Guest guest Posted May 15, 2002 Report Share Posted May 15, 2002 In a message dated 5/15/2002 11:20:17 AM, jdybala1974@... writes: << I promised to back out of the Danny Black debate, but I will say this: I think I see Tony Soares's point about Danny a little better after reading this. I still don't agree with him, but I see his point. One minor nitpick, though: would that half an inch really make such a huge difference if Reich wanted to join LPA? >> I think Reich qualifies, infact I'm certain we have menbers that are his height. I did two talk radio shows this am and suggested he join LPA. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 15, 2002 Report Share Posted May 15, 2002 I promised to back out of the Danny Black debate, but I will say this: I think I see Tony Soares's point about Danny a little better after reading this. I still don't agree with him, but I see his point. One minor nitpick, though: would that half an inch really make such a huge difference if Reich wanted to join LPA? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 15, 2002 Report Share Posted May 15, 2002 At 09:05 AM 5/15/2002 -0600, Dybala wrote: >I promised to back out of the Danny Black debate, but I will say this: I >think I see Tony Soares's point about Danny a little better after reading >this. I still don't agree with him, but I see his point. > >One minor nitpick, though: would that half an inch really make such a huge >difference if Reich wanted to join LPA? > > and does that half an inch make a difference if others wanted to love, support and embrace as a member of the human race? ....regardless of his label (dwarf vs average), his role or position in life, his success or failure? or does the fact that has risen above his " shortcomings " and been VERY successful irritate you folks? this reader feels you (the collective naysayers) can't stand success in others... what if your parents were like that? (i.e. what if they didn't think you could be successful?) or were / are they? i sincerely love, respect and support you if you didn't or aren't getting that support at home. we are ALL worthy of love and respect. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 15, 2002 Report Share Posted May 15, 2002 In a message dated 5/15/2002 4:05:07 PM, dbradfor@... writes: << According to *who* in LPA? That would mean the LPA cutoff is four nine and a half. What's going on here, Cara? >> Oh my!!! you mean there's thousands of Dwarfs out there that don't know they're Dwarfs because of this 1/2 error? Now I finally have my answer as to why LP has financial concerns and limited revenue. Maybe we should anger some more people by increasing the height to 5'2 " and get even more members! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 15, 2002 Report Share Posted May 15, 2002 Doesn't Reich look like he has SED? Telesca hometown.aol.com/suzannat ================== ABILITY Magazine & Programs www.ABILITYMagazine.com www.ABILITYAwareness.org =========================== ABILITY Awareness is a non-profit organization dedicated to enhancing the quality of life for people with disabilities through housing, education, employment, media and volunteer opportunities. =========================== Donations can be made online or sent to: Long Island / New York office: ABILITY Magazine & Awareness PO Box 1048 Kings Park, NY 11754 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 15, 2002 Report Share Posted May 15, 2002 On Wed, 15 May 2002, Dybala wrote: > One minor nitpick, though: would that half an inch really make such a huge > difference if Reich wanted to join LPA? The article says he's 4'10 " . I thought the cutoff for LPA was 4'11 " . Wouldn't that mean he's already qualified? The article reads: " The Democratic candidate ... is half-an-inch taller than someone who is considered a dwarf, according to the Little People of America, a national support organization for dwarfism. " According to *who* in LPA? That would mean the LPA cutoff is four nine and a half. What's going on here, Cara? Dave Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 15, 2002 Report Share Posted May 15, 2002 My understanding has always been that LPA's definition of dwarfism is an adult height of 4'10 " or less as the result of a medical or genetic condition. I'm quite sure that's right, but if it isn't, I hope an LPA officer will post. I'll need to make some changes to LPA Online! Here's where the Herald reporter got into trouble. She wrote that Reich is 4'10 " , but Reich has always claimed to be 4'10 1/2 " . She interviewed me for the piece (although she didn't quote me), and I told her that Reich, at 4'10 1/2 " , was a half-inch too tall to be considered a dwarf, at least by LPA. So she got his height wrong, but then correctly reported that he's a half-inch too tall for LPA. Hence the confusion. I dropped her an e-mail today and pointed out the problem, but she hasn't gotten back to me. Dan Kennedy >On Wed, 15 May 2002, Dybala wrote: > >> One minor nitpick, though: would that half an inch really make such a huge >> difference if Reich wanted to join LPA? > >The article says he's 4'10 " . I thought the cutoff for LPA was 4'11 " . >Wouldn't that mean he's already qualified? > >The article reads: > > " The Democratic candidate ... is half-an-inch taller than someone who is >considered a dwarf, according to the Little People of America, a national >support organization for dwarfism. " > >According to *who* in LPA? That would mean the LPA cutoff is four nine and >a half. What's going on here, Cara? > >Dave > > > >=== > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 15, 2002 Report Share Posted May 15, 2002 As far as that goes, I have no recollection making any statement during that interview whether Reich is/isn't a dwarf or could/should join LPA. Cara Egan On Wed, 15 May 2002 12:50:25 -0700 (Pacific Daylight Time) Bradford <dbradfor@...> wrote: On Wed, 15 May 2002, Dybala wrote: > One minor nitpick, though: would that half an inch really make such a huge > difference if Reich wanted to join LPA? The article says he's 4'10 " . I thought the cutoff for LPA was 4'11 " . Wouldn't that mean he's already qualified? The article reads: " The Democratic candidate ... is half-an-inch taller than someone who is considered a dwarf, according to the Little People of America, a national support organization for dwarfism. " According to *who* in LPA? That would mean the LPA cutoff is four nine and a half. What's going on here, Cara? Dave === Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 15, 2002 Report Share Posted May 15, 2002 To be honest, I am getting tired of hearing about B. Reich. As far as Governor of Massachusetts goes, all of my friends in Mass. are voting for Mitt Romney. Go Mitt!! > > > One minor nitpick, though: would that half an inch really make such a huge > > difference if Reich wanted to join LPA? > > The article says he's 4'10 " . I thought the cutoff for LPA was 4'11 " . > Wouldn't that mean he's already qualified? > > The article reads: > > " The Democratic candidate ... is half-an-inch taller than someone who is > considered a dwarf, according to the Little People of America, a national > support organization for dwarfism. " > > According to *who* in LPA? That would mean the LPA cutoff is four nine and > a half. What's going on here, Cara? > > Dave > > > > === > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.