Jump to content
RemedySpot.com

The Strange Case of Yates and Dr Park Dietz

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

The Strange Case of Yates and Dr Park Dietz

Malcolm McKenzie Park University of Melbourne - Department of Geomaticsn Bar News, No. 143, p. 85, 2008

Abstract: Following the erroneous testimony of a celebrated expert witness, a mentally disturbed mother was convicted of murdering her five children. The witness's evidence was the foundation for an inference that the defendant had concocted an insanity defence based upon a popular television drama series episode. In fact, the expert had "falsely remembered" a non-existent episode of the series. The conviction was reversed upon appeal on the sole ground of the witness's erroneous testimony. Upon re-trial, the defendant was found not guilty by reason of insanity.

Keywords: Texas, criminal law, murder trial, expert, testimony, witness, forensic, "Law and Order" television series, mother, infanticide, appeal, post partum psychosis, insanity defence, psychiatric evidence, psychiatric disorder, mental, witness error, false memory, expert fallibility, false evidence

Accepted Paper Series

http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1537711

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Strange Case of Yates and Dr Park Dietz

Malcolm McKenzie Park University of Melbourne - Department of Geomaticsn Bar News, No. 143, p. 85, 2008

Abstract: Following the erroneous testimony of a celebrated expert witness, a mentally disturbed mother was convicted of murdering her five children. The witness's evidence was the foundation for an inference that the defendant had concocted an insanity defence based upon a popular television drama series episode. In fact, the expert had "falsely remembered" a non-existent episode of the series. The conviction was reversed upon appeal on the sole ground of the witness's erroneous testimony. Upon re-trial, the defendant was found not guilty by reason of insanity.

Keywords: Texas, criminal law, murder trial, expert, testimony, witness, forensic, "Law and Order" television series, mother, infanticide, appeal, post partum psychosis, insanity defence, psychiatric evidence, psychiatric disorder, mental, witness error, false memory, expert fallibility, false evidence

Accepted Paper Series

http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1537711

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Strange Case of Yates and Dr Park Dietz

Malcolm McKenzie Park University of Melbourne - Department of Geomaticsn Bar News, No. 143, p. 85, 2008

Abstract: Following the erroneous testimony of a celebrated expert witness, a mentally disturbed mother was convicted of murdering her five children. The witness's evidence was the foundation for an inference that the defendant had concocted an insanity defence based upon a popular television drama series episode. In fact, the expert had "falsely remembered" a non-existent episode of the series. The conviction was reversed upon appeal on the sole ground of the witness's erroneous testimony. Upon re-trial, the defendant was found not guilty by reason of insanity.

Keywords: Texas, criminal law, murder trial, expert, testimony, witness, forensic, "Law and Order" television series, mother, infanticide, appeal, post partum psychosis, insanity defence, psychiatric evidence, psychiatric disorder, mental, witness error, false memory, expert fallibility, false evidence

Accepted Paper Series

http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1537711

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Strange Case of Yates and Dr Park Dietz

Malcolm McKenzie Park University of Melbourne - Department of Geomaticsn Bar News, No. 143, p. 85, 2008

Abstract: Following the erroneous testimony of a celebrated expert witness, a mentally disturbed mother was convicted of murdering her five children. The witness's evidence was the foundation for an inference that the defendant had concocted an insanity defence based upon a popular television drama series episode. In fact, the expert had "falsely remembered" a non-existent episode of the series. The conviction was reversed upon appeal on the sole ground of the witness's erroneous testimony. Upon re-trial, the defendant was found not guilty by reason of insanity.

Keywords: Texas, criminal law, murder trial, expert, testimony, witness, forensic, "Law and Order" television series, mother, infanticide, appeal, post partum psychosis, insanity defence, psychiatric evidence, psychiatric disorder, mental, witness error, false memory, expert fallibility, false evidence

Accepted Paper Series

http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1537711

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...