Guest guest Posted November 2, 2004 Report Share Posted November 2, 2004 http://www.examiner.ie/pport/web/opinion/Full_Story/did-sgniav6AVPIVYsg7IQHSmeYh\ NE.asp 01/11/04 Addressing the real causes of mental pain I WOULD like to respond to Hyland’s letter (Irish Examiner, October 25) in which my view that genetics do not play a significant role in behaviour or in ‘mental illness’ was criticised. The scientific evidence in support of ’s view is very sketchy indeed and far from conclusive. I would acknowledge though that some people may have a genetic predisposition towards certain behavioural or emotional problems. Some studies have suggested this but there is no convincing evidence as yet. I believe that societal/environmental factors exert a far greater influence and that these problems are best addressed through counselling and caring or supportive services. Neurotoxic and disabling psychiatric drug ‘treatments’ do not address these problems though, as they largely have a mental and emotional deadening effect. There is no evidence that they correct brain chemical imbalances which psychiatry believes is a primary cause of what it would judge to be ‘mental illness’. The chemical imbalance theory is unfounded because we have no understanding of what constitutes a chemically-balanced brain in the first place. Hyland should also remember that psychiatry has never been able to prove a biological cause to even one of the so-called behavioural disorders or mental illnesses. Psychiatry’s inference that psychiatric patients are genetically defective or are suffering from a brain chemical imbalance is one that must be challenged. A social and humanistic model of psychiatry which addresses the real causes of their mental and emotional pain is, I believe, the best way forward. Instead of negating people’s life experiences, it would give this primary importance. The profits and prestige of the psychiatric-pharmaceutical complex would simply not feature. Fleming, Leafonney Cottage, Kilglass, Co. Sligo Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 2, 2004 Report Share Posted November 2, 2004 So do I. There are still psychiatrists who refuse to acknowledge the role of early childhood trauma and the onset of mental illness (which is really mental injury) in adulthood. These morons completely overlook the reality of the attachment bond between child and family and as a result completely overlook and ignore the mental illness that results when these early attachment bonds are interrupted or never form; not to mention the actual brain damage that occurs when a child is violently abused. " Some studies have suggested this but there is no convincing evidence as yet. I believe that societal/environmental factors exert a far greater influence and that these problems are best addressed through counselling and caring or supportive services. " > http://www.examiner.ie/pport/web/opinion/Full_Story/did- sgniav6AVPIVYsg7IQHSmeYhNE.asp > > 01/11/04 > Addressing the real causes of mental pain > > I WOULD like to respond to Hyland's letter (Irish Examiner, October 25) in which my view that genetics do not play a significant role in behaviour or in `mental illness' was criticised. > > The scientific evidence in support of 's view is very sketchy indeed and far from conclusive. > > I would acknowledge though that some people may have a genetic predisposition towards certain behavioural or emotional problems. > > Some studies have suggested this but there is no convincing evidence as yet. I believe that societal/environmental factors exert a far greater influence and that these problems are best addressed through counselling and caring or supportive services. > > Neurotoxic and disabling psychiatric drug `treatments' do not address these problems though, as they largely have a mental and emotional deadening effect. > > > > > > There is no evidence that they correct brain chemical imbalances which psychiatry believes is a primary cause of what it would judge to be `mental illness'. The chemical imbalance theory is unfounded because we have no understanding of what constitutes a chemically- balanced brain in the first place. > > Hyland should also remember that psychiatry has never been able to prove a biological cause to even one of the so-called behavioural disorders or mental illnesses. > > Psychiatry's inference that psychiatric patients are genetically defective or are suffering from a brain chemical imbalance is one that must be challenged. > > A social and humanistic model of psychiatry which addresses the real causes of their mental and emotional pain is, I believe, the best way forward. Instead of negating people's life experiences, it would give this primary importance. The profits and prestige of the psychiatric-pharmaceutical complex would simply not feature. > > Fleming, > Leafonney Cottage, > Kilglass, > Co. Sligo > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 2, 2004 Report Share Posted November 2, 2004 So do I. There are still psychiatrists who refuse to acknowledge the role of early childhood trauma and the onset of mental illness (which is really mental injury) in adulthood. These morons completely overlook the reality of the attachment bond between child and family and as a result completely overlook and ignore the mental illness that results when these early attachment bonds are interrupted or never form; not to mention the actual brain damage that occurs when a child is violently abused. " Some studies have suggested this but there is no convincing evidence as yet. I believe that societal/environmental factors exert a far greater influence and that these problems are best addressed through counselling and caring or supportive services. " > http://www.examiner.ie/pport/web/opinion/Full_Story/did- sgniav6AVPIVYsg7IQHSmeYhNE.asp > > 01/11/04 > Addressing the real causes of mental pain > > I WOULD like to respond to Hyland's letter (Irish Examiner, October 25) in which my view that genetics do not play a significant role in behaviour or in `mental illness' was criticised. > > The scientific evidence in support of 's view is very sketchy indeed and far from conclusive. > > I would acknowledge though that some people may have a genetic predisposition towards certain behavioural or emotional problems. > > Some studies have suggested this but there is no convincing evidence as yet. I believe that societal/environmental factors exert a far greater influence and that these problems are best addressed through counselling and caring or supportive services. > > Neurotoxic and disabling psychiatric drug `treatments' do not address these problems though, as they largely have a mental and emotional deadening effect. > > > > > > There is no evidence that they correct brain chemical imbalances which psychiatry believes is a primary cause of what it would judge to be `mental illness'. The chemical imbalance theory is unfounded because we have no understanding of what constitutes a chemically- balanced brain in the first place. > > Hyland should also remember that psychiatry has never been able to prove a biological cause to even one of the so-called behavioural disorders or mental illnesses. > > Psychiatry's inference that psychiatric patients are genetically defective or are suffering from a brain chemical imbalance is one that must be challenged. > > A social and humanistic model of psychiatry which addresses the real causes of their mental and emotional pain is, I believe, the best way forward. Instead of negating people's life experiences, it would give this primary importance. The profits and prestige of the psychiatric-pharmaceutical complex would simply not feature. > > Fleming, > Leafonney Cottage, > Kilglass, > Co. Sligo > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.