundred or so > members of the OVSPRS and me on April 3rd...I felt I was being put on trial > and being interrogated, execution style, by the leadership of the ASPRS...I > was very disappointed that not one person at the meeting asked me about the > nature of the illnesses these patients are suffering. The > focus was solely and entirerly on their own livelihoods... " > > In a Feb. 3, 1993 letter from Dr. P. Gruber (ASPRS) to Dr. G. > Hoehn, Gruber states: " I believe that cooperation with the FDA invites > further restrictions and therefore suggest the following option. > Encourage and provide financial contributions to one of the women's > organization that is willing to take legal action against the FDA for its > failure to allow freedom of choice. " > > In Plastic Surgery Update (Winter 1996) prepared by the ASPRS, Dr. > A. Korentager states: " It is, therefore, the job of physicians and plastic > surgeons not only to anatomically reconstruct the breast > mound, but to help patients understand that contemplating breast > reconstruction is wholesome and natural, and is an integral part of breast > cancer treatment. " > > Korentager goes on to say, " In recognition of Dr. Carl Hartrampf's work in > the development of the TRAM flap, the American Medical Association presented > him its prestigious Scientific Achievement Award for 1995. He was also > chosen to receive the American Cancer Society's Distinguished > Service Award for 1995. " > > Statistics from ASPS 1999 record a 180% increase in breast reconstructions > from 1992 thru 1999. The 2000 breast surgery statistics show Tissue Flaps as > being 31% of all breast reconstructions performed. > This demonstrates that implants are not the main focus, anymore, but plastic > surgeons are moving on into selling tissue flaps. > > However, a 2001 American Cancer Society research report, Quality of Life > after Breast Carcinoma Surgery, states: " In fact, mastectomy with > reconstruction is associated with greater mood disturbance and poorer > well-being. " > > Perhaps the " divide and conquer " strategy not only applies to women's > organizations such as NOW, but to the members of the ASPRS! > > Dr. Lu Feng was NOT the only plastic surgeon to voice objection to > ASPRS's agenda. > > A Feb. 18, 1992 letter from Dr. Henry D. Onken, states: " I have learned > more about the problems associated with migrating silicone gel from the > Wall Street Journal and the New York Times in the last 6 weeks than I have > from the ASPRS...The lack of real scientific information coming from our > Society...reduce the ASPRS to another Trade Organization > howling for its share of the medical dollar. " > > Maybe the ASPRS is starting to crumble from the inside. Perhaps it is > experiencing the same fate as the women's organizations who they tricked > into believing that breast implants & tissue flaps were a woman's choice; > thus dividing & conquering us. > > The ASPRS seems to be a Bully organization, full of Pan Plastic > Surgeons who are fixated at a teenage sexual stage of development. They grew > up during the golden years of Hugh Heftner's Playboy Reign. > > As young boys, ASPRS members probably had air-brushed photos of naked > Playboy Centerfolds taped to the walls of their bedrooms. They may have even > masturbated or had " wet dreams " about the beautiful breasts that they would > create someday as plastic surgeons. > > Beauty to a young boy is the appearance of the physical body. They are > sexually excited by visual images of women's breasts. > > But, as a boy grows up out of that stage, he comes to realize the meaning of > the words of Keats. In his poem, Ode on a Grecian Urn, Keats writes: > " Beauty is truth, truth beauty. " > > Real beauty is not a man-made breast created from silicone or muscle & fat. > Real beauty is TRUTH---the truth of admitting that breast implants & tissue > flaps have injured and disabled many women. > > Maybe there are some grown up men in the ASPRS. I do hope so because if > there are they need to stand up for the TRUTH. > They need to look at the ugly, mutilated breasts that they have created, and > quit hiding the truth from " mommy. " > > Their breast reconstruction experiments have failed. Their man-made breasts > are ugly, and they need to admit to the truth. We know they have failed, > because women have put their photos on the Internet to show the > world how mutilated they are because of the Pan Plastic Surgeons, the > little boys who never grew up! > > Who do you think has more photos of women's naked breasts: Hugh Hefner or > the plastic surgeons? > > Thank you, > Pam, ASPRS Victim > Founder of SIC Sisters for Informed Choice > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.