Guest guest Posted June 5, 2009 Report Share Posted June 5, 2009 I've been doing more research today (what a surprise...I do everyday). But I think I'm finally getting why scientists say that their drugs and vax are safe, and why they even have evidence to back it up. The " inactive " ingredients in the drugs and vax are not unique to pharmaceuticals. They are in everything -- air, water, personal care products, food, etc. Therefore we are being exposed to them from many, many sources. Chemicals like polyethylene glycol, polysorbate 80, and more. These chemicals, whenever they were initially included, caused mild or no immediate side effects, but are clearly causing long-term side effects. But, if you remove the inactive ingredients from the equation of drug safety, it appears that a particular drug or vax is really no more dangerous than anything else, and that the benefits of it DO outweigh the risks. Should scientists actually investigate the exposure to these toxic but " inactive " chemicals, they might get a very, very different picture of what's going on. This is what we really have to fight against and what we need to tell people. We need to understand why they believe so strongly the way they do (their evidence, in this manner, really does " prove " them correct) and combat them on their own level. Show them the science that proves that these 'inactive' chemicals are really not so inactive and they ARE harming us, especially in the very large doses we get from so many different sources! Our society is way too chemical now. It's so chemical that adding more chemicals seems like the solution -- or at least, not a problem. Scientists dismiss this because in their trials with these chemicals, with small amounts and rare exposure it does NOT appear toxic but they are not testing true daily exposure for the average human, which IS toxic. It's another reason why we need to get rid of all the chemicals we can in our lives, but hopefully understanding this will give us a leg to stand on. If we fight the battle on their territory, with their language, and prove them wrong -- we will win. If we avoid their territory and don't understand their perspective -- we will lose. --Kate Mommy to Rebekah, 1-26-08 Baby #2 due 7-26-09...it's a BOY! www.rctdiapers.webs.com Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 5, 2009 Report Share Posted June 5, 2009 I've been doing more research today (what a surprise...I do everyday). But I think I'm finally getting why scientists say that their drugs and vax are safe, and why they even have evidence to back it up. The " inactive " ingredients in the drugs and vax are not unique to pharmaceuticals. They are in everything -- air, water, personal care products, food, etc. Therefore we are being exposed to them from many, many sources. Chemicals like polyethylene glycol, polysorbate 80, and more. These chemicals, whenever they were initially included, caused mild or no immediate side effects, but are clearly causing long-term side effects. But, if you remove the inactive ingredients from the equation of drug safety, it appears that a particular drug or vax is really no more dangerous than anything else, and that the benefits of it DO outweigh the risks. Should scientists actually investigate the exposure to these toxic but " inactive " chemicals, they might get a very, very different picture of what's going on. This is what we really have to fight against and what we need to tell people. We need to understand why they believe so strongly the way they do (their evidence, in this manner, really does " prove " them correct) and combat them on their own level. Show them the science that proves that these 'inactive' chemicals are really not so inactive and they ARE harming us, especially in the very large doses we get from so many different sources! Our society is way too chemical now. It's so chemical that adding more chemicals seems like the solution -- or at least, not a problem. Scientists dismiss this because in their trials with these chemicals, with small amounts and rare exposure it does NOT appear toxic but they are not testing true daily exposure for the average human, which IS toxic. It's another reason why we need to get rid of all the chemicals we can in our lives, but hopefully understanding this will give us a leg to stand on. If we fight the battle on their territory, with their language, and prove them wrong -- we will win. If we avoid their territory and don't understand their perspective -- we will lose. --Kate Mommy to Rebekah, 1-26-08 Baby #2 due 7-26-09...it's a BOY! www.rctdiapers.webs.com Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.