Guest guest Posted October 19, 2010 Report Share Posted October 19, 2010 The Strange Case of Yates and Dr Park Dietz Malcolm McKenzie Park University of Melbourne - Department of Geomaticsn Bar News, No. 143, p. 85, 2008 Abstract: Following the erroneous testimony of a celebrated expert witness, a mentally disturbed mother was convicted of murdering her five children. The witness's evidence was the foundation for an inference that the defendant had concocted an insanity defence based upon a popular television drama series episode. In fact, the expert had "falsely remembered" a non-existent episode of the series. The conviction was reversed upon appeal on the sole ground of the witness's erroneous testimony. Upon re-trial, the defendant was found not guilty by reason of insanity. Keywords: Texas, criminal law, murder trial, expert, testimony, witness, forensic, "Law and Order" television series, mother, infanticide, appeal, post partum psychosis, insanity defence, psychiatric evidence, psychiatric disorder, mental, witness error, false memory, expert fallibility, false evidence Accepted Paper Series http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1537711 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 19, 2010 Report Share Posted October 19, 2010 The Strange Case of Yates and Dr Park Dietz Malcolm McKenzie Park University of Melbourne - Department of Geomaticsn Bar News, No. 143, p. 85, 2008 Abstract: Following the erroneous testimony of a celebrated expert witness, a mentally disturbed mother was convicted of murdering her five children. The witness's evidence was the foundation for an inference that the defendant had concocted an insanity defence based upon a popular television drama series episode. In fact, the expert had "falsely remembered" a non-existent episode of the series. The conviction was reversed upon appeal on the sole ground of the witness's erroneous testimony. Upon re-trial, the defendant was found not guilty by reason of insanity. Keywords: Texas, criminal law, murder trial, expert, testimony, witness, forensic, "Law and Order" television series, mother, infanticide, appeal, post partum psychosis, insanity defence, psychiatric evidence, psychiatric disorder, mental, witness error, false memory, expert fallibility, false evidence Accepted Paper Series http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1537711 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 19, 2010 Report Share Posted October 19, 2010 The Strange Case of Yates and Dr Park Dietz Malcolm McKenzie Park University of Melbourne - Department of Geomaticsn Bar News, No. 143, p. 85, 2008 Abstract: Following the erroneous testimony of a celebrated expert witness, a mentally disturbed mother was convicted of murdering her five children. The witness's evidence was the foundation for an inference that the defendant had concocted an insanity defence based upon a popular television drama series episode. In fact, the expert had "falsely remembered" a non-existent episode of the series. The conviction was reversed upon appeal on the sole ground of the witness's erroneous testimony. Upon re-trial, the defendant was found not guilty by reason of insanity. Keywords: Texas, criminal law, murder trial, expert, testimony, witness, forensic, "Law and Order" television series, mother, infanticide, appeal, post partum psychosis, insanity defence, psychiatric evidence, psychiatric disorder, mental, witness error, false memory, expert fallibility, false evidence Accepted Paper Series http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1537711 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 19, 2010 Report Share Posted October 19, 2010 The Strange Case of Yates and Dr Park Dietz Malcolm McKenzie Park University of Melbourne - Department of Geomaticsn Bar News, No. 143, p. 85, 2008 Abstract: Following the erroneous testimony of a celebrated expert witness, a mentally disturbed mother was convicted of murdering her five children. The witness's evidence was the foundation for an inference that the defendant had concocted an insanity defence based upon a popular television drama series episode. In fact, the expert had "falsely remembered" a non-existent episode of the series. The conviction was reversed upon appeal on the sole ground of the witness's erroneous testimony. Upon re-trial, the defendant was found not guilty by reason of insanity. Keywords: Texas, criminal law, murder trial, expert, testimony, witness, forensic, "Law and Order" television series, mother, infanticide, appeal, post partum psychosis, insanity defence, psychiatric evidence, psychiatric disorder, mental, witness error, false memory, expert fallibility, false evidence Accepted Paper Series http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1537711 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.