Jump to content
RemedySpot.com

Re: TARGET: Older Americans

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

what a horrible thing to say about her. I blame the Republican party and their

ties to the pharmaceutical industry more than she. At least she cares for those

seniors more than Bush who only cares for the millionaire aged who have the most

of everything. Is it any wonder so many of us living on a fixed income fall

into depression? Mike in Dallas (originally from upstate NY---p.s.--Dallas

sucks). Try living on less than $600/mo. with no section 8. And Bush would

love nothing more than to have us all homeless or in an institution

Re: TARGET: Older Americans

In a message dated 9/30/04 7:16:29 AM Mountain Daylight Time,

SSRI medications <mailto:SSRI medications > writes:

> Sponsor: Sen Clinton, Hillary Rodham [NY] (introduced 6/24/2004)

> Cosponsors (2)

>

OMG! It's HER again!! UGH! I can't stand this woman, and it doesn't

surprise me AT ALL that she's a sponsor of this bill. This fat cow needs to

go back

to Arkansas. And take her junk-food eating philandering husband with her.

" Blind Reason "

a novel of pharmaceutical intrigue

Think your antidepressant is safe? Think again. It's

Unsafe At Any Dose

Link to comment
Share on other sites

what a horrible thing to say about her. I blame the Republican party and their

ties to the pharmaceutical industry more than she. At least she cares for those

seniors more than Bush who only cares for the millionaire aged who have the most

of everything. Is it any wonder so many of us living on a fixed income fall

into depression? Mike in Dallas (originally from upstate NY---p.s.--Dallas

sucks). Try living on less than $600/mo. with no section 8. And Bush would

love nothing more than to have us all homeless or in an institution

Re: TARGET: Older Americans

In a message dated 9/30/04 7:16:29 AM Mountain Daylight Time,

SSRI medications <mailto:SSRI medications > writes:

> Sponsor: Sen Clinton, Hillary Rodham [NY] (introduced 6/24/2004)

> Cosponsors (2)

>

OMG! It's HER again!! UGH! I can't stand this woman, and it doesn't

surprise me AT ALL that she's a sponsor of this bill. This fat cow needs to

go back

to Arkansas. And take her junk-food eating philandering husband with her.

" Blind Reason "

a novel of pharmaceutical intrigue

Think your antidepressant is safe? Think again. It's

Unsafe At Any Dose

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why is it okay to bash Bush but not Hilliary? I'm surprised to hear some

opponents of SSRIs who are actually aware of the great contributions the

Clinton's made to the current mess. I get the impression many think it is

all Bush and the Republicans like you Mike.

Gosh - how could anyone forget those who fought so nobly for FDA

requirements to be eased for faster, cheaper approval of new drugs? That

was actually part of the Clinton's campaign platform for those who have

forgotten or were never aware of in the first place. How could anyone

forget those who bought us the wonderful solution to rising health care

costs to be putting businessmen in charge of the doctors and our healthcare?

That's right - medical costs were to decrease by having businessmen

" approve " the doctors treatments!! They were going to catch doctors doing

things that were not necessary!! Yea right, they set up a system for

business men to just captilize more off of people's sickness and added one

more middle man to increase the total costs. How could anyone forget the

rendouvous meetings in Hole to solve the health care problems

wherein the doors were slammed to doctors and scientists to offer their

opinions on the problems and solutions? Who actually was included in those

meetings and the subsequent programs that evolved from them? Who

benefited? Pharmacia only!!

Of yes and lets not forget the NIH funding that was changed to be for

" finding cures " and next to nothing funded for basic research. Who needs to

know what really causes health problems? Oh yes, great public service from

philanthropists to cease funding to finding the cause of AIDS and only money

to finding " treatments " . And what happened to the scientists who were

speaking out at that time? Who do you think really benefited from her

" sincere " efforts Mike? Pharmacia - and not because she " cared " about the

elderly. In fact, her program that caused such uproar included NOT caring

for the elderly - she was going to save lots of money by letting old

people just die. Why prolong life of those already expended? At least that

is how Hilliary wrote it in her proposed healthcare reform program.

Sheezzz.

Re: TARGET: Older Americans

> In a message dated 9/30/04 7:16:29 AM Mountain Daylight Time,

> SSRI medications writes:

>

>

>> Sponsor: Sen Clinton, Hillary Rodham [NY] (introduced 6/24/2004)

>> Cosponsors (2)

>>

> OMG! It's HER again!! UGH! I can't stand this woman, and it doesn't

> surprise me AT ALL that she's a sponsor of this bill. This fat cow needs

> to go back

> to Arkansas. And take her junk-food eating philandering husband with her.

>

>

> " Blind Reason "

> a novel of pharmaceutical intrigue

> Think your antidepressant is safe? Think again. It's

> Unsafe At Any Dose

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why is it okay to bash Bush but not Hilliary? I'm surprised to hear some

opponents of SSRIs who are actually aware of the great contributions the

Clinton's made to the current mess. I get the impression many think it is

all Bush and the Republicans like you Mike.

Gosh - how could anyone forget those who fought so nobly for FDA

requirements to be eased for faster, cheaper approval of new drugs? That

was actually part of the Clinton's campaign platform for those who have

forgotten or were never aware of in the first place. How could anyone

forget those who bought us the wonderful solution to rising health care

costs to be putting businessmen in charge of the doctors and our healthcare?

That's right - medical costs were to decrease by having businessmen

" approve " the doctors treatments!! They were going to catch doctors doing

things that were not necessary!! Yea right, they set up a system for

business men to just captilize more off of people's sickness and added one

more middle man to increase the total costs. How could anyone forget the

rendouvous meetings in Hole to solve the health care problems

wherein the doors were slammed to doctors and scientists to offer their

opinions on the problems and solutions? Who actually was included in those

meetings and the subsequent programs that evolved from them? Who

benefited? Pharmacia only!!

Of yes and lets not forget the NIH funding that was changed to be for

" finding cures " and next to nothing funded for basic research. Who needs to

know what really causes health problems? Oh yes, great public service from

philanthropists to cease funding to finding the cause of AIDS and only money

to finding " treatments " . And what happened to the scientists who were

speaking out at that time? Who do you think really benefited from her

" sincere " efforts Mike? Pharmacia - and not because she " cared " about the

elderly. In fact, her program that caused such uproar included NOT caring

for the elderly - she was going to save lots of money by letting old

people just die. Why prolong life of those already expended? At least that

is how Hilliary wrote it in her proposed healthcare reform program.

Sheezzz.

Re: TARGET: Older Americans

> In a message dated 9/30/04 7:16:29 AM Mountain Daylight Time,

> SSRI medications writes:

>

>

>> Sponsor: Sen Clinton, Hillary Rodham [NY] (introduced 6/24/2004)

>> Cosponsors (2)

>>

> OMG! It's HER again!! UGH! I can't stand this woman, and it doesn't

> surprise me AT ALL that she's a sponsor of this bill. This fat cow needs

> to go back

> to Arkansas. And take her junk-food eating philandering husband with her.

>

>

> " Blind Reason "

> a novel of pharmaceutical intrigue

> Think your antidepressant is safe? Think again. It's

> Unsafe At Any Dose

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Both sides are neck deep in this mental health disaster.

It's not a Republican/Democrat issue as both sides have good and bad

idea's on mental health.

It's easy to bash the other side but it's not about sides anymore

it's about individual actions and the ramifications that follow.

I despise Kennedy for sitting on the Children's Medication Safety Act and

want to scream when I look over the TMAP and New Freedom Commission

on Mental Health that Bush has been planning for us since he was governor of

Texas.

At the same time the committee looking into the FDA is bi-partisan and doing

a good job.

I like to bash the individual doing the harm and not the political party.

Re: TARGET: Older Americans

>

>

> > In a message dated 9/30/04 7:16:29 AM Mountain Daylight Time,

> > SSRI medications writes:

> >

> >

> >> Sponsor: Sen Clinton, Hillary Rodham [NY] (introduced 6/24/2004)

> >> Cosponsors (2)

> >>

> > OMG! It's HER again!! UGH! I can't stand this woman, and it doesn't

> > surprise me AT ALL that she's a sponsor of this bill. This fat cow

needs

> > to go back

> > to Arkansas. And take her junk-food eating philandering husband with

her.

> >

> >

> > " Blind Reason "

> > a novel of pharmaceutical intrigue

> > Think your antidepressant is safe? Think again. It's

> > Unsafe At Any Dose

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...