Guest guest Posted November 15, 2006 Report Share Posted November 15, 2006 Wed, 15 Nov 2006 09:28:43 -0800 MEDSCAPE http://www.medscape.com found this by chance and thought wowowowowow gotta tell someone.......makes sense though.... no? To Print: Click your browser's PRINT button. NOTE: To view the article with Web enhancements, go to: http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/547242 REUTERS Circumcision Appears to Reduce STD Risk Reuters Health Information 2006. © 2006 Reuters Ltd. Republication or redistribution of Reuters content, including by framing or similar means, is expressly prohibited without the prior written consent of Reuters. Reuters shall not be liable for any errors or delays in the content, or for any actions taken in reliance thereon. Reuters and the Reuters sphere logo are registered trademarks and trademarks of the Reuters group of companies around the world. NEW YORK (Reuters Health) Nov 06 - Circumcised males are less likely than their uncircumcised peers to acquire sexually transmitted infection (STI), the findings of a 25-year longitudinal study suggest. According to the report in the November issue of Pediatrics, circumcision may reduce the risk of acquiring and spreading such infections by up to 50%, which suggests " substantial benefits " for routine neonatal circumcision. The current study is just one of many that have looked at this controversial topic. While most research has found that circumcision reduces the rates of HIV, syphilis and genital ulcers, the results are more mixed for other STDs. The American Academy of Pediatrics has calls the evidence " complex and conflicting, " and therefore concludes that, at present, the evidence is insufficient to support routine neonatal circumcision. In the current study, the researchers analyzed data collected for the Christchurch Health and Development Study, which included a large birth cohort of children from New Zealand. Males were divided into two groups based on circumcision status before 15 years of age. The presence of an STI between 18 and 25 years of age was determined by questionnaire. The 356 uncircumcised boys had a 2.66-fold increased risk of an STI compared with the 154 circumcised boys, lead author Dr. M. Fergusson and colleagues, from the Christchurch School of Medicine and Health Sciences report. Moreover, this elevated risk was largely unchanged after accounting for potential confounders, such as number of sexual partners and unprotected sex. The authors estimate that had routine neonatal circumcision been in place, the rate of STIs in the current cohort would have been reduced by 48.2%. " As shown in this analysis, the benefits of circumcision for reducing (STI) risks may be substantial, " the authors conclude. " The public health issues raised by these findings clearly involve weighing the longer-term benefits of routine neonatal circumcision in terms of reducing risks of infection within the population, against the perceived costs of the procedure, " they add. Pediatrics 2006;118:1971-1977. sallyrob sallyrob@... " and the beat goes on....... " Sonny Bono --------------Learn the art of patience. Apply discipline to your thoughts when theybecome anxious over the outcome of a goal. Impatience breeds anxiety,fear, discouragement and failure. Patience creates confidence,decisiveness, and a rational outlook, which eventually leads tosuccess. -- ________________________________________________________________________________\ ____ Sponsored Link Mortgage rates near 39yr lows. $420k for $1,399/mo. Calculate new payment! www.LowerMyBills.com/lre Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.