Guest guest Posted September 8, 2010 Report Share Posted September 8, 2010 http://jnci.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/abstract/djq301 Journal of the National Cancer Institute Advance Access originally published online on August 20, 2010 JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute 2010 102(17):1354-1365; doi:10.1093/jnci/djq301 Published by Oxford University Press 2010. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ARTICLES Association of Meat and Fat Intake With Liver Disease and Hepatocellular Carcinoma in the NIH-AARP Cohort Neal D. Freedman, J. Cross, A. McGlynn, Christian C. Abnet, Yikyung Park, Albert R. Hollenbeck, Arthur Schatzkin, E. Everhart, Rashmi Sinha Affiliations of authors: Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Department of Health and Human Services, Rockville, MD (NDF, AJC, KAM, CCA, YP, AS, RS); AARP, Washington, DC (ARH); Division of Digestive Diseases and Nutrition, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Department of Health and Human Services, Bethesda, MD (JEE) Correspondence to: Neal D. Freedman, PhD, MPH, Nutritional Epidemiology Branch, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, 6120 Executive Blvd, Rm 320, MSC 7361, Rockville, MD 20852 (e-mail: freedmanne@...). Background: Several plausible mechanisms, including fat, iron, heterocyclic amines, and N-nitroso compounds, link meat intake with chronic liver disease (CLD) and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Few studies have investigated these associations. Methods: We prospectively examined the relationship between meat and associated exposures with CLD mortality (n = 551; not including HCC) and HCC incidence (n = 338) in 495 006 men and women of the National Institutes of Health–AARP Diet and Health Study. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the fifth (Q5) vs the first (Q1) quintile were estimated from multivariable adjusted proportional hazards regression models. All tests of statistical significance were two-sided. Results: We found inverse associations between white meat and risk of CLD (HR = 0.52, 95% CI = 0.39 to 0.70, 7.5 vs 18.2 cases per 100 000 person-years) and HCC (HR = 0.52, 95% CI = 0.36 to 0.77, 5.8 vs 14.3 cases per 100 000 person-years). Red meat was associated with higher risk of CLD (HR = 2.59, 95% CI = 1.86 to 3.61, 22.3 vs 6.2 cases per 100 000 person-years) and HCC (HR = 1.74, 95% CI = 1.16 to 2.61, 14.9 vs 5.7 cases per 100 000 person-years). Among fat types, results were strongest for saturated fat (for CLD, HR = 3.50, 95% CI = 2.48 to 4.96, 23.0 vs 6.5 cases per 100 000 person-years; for HCC, HR = 1.87, 95% CI = 1.23 to 2.85, 14.5 vs 6.3 cases per 100 000 person-years). After mutual adjustment, risk estimates persisted for saturated fat, red meat, and white meat. Heme iron, processed meat, nitrate, and nitrite were positively associated with CLD but not with HCC. Individual heterocyclic amines, 2-amino-3,4,8-trimethylimidazo[4,5,-f]quinoxaline (DiMeIQx), 2-amino-3,8-dimethylimidazo[4,5-f] quinoxaline (MeIQx), and 2-amino-1-methyl-6-phenyl-imidazo[4,5-b]pyridine (PhIP), were not associated with either outcome. Conclusion: Our results suggest that red meat and saturated fat may be associated with increased CLD and HCC risk, whereas white meat may be associated with reduced risk. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- CONTEXT AND CAVEATS Prior knowledge Few studies have examined whether meat and fat intake are associated with chronic liver disease (CLD) and/or hepatocellular carcinoma. Study design Information concerning diet, CLD, and hepatocellular cancer incidence was collected for 495 006 men and women, aged 50–71 years, from the National Institutes of Health–AARP Diet and Health Study. All participants completed food-frequency questionnaires in 1995–1996, and some completed an additional food cooking questionnaire in 1996–1997. Incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma was collected from state cancer registries until the end of 2003, and incidence of CLD was determined from National Death Index records through the end of 2005. Participants were divided into quintiles on the basis of meat, fat, or other nutrient intakes, and hazard ratios for risk of CLD and hepatocellular carcinoma were estimated using proportional hazards models. Contribution Red meat and saturated fat intakes were associated with increased risk of CLD and hepatocellular carcinoma, whereas white meat intake was associated with less than average risks of both diseases. Meat processing and its heme iron, nitrate, and nitrite contents were associated with CLD but not with cancer. Implication Intake of red meat and saturated fats may increase hepatocellular cancer risk. Limitations The results are based on self-reported food intakes. They were stratified by alcohol intake and other possible confounders; however, data concerning hepatitis virus infections were unavailable. From the Editors Manuscript received July 28, 2009; revised June 22, 2010; accepted July 14, 2010. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 8, 2010 Report Share Posted September 8, 2010 http://jnci.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/abstract/djq301 Journal of the National Cancer Institute Advance Access originally published online on August 20, 2010 JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute 2010 102(17):1354-1365; doi:10.1093/jnci/djq301 Published by Oxford University Press 2010. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ARTICLES Association of Meat and Fat Intake With Liver Disease and Hepatocellular Carcinoma in the NIH-AARP Cohort Neal D. Freedman, J. Cross, A. McGlynn, Christian C. Abnet, Yikyung Park, Albert R. Hollenbeck, Arthur Schatzkin, E. Everhart, Rashmi Sinha Affiliations of authors: Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Department of Health and Human Services, Rockville, MD (NDF, AJC, KAM, CCA, YP, AS, RS); AARP, Washington, DC (ARH); Division of Digestive Diseases and Nutrition, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Department of Health and Human Services, Bethesda, MD (JEE) Correspondence to: Neal D. Freedman, PhD, MPH, Nutritional Epidemiology Branch, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, 6120 Executive Blvd, Rm 320, MSC 7361, Rockville, MD 20852 (e-mail: freedmanne@...). Background: Several plausible mechanisms, including fat, iron, heterocyclic amines, and N-nitroso compounds, link meat intake with chronic liver disease (CLD) and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Few studies have investigated these associations. Methods: We prospectively examined the relationship between meat and associated exposures with CLD mortality (n = 551; not including HCC) and HCC incidence (n = 338) in 495 006 men and women of the National Institutes of Health–AARP Diet and Health Study. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the fifth (Q5) vs the first (Q1) quintile were estimated from multivariable adjusted proportional hazards regression models. All tests of statistical significance were two-sided. Results: We found inverse associations between white meat and risk of CLD (HR = 0.52, 95% CI = 0.39 to 0.70, 7.5 vs 18.2 cases per 100 000 person-years) and HCC (HR = 0.52, 95% CI = 0.36 to 0.77, 5.8 vs 14.3 cases per 100 000 person-years). Red meat was associated with higher risk of CLD (HR = 2.59, 95% CI = 1.86 to 3.61, 22.3 vs 6.2 cases per 100 000 person-years) and HCC (HR = 1.74, 95% CI = 1.16 to 2.61, 14.9 vs 5.7 cases per 100 000 person-years). Among fat types, results were strongest for saturated fat (for CLD, HR = 3.50, 95% CI = 2.48 to 4.96, 23.0 vs 6.5 cases per 100 000 person-years; for HCC, HR = 1.87, 95% CI = 1.23 to 2.85, 14.5 vs 6.3 cases per 100 000 person-years). After mutual adjustment, risk estimates persisted for saturated fat, red meat, and white meat. Heme iron, processed meat, nitrate, and nitrite were positively associated with CLD but not with HCC. Individual heterocyclic amines, 2-amino-3,4,8-trimethylimidazo[4,5,-f]quinoxaline (DiMeIQx), 2-amino-3,8-dimethylimidazo[4,5-f] quinoxaline (MeIQx), and 2-amino-1-methyl-6-phenyl-imidazo[4,5-b]pyridine (PhIP), were not associated with either outcome. Conclusion: Our results suggest that red meat and saturated fat may be associated with increased CLD and HCC risk, whereas white meat may be associated with reduced risk. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- CONTEXT AND CAVEATS Prior knowledge Few studies have examined whether meat and fat intake are associated with chronic liver disease (CLD) and/or hepatocellular carcinoma. Study design Information concerning diet, CLD, and hepatocellular cancer incidence was collected for 495 006 men and women, aged 50–71 years, from the National Institutes of Health–AARP Diet and Health Study. All participants completed food-frequency questionnaires in 1995–1996, and some completed an additional food cooking questionnaire in 1996–1997. Incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma was collected from state cancer registries until the end of 2003, and incidence of CLD was determined from National Death Index records through the end of 2005. Participants were divided into quintiles on the basis of meat, fat, or other nutrient intakes, and hazard ratios for risk of CLD and hepatocellular carcinoma were estimated using proportional hazards models. Contribution Red meat and saturated fat intakes were associated with increased risk of CLD and hepatocellular carcinoma, whereas white meat intake was associated with less than average risks of both diseases. Meat processing and its heme iron, nitrate, and nitrite contents were associated with CLD but not with cancer. Implication Intake of red meat and saturated fats may increase hepatocellular cancer risk. Limitations The results are based on self-reported food intakes. They were stratified by alcohol intake and other possible confounders; however, data concerning hepatitis virus infections were unavailable. From the Editors Manuscript received July 28, 2009; revised June 22, 2010; accepted July 14, 2010. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.