RE: Forced Vaccination - medical ethics & vaccine drug pushers

[Guest guest]

I'd like to second Dr. Rima's health freedom concerns about vaccination.

What I'd like to point out to Dr. Erlich and other medical professionals is

their sworn duty to " do no harm. " The World Medical Association in adopting

the Declaration of Helsinki went on record that health care providers MUST

have fully informed consent before medicating anyone. This international

ethical norm is being ignored by the vaccine drug pushers.

The medical profession must take the lead in holding US national and state

authorities to these minimal international standards. Basic human rights are

at stake here.

Further, those professionals in our society whose job it is to analyze risk,

the insurance professionals, have analyzed the risks of vaccination and have

determined vaccination to be an uninsurable risk. Usually all risks are

insurable at some insurance rate: if you want to sky dive, for example, you

can get insured, but at a higher premium.

Not so with vaccination. THERE IS NO RATE AT WHICH THE RISK OF VACCINATION

INJURY CAN BE MANAGED BY INSURANCE. As with nuclear power, the other major

uninsurable risk in our economy, Congress passed special legislation exempting

the vaccine drug pushers from liability for the harm they cause.

I strongly believe it is unethical for physicians to recommend uninsurable

procedures to their patients. Even more unethical for doctors to cooperate

with the authorities when they mandate such dangerous procedures. What do you

think, doctors?

When physicians cooperated with the psuedoscience of the Nazi they were

rightly condemned as war criminals; when physicians cooperated with the

anti-human " psychology " of the Soviet Union they were rightly condemned as

human rights violators. What about physicians, like the former NJ Commissioner

of " Health " (who had a JD in addition to his MD) who push dangerous drugs on

children... what are they?

Ralph Fucetola JD

- Baby M - forced vaccination

>

> Phone (optional):

>

> Message: Dr. Laibow,

> I agree and support you fight against Codex. However regarding Baby

> M and other vaccination issues, I feel you are contributing to the

> creation pandemic-type fear. I have been a pediatrician for 10 years

> and I have concerns regarding vaccinations. However, given a mother

> who was positive for Hepatitis B antigen x 2 tests, I would also have

> mandated vaccinating the baby within the advised 12 hours to protect

> that baby against developing chronic Hepatitis B. By preoomoting

> such one-sided purely sensationalistic type stories, you potentially

> loose credibility for your true cause. Please take this into

> cconsideration.

> Please keep up your fight against Codex.

> Sincerly,

> Erlich, M.D.

>

>

[Guest guest]

I'd like to second Dr. Rima's health freedom concerns about vaccination.

What I'd like to point out to Dr. Erlich and other medical professionals is

their sworn duty to " do no harm. " The World Medical Association in adopting

the Declaration of Helsinki went on record that health care providers MUST

have fully informed consent before medicating anyone. This international

ethical norm is being ignored by the vaccine drug pushers.

The medical profession must take the lead in holding US national and state

authorities to these minimal international standards. Basic human rights are

at stake here.

Further, those professionals in our society whose job it is to analyze risk,

the insurance professionals, have analyzed the risks of vaccination and have

determined vaccination to be an uninsurable risk. Usually all risks are

insurable at some insurance rate: if you want to sky dive, for example, you

can get insured, but at a higher premium.

Not so with vaccination. THERE IS NO RATE AT WHICH THE RISK OF VACCINATION

INJURY CAN BE MANAGED BY INSURANCE. As with nuclear power, the other major

uninsurable risk in our economy, Congress passed special legislation exempting

the vaccine drug pushers from liability for the harm they cause.

I strongly believe it is unethical for physicians to recommend uninsurable

procedures to their patients. Even more unethical for doctors to cooperate

with the authorities when they mandate such dangerous procedures. What do you

think, doctors?

When physicians cooperated with the psuedoscience of the Nazi they were

rightly condemned as war criminals; when physicians cooperated with the

anti-human " psychology " of the Soviet Union they were rightly condemned as

human rights violators. What about physicians, like the former NJ Commissioner

of " Health " (who had a JD in addition to his MD) who push dangerous drugs on

children... what are they?

Ralph Fucetola JD

- Baby M - forced vaccination

>

> Phone (optional):

>

> Message: Dr. Laibow,

> I agree and support you fight against Codex. However regarding Baby

> M and other vaccination issues, I feel you are contributing to the

> creation pandemic-type fear. I have been a pediatrician for 10 years

> and I have concerns regarding vaccinations. However, given a mother

> who was positive for Hepatitis B antigen x 2 tests, I would also have

> mandated vaccinating the baby within the advised 12 hours to protect

> that baby against developing chronic Hepatitis B. By preoomoting

> such one-sided purely sensationalistic type stories, you potentially

> loose credibility for your true cause. Please take this into

> cconsideration.

> Please keep up your fight against Codex.

> Sincerly,

> Erlich, M.D.

>

>

[Guest guest]

Do you know if the hippocratic oath is still given to

Dr's when they gradutate from Medical School. I heard

that they not longer receive the oath.

Regards,

--- Ralph Fucetola JD <ralph.fucetola@...> wrote:

> I'd like to second Dr. Rima's health freedom

> concerns about vaccination.

>

> What I'd like to point out to Dr. Erlich and other

> medical professionals is

> their sworn duty to " do no harm. " The World Medical

> Association in adopting

> the Declaration of Helsinki went on record that

> health care providers MUST

> have fully informed consent before medicating

> anyone. This international

> ethical norm is being ignored by the vaccine drug

> pushers.

>

> The medical profession must take the lead in holding

> US national and state

> authorities to these minimal international

> standards. Basic human rights are

> at stake here.

>

> Further, those professionals in our society whose

> job it is to analyze risk,

> the insurance professionals, have analyzed the risks

> of vaccination and have

> determined vaccination to be an uninsurable risk.

> Usually all risks are

> insurable at some insurance rate: if you want to sky

> dive, for example, you

> can get insured, but at a higher premium.

>

> Not so with vaccination. THERE IS NO RATE AT WHICH

> THE RISK OF VACCINATION

> INJURY CAN BE MANAGED BY INSURANCE. As with nuclear

> power, the other major

> uninsurable risk in our economy, Congress passed

> special legislation exempting

> the vaccine drug pushers from liability for the harm

> they cause.

>

> I strongly believe it is unethical for physicians to

> recommend uninsurable

> procedures to their patients. Even more unethical

> for doctors to cooperate

> with the authorities when they mandate such

> dangerous procedures. What do you

> think, doctors?

>

> When physicians cooperated with the psuedoscience of

> the Nazi they were

> rightly condemned as war criminals; when physicians

> cooperated with the

> anti-human " psychology " of the Soviet Union they

> were rightly condemned as

> human rights violators. What about physicians, like

> the former NJ Commissioner

> of " Health " (who had a JD in addition to his MD) who

> push dangerous drugs on

> children... what are they?

>

> Ralph Fucetola JD

>

> - Baby M - forced vaccination

> >

> > Phone (optional):

> >

> > Message: Dr. Laibow,

> > I agree and support you fight against Codex.

> However regarding Baby

> > M and other vaccination issues, I feel you are

> contributing to the

> > creation pandemic-type fear. I have been a

> pediatrician for 10 years

> > and I have concerns regarding vaccinations.

> However, given a mother

> > who was positive for Hepatitis B antigen x 2

> tests, I would also have

> > mandated vaccinating the baby within the

> advised 12 hours to protect

> > that baby against developing chronic Hepatitis

> B. By preoomoting

> > such one-sided purely sensationalistic type

> stories, you potentially

> > loose credibility for your true cause. Please

> take this into

> > cconsideration.

> > Please keep up your fight against Codex.

> > Sincerly,

> > Erlich, M.D.

> >

> >

>

>

>

>

“THE ANSWER FOR 1984 IS 1776”

________________________________________________________________________________\

____

Be a better friend, newshound, and

know-it-all with Mobile. Try it now.

http://mobile./;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ

[Guest guest]

Do you know if the hippocratic oath is still given to

Dr's when they gradutate from Medical School. I heard

that they not longer receive the oath.

Regards,

--- Ralph Fucetola JD <ralph.fucetola@...> wrote:

> I'd like to second Dr. Rima's health freedom

> concerns about vaccination.

>

> What I'd like to point out to Dr. Erlich and other

> medical professionals is

> their sworn duty to " do no harm. " The World Medical

> Association in adopting

> the Declaration of Helsinki went on record that

> health care providers MUST

> have fully informed consent before medicating

> anyone. This international

> ethical norm is being ignored by the vaccine drug

> pushers.

>

> The medical profession must take the lead in holding

> US national and state

> authorities to these minimal international

> standards. Basic human rights are

> at stake here.

>

> Further, those professionals in our society whose

> job it is to analyze risk,

> the insurance professionals, have analyzed the risks

> of vaccination and have

> determined vaccination to be an uninsurable risk.

> Usually all risks are

> insurable at some insurance rate: if you want to sky

> dive, for example, you

> can get insured, but at a higher premium.

>

> Not so with vaccination. THERE IS NO RATE AT WHICH

> THE RISK OF VACCINATION

> INJURY CAN BE MANAGED BY INSURANCE. As with nuclear

> power, the other major

> uninsurable risk in our economy, Congress passed

> special legislation exempting

> the vaccine drug pushers from liability for the harm

> they cause.

>

> I strongly believe it is unethical for physicians to

> recommend uninsurable

> procedures to their patients. Even more unethical

> for doctors to cooperate

> with the authorities when they mandate such

> dangerous procedures. What do you

> think, doctors?

>

> When physicians cooperated with the psuedoscience of

> the Nazi they were

> rightly condemned as war criminals; when physicians

> cooperated with the

> anti-human " psychology " of the Soviet Union they

> were rightly condemned as

> human rights violators. What about physicians, like

> the former NJ Commissioner

> of " Health " (who had a JD in addition to his MD) who

> push dangerous drugs on

> children... what are they?

>

> Ralph Fucetola JD

>

> - Baby M - forced vaccination

> >

> > Phone (optional):

> >

> > Message: Dr. Laibow,

> > I agree and support you fight against Codex.

> However regarding Baby

> > M and other vaccination issues, I feel you are

> contributing to the

> > creation pandemic-type fear. I have been a

> pediatrician for 10 years

> > and I have concerns regarding vaccinations.

> However, given a mother

> > who was positive for Hepatitis B antigen x 2

> tests, I would also have

> > mandated vaccinating the baby within the

> advised 12 hours to protect

> > that baby against developing chronic Hepatitis

> B. By preoomoting

> > such one-sided purely sensationalistic type

> stories, you potentially

> > loose credibility for your true cause. Please

> take this into

> > cconsideration.

> > Please keep up your fight against Codex.

> > Sincerly,

> > Erlich, M.D.

> >

> >

>

>

>

>

“THE ANSWER FOR 1984 IS 1776”

________________________________________________________________________________\

____

Be a better friend, newshound, and

know-it-all with Mobile. Try it now.

http://mobile./;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ

[Guest guest]

I'm with you, Ralph, but assume the counter-argument is that the risk-benefit assessment favors vaccines. I don't buy that argument, as it is my understanding that 90 - 99% of vaccine adverse events are not reported, so we really don't know what the scope of the harm from vaccines is (which, along with some pretty hefty denial, is probably one reason they continue to persist). Also, the alleged benefit is hard to measure--infectious disease declined substantially before vaccines were introduced, and lack of symptoms in a vaccinated child is not proof that the child would have developed symptoms absent the vaccine, since every child exposed to disease does not develop symptoms.

Do you have a reference, citation or other documentation for the assertion that insurance companies don't insure vaccines? I've hear the same thing, but would like to be able to back it up.

Also, I'm building a list of vaccine-injury treatment links on my website, so anyone with information about this, please email information to me for inclusion on that list if desired. Email offline if desired - attorney@....

Thanks!

Alan

Baby M - forced vaccination> > Phone (optional):> > Message: Dr. Laibow,> I agree and support you fight against Codex. However regarding Baby> M and other vaccination issues, I feel you are contributing to the> creation pandemic-type fear. I have been a pediatrician for 10 years> and I have concerns regarding vaccinations. However, given a mother> who was positive for Hepatitis B antigen x 2 tests, I would also have> mandated vaccinating the baby within the advised 12 hours to protect> that baby against developing chronic Hepatitis B. By preoomoting> such one-sided purely sensationalistic type stories, you potentially> loose credibility for your true cause. Please take this into> cconsideration.> Please keep up your fight against Codex.> Sincerly,> Erlich, M.D.> >

[Guest guest]

I'm with you, Ralph, but assume the counter-argument is that the risk-benefit assessment favors vaccines. I don't buy that argument, as it is my understanding that 90 - 99% of vaccine adverse events are not reported, so we really don't know what the scope of the harm from vaccines is (which, along with some pretty hefty denial, is probably one reason they continue to persist). Also, the alleged benefit is hard to measure--infectious disease declined substantially before vaccines were introduced, and lack of symptoms in a vaccinated child is not proof that the child would have developed symptoms absent the vaccine, since every child exposed to disease does not develop symptoms.

Do you have a reference, citation or other documentation for the assertion that insurance companies don't insure vaccines? I've hear the same thing, but would like to be able to back it up.

Also, I'm building a list of vaccine-injury treatment links on my website, so anyone with information about this, please email information to me for inclusion on that list if desired. Email offline if desired - attorney@....

Thanks!

Alan

Baby M - forced vaccination> > Phone (optional):> > Message: Dr. Laibow,> I agree and support you fight against Codex. However regarding Baby> M and other vaccination issues, I feel you are contributing to the> creation pandemic-type fear. I have been a pediatrician for 10 years> and I have concerns regarding vaccinations. However, given a mother> who was positive for Hepatitis B antigen x 2 tests, I would also have> mandated vaccinating the baby within the advised 12 hours to protect> that baby against developing chronic Hepatitis B. By preoomoting> such one-sided purely sensationalistic type stories, you potentially> loose credibility for your true cause. Please take this into> cconsideration.> Please keep up your fight against Codex.> Sincerly,> Erlich, M.D.> >

[Guest guest]

Alan, good point! We don't really know the risk... maybe that's what the

insurance industry found.

" risk - benefit " ... We (our children) take the risks; they (the vaccine drug

pushers) get the $$ benefit $$. Qui bono?

I suppose, to " prove " that the insurance industry won't insure the risk, we'd

have to research the Congressional record and see what was said when the

exemption law was passed.

Public corporations cannot invest in uninsurable risks. That would violate

shareholder rights by creating potential liabilities. Congress exempts vaccine

drug pushers from liability... so, I think it fair to conclude that the common

knowledge that insurers rejected the risk is correct.

Ralph

- Baby M - forced vaccination

> >

> > Phone (optional):

> >

> > Message: Dr. Laibow,

> > I agree and support you fight against Codex. However regarding Baby

> > M and other vaccination issues, I feel you are contributing to the

> > creation pandemic-type fear. I have been a pediatrician for 10 years

> > and I have concerns regarding vaccinations. However, given a mother

> > who was positive for Hepatitis B antigen x 2 tests, I would also have

> > mandated vaccinating the baby within the advised 12 hours to protect

> > that baby against developing chronic Hepatitis B. By preoomoting

> > such one-sided purely sensationalistic type stories, you potentially

> > loose credibility for your true cause. Please take this into

> > cconsideration.

> > Please keep up your fight against Codex.

> > Sincerly,

> > Erlich, M.D.

> >

> >

>

>

>

>

[Guest guest]

Alan, good point! We don't really know the risk... maybe that's what the

insurance industry found.

" risk - benefit " ... We (our children) take the risks; they (the vaccine drug

pushers) get the $$ benefit $$. Qui bono?

I suppose, to " prove " that the insurance industry won't insure the risk, we'd

have to research the Congressional record and see what was said when the

exemption law was passed.

Public corporations cannot invest in uninsurable risks. That would violate

shareholder rights by creating potential liabilities. Congress exempts vaccine

drug pushers from liability... so, I think it fair to conclude that the common

knowledge that insurers rejected the risk is correct.

Ralph

- Baby M - forced vaccination

> >

> > Phone (optional):

> >

> > Message: Dr. Laibow,

> > I agree and support you fight against Codex. However regarding Baby

> > M and other vaccination issues, I feel you are contributing to the

> > creation pandemic-type fear. I have been a pediatrician for 10 years

> > and I have concerns regarding vaccinations. However, given a mother

> > who was positive for Hepatitis B antigen x 2 tests, I would also have

> > mandated vaccinating the baby within the advised 12 hours to protect

> > that baby against developing chronic Hepatitis B. By preoomoting

> > such one-sided purely sensationalistic type stories, you potentially

> > loose credibility for your true cause. Please take this into

> > cconsideration.

> > Please keep up your fight against Codex.

> > Sincerly,

> > Erlich, M.D.

> >

> >

>

>

>

>

[Guest guest]

The Oath has been replaced by a complex Code of Ethics

http://www.ama-assn.org/ama/pub/category/2498.html

R

- Baby M - forced vaccination

> > >

> > > Phone (optional):

> > >

> > > Message: Dr. Laibow,

> > > I agree and support you fight against Codex.

> > However regarding Baby

> > > M and other vaccination issues, I feel you are

> > contributing to the

> > > creation pandemic-type fear. I have been a

> > pediatrician for 10 years

> > > and I have concerns regarding vaccinations.

> > However, given a mother

> > > who was positive for Hepatitis B antigen x 2

> > tests, I would also have

> > > mandated vaccinating the baby within the

> > advised 12 hours to protect

> > > that baby against developing chronic Hepatitis

> > B. By preoomoting

> > > such one-sided purely sensationalistic type

> > stories, you potentially

> > > loose credibility for your true cause. Please

> > take this into

> > > cconsideration.

> > > Please keep up your fight against Codex.

> > > Sincerly,

> > > Erlich, M.D.

> > >

> > >

> >

> >

> >

> >

>

>

> “THE ANSWER FOR 1984 IS 1776”

>

>

>

________________________________________________________________________________\

____

> Be a better friend, newshound, and

> know-it-all with Mobile. Try it now.

http://mobile./;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ

>

>

[Guest guest]

The Oath has been replaced by a complex Code of Ethics

http://www.ama-assn.org/ama/pub/category/2498.html

R

- Baby M - forced vaccination

> > >

> > > Phone (optional):

> > >

> > > Message: Dr. Laibow,

> > > I agree and support you fight against Codex.

> > However regarding Baby

> > > M and other vaccination issues, I feel you are

> > contributing to the

> > > creation pandemic-type fear. I have been a

> > pediatrician for 10 years

> > > and I have concerns regarding vaccinations.

> > However, given a mother

> > > who was positive for Hepatitis B antigen x 2

> > tests, I would also have

> > > mandated vaccinating the baby within the

> > advised 12 hours to protect

> > > that baby against developing chronic Hepatitis

> > B. By preoomoting

> > > such one-sided purely sensationalistic type

> > stories, you potentially

> > > loose credibility for your true cause. Please

> > take this into

> > > cconsideration.

> > > Please keep up your fight against Codex.

> > > Sincerly,

> > > Erlich, M.D.

> > >

> > >

> >

> >

> >

> >

>

>

> “THE ANSWER FOR 1984 IS 1776”

>

>

>

________________________________________________________________________________\

____

> Be a better friend, newshound, and

> know-it-all with Mobile. Try it now.

http://mobile./;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ

>

>

[Guest guest]

Maybe this article will give Dr. Erlich some food for thought

http://ffitz.com/nyvic/health/hep-b/sword.htm

Even if the mother in this particular case tested positive for Hepatitis B

antigens, it still doesn't justify violating her basic human rights and that

of her baby and to vaccinate the child without her explicit and INFORMED

consent, which constitutes a violation of the Nuremberg Code.

Another word of caution: earlier on I reported on Novartis' new OPTAFLU

vaccine in the making, which according to their product information sheet

may give a false positive HIV reading. Now then, the flu itself and

pregnancy may do the same, which explains why the Mengele clones in New

Jersey intend to or have already mandated HIV testing for pregnant women. Go

figure!! The multi-billion coffers of the AIDS industry will flow over in no

time.

Ingrid Blank/South Africa

I'd like to second Dr. Rima's health freedom concerns about vaccination.

What I'd like to point out to Dr. Erlich and other medical professionals is

their sworn duty to " do no harm. " The World Medical Association in adopting

the Declaration of Helsinki went on record that health care providers MUST

have fully informed consent before medicating anyone. This international

ethical norm is being ignored by the vaccine drug pushers.

The medical profession must take the lead in holding US national and state

authorities to these minimal international standards. Basic human rights are

at stake here.

Further, those professionals in our society whose job it is to analyze risk,

the insurance professionals, have analyzed the risks of vaccination and have

determined vaccination to be an uninsurable risk. Usually all risks are

insurable at some insurance rate: if you want to sky dive, for example, you

can get insured, but at a higher premium.

Not so with vaccination. THERE IS NO RATE AT WHICH THE RISK OF VACCINATION

INJURY CAN BE MANAGED BY INSURANCE. As with nuclear power, the other major

uninsurable risk in our economy, Congress passed special legislation

exempting

the vaccine drug pushers from liability for the harm they cause.

I strongly believe it is unethical for physicians to recommend uninsurable

procedures to their patients. Even more unethical for doctors to cooperate

with the authorities when they mandate such dangerous procedures. What do

you

think, doctors?

When physicians cooperated with the psuedoscience of the Nazi they were

rightly condemned as war criminals; when physicians cooperated with the

anti-human " psychology " of the Soviet Union they were rightly condemned as

human rights violators. What about physicians, like the former NJ

Commissioner

of " Health " (who had a JD in addition to his MD) who push dangerous drugs on

children... what are they?

Ralph Fucetola JD

- Baby M - forced vaccination

>

> Phone (optional):

>

> Message: Dr. Laibow,

> I agree and support you fight against Codex. However regarding Baby

> M and other vaccination issues, I feel you are contributing to the

> creation pandemic-type fear. I have been a pediatrician for 10 years

> and I have concerns regarding vaccinations. However, given a mother

> who was positive for Hepatitis B antigen x 2 tests, I would also have

> mandated vaccinating the baby within the advised 12 hours to protect

> that baby against developing chronic Hepatitis B. By preoomoting

> such one-sided purely sensationalistic type stories, you potentially

> loose credibility for your true cause. Please take this into

> cconsideration.

> Please keep up your fight against Codex.

> Sincerly,

> Erlich, M.D.

>

>

[Guest guest]

Maybe this article will give Dr. Erlich some food for thought

http://ffitz.com/nyvic/health/hep-b/sword.htm

Even if the mother in this particular case tested positive for Hepatitis B

antigens, it still doesn't justify violating her basic human rights and that

of her baby and to vaccinate the child without her explicit and INFORMED

consent, which constitutes a violation of the Nuremberg Code.

Another word of caution: earlier on I reported on Novartis' new OPTAFLU

vaccine in the making, which according to their product information sheet

may give a false positive HIV reading. Now then, the flu itself and

pregnancy may do the same, which explains why the Mengele clones in New

Jersey intend to or have already mandated HIV testing for pregnant women. Go

figure!! The multi-billion coffers of the AIDS industry will flow over in no

time.

Ingrid Blank/South Africa

I'd like to second Dr. Rima's health freedom concerns about vaccination.

What I'd like to point out to Dr. Erlich and other medical professionals is

their sworn duty to " do no harm. " The World Medical Association in adopting

the Declaration of Helsinki went on record that health care providers MUST

have fully informed consent before medicating anyone. This international

ethical norm is being ignored by the vaccine drug pushers.

The medical profession must take the lead in holding US national and state

authorities to these minimal international standards. Basic human rights are

at stake here.

Further, those professionals in our society whose job it is to analyze risk,

the insurance professionals, have analyzed the risks of vaccination and have

determined vaccination to be an uninsurable risk. Usually all risks are

insurable at some insurance rate: if you want to sky dive, for example, you

can get insured, but at a higher premium.

Not so with vaccination. THERE IS NO RATE AT WHICH THE RISK OF VACCINATION

INJURY CAN BE MANAGED BY INSURANCE. As with nuclear power, the other major

uninsurable risk in our economy, Congress passed special legislation

exempting

the vaccine drug pushers from liability for the harm they cause.

I strongly believe it is unethical for physicians to recommend uninsurable

procedures to their patients. Even more unethical for doctors to cooperate

with the authorities when they mandate such dangerous procedures. What do

you

think, doctors?

When physicians cooperated with the psuedoscience of the Nazi they were

rightly condemned as war criminals; when physicians cooperated with the

anti-human " psychology " of the Soviet Union they were rightly condemned as

human rights violators. What about physicians, like the former NJ

Commissioner

of " Health " (who had a JD in addition to his MD) who push dangerous drugs on

children... what are they?

Ralph Fucetola JD

- Baby M - forced vaccination

>

> Phone (optional):

>

> Message: Dr. Laibow,

> I agree and support you fight against Codex. However regarding Baby

> M and other vaccination issues, I feel you are contributing to the

> creation pandemic-type fear. I have been a pediatrician for 10 years

> and I have concerns regarding vaccinations. However, given a mother

> who was positive for Hepatitis B antigen x 2 tests, I would also have

> mandated vaccinating the baby within the advised 12 hours to protect

> that baby against developing chronic Hepatitis B. By preoomoting

> such one-sided purely sensationalistic type stories, you potentially

> loose credibility for your true cause. Please take this into

> cconsideration.

> Please keep up your fight against Codex.

> Sincerly,

> Erlich, M.D.

>

>