Judge orders destruction of genetically engineered sugar beets

[Guest guest]

Thank you for this! This is the type of news I like to read!

I'll have to try to remember to see around Dec.06.2010 if there was an appeal.

Fortunately, after seeing that appeal date, the articles below does say that

" White found the Center for Food Safety and the other groups who sued earlier

this year are likely to win on the merits, and that they have made a strong

showing that the environment is likely to suffer irreparable harm. " , so there is

hope that this will stand.

The neat thing about this Recorder site is that there is a link to the actual

court paper (if you go to the article' URL, look for the " has ordered " link on

the first line of the article.

Again, thanks for this!

:oD

Judge orders destruction of genetically

engineered sugar beets

> http://www.law.com/jsp/ca/PubArticleCA.jsp?id=1202475570923#

>

> Judge Orders Sugar Beets Pulled from Soil

> Ginny LaRoe

>

> The Recorder

> December 01, 2010

> SAN FRANCISCO — A San Francisco federal judge has ordered the destruction of

hundreds of acres of genetically engineered sugar beets after finding the USDA

likely violated federal law by allowing the planting without analyzing the

environmental impact.

>

> U.S. District Judge White on Tuesday granted a preliminary injunction

calling for the crops to be ripped up. But he delayed action until Dec. 6 to

give the federal government and other defendants time to appeal.

>

> White found the Center for Food Safety and the other groups who sued earlier

this year are likely to win on the merits, and that they have made a strong

showing that the environment is likely to suffer irreparable harm.

>

> White took over the case in September after Chief Judge Vaughn pulled

it from Judge Saundra Brown Armstrong with a brief order citing her

" unavailability. " The case went to and, when he disqualified himself, it

went to White. It was one of two cases pulled from Armstrong on Sept. 20.

The other one was the unrelated matter of Golinski v. U.S. Office of Personnel

Management . The only connection, seemingly, is that both involved

time-sensitive issues that had not been quickly resolved.

>

> White had presided over a previous sugar beet case, and in August banned the

sale and planting of the so-called " Roundup Ready " beets after finding the USDA

had not completed a required environmental impact study. Shortly thereafter,

however, the government issued permits, and planting took place on Sept. 9 and

10.

>

> The Center for Food Safety, Earthjustice and others sued to stop it.

>

> The groups say such crops lead to increased use of herbicides and has led to

the spread of herbicide-resistant weeds on millions of acres and contamination

of conventional and organic crops.

>

> The judge says any harm to the defendants, including the seed companies, is

" only of their own doing. "

>

> " Due to their preemptive conduct, the stecklings have been planted pursuant to

the permits at issue and they have created a significant risk of environmental

harm, " White's order says.

[Guest guest]

Thank you for this! This is the type of news I like to read!

I'll have to try to remember to see around Dec.06.2010 if there was an appeal.

Fortunately, after seeing that appeal date, the articles below does say that

" White found the Center for Food Safety and the other groups who sued earlier

this year are likely to win on the merits, and that they have made a strong

showing that the environment is likely to suffer irreparable harm. " , so there is

hope that this will stand.

The neat thing about this Recorder site is that there is a link to the actual

court paper (if you go to the article' URL, look for the " has ordered " link on

the first line of the article.

Again, thanks for this!

:oD

Judge orders destruction of genetically

engineered sugar beets

> http://www.law.com/jsp/ca/PubArticleCA.jsp?id=1202475570923#

>

> Judge Orders Sugar Beets Pulled from Soil

> Ginny LaRoe

>

> The Recorder

> December 01, 2010

> SAN FRANCISCO — A San Francisco federal judge has ordered the destruction of

hundreds of acres of genetically engineered sugar beets after finding the USDA

likely violated federal law by allowing the planting without analyzing the

environmental impact.

>

> U.S. District Judge White on Tuesday granted a preliminary injunction

calling for the crops to be ripped up. But he delayed action until Dec. 6 to

give the federal government and other defendants time to appeal.

>

> White found the Center for Food Safety and the other groups who sued earlier

this year are likely to win on the merits, and that they have made a strong

showing that the environment is likely to suffer irreparable harm.

>

> White took over the case in September after Chief Judge Vaughn pulled

it from Judge Saundra Brown Armstrong with a brief order citing her

" unavailability. " The case went to and, when he disqualified himself, it

went to White. It was one of two cases pulled from Armstrong on Sept. 20.

The other one was the unrelated matter of Golinski v. U.S. Office of Personnel

Management . The only connection, seemingly, is that both involved

time-sensitive issues that had not been quickly resolved.

>

> White had presided over a previous sugar beet case, and in August banned the

sale and planting of the so-called " Roundup Ready " beets after finding the USDA

had not completed a required environmental impact study. Shortly thereafter,

however, the government issued permits, and planting took place on Sept. 9 and

10.

>

> The Center for Food Safety, Earthjustice and others sued to stop it.

>

> The groups say such crops lead to increased use of herbicides and has led to

the spread of herbicide-resistant weeds on millions of acres and contamination

of conventional and organic crops.

>

> The judge says any harm to the defendants, including the seed companies, is

" only of their own doing. "

>

> " Due to their preemptive conduct, the stecklings have been planted pursuant to

the permits at issue and they have created a significant risk of environmental

harm, " White's order says.