Re: Yates' conviction thrown out

[Guest guest]

There is a very detailed account of her life out there somewhere,

Newsweek maybe? Time? Probably not available on line anymore without

paying for it. And there is a book which I think goes into great

detail.

I had been looking for more references to this for another board and

was reminded that she had abruptly been taken off Haldol at the same

time her Effexor was halved and the Remeron was added.

> > > >

> > > > While I strongly believe that this conviction should be

> overturned

> > > and

> > > > that she was undeniably insane at the time of the deaths, I

> don't

> > > see

> > > > how anything will change in the long run, considering the way

> > Texas

> > > > law is written.

> > > >

> > > > Maybe the new info on ADs will help her case.

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > --------------------------------------------------------------------

> ----------

> >

[Guest guest]

Actually her problems started before she ever met her husband, IIRC.

I think it was in college she started behaving " oddly " . Let me go

check around if I can find the article I read. But like I said above,

I don't think it's available in line anymore.

> > > >

> > > > While I strongly believe that this conviction should be

> overturned

> > > and

> > > > that she was undeniably insane at the time of the deaths, I

> don't

> > > see

> > > > how anything will change in the long run, considering the way

> > Texas

> > > > law is written.

> > > >

> > > > Maybe the new info on ADs will help her case.

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > --------------------------------------------------------------------

> ----------

> >

[Guest guest]

Yates is one of those situations that spurred so much press and that

which goes with it - misinformation.

I remember her attending psychiatrist in jail testified that Yates

was schizophrenic and had been schizophrenic, dispite the fact that none of

her preceding psychiatrists had ever realised or diagnosed her as such. In

that psychiatrists mind, the preceding psychiatrists had been wrong but I

think that substantiates more than anything the connection to the drugs

Also, Yates had worked as a nurse prior to the birth of her children.

Had she been schizophrenic and delusional - it would have been caught at her

work, especially it being a hospital and her having to deal with people

constantly. Delusional people have trouble holding jobs - Yates did not but

rather had a good work record.

Re: Yates' conviction thrown out

>

>

>

> No, but she was taking a twice the recommeneded dose of Effexor, of

> all things, and Wellburtin. The Effexor had just been cut in half (to

> the recommended dose) and Remeron added, IIRC.

>

>

> > >

> > > While I strongly believe that this conviction should be overturned

> > and

> > > that she was undeniably insane at the time of the deaths, I don't

> > see

> > > how anything will change in the long run, considering the way

> Texas

> > > law is written.

> > >

> > > Maybe the new info on ADs will help her case.

>

>

>

>

>

> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------

>

[Guest guest]

I don't doubt had problems, we all do sooner or later. The

only real problem that poor woman ever had was to get treatment

from a psychiatrist (and also probably marry Russel). That's when her

mental state spiraled out of control

and thats when she was so over medicated and then cut of effexor and

other psych drugs and sent home. Dr. Saeed is the one that should be in jail

or at least have his license revoked. The father Russel and the lawyer

had tons of incriminating evidence against the psych and they completely

dropped the ball. Now Russel Yates is promoting that she get even more

mental health treatment on CNN. I think the guy is evil encarnate.

Actually her problems started before she ever met her husband, IIRC.

I think it was in college she started behaving " oddly " . Let me go

check around if I can find the article I read. But like I said above,

I don't think it's available in line anymore.

> > > >

> > > > While I strongly believe that this conviction should be

> overturned

> > > and

> > > > that she was undeniably insane at the time of the deaths, I

> don't

> > > see

> > > > how anything will change in the long run, considering the way

> > Texas

> > > > law is written.

> > > >

> > > > Maybe the new info on ADs will help her case.

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > --------------------------------------------------------------------

> ----------

> >

[Guest guest]

I don't doubt had problems, we all do sooner or later. The

only real problem that poor woman ever had was to get treatment

from a psychiatrist (and also probably marry Russel). That's when her

mental state spiraled out of control

and thats when she was so over medicated and then cut of effexor and

other psych drugs and sent home. Dr. Saeed is the one that should be in jail

or at least have his license revoked. The father Russel and the lawyer

had tons of incriminating evidence against the psych and they completely

dropped the ball. Now Russel Yates is promoting that she get even more

mental health treatment on CNN. I think the guy is evil encarnate.

Actually her problems started before she ever met her husband, IIRC.

I think it was in college she started behaving " oddly " . Let me go

check around if I can find the article I read. But like I said above,

I don't think it's available in line anymore.

> > > >

> > > > While I strongly believe that this conviction should be

> overturned

> > > and

> > > > that she was undeniably insane at the time of the deaths, I

> don't

> > > see

> > > > how anything will change in the long run, considering the way

> > Texas

> > > > law is written.

> > > >

> > > > Maybe the new info on ADs will help her case.

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > --------------------------------------------------------------------

> ----------

> >