Re: must see this

[Guest guest]

Hi Sarpe: The cancer studies done by different researchers which GEIPE cites are

very promising and the website writer offers a novel and testable hypothesis

about an enzyme that might be the mechanism. The studies seem to agree that the

optimum current through the tumor should be around 2.4ma. More was not better.

In the animal studies cited the electrodes were needles inserted through the

skin into the tumor itself and the voltage to effect this was low, 2 to 4 volts.

(From this,by Ohms law, we can calculate the effective resistance between the

electrodes was between 833 and 1667 ohms).

If instead,for self-administration, one uses flat electrodes on the skin near

the tumor, as GEIPE proposes, the resistance between the electrodes is likely to

be higher than in the cited studies and so the voltage to obtain a current of

2.4ma will necessarily be higher.

Unfortunately the website writer at GEIPE seems to be ignorant of Ohms law and

is so insistent that skin surface studies must replicate the voltage as well as

the current used in needle electrode studies, that he even suggests sanding the

skin to lower its resistance! I'm confident that the current through the tumor

is the significant variable and the voltage should be adjusted as needed to

obtain the optimum current.

I don't know of any evidence that a current of 2.4ma is optimum for the

destruction of viruses and bacteria.

All the best,

@..., sarpe_2002 <no_reply@...>

wrote:

>

> excuse my bad english!

> It seem that this electric therapy is very eficient but at low level of

voltage and amperage (U=2-4V and I=2.4mA); this way secondary bad products in

tissues appear at insignifiat levels!

> So search for Geipe for more informations:

> From " Cancer cure? " of geipe site:

>

> 1. In the 1985 study, gentle electrotherapy was shown to consistently and

progressively reduce the tumor mass. Five one-hour treatments over 5 days at 2.4

milli-ampere resulted in 98% reduction. 98% is not that far from 100%, or cure.

In fact, 4 of the 6 animals in this group had no visually identifiable tumor

remaining.

>

>

> and

>

> However, as it became easier to produce electricity at higher voltage and

amperes, electrotherapy treatments were done at these higher levels and curative

effects were seen less and less. Soon the treatment went out of favor. (It is

counter-intuitive to think that gentle levels of a treatment will be more

effective against this vicious disease.)

>

> Meybe this work very well in all diseases!

>

> Interesting, isn't it?

>

> Best regards! and GOOD HEALTH!

>