Your comment is awaiting moderation - yeah, I bet! :)

[Guest guest]

In NO manner do I wish to encourage any softening on the NO to swine flu (or any) vaccs, but earlier today I did post a CDC link that stated that single shot vials w/o Thimerosal would be used for pregnant women or children. It also said that the use of adjuvants was not likely (the vaccine isn't quite ready yet). With or without Thimerosal or squalene, the use of this vaccine should result in a lengthy prison term for anyone administering or approving of it. The CDC and all government agencies are known liars, but I did want to point that out. The claims by med/gov that any vaccine has ever prevented anything doesn't chalk up against my 8 years university study in bio/chem/math, but the epidemic of obvious vaccine damage to adults and children is clear evidence of intent to cause severe harm. I

bring these things up so that people know what the CDC is saying, not to convince anyone of anything, but consider that small changes like this are used to deny the overall damages being done:

http://www.cdc.gov/h1n1flu/vaccination/statelocal/qa.htm?s_cid=ccu081009_CDCQandA_e

From: Ingrid Blank <enb1@...>no-forced-vaccination Sent: Monday, August 17, 2009 7:29:54 PMSubject: Your comment is awaiting moderation - yeah, I bet!

http://pagingdrgupt a.blogs.cnn. com/2009/ 08/05/swine- flu-vaccine- for-pregnant-women/#comment- 14963Ingrid Blank August 18th, 2009 3:28 am ETYour comment is awaiting moderation.Any government agency and physician promoting and administering thimerosaland aluminium-laced flu shots to pregnant women, thus impairing thedeveloping brain of the fetus, should be charged with criminal intent to dogrievous bodily harm and have his or her licence revoked. Don’t fall prey tothe WHO and UN-instigated swine flu hype, particularly in light of the factthat a) 1,700 deaths allegedly caused by H1N1 in a global population ofapprox. 6.9 billion hardly constitutes a pandemic and according to a CDCstudy , up to 9 out of 10 rapid tests to diagnose the “swine flu†areWRONG!! The government

study indicating that rapid tests to diagnose the“swine flu†could hardly distinguish between the “swine flu†and normalseasonal flu gives support to those medical experts who say the “swine fluâ€is a harmless, ordinary flu that is being hyped by the WHO and the vaccinecompanies to justify a pandemic level 6 declaration and mass forcedvaccinations.Furthermore, According to expertsin this field, the novel “swine flu†vaccines that were already developedtwo years ago before pigs intended to fly, are more dangerous than thebioengineered swine flu itself, since – in addition to aluminium (a knownneurotoxin) they will contain an oil-based adjuvant, squalene.http://www.newsmax. com/health/ vaccine_swine_ flu/2009/ 07/07/232717. htmlSqualene in vaccines has been strongly linked

to the Gulf War Syndrome. OnAugust 1991, Principi, Secretary of Veterans Affairs admitted thatsoldiers vaccinated with the anthrax vaccine from 1990 to 1991 had anincreased risk of 200 percent in developing the deadly disease amyotrophiclateral sclerosis (ALS), also called Lou Gehrig’s disease. The soldiers alsosuffered from a number of debilitating and life-shortening diseases, such aspolyarteritis nodosa, multiple sclerosis (MS), lupus, transverse myelitis (aneurological disorder caused by inflammation of the spinal cord),endocarditis (inflammation of the heart’s inner lining), optic neuritis withblindness and glomerulonephritis (a type of kidney disease).Because squalene, the main ingredient in MF-59, can induce hyperimmuneresponses and induce autoimmunity, a real danger exists for prolongedactivation of the brain’s immune cells, the microglia. This type ofprolonged activation has

been strongly associated with such diseases asmultiple sclerosis, Alzheimer’s disease, Parkinson’s disease, ALS andpossibly vaccine-related encephalitis. It has been shown that activation ofthe systemic immune system, as occurs with vaccination, rapidly activatesthe brain’s microglia at the same time, and this brain inflammation canpersist for long periods.Here is another opinion from renowned physician DOUGLASS,M.D.:Many people assume that the vaccinations they receive are backed up by manymonths of extensive clinical trials and medical evaluation.But regulators at the European Medicines Agency (EMEA) in the UK are aboutto distribute a new swine flu vaccine that’s had a whopping FIVE DAYS oftesting.How about that for a reality check?Vaccines in general are unproven, unnecessary, and potentially dangerous –and they’re the ones that have undergone

clinical trials. I cannot believethat the government of Great Britain is actually about to start distributinga vaccine — for a form of influenza that is already little understood –without having it thoroughly vetted.The EMEA says that clinical trials will be carried out — but that the swineflu vaccine will already be distributed while those trials are conducted.So let’s say that the clinical trials do indeed discover that the vaccinehas a serious side effect. Vaccines are not like cars with defectiveairbags. You can’t just recall a live virus that’s been injected into thebloodstreams of thousands of people.It would be a man-made medical catastrophe.Also seehttp://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1206807/Swine-flu-jab-link-killer-nerve-disease- Leaked-letter- reveals-concern- neurologists- 25-deaths- America.html#ixzz0OIhbRlSHA warning that the new swine flu jab

is linked to a deadly nerve disease hasbeen sent by the Government to senior neurologists in a confidential letter.The letter from the Health Protection Agency, the official body thatoversees public health, has been leaked to The Mail on Sunday, leading todemands to know why the information has not been given to the public beforethe vaccination of millions of people, including children, begins.It tells the neurologists that they must be alert for an increase in a braindisorder called Guillain-Barre Syndrome (GBS), which could be triggered bythe vaccine.GBS attacks the lining of the nerves, causing paralysis and inability tobreathe, and can be fatal.The letter, sent to about 600 neurologists on July 29, is the first signthat there is concern at the highest levels that the vaccine itself couldcause serious complications.It refers to the use of a similar swine flu vaccine in the

United States in1976 when:More people died from the vaccination than from swine flu.500 cases of GBS were detected.The vaccine may have increased the risk of contracting GBS by eight times.The vaccine was withdrawn after just ten weeks when the link with GBS becameclear.The US Government was forced to pay out millions of dollars to thoseaffected.Concerns have already been raised that the new vaccine has not beensufficiently tested and that the effects, especially on children, areunknown.It is being developed by pharmaceutical companies and will be given to about13million people during the first wave of immunisation, expected to start inOctober.Top priority will be given to everyone aged six months to 65 with anunderlying health problem, pregnant women and health professionals.The British Neurological Surveillance Unit (BNSU), part of the BritishAssociation of

Neurologists, has been asked to monitor closely any cases ofGBS as the vaccine is rolled out.One senior neurologist said last night: ‘I would not have the swineflu jab because of the GBS risk.’There are concerns that there could be a repeat of what became known as the‘1976 debacle’ in the US, where a swine flu vaccine killed 25 people – morethan the virus itself.A mass vaccination was given the go-ahead by President Gerald Ford becausescientists believed that the swine flu strain was similar to the oneresponsible for the 1918-19 pandemic, which killed half a million Americansand 20million people worldwide.Also seehttp://www.pandemic fluonline. com/?p=770German health expert’s swine flu warning: Does virus vaccine increase therisk of cancer?August 12th, 2009The swine flu

vaccine has been hit by new cancer fears after a German healthexpert gave a shock warning about its safety.Lung specialist Wolfgang Wodarg has said that there are many risksassociated with the vaccine for the H1N1 virus.He has grave reservations about the firm Novartis who are developing thevaccine and testing it in Germany. The vaccination is injected “with a veryhot needleâ€, Wodarg said.The nutrient solution for the vaccine consists of cancerous cells fromanimals and “we do not know if there could be an allergic reactionâ€.But more importantly, some people fear that the risk of cancer could beincreased by injecting the cells.The vaccine – as Johannes Löwer, president of the Ehrlich Institute,has pointed out – can also cause worse side effects than the actual swineflu virus.Wodrag also described people’s fear of the pandemic as an “orchestrationâ€

:“It is great business for the pharmaceutical industry,†he told the ‘NeuenPresse’.Swine flu is not very different from normal flu. “On the contrary if youlook at the number of cases it is nothing compared to a normal fluoutbreak,†he added.The chairman of the health committee in the European Council has urged for acareful and calm reaction to the virus.Up until now, the producers of the vaccine did not know how many orders theywould have by the autumn, but the German Government is now a guaranteedcustomer.Even the pharmaceutical companies are trying to exploit the fear of theswine flu pandemic.

[Guest guest]

In NO manner do I wish to encourage any softening on the NO to swine flu (or any) vaccs, but earlier today I did post a CDC link that stated that single shot vials w/o Thimerosal would be used for pregnant women or children. It also said that the use of adjuvants was not likely (the vaccine isn't quite ready yet). With or without Thimerosal or squalene, the use of this vaccine should result in a lengthy prison term for anyone administering or approving of it. The CDC and all government agencies are known liars, but I did want to point that out. The claims by med/gov that any vaccine has ever prevented anything doesn't chalk up against my 8 years university study in bio/chem/math, but the epidemic of obvious vaccine damage to adults and children is clear evidence of intent to cause severe harm. I

bring these things up so that people know what the CDC is saying, not to convince anyone of anything, but consider that small changes like this are used to deny the overall damages being done:

http://www.cdc.gov/h1n1flu/vaccination/statelocal/qa.htm?s_cid=ccu081009_CDCQandA_e

From: Ingrid Blank <enb1@...>no-forced-vaccination Sent: Monday, August 17, 2009 7:29:54 PMSubject: Your comment is awaiting moderation - yeah, I bet!

http://pagingdrgupt a.blogs.cnn. com/2009/ 08/05/swine- flu-vaccine- for-pregnant-women/#comment- 14963Ingrid Blank August 18th, 2009 3:28 am ETYour comment is awaiting moderation.Any government agency and physician promoting and administering thimerosaland aluminium-laced flu shots to pregnant women, thus impairing thedeveloping brain of the fetus, should be charged with criminal intent to dogrievous bodily harm and have his or her licence revoked. Don’t fall prey tothe WHO and UN-instigated swine flu hype, particularly in light of the factthat a) 1,700 deaths allegedly caused by H1N1 in a global population ofapprox. 6.9 billion hardly constitutes a pandemic and according to a CDCstudy , up to 9 out of 10 rapid tests to diagnose the “swine flu†areWRONG!! The government

study indicating that rapid tests to diagnose the“swine flu†could hardly distinguish between the “swine flu†and normalseasonal flu gives support to those medical experts who say the “swine fluâ€is a harmless, ordinary flu that is being hyped by the WHO and the vaccinecompanies to justify a pandemic level 6 declaration and mass forcedvaccinations.Furthermore, According to expertsin this field, the novel “swine flu†vaccines that were already developedtwo years ago before pigs intended to fly, are more dangerous than thebioengineered swine flu itself, since – in addition to aluminium (a knownneurotoxin) they will contain an oil-based adjuvant, squalene.http://www.newsmax. com/health/ vaccine_swine_ flu/2009/ 07/07/232717. htmlSqualene in vaccines has been strongly linked

to the Gulf War Syndrome. OnAugust 1991, Principi, Secretary of Veterans Affairs admitted thatsoldiers vaccinated with the anthrax vaccine from 1990 to 1991 had anincreased risk of 200 percent in developing the deadly disease amyotrophiclateral sclerosis (ALS), also called Lou Gehrig’s disease. The soldiers alsosuffered from a number of debilitating and life-shortening diseases, such aspolyarteritis nodosa, multiple sclerosis (MS), lupus, transverse myelitis (aneurological disorder caused by inflammation of the spinal cord),endocarditis (inflammation of the heart’s inner lining), optic neuritis withblindness and glomerulonephritis (a type of kidney disease).Because squalene, the main ingredient in MF-59, can induce hyperimmuneresponses and induce autoimmunity, a real danger exists for prolongedactivation of the brain’s immune cells, the microglia. This type ofprolonged activation has

been strongly associated with such diseases asmultiple sclerosis, Alzheimer’s disease, Parkinson’s disease, ALS andpossibly vaccine-related encephalitis. It has been shown that activation ofthe systemic immune system, as occurs with vaccination, rapidly activatesthe brain’s microglia at the same time, and this brain inflammation canpersist for long periods.Here is another opinion from renowned physician DOUGLASS,M.D.:Many people assume that the vaccinations they receive are backed up by manymonths of extensive clinical trials and medical evaluation.But regulators at the European Medicines Agency (EMEA) in the UK are aboutto distribute a new swine flu vaccine that’s had a whopping FIVE DAYS oftesting.How about that for a reality check?Vaccines in general are unproven, unnecessary, and potentially dangerous –and they’re the ones that have undergone

clinical trials. I cannot believethat the government of Great Britain is actually about to start distributinga vaccine — for a form of influenza that is already little understood –without having it thoroughly vetted.The EMEA says that clinical trials will be carried out — but that the swineflu vaccine will already be distributed while those trials are conducted.So let’s say that the clinical trials do indeed discover that the vaccinehas a serious side effect. Vaccines are not like cars with defectiveairbags. You can’t just recall a live virus that’s been injected into thebloodstreams of thousands of people.It would be a man-made medical catastrophe.Also seehttp://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1206807/Swine-flu-jab-link-killer-nerve-disease- Leaked-letter- reveals-concern- neurologists- 25-deaths- America.html#ixzz0OIhbRlSHA warning that the new swine flu jab

is linked to a deadly nerve disease hasbeen sent by the Government to senior neurologists in a confidential letter.The letter from the Health Protection Agency, the official body thatoversees public health, has been leaked to The Mail on Sunday, leading todemands to know why the information has not been given to the public beforethe vaccination of millions of people, including children, begins.It tells the neurologists that they must be alert for an increase in a braindisorder called Guillain-Barre Syndrome (GBS), which could be triggered bythe vaccine.GBS attacks the lining of the nerves, causing paralysis and inability tobreathe, and can be fatal.The letter, sent to about 600 neurologists on July 29, is the first signthat there is concern at the highest levels that the vaccine itself couldcause serious complications.It refers to the use of a similar swine flu vaccine in the

United States in1976 when:More people died from the vaccination than from swine flu.500 cases of GBS were detected.The vaccine may have increased the risk of contracting GBS by eight times.The vaccine was withdrawn after just ten weeks when the link with GBS becameclear.The US Government was forced to pay out millions of dollars to thoseaffected.Concerns have already been raised that the new vaccine has not beensufficiently tested and that the effects, especially on children, areunknown.It is being developed by pharmaceutical companies and will be given to about13million people during the first wave of immunisation, expected to start inOctober.Top priority will be given to everyone aged six months to 65 with anunderlying health problem, pregnant women and health professionals.The British Neurological Surveillance Unit (BNSU), part of the BritishAssociation of

Neurologists, has been asked to monitor closely any cases ofGBS as the vaccine is rolled out.One senior neurologist said last night: ‘I would not have the swineflu jab because of the GBS risk.’There are concerns that there could be a repeat of what became known as the‘1976 debacle’ in the US, where a swine flu vaccine killed 25 people – morethan the virus itself.A mass vaccination was given the go-ahead by President Gerald Ford becausescientists believed that the swine flu strain was similar to the oneresponsible for the 1918-19 pandemic, which killed half a million Americansand 20million people worldwide.Also seehttp://www.pandemic fluonline. com/?p=770German health expert’s swine flu warning: Does virus vaccine increase therisk of cancer?August 12th, 2009The swine flu

vaccine has been hit by new cancer fears after a German healthexpert gave a shock warning about its safety.Lung specialist Wolfgang Wodarg has said that there are many risksassociated with the vaccine for the H1N1 virus.He has grave reservations about the firm Novartis who are developing thevaccine and testing it in Germany. The vaccination is injected “with a veryhot needleâ€, Wodarg said.The nutrient solution for the vaccine consists of cancerous cells fromanimals and “we do not know if there could be an allergic reactionâ€.But more importantly, some people fear that the risk of cancer could beincreased by injecting the cells.The vaccine – as Johannes Löwer, president of the Ehrlich Institute,has pointed out – can also cause worse side effects than the actual swineflu virus.Wodrag also described people’s fear of the pandemic as an “orchestrationâ€

:“It is great business for the pharmaceutical industry,†he told the ‘NeuenPresse’.Swine flu is not very different from normal flu. “On the contrary if youlook at the number of cases it is nothing compared to a normal fluoutbreak,†he added.The chairman of the health committee in the European Council has urged for acareful and calm reaction to the virus.Up until now, the producers of the vaccine did not know how many orders theywould have by the autumn, but the German Government is now a guaranteedcustomer.Even the pharmaceutical companies are trying to exploit the fear of theswine flu pandemic.

[Guest guest]

Please terminate all future emails on no forced vaccinations....

From: Ingrid Blank <enb1@...>Subject: Your comment is awaiting moderation - yeah, I bet! no-forced-vaccination Date: Tuesday, August 18, 2009, 1:29 AM

http://pagingdrgupt a.blogs.cnn. com/2009/ 08/05/swine- flu-vaccine- for-pregnant-women/#comment- 14963Ingrid Blank August 18th, 2009 3:28 am ETYour comment is awaiting moderation.Any government agency and physician promoting and administering thimerosaland aluminium-laced flu shots to pregnant women, thus impairing thedeveloping brain of the fetus, should be charged with criminal intent to dogrievous bodily harm and have his or her licence revoked. Don’t fall prey tothe WHO and UN-instigated swine flu hype, particularly in light of the factthat a) 1,700 deaths allegedly caused by H1N1 in a global population ofapprox. 6.9 billion hardly constitutes a pandemic and according to a CDCstudy , up to 9 out of 10 rapid tests to diagnose the “swine flu†areWRONG!! The government

study indicating that rapid tests to diagnose the“swine flu†could hardly distinguish between the “swine flu†and normalseasonal flu gives support to those medical experts who say the “swine fluâ€is a harmless, ordinary flu that is being hyped by the WHO and the vaccinecompanies to justify a pandemic level 6 declaration and mass forcedvaccinations.Furthermore, According to expertsin this field, the novel “swine flu†vaccines that were already developedtwo years ago before pigs intended to fly, are more dangerous than thebioengineered swine flu itself, since – in addition to aluminium (a knownneurotoxin) they will contain an oil-based adjuvant, squalene.http://www.newsmax. com/health/ vaccine_swine_ flu/2009/ 07/07/232717. htmlSqualene in vaccines has been strongly linked

to the Gulf War Syndrome. OnAugust 1991, Principi, Secretary of Veterans Affairs admitted thatsoldiers vaccinated with the anthrax vaccine from 1990 to 1991 had anincreased risk of 200 percent in developing the deadly disease amyotrophiclateral sclerosis (ALS), also called Lou Gehrig’s disease. The soldiers alsosuffered from a number of debilitating and life-shortening diseases, such aspolyarteritis nodosa, multiple sclerosis (MS), lupus, transverse myelitis (aneurological disorder caused by inflammation of the spinal cord),endocarditis (inflammation of the heart’s inner lining), optic neuritis withblindness and glomerulonephritis (a type of kidney disease).Because squalene, the main ingredient in MF-59, can induce hyperimmuneresponses and induce autoimmunity, a real danger exists for prolongedactivation of the brain’s immune cells, the microglia. This type ofprolonged activation has

been strongly associated with such diseases asmultiple sclerosis, Alzheimer’s disease, Parkinson’s disease, ALS andpossibly vaccine-related encephalitis. It has been shown that activation ofthe systemic immune system, as occurs with vaccination, rapidly activatesthe brain’s microglia at the same time, and this brain inflammation canpersist for long periods.Here is another opinion from renowned physician DOUGLASS,M.D.:Many people assume that the vaccinations they receive are backed up by manymonths of extensive clinical trials and medical evaluation.But regulators at the European Medicines Agency (EMEA) in the UK are aboutto distribute a new swine flu vaccine that’s had a whopping FIVE DAYS oftesting.How about that for a reality check?Vaccines in general are unproven, unnecessary, and potentially dangerous –and they’re the ones that have undergone

clinical trials. I cannot believethat the government of Great Britain is actually about to start distributinga vaccine — for a form of influenza that is already little understood –without having it thoroughly vetted.The EMEA says that clinical trials will be carried out — but that the swineflu vaccine will already be distributed while those trials are conducted.So let’s say that the clinical trials do indeed discover that the vaccinehas a serious side effect. Vaccines are not like cars with defectiveairbags. You can’t just recall a live virus that’s been injected into thebloodstreams of thousands of people.It would be a man-made medical catastrophe.Also seehttp://www.dailymai l.co.uk/news/ article-1206807/ Swine-flu- jab-link- killer-nerve-disease-

Leaked-letter- reveals-concern- neurologists- 25-deaths- America.html#ixzz0OIhbRlSHA warning that the new swine flu jab is linked to a deadly nerve disease hasbeen sent by the Government to senior neurologists in a confidential letter.The letter from the Health Protection Agency, the official body thatoversees public health, has been leaked to The Mail on Sunday, leading todemands to know why the information has not been given to the public beforethe vaccination of millions of people, including children, begins.It tells the neurologists that they must be alert for an increase in a braindisorder called Guillain-Barre Syndrome (GBS), which could be triggered bythe vaccine.GBS attacks the lining of the nerves, causing paralysis and inability tobreathe, and can be fatal.The letter, sent to about 600 neurologists on July 29, is the first signthat there is concern at the highest

levels that the vaccine itself couldcause serious complications.It refers to the use of a similar swine flu vaccine in the United States in1976 when:More people died from the vaccination than from swine flu.500 cases of GBS were detected.The vaccine may have increased the risk of contracting GBS by eight times.The vaccine was withdrawn after just ten weeks when the link with GBS becameclear.The US Government was forced to pay out millions of dollars to thoseaffected.Concerns have already been raised that the new vaccine has not beensufficiently tested and that the effects, especially on children, areunknown.It is being developed by pharmaceutical companies and will be given to about13million people during the first wave of immunisation, expected to start inOctober.Top priority will be given to everyone aged six months to 65 with anunderlying health problem, pregnant

women and health professionals.The British Neurological Surveillance Unit (BNSU), part of the BritishAssociation of Neurologists, has been asked to monitor closely any cases ofGBS as the vaccine is rolled out.One senior neurologist said last night: ‘I would not have the swineflu jab because of the GBS risk.’There are concerns that there could be a repeat of what became known as the‘1976 debacle’ in the US, where a swine flu vaccine killed 25 people – morethan the virus itself.A mass vaccination was given the go-ahead by President Gerald Ford becausescientists believed that the swine flu strain was similar to the oneresponsible for the 1918-19 pandemic, which killed half a million Americansand 20million people worldwide.Also seehttp://www.pandemic fluonline. com/?p=770German

health expert’s swine flu warning: Does virus vaccine increase therisk of cancer?August 12th, 2009The swine flu vaccine has been hit by new cancer fears after a German healthexpert gave a shock warning about its safety.Lung specialist Wolfgang Wodarg has said that there are many risksassociated with the vaccine for the H1N1 virus.He has grave reservations about the firm Novartis who are developing thevaccine and testing it in Germany. The vaccination is injected “with a veryhot needleâ€, Wodarg said.The nutrient solution for the vaccine consists of cancerous cells fromanimals and “we do not know if there could be an allergic reactionâ€.But more importantly, some people fear that the risk of cancer could beincreased by injecting the cells.The vaccine – as Johannes Löwer, president of the Ehrlich Institute,has pointed out – can also cause worse side

effects than the actual swineflu virus.Wodrag also described people’s fear of the pandemic as an “orchestration†:“It is great business for the pharmaceutical industry,†he told the ‘NeuenPresse’.Swine flu is not very different from normal flu. “On the contrary if youlook at the number of cases it is nothing compared to a normal fluoutbreak,†he added.The chairman of the health committee in the European Council has urged for acareful and calm reaction to the virus.Up until now, the producers of the vaccine did not know how many orders theywould have by the autumn, but the German Government is now a guaranteedcustomer.Even the pharmaceutical companies are trying to exploit the fear of theswine flu pandemic.

[Guest guest]

Please terminate all future emails on no forced vaccinations....

From: Ingrid Blank <enb1@...>Subject: Your comment is awaiting moderation - yeah, I bet! no-forced-vaccination Date: Tuesday, August 18, 2009, 1:29 AM

http://pagingdrgupt a.blogs.cnn. com/2009/ 08/05/swine- flu-vaccine- for-pregnant-women/#comment- 14963Ingrid Blank August 18th, 2009 3:28 am ETYour comment is awaiting moderation.Any government agency and physician promoting and administering thimerosaland aluminium-laced flu shots to pregnant women, thus impairing thedeveloping brain of the fetus, should be charged with criminal intent to dogrievous bodily harm and have his or her licence revoked. Don’t fall prey tothe WHO and UN-instigated swine flu hype, particularly in light of the factthat a) 1,700 deaths allegedly caused by H1N1 in a global population ofapprox. 6.9 billion hardly constitutes a pandemic and according to a CDCstudy , up to 9 out of 10 rapid tests to diagnose the “swine flu†areWRONG!! The government

study indicating that rapid tests to diagnose the“swine flu†could hardly distinguish between the “swine flu†and normalseasonal flu gives support to those medical experts who say the “swine fluâ€is a harmless, ordinary flu that is being hyped by the WHO and the vaccinecompanies to justify a pandemic level 6 declaration and mass forcedvaccinations.Furthermore, According to expertsin this field, the novel “swine flu†vaccines that were already developedtwo years ago before pigs intended to fly, are more dangerous than thebioengineered swine flu itself, since – in addition to aluminium (a knownneurotoxin) they will contain an oil-based adjuvant, squalene.http://www.newsmax. com/health/ vaccine_swine_ flu/2009/ 07/07/232717. htmlSqualene in vaccines has been strongly linked

to the Gulf War Syndrome. OnAugust 1991, Principi, Secretary of Veterans Affairs admitted thatsoldiers vaccinated with the anthrax vaccine from 1990 to 1991 had anincreased risk of 200 percent in developing the deadly disease amyotrophiclateral sclerosis (ALS), also called Lou Gehrig’s disease. The soldiers alsosuffered from a number of debilitating and life-shortening diseases, such aspolyarteritis nodosa, multiple sclerosis (MS), lupus, transverse myelitis (aneurological disorder caused by inflammation of the spinal cord),endocarditis (inflammation of the heart’s inner lining), optic neuritis withblindness and glomerulonephritis (a type of kidney disease).Because squalene, the main ingredient in MF-59, can induce hyperimmuneresponses and induce autoimmunity, a real danger exists for prolongedactivation of the brain’s immune cells, the microglia. This type ofprolonged activation has

been strongly associated with such diseases asmultiple sclerosis, Alzheimer’s disease, Parkinson’s disease, ALS andpossibly vaccine-related encephalitis. It has been shown that activation ofthe systemic immune system, as occurs with vaccination, rapidly activatesthe brain’s microglia at the same time, and this brain inflammation canpersist for long periods.Here is another opinion from renowned physician DOUGLASS,M.D.:Many people assume that the vaccinations they receive are backed up by manymonths of extensive clinical trials and medical evaluation.But regulators at the European Medicines Agency (EMEA) in the UK are aboutto distribute a new swine flu vaccine that’s had a whopping FIVE DAYS oftesting.How about that for a reality check?Vaccines in general are unproven, unnecessary, and potentially dangerous –and they’re the ones that have undergone

clinical trials. I cannot believethat the government of Great Britain is actually about to start distributinga vaccine — for a form of influenza that is already little understood –without having it thoroughly vetted.The EMEA says that clinical trials will be carried out — but that the swineflu vaccine will already be distributed while those trials are conducted.So let’s say that the clinical trials do indeed discover that the vaccinehas a serious side effect. Vaccines are not like cars with defectiveairbags. You can’t just recall a live virus that’s been injected into thebloodstreams of thousands of people.It would be a man-made medical catastrophe.Also seehttp://www.dailymai l.co.uk/news/ article-1206807/ Swine-flu- jab-link- killer-nerve-disease-

Leaked-letter- reveals-concern- neurologists- 25-deaths- America.html#ixzz0OIhbRlSHA warning that the new swine flu jab is linked to a deadly nerve disease hasbeen sent by the Government to senior neurologists in a confidential letter.The letter from the Health Protection Agency, the official body thatoversees public health, has been leaked to The Mail on Sunday, leading todemands to know why the information has not been given to the public beforethe vaccination of millions of people, including children, begins.It tells the neurologists that they must be alert for an increase in a braindisorder called Guillain-Barre Syndrome (GBS), which could be triggered bythe vaccine.GBS attacks the lining of the nerves, causing paralysis and inability tobreathe, and can be fatal.The letter, sent to about 600 neurologists on July 29, is the first signthat there is concern at the highest

levels that the vaccine itself couldcause serious complications.It refers to the use of a similar swine flu vaccine in the United States in1976 when:More people died from the vaccination than from swine flu.500 cases of GBS were detected.The vaccine may have increased the risk of contracting GBS by eight times.The vaccine was withdrawn after just ten weeks when the link with GBS becameclear.The US Government was forced to pay out millions of dollars to thoseaffected.Concerns have already been raised that the new vaccine has not beensufficiently tested and that the effects, especially on children, areunknown.It is being developed by pharmaceutical companies and will be given to about13million people during the first wave of immunisation, expected to start inOctober.Top priority will be given to everyone aged six months to 65 with anunderlying health problem, pregnant

women and health professionals.The British Neurological Surveillance Unit (BNSU), part of the BritishAssociation of Neurologists, has been asked to monitor closely any cases ofGBS as the vaccine is rolled out.One senior neurologist said last night: ‘I would not have the swineflu jab because of the GBS risk.’There are concerns that there could be a repeat of what became known as the‘1976 debacle’ in the US, where a swine flu vaccine killed 25 people – morethan the virus itself.A mass vaccination was given the go-ahead by President Gerald Ford becausescientists believed that the swine flu strain was similar to the oneresponsible for the 1918-19 pandemic, which killed half a million Americansand 20million people worldwide.Also seehttp://www.pandemic fluonline. com/?p=770German

health expert’s swine flu warning: Does virus vaccine increase therisk of cancer?August 12th, 2009The swine flu vaccine has been hit by new cancer fears after a German healthexpert gave a shock warning about its safety.Lung specialist Wolfgang Wodarg has said that there are many risksassociated with the vaccine for the H1N1 virus.He has grave reservations about the firm Novartis who are developing thevaccine and testing it in Germany. The vaccination is injected “with a veryhot needleâ€, Wodarg said.The nutrient solution for the vaccine consists of cancerous cells fromanimals and “we do not know if there could be an allergic reactionâ€.But more importantly, some people fear that the risk of cancer could beincreased by injecting the cells.The vaccine – as Johannes Löwer, president of the Ehrlich Institute,has pointed out – can also cause worse side

effects than the actual swineflu virus.Wodrag also described people’s fear of the pandemic as an “orchestration†:“It is great business for the pharmaceutical industry,†he told the ‘NeuenPresse’.Swine flu is not very different from normal flu. “On the contrary if youlook at the number of cases it is nothing compared to a normal fluoutbreak,†he added.The chairman of the health committee in the European Council has urged for acareful and calm reaction to the virus.Up until now, the producers of the vaccine did not know how many orders theywould have by the autumn, but the German Government is now a guaranteedcustomer.Even the pharmaceutical companies are trying to exploit the fear of theswine flu pandemic.