Guest guest Posted October 19, 2004 Report Share Posted October 19, 2004 http://www.ssricitizen.org/index.html About SSRI Citizen Every day millions and millions of Americans take SSRIs — drugs like Paxil, Prozac, Zoloft and Effexor — just to name a few. This population includes men, women, children (even infants) who come from all walks of life. In fact, so many Americans are under the influence of these drugs that one might argue we are fast becoming " One nation, under Prozac " . Or to put it another way " SSRI Citizens " . For the most part, however, we are an ignorant SSRI citizenry. We have blindly accepted the junk science sold to us by a drug industry which has, from the beginning, claimed these compounds are safe and effective. Likewise, doctors have been sold on the drugs, and prescribe them to patients as if they were a kind of pharmaceutical candy — and not the powerful and often dangerous psychotropic drugs that they truly are. That said: It might surprise you to hear that I am not irreconcilably opposed to the sale of SSRIs — with the exception of Paxil (which should be pulled from the marketplace immediately.) My position on the matter is simply pragmatic: Since the regulatory door guarding the SSRI cage has been sprung there's really no way to close it. Today, the SSRI industry feeds (and sleeps with) its own handler, the Food and Drug Administration, and gorges on billions in pill profits every year. There is simply no easy way to kill the SSRI beast now that it is on the prowl; the most one can hope to do is corner it ... and hold it at bay. But how to accomplish that? First, someone has to warn the public that there's a " wild animal " on the loose. (This is SSRI Citizen's primary mission.) Secondly, by hounding the industry's handler (the FDA) to collar its SSRI beast with a collection of clear and unambiguous drug warning labels. (We are also " working " on this through back channel communications with the FDA.) What kind of drug warning labels you ask? Well for starters, warnings that appear in black boxes and in bold face language that reads like: Warning — This drug can cause addiction and dependency. Warning —This drug has been classified by The Center for the Evaluation of Risks to Human Reproduction (CERHR) as a developmental toxin; do not take during pregnancy. Warning — This drug frequently causes severe and potentially life- threatening withdrawals. Warning — This drug may induce a spontaneous condition known as " activation syndrome " whereby users become suicidal or homicidal. Then, if consumers still feel the benefits of taking one of these drugs outweigh the potential risks then that's their business — at least they can't say they haven't been properly warned. But it is wrong to expose consumers to these grave risks without vigorously and aggressively informing them of the same. Think about it this way. Imagine an airline carrier (take Delta for example) transporting passengers on a jet which was known to have a life-threatening structural defect. You'd want to know about that " problem " before you booked a flight, wouldn't you? Furthermore, you would expect — no, you would demand — that the airline carrier be required to inform you of that risk. And you would further demand that the government agency that regulates the airline agency (the FAA) to force the carrier to ground the planes and fix the defect. But is our Food and Drug Administration effectively warning the public about unsafe SSRIs, or " grounding " any pill bottles flying out of pharmacies filled with Paxil (or its kin)? The answer is a horrifying " no " . But why? After all, the FDA has known full well about the dangers of SSRIs for over twenty years. The answer is simple: SSRIs sales — and the resulting drug company profits — would implode and collapse like the World Trade Center towers did on 9/11. And the FDA is not going to let that happen, since the financial health of the drug companies takes precedence over the health of the American people. Finally, while on the subject of the FDA, I am calling on the general public to demand the immediate removal of four persons from their posts at the FDA: Drs. Katz, Laughren and Temple — and legal counsel Troy. These individuals have shown themselves to be a grave and continuing menace to the health and well being of all Americans. Collectively, their actions have contributed to more human misery and death than that caused by a major terrorist organization. That's a shocking charge to level against these public servants, but it is, unfortunately " the God awful truth " . In the coming months SSRI Citizen will lay out a detailed and comprehensive public indictment of these individuals. Kind Regards, Rob Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 19, 2004 Report Share Posted October 19, 2004 http://www.ssricitizen.org/index.html About SSRI Citizen Every day millions and millions of Americans take SSRIs — drugs like Paxil, Prozac, Zoloft and Effexor — just to name a few. This population includes men, women, children (even infants) who come from all walks of life. In fact, so many Americans are under the influence of these drugs that one might argue we are fast becoming " One nation, under Prozac " . Or to put it another way " SSRI Citizens " . For the most part, however, we are an ignorant SSRI citizenry. We have blindly accepted the junk science sold to us by a drug industry which has, from the beginning, claimed these compounds are safe and effective. Likewise, doctors have been sold on the drugs, and prescribe them to patients as if they were a kind of pharmaceutical candy — and not the powerful and often dangerous psychotropic drugs that they truly are. That said: It might surprise you to hear that I am not irreconcilably opposed to the sale of SSRIs — with the exception of Paxil (which should be pulled from the marketplace immediately.) My position on the matter is simply pragmatic: Since the regulatory door guarding the SSRI cage has been sprung there's really no way to close it. Today, the SSRI industry feeds (and sleeps with) its own handler, the Food and Drug Administration, and gorges on billions in pill profits every year. There is simply no easy way to kill the SSRI beast now that it is on the prowl; the most one can hope to do is corner it ... and hold it at bay. But how to accomplish that? First, someone has to warn the public that there's a " wild animal " on the loose. (This is SSRI Citizen's primary mission.) Secondly, by hounding the industry's handler (the FDA) to collar its SSRI beast with a collection of clear and unambiguous drug warning labels. (We are also " working " on this through back channel communications with the FDA.) What kind of drug warning labels you ask? Well for starters, warnings that appear in black boxes and in bold face language that reads like: Warning — This drug can cause addiction and dependency. Warning —This drug has been classified by The Center for the Evaluation of Risks to Human Reproduction (CERHR) as a developmental toxin; do not take during pregnancy. Warning — This drug frequently causes severe and potentially life- threatening withdrawals. Warning — This drug may induce a spontaneous condition known as " activation syndrome " whereby users become suicidal or homicidal. Then, if consumers still feel the benefits of taking one of these drugs outweigh the potential risks then that's their business — at least they can't say they haven't been properly warned. But it is wrong to expose consumers to these grave risks without vigorously and aggressively informing them of the same. Think about it this way. Imagine an airline carrier (take Delta for example) transporting passengers on a jet which was known to have a life-threatening structural defect. You'd want to know about that " problem " before you booked a flight, wouldn't you? Furthermore, you would expect — no, you would demand — that the airline carrier be required to inform you of that risk. And you would further demand that the government agency that regulates the airline agency (the FAA) to force the carrier to ground the planes and fix the defect. But is our Food and Drug Administration effectively warning the public about unsafe SSRIs, or " grounding " any pill bottles flying out of pharmacies filled with Paxil (or its kin)? The answer is a horrifying " no " . But why? After all, the FDA has known full well about the dangers of SSRIs for over twenty years. The answer is simple: SSRIs sales — and the resulting drug company profits — would implode and collapse like the World Trade Center towers did on 9/11. And the FDA is not going to let that happen, since the financial health of the drug companies takes precedence over the health of the American people. Finally, while on the subject of the FDA, I am calling on the general public to demand the immediate removal of four persons from their posts at the FDA: Drs. Katz, Laughren and Temple — and legal counsel Troy. These individuals have shown themselves to be a grave and continuing menace to the health and well being of all Americans. Collectively, their actions have contributed to more human misery and death than that caused by a major terrorist organization. That's a shocking charge to level against these public servants, but it is, unfortunately " the God awful truth " . In the coming months SSRI Citizen will lay out a detailed and comprehensive public indictment of these individuals. Kind Regards, Rob Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 19, 2004 Report Share Posted October 19, 2004 Don't forget 'Increased Cancer risk'....and maybe homicide??? in the case of mothers who kill their children. > > > http://www.ssricitizen.org/index.html > > About SSRI Citizen > > > Every day millions and millions of Americans take SSRIs — drugs like > Paxil, Prozac, Zoloft and Effexor — just to name a few. This > population includes men, women, children (even infants) who come > from all walks of life. In fact, so many Americans are under the > influence of these drugs that one might argue we are fast > becoming " One nation, under Prozac " . Or to put it another way " SSRI > Citizens " . > > For the most part, however, we are an ignorant SSRI citizenry. We > have blindly accepted the junk science sold to us by a drug industry > which has, from the beginning, claimed these compounds are safe and > effective. Likewise, doctors have been sold on the drugs, and > prescribe them to patients as if they were a kind of pharmaceutical > candy — and not the powerful and often dangerous psychotropic drugs > that they truly are. > > That said: It might surprise you to hear that I am not > irreconcilably opposed to the sale of SSRIs — with the exception of > Paxil (which should be pulled from the marketplace immediately.) My > position on the matter is simply pragmatic: Since the regulatory > door guarding the SSRI cage has been sprung there's really no way to > close it. Today, the SSRI industry feeds (and sleeps with) its own > handler, the Food and Drug Administration, and gorges on billions in > pill profits every year. There is simply no easy way to kill the > SSRI beast now that it is on the prowl; the most one can hope to do > is corner it ... and hold it at bay. > > But how to accomplish that? First, someone has to warn the public > that there's a " wild animal " on the loose. (This is SSRI Citizen's > primary mission.) Secondly, by hounding the industry's handler (the > FDA) to collar its SSRI beast with a collection of clear and > unambiguous drug warning labels. (We are also " working " on this > through back channel communications with the FDA.) > > What kind of drug warning labels you ask? Well for starters, > warnings that appear in black boxes and in bold face language that > reads like: > > Warning — This drug can cause addiction and dependency. > > Warning —This drug has been classified by The Center for the > Evaluation of Risks to Human Reproduction (CERHR) as a developmental > toxin; do not take during pregnancy. > > Warning — This drug frequently causes severe and potentially life- > threatening withdrawals. > > Warning — This drug may induce a spontaneous condition known as " > activation syndrome " whereby users become suicidal or homicidal. > > Then, if consumers still feel the benefits of taking one of these > drugs outweigh the potential risks then that's their business — at > least they can't say they haven't been properly warned. But it is > wrong to expose consumers to these grave risks without vigorously > and aggressively informing them of the same. > > Think about it this way. Imagine an airline carrier (take Delta for > example) transporting passengers on a jet which was known to have a > life-threatening structural defect. You'd want to know about that " > problem " before you booked a flight, wouldn't you? Furthermore, you > would expect — no, you would demand — that the airline carrier be > required to inform you of that risk. And you would further demand > that the government agency that regulates the airline agency (the > FAA) to force the carrier to ground the planes and fix the defect. > > But is our Food and Drug Administration effectively warning the > public about unsafe SSRIs, or " grounding " any pill bottles flying > out of pharmacies filled with Paxil (or its kin)? The answer is a > horrifying " no " . But why? After all, the FDA has known full well > about the dangers of SSRIs for over twenty years. > > The answer is simple: SSRIs sales — and the resulting drug company > profits — would implode and collapse like the World Trade Center > towers did on 9/11. And the FDA is not going to let that happen, > since the financial health of the drug companies takes precedence > over the health of the American people. > > Finally, while on the subject of the FDA, I am calling on the > general public to demand the immediate removal of four persons from > their posts at the FDA: Drs. Katz, Laughren and > Temple — and legal counsel Troy. These individuals > have shown themselves to be a grave and continuing menace to the > health and well being of all Americans. Collectively, their actions > have contributed to more human misery and death than that caused by > a major terrorist organization. That's a shocking charge to level > against these public servants, but it is, unfortunately " the God > awful truth " . In the coming months SSRI Citizen will lay out a > detailed and comprehensive public indictment of these individuals. > > Kind Regards, > Rob Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 19, 2004 Report Share Posted October 19, 2004 Don't forget 'Increased Cancer risk'....and maybe homicide??? in the case of mothers who kill their children. > > > http://www.ssricitizen.org/index.html > > About SSRI Citizen > > > Every day millions and millions of Americans take SSRIs — drugs like > Paxil, Prozac, Zoloft and Effexor — just to name a few. This > population includes men, women, children (even infants) who come > from all walks of life. In fact, so many Americans are under the > influence of these drugs that one might argue we are fast > becoming " One nation, under Prozac " . Or to put it another way " SSRI > Citizens " . > > For the most part, however, we are an ignorant SSRI citizenry. We > have blindly accepted the junk science sold to us by a drug industry > which has, from the beginning, claimed these compounds are safe and > effective. Likewise, doctors have been sold on the drugs, and > prescribe them to patients as if they were a kind of pharmaceutical > candy — and not the powerful and often dangerous psychotropic drugs > that they truly are. > > That said: It might surprise you to hear that I am not > irreconcilably opposed to the sale of SSRIs — with the exception of > Paxil (which should be pulled from the marketplace immediately.) My > position on the matter is simply pragmatic: Since the regulatory > door guarding the SSRI cage has been sprung there's really no way to > close it. Today, the SSRI industry feeds (and sleeps with) its own > handler, the Food and Drug Administration, and gorges on billions in > pill profits every year. There is simply no easy way to kill the > SSRI beast now that it is on the prowl; the most one can hope to do > is corner it ... and hold it at bay. > > But how to accomplish that? First, someone has to warn the public > that there's a " wild animal " on the loose. (This is SSRI Citizen's > primary mission.) Secondly, by hounding the industry's handler (the > FDA) to collar its SSRI beast with a collection of clear and > unambiguous drug warning labels. (We are also " working " on this > through back channel communications with the FDA.) > > What kind of drug warning labels you ask? Well for starters, > warnings that appear in black boxes and in bold face language that > reads like: > > Warning — This drug can cause addiction and dependency. > > Warning —This drug has been classified by The Center for the > Evaluation of Risks to Human Reproduction (CERHR) as a developmental > toxin; do not take during pregnancy. > > Warning — This drug frequently causes severe and potentially life- > threatening withdrawals. > > Warning — This drug may induce a spontaneous condition known as " > activation syndrome " whereby users become suicidal or homicidal. > > Then, if consumers still feel the benefits of taking one of these > drugs outweigh the potential risks then that's their business — at > least they can't say they haven't been properly warned. But it is > wrong to expose consumers to these grave risks without vigorously > and aggressively informing them of the same. > > Think about it this way. Imagine an airline carrier (take Delta for > example) transporting passengers on a jet which was known to have a > life-threatening structural defect. You'd want to know about that " > problem " before you booked a flight, wouldn't you? Furthermore, you > would expect — no, you would demand — that the airline carrier be > required to inform you of that risk. And you would further demand > that the government agency that regulates the airline agency (the > FAA) to force the carrier to ground the planes and fix the defect. > > But is our Food and Drug Administration effectively warning the > public about unsafe SSRIs, or " grounding " any pill bottles flying > out of pharmacies filled with Paxil (or its kin)? The answer is a > horrifying " no " . But why? After all, the FDA has known full well > about the dangers of SSRIs for over twenty years. > > The answer is simple: SSRIs sales — and the resulting drug company > profits — would implode and collapse like the World Trade Center > towers did on 9/11. And the FDA is not going to let that happen, > since the financial health of the drug companies takes precedence > over the health of the American people. > > Finally, while on the subject of the FDA, I am calling on the > general public to demand the immediate removal of four persons from > their posts at the FDA: Drs. Katz, Laughren and > Temple — and legal counsel Troy. These individuals > have shown themselves to be a grave and continuing menace to the > health and well being of all Americans. Collectively, their actions > have contributed to more human misery and death than that caused by > a major terrorist organization. That's a shocking charge to level > against these public servants, but it is, unfortunately " the God > awful truth " . In the coming months SSRI Citizen will lay out a > detailed and comprehensive public indictment of these individuals. > > Kind Regards, > Rob Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.