Woman special needs teacher jailed for six months for sexual relations with boy

[Guest guest]

,

We have had stories on this group of women doing things on antidepressants

that they would not normally do and later feeling very bad about it. I know

one fellow that was wealthy and doing fine with a stable marriage and a

little Paxil and he kicks his wife of 20 years out the door and changes the

locks, spends all their savings and takes up with a young floozy that was

just along for the ride. Went into debt by hundreds of thousands of dollars

which the wife was terrified she would be responsible for. The guy was a

lawyer and when they went to court he got slaughtered by the court. If he

wasn't acting without inhibitions I bet he wouldn't have dug such a deep

hole for himself. I never did investigate all these women that started

sexual relationships with young boys to see if they were on antidepressants

or some other psych drug but I remember at the time the general idea on the

list was they probably were.

Now I have noticed in the last ten years that young women at bars have

actually startled me with their aggresive sexual advances and these were

middle class kids. There is something to what you say there and while I

don't mind the idea of people being comfortable with their sexuality I have

to say that in every religion that's worth it's salt for eons have put forth

that sexual promiscuity causes all sorts of problems and is not very

pro-survival. Un-wed pregnancy, veneral disease, emotional harm and

especially when people are on drugs, murder. What a perfect way to control

the masses by giving them drugs that either kill the sex drive or make

people do things that are not in their best interest and not anything like

what they would normally do and keep the offspring in foster care owned by

the state, drugged up and out of commission.

Loss of inhibitions means loss of control for me and I don't think anyone

wants to be out of control, especially later when they have to face the

reality they find themselves in.

Jim

I don't believe a loss of inhibitions are the real

issue. I believe that women have come out of the

closet so to say, when it comes to sex, in the past 20

to 30 years. Women are saying they have just as much a

right to sex as men have always had and are not going

to hide the desire or fact anymore.

As far as the teacher and 16 year old boy goes,I

believe his mother did him more harm than the teacher

did (if any at all). I do not condone what she did,

but the boy was just a slow learner, and she was

slapped on the wrist for it as compared to a man. I do

have dual standards in these types of cases.

Are you men worring about a loss of inhibitions in men

or women?

john

--- cdvlcarpenter <cdvlcarpenter@...> wrote:

> Good question, I saw another incident in NJ a few

> weeks ago and I

> thought the same thing. The loss of inhibitions is a

> much larger

> problem than we can comprehend.

>

> Charlie

>

>

> > I wonder what antidepressant the teacher is on.

> >

> > Jim

> >

> > I believe that the " virgin " mother of the 16 year

> old

> > is over reacting.

> >

> > john

>

>

>

>

>

[Guest guest]

The romans believed women, by nature, could not

control their sexuality. It wasn't until n

times that sexuality in woman was seen as immoral. I

think this was fueled by fraudism. " Lay back and think

Of England " was advice give by , when asked

what to do on a wedding night. By the sixties, the

pendulam began to swing the other way, with the Pill

as the catalist. The genie has escaped the bottle, and

no one knows where the stopper is anymore.

Woman I talk to, and I am one (so I have a little

invested in my conclusions), feel torn by the

superwoman image. Full time job, perfect home, 2.5

kids (all going to Harvard or be sports hero's) and

the happy husband. They cant be tired, or unavalible

to the PTA. Sports on Saturday, Church on Sunday, that

little Happy pill is very tempting.

The mind set is shifted, So what if it can make a

night out on the town an adventure by lowering you

inhibitions. What happens on Ladys night stays on

Ladys night. Men have been doing it for years. What if

the only contact with males is through your job. You

feel like sixteen all over again, You feel " better

than well " , better than you have felt since you were a

teen. Where could that lead?

I am in no way justifing this womans actions, I think

she should be punished. The buck has to stop

somewhere, and right now it is not going to stop at

the drug co. table.

Maggs

(Getting of my soapbox now, and slinking away.. LOL)

> I don't believe a loss of inhibitions are the real

> issue. I believe that women have come out of the

> closet so to say, when it comes to sex, in the past

> 20

> to 30 years.

__________________________________

- PC Magazine Editors' Choice 2005

http://mail.

[Guest guest]

The romans believed women, by nature, could not

control their sexuality. It wasn't until n

times that sexuality in woman was seen as immoral. I

think this was fueled by fraudism. " Lay back and think

Of England " was advice give by , when asked

what to do on a wedding night. By the sixties, the

pendulam began to swing the other way, with the Pill

as the catalist. The genie has escaped the bottle, and

no one knows where the stopper is anymore.

Woman I talk to, and I am one (so I have a little

invested in my conclusions), feel torn by the

superwoman image. Full time job, perfect home, 2.5

kids (all going to Harvard or be sports hero's) and

the happy husband. They cant be tired, or unavalible

to the PTA. Sports on Saturday, Church on Sunday, that

little Happy pill is very tempting.

The mind set is shifted, So what if it can make a

night out on the town an adventure by lowering you

inhibitions. What happens on Ladys night stays on

Ladys night. Men have been doing it for years. What if

the only contact with males is through your job. You

feel like sixteen all over again, You feel " better

than well " , better than you have felt since you were a

teen. Where could that lead?

I am in no way justifing this womans actions, I think

she should be punished. The buck has to stop

somewhere, and right now it is not going to stop at

the drug co. table.

Maggs

(Getting of my soapbox now, and slinking away.. LOL)

> I don't believe a loss of inhibitions are the real

> issue. I believe that women have come out of the

> closet so to say, when it comes to sex, in the past

> 20

> to 30 years.

__________________________________

- PC Magazine Editors' Choice 2005

http://mail.

[Guest guest]

The romans believed women, by nature, could not

control their sexuality. It wasn't until n

times that sexuality in woman was seen as immoral. I

think this was fueled by fraudism. " Lay back and think

Of England " was advice give by , when asked

what to do on a wedding night. By the sixties, the

pendulam began to swing the other way, with the Pill

as the catalist. The genie has escaped the bottle, and

no one knows where the stopper is anymore.

Woman I talk to, and I am one (so I have a little

invested in my conclusions), feel torn by the

superwoman image. Full time job, perfect home, 2.5

kids (all going to Harvard or be sports hero's) and

the happy husband. They cant be tired, or unavalible

to the PTA. Sports on Saturday, Church on Sunday, that

little Happy pill is very tempting.

The mind set is shifted, So what if it can make a

night out on the town an adventure by lowering you

inhibitions. What happens on Ladys night stays on

Ladys night. Men have been doing it for years. What if

the only contact with males is through your job. You

feel like sixteen all over again, You feel " better

than well " , better than you have felt since you were a

teen. Where could that lead?

I am in no way justifing this womans actions, I think

she should be punished. The buck has to stop

somewhere, and right now it is not going to stop at

the drug co. table.

Maggs

(Getting of my soapbox now, and slinking away.. LOL)

> I don't believe a loss of inhibitions are the real

> issue. I believe that women have come out of the

> closet so to say, when it comes to sex, in the past

> 20

> to 30 years.

__________________________________

- PC Magazine Editors' Choice 2005

http://mail.

[Guest guest]

The romans believed women, by nature, could not

control their sexuality. It wasn't until n

times that sexuality in woman was seen as immoral. I

think this was fueled by fraudism. " Lay back and think

Of England " was advice give by , when asked

what to do on a wedding night. By the sixties, the

pendulam began to swing the other way, with the Pill

as the catalist. The genie has escaped the bottle, and

no one knows where the stopper is anymore.

Woman I talk to, and I am one (so I have a little

invested in my conclusions), feel torn by the

superwoman image. Full time job, perfect home, 2.5

kids (all going to Harvard or be sports hero's) and

the happy husband. They cant be tired, or unavalible

to the PTA. Sports on Saturday, Church on Sunday, that

little Happy pill is very tempting.

The mind set is shifted, So what if it can make a

night out on the town an adventure by lowering you

inhibitions. What happens on Ladys night stays on

Ladys night. Men have been doing it for years. What if

the only contact with males is through your job. You

feel like sixteen all over again, You feel " better

than well " , better than you have felt since you were a

teen. Where could that lead?

I am in no way justifing this womans actions, I think

she should be punished. The buck has to stop

somewhere, and right now it is not going to stop at

the drug co. table.

Maggs

(Getting of my soapbox now, and slinking away.. LOL)

> I don't believe a loss of inhibitions are the real

> issue. I believe that women have come out of the

> closet so to say, when it comes to sex, in the past

> 20

> to 30 years.

__________________________________

- PC Magazine Editors' Choice 2005

http://mail.

[Guest guest]

When I said loss of inhibition I did not mean just sexual inhibition

although I do see that as a very serious problem.

Main Entry: in·hi·bi·tion

Pronunciation: " in-h & -'bi-sh & n, " i-n & -

Function: noun

1 a : the act of inhibiting : the state of being inhibited b :

something that forbids, debars, or restricts

2 : an inner impediment to free activity, expression, or functioning:

as a : a psychic activity imposing restraint upon another activity

I personally believe that in order for these drugs to get someone to

the point they either attempt or commit suicide (for example) there

must be that level of disinhibition. If that is the case then what

kind of behavior is off limits, what kind of behavior can they not

alter?

Charlie

> > > > > I wonder what antidepressant the teacher is

> > on.

> > > > >

> > > > > Jim

> > > > >

> > > > > I believe that the " virgin " mother of the 16

> > year

> > > > old

> > > > > is over reacting.

> > > > >

> > > > > john

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

[Guest guest]

When I said loss of inhibition I did not mean just sexual inhibition

although I do see that as a very serious problem.

Main Entry: in·hi·bi·tion

Pronunciation: " in-h & -'bi-sh & n, " i-n & -

Function: noun

1 a : the act of inhibiting : the state of being inhibited b :

something that forbids, debars, or restricts

2 : an inner impediment to free activity, expression, or functioning:

as a : a psychic activity imposing restraint upon another activity

I personally believe that in order for these drugs to get someone to

the point they either attempt or commit suicide (for example) there

must be that level of disinhibition. If that is the case then what

kind of behavior is off limits, what kind of behavior can they not

alter?

Charlie

> > > > > I wonder what antidepressant the teacher is

> > on.

> > > > >

> > > > > Jim

> > > > >

> > > > > I believe that the " virgin " mother of the 16

> > year

> > > > old

> > > > > is over reacting.

> > > > >

> > > > > john

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

[Guest guest]

Extremely good point. Maggs too. Part of being sane is knowing when to

restrain yourself otherwise we would all be beating our children, grabbing

someone's butt, telling our boss to spin on it and eating and screwing

ourselfs to death. The end of society and culture would most likely ensue in

the mayhem. Road rage would be an epidemic.

Not a pleasant thought especially with all the guns laying around.

Interesting angle for a Science Fiction story though

Jim

When I said loss of inhibition I did not mean just sexual inhibition

although I do see that as a very serious problem.

Main Entry: in·hi·bi·tion

Pronunciation: " in-h & -'bi-sh & n, " i-n & -

Function: noun

1 a : the act of inhibiting : the state of being inhibited b :

something that forbids, debars, or restricts

2 : an inner impediment to free activity, expression, or functioning:

as a : a psychic activity imposing restraint upon another activity

I personally believe that in order for these drugs to get someone to

the point they either attempt or commit suicide (for example) there

must be that level of disinhibition. If that is the case then what

kind of behavior is off limits, what kind of behavior can they not

alter?

Charlie

> > > > > I wonder what antidepressant the teacher is

> > on.

> > > > >

> > > > > Jim

> > > > >

> > > > > I believe that the " virgin " mother of the 16

> > year

> > > > old

> > > > > is over reacting.

> > > > >

> > > > > john

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

[Guest guest]

Extremely good point. Maggs too. Part of being sane is knowing when to

restrain yourself otherwise we would all be beating our children, grabbing

someone's butt, telling our boss to spin on it and eating and screwing

ourselfs to death. The end of society and culture would most likely ensue in

the mayhem. Road rage would be an epidemic.

Not a pleasant thought especially with all the guns laying around.

Interesting angle for a Science Fiction story though

Jim

When I said loss of inhibition I did not mean just sexual inhibition

although I do see that as a very serious problem.

Main Entry: in·hi·bi·tion

Pronunciation: " in-h & -'bi-sh & n, " i-n & -

Function: noun

1 a : the act of inhibiting : the state of being inhibited b :

something that forbids, debars, or restricts

2 : an inner impediment to free activity, expression, or functioning:

as a : a psychic activity imposing restraint upon another activity

I personally believe that in order for these drugs to get someone to

the point they either attempt or commit suicide (for example) there

must be that level of disinhibition. If that is the case then what

kind of behavior is off limits, what kind of behavior can they not

alter?

Charlie

> > > > > I wonder what antidepressant the teacher is

> > on.

> > > > >

> > > > > Jim

> > > > >

> > > > > I believe that the " virgin " mother of the 16

> > year

> > > > old

> > > > > is over reacting.

> > > > >

> > > > > john

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

[Guest guest]

Extremely good point. Maggs too. Part of being sane is knowing when to

restrain yourself otherwise we would all be beating our children, grabbing

someone's butt, telling our boss to spin on it and eating and screwing

ourselfs to death. The end of society and culture would most likely ensue in

the mayhem. Road rage would be an epidemic.

Not a pleasant thought especially with all the guns laying around.

Interesting angle for a Science Fiction story though

Jim

When I said loss of inhibition I did not mean just sexual inhibition

although I do see that as a very serious problem.

Main Entry: in·hi·bi·tion

Pronunciation: " in-h & -'bi-sh & n, " i-n & -

Function: noun

1 a : the act of inhibiting : the state of being inhibited b :

something that forbids, debars, or restricts

2 : an inner impediment to free activity, expression, or functioning:

as a : a psychic activity imposing restraint upon another activity

I personally believe that in order for these drugs to get someone to

the point they either attempt or commit suicide (for example) there

must be that level of disinhibition. If that is the case then what

kind of behavior is off limits, what kind of behavior can they not

alter?

Charlie

> > > > > I wonder what antidepressant the teacher is

> > on.

> > > > >

> > > > > Jim

> > > > >

> > > > > I believe that the " virgin " mother of the 16

> > year

> > > > old

> > > > > is over reacting.

> > > > >

> > > > > john

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

[Guest guest]

Extremely good point. Maggs too. Part of being sane is knowing when to

restrain yourself otherwise we would all be beating our children, grabbing

someone's butt, telling our boss to spin on it and eating and screwing

ourselfs to death. The end of society and culture would most likely ensue in

the mayhem. Road rage would be an epidemic.

Not a pleasant thought especially with all the guns laying around.

Interesting angle for a Science Fiction story though

Jim

When I said loss of inhibition I did not mean just sexual inhibition

although I do see that as a very serious problem.

Main Entry: in·hi·bi·tion

Pronunciation: " in-h & -'bi-sh & n, " i-n & -

Function: noun

1 a : the act of inhibiting : the state of being inhibited b :

something that forbids, debars, or restricts

2 : an inner impediment to free activity, expression, or functioning:

as a : a psychic activity imposing restraint upon another activity

I personally believe that in order for these drugs to get someone to

the point they either attempt or commit suicide (for example) there

must be that level of disinhibition. If that is the case then what

kind of behavior is off limits, what kind of behavior can they not

alter?

Charlie

> > > > > I wonder what antidepressant the teacher is

> > on.

> > > > >

> > > > > Jim

> > > > >

> > > > > I believe that the " virgin " mother of the 16

> > year

> > > > old

> > > > > is over reacting.

> > > > >

> > > > > john

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

[Guest guest]

OK, so I got off on the wrong track, but again I say

any psychotropic/neuroleptic drug and pain pills can

cause your lose of inhibitions; not just the SSRI

drugs.

This lose of inhibitions with drugs has been around

for years.

I am not defending the SSRI drugs.

It appears that you are saying, that SSRI drugs have

made the situation worse. I can not debate this at all

for lack of good statistics.

john

--- cdvlcarpenter <cdvlcarpenter@...> wrote:

> When I said loss of inhibition I did not mean just

> sexual inhibition

> although I do see that as a very serious problem.

>

> Main Entry: in·hi·bi·tion

> Pronunciation: " in-h & -'bi-sh & n, " i-n & -

> Function: noun

> 1 a : the act of inhibiting : the state of being

> inhibited b :

> something that forbids, debars, or restricts

> 2 : an inner impediment to free activity,

> expression, or functioning:

> as a : a psychic activity imposing restraint upon

> another activity

>

> I personally believe that in order for these drugs

> to get someone to

> the point they either attempt or commit suicide (for

> example) there

> must be that level of disinhibition. If that is the

> case then what

> kind of behavior is off limits, what kind of

> behavior can they not

> alter?

>

> Charlie

>

>

>

>

> > > > > > I wonder what antidepressant the teacher

> is

> > > on.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Jim

> > > > > >

> > > > > > I believe that the " virgin " mother of the

> 16

> > > year

> > > > > old

> > > > > > is over reacting.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > john

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

[Guest guest]

OK, so I got off on the wrong track, but again I say

any psychotropic/neuroleptic drug and pain pills can

cause your lose of inhibitions; not just the SSRI

drugs.

This lose of inhibitions with drugs has been around

for years.

I am not defending the SSRI drugs.

It appears that you are saying, that SSRI drugs have

made the situation worse. I can not debate this at all

for lack of good statistics.

john

--- cdvlcarpenter <cdvlcarpenter@...> wrote:

> When I said loss of inhibition I did not mean just

> sexual inhibition

> although I do see that as a very serious problem.

>

> Main Entry: in·hi·bi·tion

> Pronunciation: " in-h & -'bi-sh & n, " i-n & -

> Function: noun

> 1 a : the act of inhibiting : the state of being

> inhibited b :

> something that forbids, debars, or restricts

> 2 : an inner impediment to free activity,

> expression, or functioning:

> as a : a psychic activity imposing restraint upon

> another activity

>

> I personally believe that in order for these drugs

> to get someone to

> the point they either attempt or commit suicide (for

> example) there

> must be that level of disinhibition. If that is the

> case then what

> kind of behavior is off limits, what kind of

> behavior can they not

> alter?

>

> Charlie

>

>

>

>

> > > > > > I wonder what antidepressant the teacher

> is

> > > on.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Jim

> > > > > >

> > > > > > I believe that the " virgin " mother of the

> 16

> > > year

> > > > > old

> > > > > > is over reacting.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > john

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

[Guest guest]

Jim,

I don't disagree with you.

My son, who has been on Paxil for 3 years, got a

divorce and almost lost his business. He is still on

the Paxil, but is starting to get things turned

around. I wish he had never started the Paxil and I

wish he would give it up.

Of course the witch who somehow spent his money is out

of the picture. He has a new lady friend.

My ex-wife took Paxil for 3 months and then quit cold

turkey. She said it did nothing for her.

I am not sure if I would give Paxil to the devil.

john

--- Jim <mofunnow@...> wrote:

> ,

>

> We have had stories on this group of women doing

> things on antidepressants

> that they would not normally do and later feeling

> very bad about it. I know

> one fellow that was wealthy and doing fine with a

> stable marriage and a

> little Paxil and he kicks his wife of 20 years out

> the door and changes the

> locks, spends all their savings and takes up with a

> young floozy that was

> just along for the ride. Went into debt by hundreds

> of thousands of dollars

> which the wife was terrified she would be

> responsible for. The guy was a

> lawyer and when they went to court he got

> slaughtered by the court. If he

> wasn't acting without inhibitions I bet he wouldn't

> have dug such a deep

> hole for himself. I never did investigate all these

> women that started

> sexual relationships with young boys to see if they

> were on antidepressants

> or some other psych drug but I remember at the time

> the general idea on the

> list was they probably were.

>

> Now I have noticed in the last ten years that young

> women at bars have

> actually startled me with their aggresive sexual

> advances and these were

> middle class kids. There is something to what you

> say there and while I

> don't mind the idea of people being comfortable with

> their sexuality I have

> to say that in every religion that's worth it's salt

> for eons have put forth

> that sexual promiscuity causes all sorts of problems

> and is not very

> pro-survival. Un-wed pregnancy, veneral disease,

> emotional harm and

> especially when people are on drugs, murder. What a

> perfect way to control

> the masses by giving them drugs that either kill the

> sex drive or make

> people do things that are not in their best interest

> and not anything like

> what they would normally do and keep the offspring

> in foster care owned by

> the state, drugged up and out of commission.

>

> Loss of inhibitions means loss of control for me and

> I don't think anyone

> wants to be out of control, especially later when

> they have to face the

> reality they find themselves in.

>

> Jim

>

> I don't believe a loss of inhibitions are the real

> issue. I believe that women have come out of the

> closet so to say, when it comes to sex, in the past

> 20

> to 30 years. Women are saying they have just as much

> a

> right to sex as men have always had and are not

> going

> to hide the desire or fact anymore.

>

> As far as the teacher and 16 year old boy goes,I

> believe his mother did him more harm than the

> teacher

> did (if any at all). I do not condone what she did,

> but the boy was just a slow learner, and she was

> slapped on the wrist for it as compared to a man. I

> do

> have dual standards in these types of cases.

>

> Are you men worring about a loss of inhibitions in

> men

> or women?

>

> john

>

> --- cdvlcarpenter <cdvlcarpenter@...> wrote:

>

> > Good question, I saw another incident in NJ a few

> > weeks ago and I

> > thought the same thing. The loss of inhibitions is

> a

> > much larger

> > problem than we can comprehend.

> >

> > Charlie

> >

> >

> > > I wonder what antidepressant the teacher is on.

> > >

> > > Jim

> > >

> > > I believe that the " virgin " mother of the 16

> year

> > old

> > > is over reacting.

> > >

> > > john

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

[Guest guest]

> I am not sure if I would give Paxil to the devil.

You don't have to he's already in the pills

Charlie

> > > > I wonder what antidepressant the teacher is on.

> > > >

> > > > Jim

> > > >

> > > > I believe that the " virgin " mother of the 16

> > year

> > > old

> > > > is over reacting.

> > > >

> > > > john

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

[Guest guest]

> I am not sure if I would give Paxil to the devil.

You don't have to he's already in the pills

Charlie

> > > > I wonder what antidepressant the teacher is on.

> > > >

> > > > Jim

> > > >

> > > > I believe that the " virgin " mother of the 16

> > year

> > > old

> > > > is over reacting.

> > > >

> > > > john

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

[Guest guest]

> I am not sure if I would give Paxil to the devil.

You don't have to he's already in the pills

Charlie

> > > > I wonder what antidepressant the teacher is on.

> > > >

> > > > Jim

> > > >

> > > > I believe that the " virgin " mother of the 16

> > year

> > > old

> > > > is over reacting.

> > > >

> > > > john

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

[Guest guest]

> I am not sure if I would give Paxil to the devil.

You don't have to he's already in the pills

Charlie

> > > > I wonder what antidepressant the teacher is on.

> > > >

> > > > Jim

> > > >

> > > > I believe that the " virgin " mother of the 16

> > year

> > > old

> > > > is over reacting.

> > > >

> > > > john

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

[Guest guest]

In solidarity!

Jim

Jim,

I don't disagree with you.

My son, who has been on Paxil for 3 years, got a

divorce and almost lost his business. He is still on

the Paxil, but is starting to get things turned

around. I wish he had never started the Paxil and I

wish he would give it up.

Of course the witch who somehow spent his money is out

of the picture. He has a new lady friend.

My ex-wife took Paxil for 3 months and then quit cold

turkey. She said it did nothing for her.

I am not sure if I would give Paxil to the devil.

john

--- Jim <mofunnow@...> wrote:

> ,

>

> We have had stories on this group of women doing

> things on antidepressants

> that they would not normally do and later feeling

> very bad about it. I know

> one fellow that was wealthy and doing fine with a

> stable marriage and a

> little Paxil and he kicks his wife of 20 years out

> the door and changes the

> locks, spends all their savings and takes up with a

> young floozy that was

> just along for the ride. Went into debt by hundreds

> of thousands of dollars

> which the wife was terrified she would be

> responsible for. The guy was a

> lawyer and when they went to court he got

> slaughtered by the court. If he

> wasn't acting without inhibitions I bet he wouldn't

> have dug such a deep

> hole for himself. I never did investigate all these

> women that started

> sexual relationships with young boys to see if they

> were on antidepressants

> or some other psych drug but I remember at the time

> the general idea on the

> list was they probably were.

>

> Now I have noticed in the last ten years that young

> women at bars have

> actually startled me with their aggresive sexual

> advances and these were

> middle class kids. There is something to what you

> say there and while I

> don't mind the idea of people being comfortable with

> their sexuality I have

> to say that in every religion that's worth it's salt

> for eons have put forth

> that sexual promiscuity causes all sorts of problems

> and is not very

> pro-survival. Un-wed pregnancy, veneral disease,

> emotional harm and

> especially when people are on drugs, murder. What a

> perfect way to control

> the masses by giving them drugs that either kill the

> sex drive or make

> people do things that are not in their best interest

> and not anything like

> what they would normally do and keep the offspring

> in foster care owned by

> the state, drugged up and out of commission.

>

> Loss of inhibitions means loss of control for me and

> I don't think anyone

> wants to be out of control, especially later when

> they have to face the

> reality they find themselves in.

>

> Jim

>

> I don't believe a loss of inhibitions are the real

> issue. I believe that women have come out of the

> closet so to say, when it comes to sex, in the past

> 20

> to 30 years. Women are saying they have just as much

> a

> right to sex as men have always had and are not

> going

> to hide the desire or fact anymore.

>

> As far as the teacher and 16 year old boy goes,I

> believe his mother did him more harm than the

> teacher

> did (if any at all). I do not condone what she did,

> but the boy was just a slow learner, and she was

> slapped on the wrist for it as compared to a man. I

> do

> have dual standards in these types of cases.

>

> Are you men worring about a loss of inhibitions in

> men

> or women?

>

> john

>

> --- cdvlcarpenter <cdvlcarpenter@...> wrote:

>

> > Good question, I saw another incident in NJ a few

> > weeks ago and I

> > thought the same thing. The loss of inhibitions is

> a

> > much larger

> > problem than we can comprehend.

> >

> > Charlie

> >

> >

> > > I wonder what antidepressant the teacher is on.

> > >

> > > Jim

> > >

> > > I believe that the " virgin " mother of the 16

> year

> > old

> > > is over reacting.

> > >

> > > john

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

[Guest guest]

In solidarity!

Jim

Jim,

I don't disagree with you.

My son, who has been on Paxil for 3 years, got a

divorce and almost lost his business. He is still on

the Paxil, but is starting to get things turned

around. I wish he had never started the Paxil and I

wish he would give it up.

Of course the witch who somehow spent his money is out

of the picture. He has a new lady friend.

My ex-wife took Paxil for 3 months and then quit cold

turkey. She said it did nothing for her.

I am not sure if I would give Paxil to the devil.

john

--- Jim <mofunnow@...> wrote:

> ,

>

> We have had stories on this group of women doing

> things on antidepressants

> that they would not normally do and later feeling

> very bad about it. I know

> one fellow that was wealthy and doing fine with a

> stable marriage and a

> little Paxil and he kicks his wife of 20 years out

> the door and changes the

> locks, spends all their savings and takes up with a

> young floozy that was

> just along for the ride. Went into debt by hundreds

> of thousands of dollars

> which the wife was terrified she would be

> responsible for. The guy was a

> lawyer and when they went to court he got

> slaughtered by the court. If he

> wasn't acting without inhibitions I bet he wouldn't

> have dug such a deep

> hole for himself. I never did investigate all these

> women that started

> sexual relationships with young boys to see if they

> were on antidepressants

> or some other psych drug but I remember at the time

> the general idea on the

> list was they probably were.

>

> Now I have noticed in the last ten years that young

> women at bars have

> actually startled me with their aggresive sexual

> advances and these were

> middle class kids. There is something to what you

> say there and while I

> don't mind the idea of people being comfortable with

> their sexuality I have

> to say that in every religion that's worth it's salt

> for eons have put forth

> that sexual promiscuity causes all sorts of problems

> and is not very

> pro-survival. Un-wed pregnancy, veneral disease,

> emotional harm and

> especially when people are on drugs, murder. What a

> perfect way to control

> the masses by giving them drugs that either kill the

> sex drive or make

> people do things that are not in their best interest

> and not anything like

> what they would normally do and keep the offspring

> in foster care owned by

> the state, drugged up and out of commission.

>

> Loss of inhibitions means loss of control for me and

> I don't think anyone

> wants to be out of control, especially later when

> they have to face the

> reality they find themselves in.

>

> Jim

>

> I don't believe a loss of inhibitions are the real

> issue. I believe that women have come out of the

> closet so to say, when it comes to sex, in the past

> 20

> to 30 years. Women are saying they have just as much

> a

> right to sex as men have always had and are not

> going

> to hide the desire or fact anymore.

>

> As far as the teacher and 16 year old boy goes,I

> believe his mother did him more harm than the

> teacher

> did (if any at all). I do not condone what she did,

> but the boy was just a slow learner, and she was

> slapped on the wrist for it as compared to a man. I

> do

> have dual standards in these types of cases.

>

> Are you men worring about a loss of inhibitions in

> men

> or women?

>

> john

>

> --- cdvlcarpenter <cdvlcarpenter@...> wrote:

>

> > Good question, I saw another incident in NJ a few

> > weeks ago and I

> > thought the same thing. The loss of inhibitions is

> a

> > much larger

> > problem than we can comprehend.

> >

> > Charlie

> >

> >

> > > I wonder what antidepressant the teacher is on.

> > >

> > > Jim

> > >

> > > I believe that the " virgin " mother of the 16

> year

> > old

> > > is over reacting.

> > >

> > > john

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

[Guest guest]

In solidarity!

Jim

Jim,

I don't disagree with you.

My son, who has been on Paxil for 3 years, got a

divorce and almost lost his business. He is still on

the Paxil, but is starting to get things turned

around. I wish he had never started the Paxil and I

wish he would give it up.

Of course the witch who somehow spent his money is out

of the picture. He has a new lady friend.

My ex-wife took Paxil for 3 months and then quit cold

turkey. She said it did nothing for her.

I am not sure if I would give Paxil to the devil.

john

--- Jim <mofunnow@...> wrote:

> ,

>

> We have had stories on this group of women doing

> things on antidepressants

> that they would not normally do and later feeling

> very bad about it. I know

> one fellow that was wealthy and doing fine with a

> stable marriage and a

> little Paxil and he kicks his wife of 20 years out

> the door and changes the

> locks, spends all their savings and takes up with a

> young floozy that was

> just along for the ride. Went into debt by hundreds

> of thousands of dollars

> which the wife was terrified she would be

> responsible for. The guy was a

> lawyer and when they went to court he got

> slaughtered by the court. If he

> wasn't acting without inhibitions I bet he wouldn't

> have dug such a deep

> hole for himself. I never did investigate all these

> women that started

> sexual relationships with young boys to see if they

> were on antidepressants

> or some other psych drug but I remember at the time

> the general idea on the

> list was they probably were.

>

> Now I have noticed in the last ten years that young

> women at bars have

> actually startled me with their aggresive sexual

> advances and these were

> middle class kids. There is something to what you

> say there and while I

> don't mind the idea of people being comfortable with

> their sexuality I have

> to say that in every religion that's worth it's salt

> for eons have put forth

> that sexual promiscuity causes all sorts of problems

> and is not very

> pro-survival. Un-wed pregnancy, veneral disease,

> emotional harm and

> especially when people are on drugs, murder. What a

> perfect way to control

> the masses by giving them drugs that either kill the

> sex drive or make

> people do things that are not in their best interest

> and not anything like

> what they would normally do and keep the offspring

> in foster care owned by

> the state, drugged up and out of commission.

>

> Loss of inhibitions means loss of control for me and

> I don't think anyone

> wants to be out of control, especially later when

> they have to face the

> reality they find themselves in.

>

> Jim

>

> I don't believe a loss of inhibitions are the real

> issue. I believe that women have come out of the

> closet so to say, when it comes to sex, in the past

> 20

> to 30 years. Women are saying they have just as much

> a

> right to sex as men have always had and are not

> going

> to hide the desire or fact anymore.

>

> As far as the teacher and 16 year old boy goes,I

> believe his mother did him more harm than the

> teacher

> did (if any at all). I do not condone what she did,

> but the boy was just a slow learner, and she was

> slapped on the wrist for it as compared to a man. I

> do

> have dual standards in these types of cases.

>

> Are you men worring about a loss of inhibitions in

> men

> or women?

>

> john

>

> --- cdvlcarpenter <cdvlcarpenter@...> wrote:

>

> > Good question, I saw another incident in NJ a few

> > weeks ago and I

> > thought the same thing. The loss of inhibitions is

> a

> > much larger

> > problem than we can comprehend.

> >

> > Charlie

> >

> >

> > > I wonder what antidepressant the teacher is on.

> > >

> > > Jim

> > >

> > > I believe that the " virgin " mother of the 16

> year

> > old

> > > is over reacting.

> > >

> > > john

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

[Guest guest]

In solidarity!

Jim

Jim,

I don't disagree with you.

My son, who has been on Paxil for 3 years, got a

divorce and almost lost his business. He is still on

the Paxil, but is starting to get things turned

around. I wish he had never started the Paxil and I

wish he would give it up.

Of course the witch who somehow spent his money is out

of the picture. He has a new lady friend.

My ex-wife took Paxil for 3 months and then quit cold

turkey. She said it did nothing for her.

I am not sure if I would give Paxil to the devil.

john

--- Jim <mofunnow@...> wrote:

> ,

>

> We have had stories on this group of women doing

> things on antidepressants

> that they would not normally do and later feeling

> very bad about it. I know

> one fellow that was wealthy and doing fine with a

> stable marriage and a

> little Paxil and he kicks his wife of 20 years out

> the door and changes the

> locks, spends all their savings and takes up with a

> young floozy that was

> just along for the ride. Went into debt by hundreds

> of thousands of dollars

> which the wife was terrified she would be

> responsible for. The guy was a

> lawyer and when they went to court he got

> slaughtered by the court. If he

> wasn't acting without inhibitions I bet he wouldn't

> have dug such a deep

> hole for himself. I never did investigate all these

> women that started

> sexual relationships with young boys to see if they

> were on antidepressants

> or some other psych drug but I remember at the time

> the general idea on the

> list was they probably were.

>

> Now I have noticed in the last ten years that young

> women at bars have

> actually startled me with their aggresive sexual

> advances and these were

> middle class kids. There is something to what you

> say there and while I

> don't mind the idea of people being comfortable with

> their sexuality I have

> to say that in every religion that's worth it's salt

> for eons have put forth

> that sexual promiscuity causes all sorts of problems

> and is not very

> pro-survival. Un-wed pregnancy, veneral disease,

> emotional harm and

> especially when people are on drugs, murder. What a

> perfect way to control

> the masses by giving them drugs that either kill the

> sex drive or make

> people do things that are not in their best interest

> and not anything like

> what they would normally do and keep the offspring

> in foster care owned by

> the state, drugged up and out of commission.

>

> Loss of inhibitions means loss of control for me and

> I don't think anyone

> wants to be out of control, especially later when

> they have to face the

> reality they find themselves in.

>

> Jim

>

> I don't believe a loss of inhibitions are the real

> issue. I believe that women have come out of the

> closet so to say, when it comes to sex, in the past

> 20

> to 30 years. Women are saying they have just as much

> a

> right to sex as men have always had and are not

> going

> to hide the desire or fact anymore.

>

> As far as the teacher and 16 year old boy goes,I

> believe his mother did him more harm than the

> teacher

> did (if any at all). I do not condone what she did,

> but the boy was just a slow learner, and she was

> slapped on the wrist for it as compared to a man. I

> do

> have dual standards in these types of cases.

>

> Are you men worring about a loss of inhibitions in

> men

> or women?

>

> john

>

> --- cdvlcarpenter <cdvlcarpenter@...> wrote:

>

> > Good question, I saw another incident in NJ a few

> > weeks ago and I

> > thought the same thing. The loss of inhibitions is

> a

> > much larger

> > problem than we can comprehend.

> >

> > Charlie

> >

> >

> > > I wonder what antidepressant the teacher is on.

> > >

> > > Jim

> > >

> > > I believe that the " virgin " mother of the 16

> year

> > old

> > > is over reacting.

> > >

> > > john

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >