Guest guest Posted August 24, 2004 Report Share Posted August 24, 2004 Thank you Glitter. Your exactly right. It's an attempt on the drug pushers to change the subject. Your right on the money for not letting them do it. Thank you Connie also for being so sweet. I am always seeing your son as getting well. And I want to thank Niles for allowing us to have this group hug. I very much want Niles input on these issues and hope we have not chased him off. Niles, your input is needed and wanted. And I will try to keep my religion down to a dull roar for you Re: Scientology > In a message dated 8/24/04 5:16:54 AM Mountain Daylight Time, > SSRI medications writes: > > > > It only looks like a Scientology fringe thing as long as we let it. > > > How this association became the ultimate smear tactic is beyond me. It would > be analogous to a Roman Catholic protesting nuclear weapons and then being > called a Catholic fanatic, a fringe dweller, a misinformed psycho. I wrote the > author of that article and protested about Vicki Cottrell's reference to > Scientology when NAMI is little more than a front for Big Pharma. I suggested the > writer ask Ms. Vicki where NAMI gets its funding, and that people other than > Scientologists (like ME!) are against psychiatric drugs and that the issue is > NOT whether Dr. is or is not a Scientologist but whether there is massive > amounts of fraud surrounding mental illness and it's billion-dollar cures. > That comment by Ms Vicki really got me riled up. I have friends who are > Scientologists -- one was the Captain of Ron Hubbard's ship, and others are very > instrumental in disseminating the truth about psychiatry, and never once have > these people pushed their agenda or personal beliefs on anyone, but the truth > about psychiatry was their focus long before I ever knew anything about psych > meds. As you said, Jim, the slam is very thin now because so many of us are onto > the game and it's not just a CCHR thing anymore yet small-minded people like > Vicki Cottrell still believe that calling someone a Scientologist is the > ultimate insult and way to discredit someone. > > > > " Blind Reason " > a novel of pharmaceutical intrigue > Think your antidepressant is safe? Think again. It's > Unsafe At Any Dose > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 24, 2004 Report Share Posted August 24, 2004 Thank you Glitter. Your exactly right. It's an attempt on the drug pushers to change the subject. Your right on the money for not letting them do it. Thank you Connie also for being so sweet. I am always seeing your son as getting well. And I want to thank Niles for allowing us to have this group hug. I very much want Niles input on these issues and hope we have not chased him off. Niles, your input is needed and wanted. And I will try to keep my religion down to a dull roar for you Re: Scientology > In a message dated 8/24/04 5:16:54 AM Mountain Daylight Time, > SSRI medications writes: > > > > It only looks like a Scientology fringe thing as long as we let it. > > > How this association became the ultimate smear tactic is beyond me. It would > be analogous to a Roman Catholic protesting nuclear weapons and then being > called a Catholic fanatic, a fringe dweller, a misinformed psycho. I wrote the > author of that article and protested about Vicki Cottrell's reference to > Scientology when NAMI is little more than a front for Big Pharma. I suggested the > writer ask Ms. Vicki where NAMI gets its funding, and that people other than > Scientologists (like ME!) are against psychiatric drugs and that the issue is > NOT whether Dr. is or is not a Scientologist but whether there is massive > amounts of fraud surrounding mental illness and it's billion-dollar cures. > That comment by Ms Vicki really got me riled up. I have friends who are > Scientologists -- one was the Captain of Ron Hubbard's ship, and others are very > instrumental in disseminating the truth about psychiatry, and never once have > these people pushed their agenda or personal beliefs on anyone, but the truth > about psychiatry was their focus long before I ever knew anything about psych > meds. As you said, Jim, the slam is very thin now because so many of us are onto > the game and it's not just a CCHR thing anymore yet small-minded people like > Vicki Cottrell still believe that calling someone a Scientologist is the > ultimate insult and way to discredit someone. > > > > " Blind Reason " > a novel of pharmaceutical intrigue > Think your antidepressant is safe? Think again. It's > Unsafe At Any Dose > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 24, 2004 Report Share Posted August 24, 2004 Thank you Glitter. Your exactly right. It's an attempt on the drug pushers to change the subject. Your right on the money for not letting them do it. Thank you Connie also for being so sweet. I am always seeing your son as getting well. And I want to thank Niles for allowing us to have this group hug. I very much want Niles input on these issues and hope we have not chased him off. Niles, your input is needed and wanted. And I will try to keep my religion down to a dull roar for you Re: Scientology > In a message dated 8/24/04 5:16:54 AM Mountain Daylight Time, > SSRI medications writes: > > > > It only looks like a Scientology fringe thing as long as we let it. > > > How this association became the ultimate smear tactic is beyond me. It would > be analogous to a Roman Catholic protesting nuclear weapons and then being > called a Catholic fanatic, a fringe dweller, a misinformed psycho. I wrote the > author of that article and protested about Vicki Cottrell's reference to > Scientology when NAMI is little more than a front for Big Pharma. I suggested the > writer ask Ms. Vicki where NAMI gets its funding, and that people other than > Scientologists (like ME!) are against psychiatric drugs and that the issue is > NOT whether Dr. is or is not a Scientologist but whether there is massive > amounts of fraud surrounding mental illness and it's billion-dollar cures. > That comment by Ms Vicki really got me riled up. I have friends who are > Scientologists -- one was the Captain of Ron Hubbard's ship, and others are very > instrumental in disseminating the truth about psychiatry, and never once have > these people pushed their agenda or personal beliefs on anyone, but the truth > about psychiatry was their focus long before I ever knew anything about psych > meds. As you said, Jim, the slam is very thin now because so many of us are onto > the game and it's not just a CCHR thing anymore yet small-minded people like > Vicki Cottrell still believe that calling someone a Scientologist is the > ultimate insult and way to discredit someone. > > > > " Blind Reason " > a novel of pharmaceutical intrigue > Think your antidepressant is safe? Think again. It's > Unsafe At Any Dose > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 24, 2004 Report Share Posted August 24, 2004 Thank you Glitter. Your exactly right. It's an attempt on the drug pushers to change the subject. Your right on the money for not letting them do it. Thank you Connie also for being so sweet. I am always seeing your son as getting well. And I want to thank Niles for allowing us to have this group hug. I very much want Niles input on these issues and hope we have not chased him off. Niles, your input is needed and wanted. And I will try to keep my religion down to a dull roar for you Re: Scientology > In a message dated 8/24/04 5:16:54 AM Mountain Daylight Time, > SSRI medications writes: > > > > It only looks like a Scientology fringe thing as long as we let it. > > > How this association became the ultimate smear tactic is beyond me. It would > be analogous to a Roman Catholic protesting nuclear weapons and then being > called a Catholic fanatic, a fringe dweller, a misinformed psycho. I wrote the > author of that article and protested about Vicki Cottrell's reference to > Scientology when NAMI is little more than a front for Big Pharma. I suggested the > writer ask Ms. Vicki where NAMI gets its funding, and that people other than > Scientologists (like ME!) are against psychiatric drugs and that the issue is > NOT whether Dr. is or is not a Scientologist but whether there is massive > amounts of fraud surrounding mental illness and it's billion-dollar cures. > That comment by Ms Vicki really got me riled up. I have friends who are > Scientologists -- one was the Captain of Ron Hubbard's ship, and others are very > instrumental in disseminating the truth about psychiatry, and never once have > these people pushed their agenda or personal beliefs on anyone, but the truth > about psychiatry was their focus long before I ever knew anything about psych > meds. As you said, Jim, the slam is very thin now because so many of us are onto > the game and it's not just a CCHR thing anymore yet small-minded people like > Vicki Cottrell still believe that calling someone a Scientologist is the > ultimate insult and way to discredit someone. > > > > " Blind Reason " > a novel of pharmaceutical intrigue > Think your antidepressant is safe? Think again. It's > Unsafe At Any Dose > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.