Guest guest Posted June 17, 2004 Report Share Posted June 17, 2004 In a message dated 6/17/04 1:46:08 AM Mountain Daylight Time, SSRI medications writes: > I've heard this argument about [it not > > being addictive], but I think it's mischievous. What they're > saying > > is that the body doesn't become so absorbent to the drug that you > > have to keep prescribing larger and larger amounts. That may well > be > > right. How then does this guy explain how people start out on 10 mgs, and wind up on 40 or 50 or 80 mgs because the damn drug stopped working????? And what about all the people who wind up in the ER to get MORE Paxil after they ran out and went into massive withdrawals? Just because they aren't copping dope from a guy in their local park doesn't mean that this drug isn't addictive. It's more addictive than heroin, and anyone who's ever taking Paxil knows that, and GSK knows that, and this is nothing more than a massive cover-up, but there are surprises waiting for GSK when the truth comes out. Blind Reason a novel of espionage and pharmaceutical intrigue Think your antidepressant is safe? Think again. An army of sheep led by a lion would defeat an army of lions led by a sheep. - Oriental proverb Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 17, 2004 Report Share Posted June 17, 2004 In a message dated 6/17/04 1:46:08 AM Mountain Daylight Time, SSRI medications writes: > I've heard this argument about [it not > > being addictive], but I think it's mischievous. What they're > saying > > is that the body doesn't become so absorbent to the drug that you > > have to keep prescribing larger and larger amounts. That may well > be > > right. How then does this guy explain how people start out on 10 mgs, and wind up on 40 or 50 or 80 mgs because the damn drug stopped working????? And what about all the people who wind up in the ER to get MORE Paxil after they ran out and went into massive withdrawals? Just because they aren't copping dope from a guy in their local park doesn't mean that this drug isn't addictive. It's more addictive than heroin, and anyone who's ever taking Paxil knows that, and GSK knows that, and this is nothing more than a massive cover-up, but there are surprises waiting for GSK when the truth comes out. Blind Reason a novel of espionage and pharmaceutical intrigue Think your antidepressant is safe? Think again. An army of sheep led by a lion would defeat an army of lions led by a sheep. - Oriental proverb Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 17, 2004 Report Share Posted June 17, 2004 In a message dated 6/17/04 1:46:08 AM Mountain Daylight Time, SSRI medications writes: > I've heard this argument about [it not > > being addictive], but I think it's mischievous. What they're > saying > > is that the body doesn't become so absorbent to the drug that you > > have to keep prescribing larger and larger amounts. That may well > be > > right. How then does this guy explain how people start out on 10 mgs, and wind up on 40 or 50 or 80 mgs because the damn drug stopped working????? And what about all the people who wind up in the ER to get MORE Paxil after they ran out and went into massive withdrawals? Just because they aren't copping dope from a guy in their local park doesn't mean that this drug isn't addictive. It's more addictive than heroin, and anyone who's ever taking Paxil knows that, and GSK knows that, and this is nothing more than a massive cover-up, but there are surprises waiting for GSK when the truth comes out. Blind Reason a novel of espionage and pharmaceutical intrigue Think your antidepressant is safe? Think again. An army of sheep led by a lion would defeat an army of lions led by a sheep. - Oriental proverb Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 17, 2004 Report Share Posted June 17, 2004 In a message dated 6/17/04 1:46:08 AM Mountain Daylight Time, SSRI medications writes: > I've heard this argument about [it not > > being addictive], but I think it's mischievous. What they're > saying > > is that the body doesn't become so absorbent to the drug that you > > have to keep prescribing larger and larger amounts. That may well > be > > right. How then does this guy explain how people start out on 10 mgs, and wind up on 40 or 50 or 80 mgs because the damn drug stopped working????? And what about all the people who wind up in the ER to get MORE Paxil after they ran out and went into massive withdrawals? Just because they aren't copping dope from a guy in their local park doesn't mean that this drug isn't addictive. It's more addictive than heroin, and anyone who's ever taking Paxil knows that, and GSK knows that, and this is nothing more than a massive cover-up, but there are surprises waiting for GSK when the truth comes out. Blind Reason a novel of espionage and pharmaceutical intrigue Think your antidepressant is safe? Think again. An army of sheep led by a lion would defeat an army of lions led by a sheep. - Oriental proverb Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.