Jump to content
RemedySpot.com

Warning, Gardasil may cause increased risk of cervical cancer

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Guest guest

Problem too is that even if they find what they say is evidence of HPV it

doesn't mean you have anything that is lasting. Many test positive

and later test negative.

too many lies about so-called viruses

Sheri

Warning, Gardasil may cause increased risk of cervical cancer

http://www.examiner.com/x-40801-Vaccines-Examiner~y2010m6d30-Warning-Gardasil-may-cause-increased-risk-of-cervical-cancer

Would you consent to giving your child a vaccine that caused an increased

risk of cancer? That may be exactly what you are doing when you consent

to Gardasil.

According to Information the manufacturer of this vaccine presented to

the FDA prior to approval, if a person has already been exposed to HPV 16

or 18 prior to injection Gardasil increases the risk of precancerous

lesions, or worse, by 44.6%. (See

VRBPAC Background document, bottom of page 13) This documentation was

presented on the 18th of May 2006.

That statement bears repeating, if you have been exposed to HPV 16 or

18 prior to injection and take the vaccine, you increase your risk of

precancerous lesions, or worse, by 44.6%.

Is this information advertised? No! This information was actually

presented to the FDA by Merck. It came from their own safety trials. The

FDA did not respond by recommending screening for HPV prior to

vaccination. The FDA did not even demand a warning be included in the

package insert.

Now, Merck's research is indicating that Gardasil may also 'provide

cross-protection' against other strains of HPV that are closely related

to HPV 16 and 18. (see this article on

Medpage Today) This means prior exposure to these additional

strains may pose an increased risk for cervical cancer also, if combined

with vaccination.

No one appears to be concerned with the increased risk of vaccination

combined with prior exposure, as long as you take the vaccine. You will

see no advertisements indicating the possibility of increased risk of the

very cancer this vaccine is supposed to help you avoid.

Government officials will not be informed of the potential danger. They

will be told HPV is the most common sexually transmitted virus in the

country and that it must be eradicated. They will be told this vaccine

should be mandatory.

As a consumer, you must protect yourself. If you are sexually

active or suspect you may have been exposed to HPV, ask your doctor to

screen for HPV prior to taking Gardasil. If he, or she, does not know

why, educate them. After all, it is your future at stake.

44.6% increased risk of cervical lesions/cancer; or HPV screening before

consenting to vaccination -- it is your decision. Please, make it an

informed one.

Sheri Nakken, R.N., MA, Hahnemannian

Homeopath

Vaccination Information & Choice Network, Washington State, USA

Vaccines -

http://vaccinationdangers.wordpress.com/ Homeopathy

http://homeopathycures.wordpress.com

Vaccine Dangers, Childhood Disease Classes & Homeopathy

Online/email courses - next classes start September 2010

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

This just makes me SICK!

>

> Problem too is that even if they find what they say is evidence of

> HPV it doesn't mean you have anything that is lasting. Many test

> positive and later test negative.

> too many lies about so-called viruses

> Sheri

>

>

> Warning, Gardasil may cause increased risk of cervical cancer

>

http://www.examiner.com/x-40801-Vaccines-Examiner~y2010m6d30-Warning-Gardasil-ma\

y-cause-increased-risk-of-cervical-cancer

>

>

> Would you consent to giving your child a vaccine that caused an

> increased risk of cancer? That may be exactly what you are doing when

> you consent to Gardasil.

>

> According to Information the manufacturer of this vaccine presented

> to the FDA prior to approval, if a person has already been exposed to

> HPV 16 or 18 prior to injection Gardasil increases the risk of

> precancerous lesions, or worse, by 44.6%. (See

> <http://www.fda.gov/ohrms/dockets/ac/06/briefing/2006-4222B3.pdf>VRBPAC

> Background document, bottom of page 13) This documentation was

> presented on the 18th of May 2006.

>

> That statement bears repeating, if you have been exposed to HPV 16 or

> 18 prior to injection and take the vaccine, you increase your risk of

> precancerous lesions, or worse, by 44.6%.

>

> Is this information advertised? No! This information was actually

> presented to the FDA by Merck. It came from their own safety trials.

> The FDA did not respond by recommending screening for HPV prior to

> vaccination. The FDA did not even demand a warning be included in the

> package insert.

>

> Now, Merck's research is indicating that Gardasil may also 'provide

> cross-protection' against other strains of HPV that are closely

> related to HPV 16 and 18. (see this article on

> <http://www.medpagetoday.com/MeetingCoverage/ICAAC/6730>Medpage

> Today) This means prior exposure to these additional strains may pose

> an increased risk for cervical cancer also, if combined with vaccination.

>

> No one appears to be concerned with the increased risk of vaccination

> combined with prior exposure, as long as you take the vaccine. You

> will see no advertisements indicating the possibility of increased

> risk of the very cancer this vaccine is supposed to help you avoid.

>

> Government officials will not be informed of the potential danger.

> They will be told HPV is the most common sexually transmitted virus

> in the country and that it must be eradicated. They will be told this

> vaccine should be mandatory.

>

> As a consumer, you must protect yourself. If you are sexually active

> or suspect you may have been exposed to HPV, ask your doctor to

> screen for HPV prior to taking Gardasil. If he, or she, does not know

> why, educate them. After all, it is your future at stake.

>

> 44.6% increased risk of cervical lesions/cancer; or HPV screening

> before consenting to vaccination -- it is your decision. Please, make

> it an informed one.

>

> Sheri Nakken, R.N., MA, Hahnemannian Homeopath

> Vaccination Information & Choice Network, Washington State, USA

> Vaccines - http://vaccinationdangers.wordpress.com/ Homeopathy

> http://homeopathycures.wordpress.com

> Vaccine Dangers, Childhood Disease Classes & Homeopathy Online/email

> courses - next classes start September 2010

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...