Re: Re: British Medical Journal - response needed

[Guest guest]

Absolutely.That is correct.

That's the game they play.

It boosts their chances of getting into the kid's heads from 50% to 95%.

Re: British Medical Journal - response needed

>

>

> " if a parent does not return the consent form

> TeenScreen considers they have consented. "

>

>

> You mean, if the parent doesn't return the consent form stating that

> they DO NOT consent then consent is automatically implied.

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

[Guest guest]

Absolutely.That is correct.

That's the game they play.

It boosts their chances of getting into the kid's heads from 50% to 95%.

Re: British Medical Journal - response needed

>

>

> " if a parent does not return the consent form

> TeenScreen considers they have consented. "

>

>

> You mean, if the parent doesn't return the consent form stating that

> they DO NOT consent then consent is automatically implied.

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

[Guest guest]

You've hit the lunacy square on the head.

And this is happening without parents knowing what is really going on.

Re: British Medical Journal - response needed

>

>

> Isn't that like 'negative voting'????

>

> Doesn't it work the opposite way in government? ie. in government a

> proposal is put forward and people vote 'in favor' of it? They're not

> presumed to all be in favor unless someone is not in favor?

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

[Guest guest]

YES! It's called " passive consent " and since drugs are the " first line

defense " for depression and everything else many children will end up on

them. Then guess what happens if the parent disagrees with the diagnosis?

The state can take the children away from the parent. Go to wildestcolts

newsgroup and hear story after story of parents being forced by the state to

drug their children under threat of having the children taken away all over

the country. Aliah Gleason's story is the most perfect example. Screened at

school, goofed around with the answers and got taken from school by the

state because the parents didn't see any suicidality and her parents didn't

see her for 5 months. 5 months of 13 psychotropic medications at once and

repeated restraints for reacting to side effects of the drugs. 9 months to

get Aliah home. The whole time they were telling Aliah that her parents

didn't want to ever see her again.

Jim

" if a parent does not return the consent form

TeenScreen considers they have consented. "

You mean, if the parent doesn't return the consent form stating that

they DO NOT consent then consent is automatically implied.

[Guest guest]

YES! It's called " passive consent " and since drugs are the " first line

defense " for depression and everything else many children will end up on

them. Then guess what happens if the parent disagrees with the diagnosis?

The state can take the children away from the parent. Go to wildestcolts

newsgroup and hear story after story of parents being forced by the state to

drug their children under threat of having the children taken away all over

the country. Aliah Gleason's story is the most perfect example. Screened at

school, goofed around with the answers and got taken from school by the

state because the parents didn't see any suicidality and her parents didn't

see her for 5 months. 5 months of 13 psychotropic medications at once and

repeated restraints for reacting to side effects of the drugs. 9 months to

get Aliah home. The whole time they were telling Aliah that her parents

didn't want to ever see her again.

Jim

" if a parent does not return the consent form

TeenScreen considers they have consented. "

You mean, if the parent doesn't return the consent form stating that

they DO NOT consent then consent is automatically implied.

[Guest guest]

> Since when and WHY are drugs the 'first line' of

> 'defence' in treating

> depression in children???!!!

Since it is cheeper for the Insurance Co's.

Why..Because it is a quick fix.

__________________________________

- PC Magazine Editors' Choice 2005

http://mail.

[Guest guest]

> Since when and WHY are drugs the 'first line' of

> 'defence' in treating

> depression in children???!!!

Since it is cheeper for the Insurance Co's.

Why..Because it is a quick fix.

__________________________________

- PC Magazine Editors' Choice 2005

http://mail.

[Guest guest]

Hi Bow,

Antidepressants are recommended as " first line " treatments for all sorts of

things.....

http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/medicalnews.php?newsid=27760

http://www.guideline.gov/summary/summary.aspx?view_id=1 & doc_id=6007

First Line of Treatment

Use either antidepressant medication or psychotherapy as first line

treatment for mild to moderate Major Depressive Disorder (MDD).

http://www.ashp.org/news/ShowArticle.cfm?id=11855

So I'm looking for some old press where psychs are saying antidepressants

are a " First-Line " defense, treatment or whatever and all I see is a

complete antidepressant ass-whompin on google news!!!! I swear, There is

barely any pro-antidepressant press anywhere! Freakin amazing.

Aaahhh.... some days are just great

Jim

Since when and WHY are drugs the 'first line' of 'defence' in treating

depression in children???!!!

I always thought they were to be used only when therapy and behavior

modification didn't work (especially in children.)

Children are only just learning how to behave and relate in the world

whereas it is presumed that adults have already passed through this

stage of development and hence, drugs could be justified as one of the

first therapies for depression in adult populations where obviously

social adjustment issues are not thought to be the main problem.

[Guest guest]

Hi Bow,

Antidepressants are recommended as " first line " treatments for all sorts of

things.....

http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/medicalnews.php?newsid=27760

http://www.guideline.gov/summary/summary.aspx?view_id=1 & doc_id=6007

First Line of Treatment

Use either antidepressant medication or psychotherapy as first line

treatment for mild to moderate Major Depressive Disorder (MDD).

http://www.ashp.org/news/ShowArticle.cfm?id=11855

So I'm looking for some old press where psychs are saying antidepressants

are a " First-Line " defense, treatment or whatever and all I see is a

complete antidepressant ass-whompin on google news!!!! I swear, There is

barely any pro-antidepressant press anywhere! Freakin amazing.

Aaahhh.... some days are just great

Jim

Since when and WHY are drugs the 'first line' of 'defence' in treating

depression in children???!!!

I always thought they were to be used only when therapy and behavior

modification didn't work (especially in children.)

Children are only just learning how to behave and relate in the world

whereas it is presumed that adults have already passed through this

stage of development and hence, drugs could be justified as one of the

first therapies for depression in adult populations where obviously

social adjustment issues are not thought to be the main problem.