Guest guest Posted December 11, 2006 Report Share Posted December 11, 2006 " ...6. J Mann, Graham Emslie, Ross J Baldessarini, Beardslee, Jan A Fawcett, Frederick K Goodwin, C Leon, Herbert Y Meltzer, Neal D , Shaffer and D Wagner. ACNP Task Force Report on SSRIs and Suicidal Behavior in Youth, Neuropsychopharmacology advance online publication 23 November 2005... " http://www.ahrp.org/cms/content/view/327/27/ ACNP Journal Editor Quits Amid Exposure of Conflicts of Interest Sunday, 27 August 2006 A notice from The American College of Neuropsychopharmacology, the inner sanctum of biological--predominantly drug-centered psychiatry-- informs the membership of the resignation of Dr. Nemeroff, the Editor-in-Chief of its journal, Neuropsychopharmacology. The resignation comes after the Wall Street Journal reported that the authors of research review article in the ACNP journal had concealed conflicts of interest. [1] http://www.ahrp.org/cms/content/view/295/55/ Furthermore, the article appears to have been ghostwritten by a writer paid by Cyberonics' communication management company. The lead author was the journal's editor in chief. The New York Times described the relationship in an editorial as, " incestuous. " http://www.ahrp.org/cms/content/view/301/55/ Dr. Nemeroff, chairman of Psychiatry at Emory, a past president of the ACNP, is not an outlier in the profession. Indeed, Dr. Nemeroff and the ACNP are the key opinion leaders in psychiatry whose influence on research and treatment paradigms in psychiatry are the bedrock of this primarily commercial enterprise. The case represents a microcosm of Biological psychiatry and its failure to rise to the level of a science-based medical discipline. Neither its diagnostic guide (DSM-IV), nor treatment guidelines (TMAP) are based on any validated scientific standards of professional judgment--they are based on the financial interests of those who write the standards. [2] http://www.ahrp.org/cms/content/view/143/55/ Most importantly, when this case is considered alongside the tainted antidepressant drug literature, only then does the magnitude of the disconnect between psychiatry's academic literature and the data that that literature is supposed to reflect. For example, The Executive Summary of ACNP's Task Force on SSRIs and Suicidal Behavior in Youth, was issued by GYMR, a public relations firm in Washington (in January 2004) 10 days prior to an FDA advisory committee hearing about this issue. Just as the VNS article bye Nemeroff et al, acknowledged " editorial support in developing early drafts of this manuscript, " the ACNP Report acknowledged " medical writing input. " Indeed, Dr. Healy has noted: " There is probably no other area of medicine in which the academic literature is so at odds with the raw data. A possible explanation is that this literature has had a significant ghostwriting input, a possibility that the ACNP Task Force Report, published 10 days before the FDA hearing and widely seen as a pre-emptive strike at FDA, does nothing to dispel. " For a long time foollowing its dissemination to the press, the ACNP SSRI Task Force Executive Summary report was unavailable from ACNP offices. Those who wished to obtain a copy were referred to GYMR, whose medical writers, its website promised, " know how to take the language of science and medicine and transform it into the more understandable language of health " . http://www.gymr.com/docs/capabilities/index.jsp Further underscoring its public relations value: " GYMR knows how to grab the attention of DC and national reporters--reporters who set the agenda for media in communities nationwide. " The message that GYMR disseminated with the ACNP logo was meant to deflect from the evidence by reassuring the public: " taking Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors (SSRIs) or other new generation antidepressant drugs does not increase the risk of suicidal thinking or suicide attempts. " [3] But, as Dr. Healy points out, the authors's diclaimer that " they might be mistaken in that they had not seen the raw data, " is incomprehensible: " The authors of the Task Force Report [ ] include [Graham] Emslie, [] Wagner and [Neil] who are authors on almost all of the randomized trials on SSRIs, in addition to study 329. " " On what basis, " he asks, " can they claim not to have seen the raw data? " http://www.ahrp.org/risks/healy/FDA0204.php The answer is provided by a GlaxoKline internal memo, which makes clear, that the antidepressant drug reports authored by members the ACNP Task Force were based on selective partial clinical trial data: " positive data from study 329 will be published...there are no plans to publish data from Study 377. " [4] http://www.ahrp.org/risks/SSRI0204/GSKpaxil/pg1.html NY State Attorney General, Elliott Spitzer, characterized such partial concealment of data as FRAUD. But what about the integrity of medicine and science? Even after those reports of partial data have been discredited, they continue to be cited as authoritative. Indeed, the Final report of the ACNP Task Force continues to cite those studies as authoritative. [5] http://www.nature.com/npp/journal/vaop/ncurrent/full/1300958a.html Concealment of financial conflicts of interest is only one symptom of the disease. Financial conflicts of interest permeate the entire fabric of medicine--but as the case example demonstrates, psychiatry is fartherst afield from acceptable conduct. Fraudulent practices-- such as, concealment of negative data, and clinical trials designed NOT to detect severe, though rare, adverse effects, have resulted in the approval of tainted drugs that injur and kill. The proliferation of expensive but worthless treatments is also bankrupting the public healthcare budget. See also, comments by ACNP member, Dr. Bernard Carroll, retired chairman of psychiatry at Duke University, on his blog, Health Care Renewal (Tuesday, August 08, 2006) " Money and Medical Journals " http://hcrenewal.blogspot.com/ References: 1. B Nemeroff, Helen S Mayberg, E Krahl, McNamara, Alan Frazer, R Henry, Mark S , Dennis S Charney and K Brannan. VNS Therapy in Treatment-Resistant Depression: Clinical Evidence and Putative Neurobiological Mechanisms Neuropsychopharmacology (July, 2006) 31, 1345-1355. published online 19 April 2006. http://www.nature.com/npp/journal/v31/n7/full/1301082a.html 2. Cosgrove and Sheldon Krimsky, Financial Ties between DSM-IV Panel Members and the Pharmaceutical Industry, in Psychotherapy & sychometrics, 2006, 75:154-160. see AHRP comments: http://www.ahrp.org/cms/content/view/143/55/ 3. ACNP Task Force on SSRIs and Suicidal Behavior in Youth. Executive Summary was issued by GYMR Communications without any accompanying data analysis. Whether the document was ghostwritten is anyone's guess. The Task Force known ties to the pharmaceutical industry http://www.ahrp.org/cms/content/view/26/55/ 4. See, GlaxoKline internal 1998 memo indicating that publication of Paxil pediatric study 329 will be based on only partial (positive) data. And the memo indicates that study 377 will not be published at all because it failed. http://www.ahrp.org/risks/SSRI0204/GSKpaxil/pg1.html 5. Among the published reports about Paxil study 329: Keller MB, ND, Strober M, Klein RG, Kutcher SP, Birmaher B et al (2001). Efficacy of paroxetine in the treatment of adolescent major depression: a randomized, controlled trial. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 40: 762-772.; Montgomery SA, Dunner DL, Dunbar GC (1995). Reduction of suicidal thoughts with paroxetine in comparison with reference antidepressants and placebo. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol 5: 5-13. 6. J Mann, Graham Emslie, Ross J Baldessarini, Beardslee, Jan A Fawcett, Frederick K Goodwin, C Leon, Herbert Y Meltzer, Neal D , Shaffer and D Wagner. ACNP Task Force Report on SSRIs and Suicidal Behavior in Youth, Neuropsychopharmacology advance online publication 23 November 2005; http://www.nature.com/npp/journal/vaop/ncurrent/full/1300958a.html Contact: Vera Hassner Sharav veracare@... veracare@... ... FAIR USE NOTICE: This may contain copyrighted (C ) material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Such material is made available for educational purposes, to advance understanding of human rights, democracy, scientific, moral, ethical, and social justice issues, etc. It is believed that this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in Title 17 U.S.C. section 107 of the US Copyright Law. This material is distributed without Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.