Guest guest Posted April 7, 2009 Report Share Posted April 7, 2009 Idiopathic Chondrolysis Treated With Etanercept ORTHOPEDICS 2009; 32:214 http://www.orthosupersite.com/view.asp?rID=37214 Deborah V. Appleyard, MD, MPH; R. Schiller, MD; Craig P. Eberson, MD; G. Ehrlich,MD Abstract Idiopathic chondrolysis of the hip in children has been well documented in the literature. The insidious nature of the symptoms and lack of early radiographic findings and diagnostic testing often delay diagnosis. Children often report a stiff, painful hip and have an associated limp in the absence of trauma or constitutional symptoms. Despite these symptoms it remains a poorly understood diagnosis with no identifiable cause. Some have speculated an inflammatory cause, as this disease exhibits joint space narrowing, presumably due to enzymatic activity similar to juvenile rheumatoid arthritis. Despite case reports attempting traction, physical therapy, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatories, steroids, and even operative intervention, no current treatment regimen exists that offers proven appreciable benefit. We hypothesized the powerful anti-inflammatory properties of etanercept would provide symptomatic and radiographic improvement of idiopathic chondrolysis of the hip. This article presents a case of an adolescent boy with a stiff, painful left hip that failed treatment with traction, physical therapy, naproxen, and methotrexate, prior to initiating etanercept. After 1 year of daily etanercept therapy, the patient's hip motion improved in all directions and his pain completely resolved. This novel therapeutic approach offered symptomatic relief and radiographic improvement, and may provide an effective treatment strategy for this difficult disease. Idiopathic chondrolysis of the hip in children has been a well-recognized, though poorly understood, diagnosis. Although chondrolysis of the hip as a consequence of treatment of slipped capital femoral epiphysis was first described by Waldenstrom in 1930,1 it was not until 1971 that the idiopathic form was introduced to the literature.2 In that series, 7 of 9 patients with chondrolysis of the hip had no identifiable cause for the disorder. Interestingly, 7 of the 9 patients in this series were adolescent African-American girls, which led to the supposition that the disease was predominantly in adolescent African-American girls and rarely in other groups. Although the insidious onset of hip pain and progressive loss of hip motion in idiopathic chondrolysis of the hip demonstrates a predilection for adolescent African-American girls, cases have been reported in boys and in children of Indian, Hispanic, White, and Asian descent.3-5 The frequency with which this disease is described in African-American girls led to speculation of a genetic basis to this disorder, although this has yet to be demonstrated. sy and others have suggested that this perhaps represents a seronegative type of immune reaction, since the joint space narrowing was typical of juvenile rheumatoid arthritis. They demonstrated antibodies in the synovium that may play a role in the development of chondrolysis.6-10 Despite many case reports available in the literature,2,3,5,11-13 few have offered treatment options with appreciable or proven benefit. Unfortunately, this is likely because this uncommon condition remains poorly understood despite tremendous advances in our knowledge of the pathologic basis of many other orthopedic disorders. As a result, novel and effective treatment modalities for this puzzling and disabling disorder have been lacking. We present a case using a novel therapeutic alternative for idiopathic chondrolysis of the hip consisting of a combination of pharmacologic therapy and traditional modalities. Case Report A 15-year-old African-American boy presented 18 months after the onset of left groin pain and continued use of a wheelchair to travel substantial distances. Prior to presentation, his treatment elsewhere consisted of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and physical therapy for 6 months. This offered no symptomatic or radiographic improvement and was followed by surgical exploration. The cartilage appeared normal and a synovial biopsy showed chronic inflammatory changes. Cultures demonstrated no evidence of infection. Muscle releases of hip adductor and rotators were performed to decrease the tightness of the joint. Intraoperative passive motion of the left hip improved to 90% of the right hip. Postoperatively, he was placed on a continuous passive motion machine for approximately 2 weeks. Motion achieved intraoperatively was not maintained, and the patient continued to have limited motion, most severely with abduction and internal rotation. The lack of left hip motion, constant pain, and inability to ambulate long distances contributed to the patient's decision to seek further treatment. At presentation, physical exam of the left hip revealed a flexion contracture of 45°; 5° of active flexion (right hip 110°); and no extension (right hip 20°), abduction (right hip 60°) or rotation (right hip 30° internally, 40° externally). The patient was admitted to the hospital and spent 3 weeks in 10 lb of skin traction while receiving daily physical therapy consisting of range-of-motion exercises. Radiographs and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) confirmed a prior diagnosis of idiopathic chondrolysis of the left hip. Work-up included an erythrocyte sedimentation rate of 2 (mm/hr); normal creatine phosphokinase; and negative anti-nuclear antibody, rheumatoid factor, HLA-B27, and purified protein derivative skin tests. In view of some published case reports suggesting a rheumatologic etiology, rheumatology consultation was obtained to consider the start of disease-modifying agents. The patient was started on naproxen (250 mg twice daily) and methotrexate (200 mg once a week). After 2 weeks, active motion in his left hip improved: 50° of flexion from 5°, 5° of extension, 20° of abduction, and 5° to 10° of internal and external rotation from 0°. The patient was discharged on naproxen (250 mg twice daily) and methotrexate (200 mg once a week), as well as 10 lb of skin traction for 18 hours per day and daily physical therapy for range-of-motion exercises. After 6 months of treatment, despite modest improvement in mechanical pain, the patient reported stiffness and no further improvement of range of motion. Due to the presumed inflammatory component of this disease and the failure of the current medication regimen to improve the patient's symptoms, the naproxen and methotrexate were discontinued and the patient was started on etanercept (25 mg twice weekly). After 3 months of etanercept treatment combined with the prior physical therapy regimen and reduction of traction to only 3 times per week, his hip motion improved significantly. Hip flexion increased to 100° (initially 5°), extension to 35°, and abduction/adduction to 40° and 20°, respectively. Internal and external rotation continued to be limited (5° to 10°), and was worse with the hip flexed. Radiographs suggested an increase in available joint space. After 8 months of etanercept treatment, the patient maintained his range of motion and experienced increased internal and external rotation to 10° and 30°, respectively, despite discontinuing the nightly skin traction 3 times per week. The patient maintained his range of motion for 2 years while continuing etanercept (25 mg twice weekly) and daily range of motion exercises. Prior to leaving our care due to a family move, the patient was pain free and able to play basketball. He was given rheumatology follow-up and 1 additional year of etanercept therapy. Discussion Idiopathic chondrolysis of the hip presents an interesting, though difficult, diagnostic and therapeutic dilemma for the clinician and patient. The diagnosis is often delayed secondary to the insidious onset of symptoms, progressive radiographic findings, and absence of diagnostic laboratory tests. Typically reporting no history of trauma or constitutional symptoms, patients present with pain in the hip, knee, or leg; an associated limp; progressive loss of range of motion in the affected hip; and in some instances fixed flexion, abduction, or adduction deformities.3,13,14 Usual laboratory work-up includes complete blood count, white blood cell count with differential, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, rheumatoid factor, and anti-nuclear antibody test. Some have included HLA-B27 screening, Coombs testing, serum immunoelectrophoresis, and serum immunoglobulin level, but no significant pattern has been identified, and therefore laboratory testing is potentially more useful in ruling out other pathology.3,11,12,15 Histological features include capsular thickening and edema, lymphocyte and plasma cell infiltration of the synovium, fibrillation and fragmentation of the articular surface with progressive loss of articular cartilage, and even chondrocyte degeneration and empty lacunae.2-5,11 Open synovial biopsy and joint aspiration aid in identifying infectious or neoplastic causes of pain such as septic arthritis, tuberculosis, pigmented villonodular synovitis, and juvenile rheumatoid arthritis.3 Radiographic changes seen in idiopathic chondrolysis of the hip have been well documented and facilitate differentiating between idiopathic chondrolysis of the hip and the typical radiographic findings in slipped capital femoral epiphysis and Perthes disease.11,13,14,16,17 Early features consist of localized osteoporosis, subchondral erosions, femoral head change,15,18 and reduction of the joint space. Later changes include complete loss of the joint space, subchondral cysts, trochanteric and epiphyseal physeal closure, osteophytes, and in severe cases, protrusion acetabuli, ankylosis, and osteoarthritis. Magnetic resonance imaging of the hip demonstrates cartilage loss, joint effusion, marrow edema, femoral and acetabular remodeling, significant regional muscle atrophy, and synovial enhancement, though this is not a consistent feature of the disease.16 Cartilage loss was found to be most severe in the central part of the joint. When left untreated, the natural history of this disease often leads to complete or near-complete ankylosis of the joint.13,14,16 Only after eliminating traumatic, infectious, neoplastic, or autoimmune etiologies, combined with diagnostic loss of the joint space to <3 mm,11,19-21 can a diagnosis of idiopathic chondrolysis be made. According to the literature, many idiopathic chondrolysis therapies have been tried, although none with great success. The mainstays of most treatment algorithms have been nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory medication, physical therapy,22 and traction.17 After failure of conservative treatment, operative intervention has been attempted to achieve satisfactory results. Surgical procedures include subtotal hip capsulectomies with or without psoas and/or adductor tenotomies,11,17 hanging hip operation,23 hip arthrodesis,14,24-26 hinged distraction,27 and excision arthroplasty.17 The results of operative intervention other than arthrodesis or excision arthroplasty are inconsistent and the goals of these procedures are accordingly modest: pain relief, deformity correction, and restoration of functional hip range of motion.11,18 However, Korula et al's17 case series of 20 patients (21 hips) found near-normal hip range of motion could be achieved when the affected hip was examined under anesthesia, suggesting muscle spasm is a prominent and consistent feature of this condition. In 2005, Thacker et al28 reported a series of 11 adolescents with severe hip joint arthritis, 3 of whom carried a primary diagnosis of idiopathic chondrolysis, treated with articulated hinged distraction arthroplasty. The authors concluded that hinged hip distraction was an effective treatment in eliminating pain, restoring joint space, and improving function. However, the complication rate of 36.4% stressed the importance of correct application of the hinged device, patient compliance, and supervised rehabilitation postoperatively. The limited success of surgical intervention has emphasized the need for alternate yet effective medical treatment of this condition. While NSAIDs have been the mainstay of medical therapy, their effectiveness is limited and the associated gastrointestinal toxicity precludes their use in certain patients. Etanercept was chosen as a possible treatment for this disorder due to its powerful anti-inflammatory effect. The drug is a soluble, dimeric fusion protein consisting of 2 copies of the extracellular ligand-binding portion of the human tumor necrosis factor p75 receptor linked to the constant portion of human immunoglobulin G1.29 This protein complex binds to the tumor necrosis factor and thereby blocks its interaction with cell surface receptors and attenuates its pro-inflammatory effects. Importantly, the drug, which is administered as a twice-weekly subcutaneous injection (adult dose 25 mg; pediatric dose 0.4 mg/kg, maximum 25 mg), has been shown to be widely distributed throughout the body and even reaches the synovium.30 The medication has been used primarily to treat rheumatoid arthritis and has been shown to be significantly better than placebo at reducing disease activity in patients who had an inadequate response to previous treatment with disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs.31 Etanercept has also been used successfully to treat psoriatic arthritis and polyarticular juvenile rheumatoid arthritis.31 However, its action as a biological response modifier results in a significantly decreased immune response; thus, patients must be followed for potential infection. The reduced immune response may be what was successful in this case. Idiopathic chondrolysis of the hip is a rare and devastating disease with limited therapeutic options. Although no etiology for this disease has been identified, synovial biopsies suggest an inflammatory component to the disorder, possibly secondary to an abnormal immunologic response, suggesting a potential target for intervening in the disease process. We have presented a case of an adolescent boy who achieved substantial symptomatic improvement with the use of etanercept in combination with physical therapy and traction, suggesting this innovative approach may be an effective treatment strategy for future patients. Authors Drs Appleyard, Schiller, Eberson, and Ehrlich are from the Department of Orthopedics, Brown Alpert Medical School/Rhode Island Hospital, Providence, Rhode Island. Drs Appleyard, Schiller, Eberson, and Ehrlich have no relevant financial relationships to disclose. Correspondence should be addressed to: R. Schiller, MD, Department of Orthopedics, Brown Alpert Medical School/Rhode Island Hospital, 593 Eddy St, Providence, RI 02903. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.