Re: Beck Protocol efficacy

[Guest guest]

ha ha, yeah. I'm kicking up dust too. good to hear from you.

but i do think there's inferences from the testimonial versus two other cases in

our own files. (there's " anecdotes " or stories, then " anecdotal evidence " which

has more than a story, also numbers, and is much stronger.) The viral load

jumped when off the meds when using the 4 hertz blood electrifier, while we have

another report in our own hiv files where a man went off the drugs and his

numbers went down after 3 weeks stopping the drug and using godzilla, and

continued to go down to near zero while still off the meds stands in stark

contrast. This, plus the hep-c case where the 4 hertz device was used for a

whole year for an hour a day, then godzilla for 15 weeks and the count went down

99 percent with no test rising in the whole 15 weeks. went from 2.2 million to

14 thousand. It may indicate that the godzilla dc current is working while the

alternating current isn't as far as getting these numbers down. Sure it's a few

cases, it's all we have. Had they been close calls, well, then forget it, but

this isn't close at all, it's polar opposites. I do wish we had more anecdotal

evidence however, if not a full study.

I can't envision more than two approaches to use mild dc on HIV, the one being a

simple current head to toe, maybe 1.5 volts, around that used for the rods of

amun ra in ancient egypt, or internal electrodes for short run sessions. The

first idea is obviously the easiest.

bG

>

> BG you seem really negative on the beck protocol based on this one last

result. I've had both positive and negative experiences with the beck protocol

(including INCREASING CD4 counts while on the protocol) and I think you might be

jumping the gun a little bit based on this one negative. Here's a couple of

things I've observerd...

>

> 1. Check out the equipment. It doesn't look like quality stuff to me. Could be

wrong but don't dismiss it.

>

> 2. I probably would have recommendeded that this one person stay on his meds

during his first trial with beck protocol. The beck protocol did not make his

viral load jump to 300,000. Going off meds is known to do that. There's no

scientific conclusion that we can draw from this one testimonial. Once he went

off meds and jumped on the beck protocol, we lost any scientific baseline to

draw conclusions from.

>

> 3. His other symptoms diminished.

>

> Anyway....

>

> I've been running this theory around in my head too. I agree that HIV in the

gut is THE challenge but you should not extrapolate the results of this one guys

experience as supporting evidence.

>

> I also have been reconsidering anything that boosts the immune system while at

the same time your trying to reduce your viral load. Studies show that echinacea

can INCREASE viral load. I think it only makes sense that if you boost the

immune system that you might also be feeding HIV the very thing that it needs to

proliferate. I think anecdotally this might be why Beck saw worse results when

the subject was on herbal/vitamin regimens. If you do add herbals to your

regimen, focus on virus killers like astragulus and cats claw and avoid immune

enhancers like mushrooms (imho).

>

> So, anyway, that's my two cents while I sit here. I've got my zapper on. I

drink my CS before I hit the sack. I pulse my lymph nodes while I'm watching Two

and a Half men and I drink Ozonated water and Peroxide upon waking every

morning. I also am on a maintenance dose of MMS.

>

> Hope all that helps the discussion. I just like to kick up the dust every now

and then : )

>

[Guest guest]

In my limited experience with the Beck protocol, I've found that taking the meds

while using the protocol seems to diminish the effectiveness of the electrical

therapy. Don't know why and I've never found any comments about this. Right now

I'm doing the one thing I never wanted to do: taking the meds. They really do

effect my body in negative ways, some I'm too embarrassed to detail, but my hair

was falling out and that's pretty ugly too. I'm planning to go back to Ozone

insufflation soon, and ease off the drugs and watch what happens. The reason I

haven't posted lately is that I really don't have anything earth-shaking to

report. Keep up the good work Bg.

Pat

>

> BG you seem really negative on the beck protocol based on this one last

result. I've had both positive and negative experiences with the beck protocol

(including INCREASING CD4 counts while on the protocol) and I think you might be

jumping the gun a little bit based on this one negative. Here's a couple of

things I've observerd...

> Anyway....

> Hope all that helps the discussion. I just like to kick up the dust every now

and then : )

>

[Guest guest]

Have you tried the godzilla wrist electrifier in place of the beck 4 hertz

device? In my recent posts I documented the swing in numbers when that happened

with hep-c and hiv when using dc in place of the 4 hertz device. Also, dc

should not have a transfection effect, still I would time it to before taking

the meds. You should also do it in 2 shorter sessions rather than one longer

one, interrupting the replication cycle of the virus.

I would not mention this without having been impressed by these numbers. I'm

happy to let folks do literal beck all the way but the numbers show you need to

try dc.

Thanks for encouragement.

bG

> >

> > BG you seem really negative on the beck protocol based on this one last

result. I've had both positive and negative experiences with the beck protocol

(including INCREASING CD4 counts while on the protocol) and I think you might be

jumping the gun a little bit based on this one negative. Here's a couple of

things I've observerd...

> > Anyway....

> > Hope all that helps the discussion. I just like to kick up the dust every

now and then : )

> >

>