Guest guest Posted December 30, 2004 Report Share Posted December 30, 2004 http://www.nytimes.com/2004/12/30/opinion/l30drug.html December 30, 2004 Physicians, Educate Yourselves To the Editor: " Prescription for Confusion " (editorial, Dec. 28) correctly observes that doctors, as well as drug companies and the Food and Drug Administration, share responsibility for the pain medication fiasco, but you do not sufficiently emphasize the role of marketing. According to its annual report, Merck, the maker of Vioxx, spent 28 percent of its revenues (more than $6 billion) on " marketing and administrative " expenses last year, while spending only half that on " research and development " and keeping 30 percent in net income. Figures for other major drug companies were not much different. We are all aware of the incessant direct-to-consumer advertising, but that pales beside the amounts spent on marketing to doctors, including what the companies call " education. " That is why doctors learn to practice a highly drug-intensive style of medicine and to use the newest, most expensive brand-name drugs, even when there is no evidence, as in the case of Vioxx, that they are more effective than older, cheaper drugs. The medical profession should break its dependence on the pharmaceutical industry and educate its own. Until then, the industry should come clean about all the money it spends influencing doctors' prescribing habits. Marcia Angell, M.D. Arnold S. Relman, M.D. Cambridge, Mass., Dec. 28, 2004 The writers served as editors in chief of The New England Journal of Medicine. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.